And called for a 30 pt win when they were -19.5. W .Carolina wins by 38. Could have gotten + money there
Can't count over 81.5 tt w Carolina. But thats how you turn a bad play into 3 winners. 21-4. Their tt was 81.5. And citadel tt was 61.5. And it was still 61.5 with 2 mins left in 1st half
Made more money by being pissed at myself for not following what I wrote..lol
151
0
Under 61.5 tt citadel. Win
And called for a 30 pt win when they were -19.5. W .Carolina wins by 38. Could have gotten + money there
Can't count over 81.5 tt w Carolina. But thats how you turn a bad play into 3 winners. 21-4. Their tt was 81.5. And citadel tt was 61.5. And it was still 61.5 with 2 mins left in 1st half
Made more money by being pissed at myself for not following what I wrote..lol
toledo i had on parlay should have used str up austin peay looking good and the over , v tech is up......USF within 2 ..N Fla will be close down 11 under 2 left
should have never switched to marshall i posted a lean to ODU-3 they are winning big, Rice up big....had texas st in a teaser they are up like 13
151
0
depaul is a play got it in +1.5
toledo i had on parlay should have used str up austin peay looking good and the over , v tech is up......USF within 2 ..N Fla will be close down 11 under 2 left
should have never switched to marshall i posted a lean to ODU-3 they are winning big, Rice up big....had texas st in a teaser they are up like 13
I will always buy 2 points with dogs. Trust me, the amount of times that helps is unreal. Sometimes I even buy 3 so in the North Florida case (which I tailed you btw) I had +15.5 so even when they were playing that game at the end of “will they cover or won’t” I wasn’t worried. I just eat the juice. I’d rather win than lose by a point or half point and make less on the win.
0
I will always buy 2 points with dogs. Trust me, the amount of times that helps is unreal. Sometimes I even buy 3 so in the North Florida case (which I tailed you btw) I had +15.5 so even when they were playing that game at the end of “will they cover or won’t” I wasn’t worried. I just eat the juice. I’d rather win than lose by a point or half point and make less on the win.
well i originally bet them ML so it would not have mattered but when the game was going on i was happy i was getting 1.5 anytime i can gain points i will yes i just seen the score, having a very good night for str ups for sure ,even App st , App st was just like a str up play, except why pay juice on changing it to +1.5 when i can just add a team that i know will just win like Tennessee??? and instead of betting app st +1.5 -130 or more i can add tenn ml and get +114 sorry about the bad luck i thought you would have went ML ...again a 3 point line move that loses i wondered why the line stayed depaul -1.5 as long as it did, i figured people would be betting creighton and they finally did....also i followed Fla man again on his Under pepperdine 59.5 but in 1st half when it was 29-20 with 10 mins left i seen i bet over 59.5, so i looked and the line went to under 62.5 so i bet the under for half unit more 1.5 units so ill win either way but hope for a middle its odd what pepperdine is doing too going minutes without scoring
texas am lost but i hit Under 61.5 TT on Citadel also bet w.car -19.5 when i said they would win by 30 when it was 21-4 i had that game pegged in my write up, i do not know what people were thinking, again i think people just seen that citadel won at home by 2 and so 9 was a lot and they would cover, but when i looked into it as in handicapping it, i seen that Citadel should not have won the 1st meeting, they shouldd have lost by like 7+ and so w.carolina would be ready and wanting to prove that the 1st game was a fluke, and thats what they did , from beginning to end ...but for some reason i doubt myself seeing everyone on citadel and thinking well everyone is smarter than me...lol so many times i am rigfht when i do writeups that go against what everyone likes so i get 3 winners over 81.5 w.car -19.5 and under 61.5 TT citadel, when you explain yourself they cannot take it away
then marshall comes back to win me the teaser.....USF wins not many on them...Austin Peay came through....Mercer wins....N.Florida wins....Virginia tech wins....Over queens game wins....did a live play on over wofford 161.5 ...win depaul.... lost texas am and over tulsa thats all
Depaul +1.5 winner
Over 159.5 Tulsa Loser
Over 160 Queens/AP winner
Texas AM -5.5 Loser
Mercer -2 winner
USF ML winner
U N Fla +12.5 winner
Austin Peay +3 winner
Virginia Tech +8.5 winner
Under 61.5 TT Citadel winner
App st +1.5/Tennessee +114 winner
151
0
@Mskeets
well i originally bet them ML so it would not have mattered but when the game was going on i was happy i was getting 1.5 anytime i can gain points i will yes i just seen the score, having a very good night for str ups for sure ,even App st , App st was just like a str up play, except why pay juice on changing it to +1.5 when i can just add a team that i know will just win like Tennessee??? and instead of betting app st +1.5 -130 or more i can add tenn ml and get +114 sorry about the bad luck i thought you would have went ML ...again a 3 point line move that loses i wondered why the line stayed depaul -1.5 as long as it did, i figured people would be betting creighton and they finally did....also i followed Fla man again on his Under pepperdine 59.5 but in 1st half when it was 29-20 with 10 mins left i seen i bet over 59.5, so i looked and the line went to under 62.5 so i bet the under for half unit more 1.5 units so ill win either way but hope for a middle its odd what pepperdine is doing too going minutes without scoring
texas am lost but i hit Under 61.5 TT on Citadel also bet w.car -19.5 when i said they would win by 30 when it was 21-4 i had that game pegged in my write up, i do not know what people were thinking, again i think people just seen that citadel won at home by 2 and so 9 was a lot and they would cover, but when i looked into it as in handicapping it, i seen that Citadel should not have won the 1st meeting, they shouldd have lost by like 7+ and so w.carolina would be ready and wanting to prove that the 1st game was a fluke, and thats what they did , from beginning to end ...but for some reason i doubt myself seeing everyone on citadel and thinking well everyone is smarter than me...lol so many times i am rigfht when i do writeups that go against what everyone likes so i get 3 winners over 81.5 w.car -19.5 and under 61.5 TT citadel, when you explain yourself they cannot take it away
then marshall comes back to win me the teaser.....USF wins not many on them...Austin Peay came through....Mercer wins....N.Florida wins....Virginia tech wins....Over queens game wins....did a live play on over wofford 161.5 ...win depaul.... lost texas am and over tulsa thats all
That’s a perdy good spread sheet…. Good job rum. Lookin at box score… DePaul was lucky… creighton did not score last few min of game… had 71 with about 2:50 left in game. It was 71-68 ish then…. Teams catching my eye lately…..Florida with both big men back… are heating up… Kansas improving a lot… have depth… and LSU jv squad they put out last game…. They can only go up….. ??…. One more. I think your A n M team is tired….. they will be ready in 2 weeks ish… good pickin as usual.
