Too early for the Miami/Indiana odds to come out just yet (though we should see some in about 2 hours) HOWEVER if the odds are Indiana by less than -4.5 points then I am very likely ON Hoosiers.....and pending injuries tonight, I would seriously consider Hoosiers up to -6.5 as far as spreads go......BUT I will almost definitely take Indiana on a moneyline for January 19 MNF.
Spread opens at -7.5 with a ML round 320 and total at 48.5 depending on your books....
My bet: Indiana -310 BB @B365
My Hoosiers: Best Bet WINNER!!! 
W Indiana -310 @B365 *BB (posted 9 days ago!)
W LIVE BET mid-4Q IU 24 - 14, Miami ball: Canes +13.5 -650 alt@B365
W LIVE BET mid-4Q IU 24 - 14, Miami ball: alt-total OVER 40.5 -330 @B365
2025 Post-Season: 26 - 11 
70.3% ...juice from all 11 losses is -1918
NCAA appealing ruling granting Ole Miss QB Chambliss a 6th year
The NCAA is appealing the preliminary injunction that a state court in Mississippi granted to Ole Miss quarterback Trinidad Chambliss that paved his way to be eligible for a sixth college season in 2026.
In a filing in the Mississippi Supreme Court on Thursday, the NCAA is appealing the injunction, claiming that the organization "has final decision-making authority in the interpretation and application of its own eligibility rules."
*Personally agree with NCAA ruling, and I also believe 5 seasons should be the maximum regardless unfortunate injuries.
The play clock is set to 25 seconds following an Instant replay review with the following
exception:
• After the Two-Minute Timeout in the 2nd or 4th quarters, when the Replay Official stops the game for review, the play clock will be frozen at that point and will be restarted followingthereview when the ball is made ready for play by the Referee’s signal.
• If the play clock displays less than 10 seconds when it is frozen, it will be reset to 10 seconds and started when the ball is made ready for play by the Referee’s signal.
Rationale: This change avoids teams from gaining an advantage when video replay is involvedlate in either half due to the status of the play clock
Yes Fubah I agree and according to my data I see terrible situations for UNC as they improve. They are rarely elite and end up being overpriced historically
season > 2014 and conference = ACC and t:team = NCAR and line>=-9 and o:division=FBS and n:line>-7 and week>2 and total<66.
This situation is 5-32 ATS and I believe because of their advancement improvements will still end up being very inconsistent. I just need UNC to improve so they can increase their upcoming lines then fall back because of their lack of consistency.
The only way they can overcome is to have MUCH better elite level talent and until I see it I'll trust their historical lack luster trends
By the way I would love to see UNC cover in week 1 because they are the dog, that will give them the credibility i see when I fade a future favorite that has been a previous dog.
As for week 1 no play because thir next opponent is FCS so future lines not applicable in my systems.
It would be awesome for me and my way of thinking to have UNC cover both week 1 and 2. That set up would be premium.
Likely to be over-priced after such a start
Either way it will be interesting to see how Belichik's team does this year...
Established in 1995,
R.I.P. Lou
Hot Forum Topics