0
That’s a perdy good spread sheet…. Good job rum. Lookin at box score… DePaul was lucky… creighton did not score last few min of game… had 71 with about 2:50 left in game. It was 71-68 ish then…. Teams catching my eye lately…..Florida with both big men back… are heating up… Kansas improving a lot… have depth… and LSU jv squad they put out last game…. They can only go up….. ??…. One more. I think your A n M team is tired….. they will be ready in 2 weeks ish… good pickin as usual.
i have had about 5 losses this year where my team did not score last 5-7 mins....it happens a lot look at marshall they came back from way down to win the game but not cover but they did win the teaser i seen some played marshall moneyline i cant bet -175 str up at -3.5 because thats about what the juice is on 3.5 pts but they came back all i knew about depaul was that it was a close game last 10 mins not much scoring looked like it was going to be a 1 pt game
i was happy with my plays really happy how i turned citadel into 3 wins when i didnt even play them str up they were horrible and so many people were on them , that it even fooled me after i did a write up saying how W.car could win big
151
0
@Mskeets
i have had about 5 losses this year where my team did not score last 5-7 mins....it happens a lot look at marshall they came back from way down to win the game but not cover but they did win the teaser i seen some played marshall moneyline i cant bet -175 str up at -3.5 because thats about what the juice is on 3.5 pts but they came back all i knew about depaul was that it was a close game last 10 mins not much scoring looked like it was going to be a 1 pt game
i was happy with my plays really happy how i turned citadel into 3 wins when i didnt even play them str up they were horrible and so many people were on them , that it even fooled me after i did a write up saying how W.car could win big
i could have won both taking odu +3.5 and teasing marshall down ill take 8-2 and thats not counting over tt w.car or w.car -19.5 or counting app st which was pretty much a str up play, adding tenn ml just lowered my juice to a +114 from -130
151
0
@stevex01
i could have won both taking odu +3.5 and teasing marshall down ill take 8-2 and thats not counting over tt w.car or w.car -19.5 or counting app st which was pretty much a str up play, adding tenn ml just lowered my juice to a +114 from -130
plus if you read what i did on the pepperdine team total i ended up middling it :) because i mistakenly bet over 59.5 TT and then right before halftime i seen what i did so i bet under 62.5 TT on pepperdine...lol and i bet the under 62.5 for 1.5 units and the over 59.5 for just 1 unit, i had more faith in fla mans under i end up winning 250, and it lands right on 60 perfecto!!!!!! and i posted that at post #36 game wasnt over yet so 8-2 but got 4 other str ups i did not count and should have
151
0
plus if you read what i did on the pepperdine team total i ended up middling it :) because i mistakenly bet over 59.5 TT and then right before halftime i seen what i did so i bet under 62.5 TT on pepperdine...lol and i bet the under 62.5 for 1.5 units and the over 59.5 for just 1 unit, i had more faith in fla mans under i end up winning 250, and it lands right on 60 perfecto!!!!!! and i posted that at post #36 game wasnt over yet so 8-2 but got 4 other str ups i did not count and should have
5-5 tues ytd 373-305 9-2 thursday not counting under 62.5 pepperdine, or over 59.5 TT pepperdin or over 81.5 TT w.carolina , or western car -19.5 or -30 which is what i called for but did count under 61.5 TT Citadel because i did post that
9-2 wed YTD 382-307
4 team parlay i won 3 of the 4 2 team parlay i won both so 5-1 there and gave out 4 opinions toledo winner, alabama winner, liberty ml winner over mercer loser 3-1
151
0
5-5 tues ytd 373-305 9-2 thursday not counting under 62.5 pepperdine, or over 59.5 TT pepperdin or over 81.5 TT w.carolina , or western car -19.5 or -30 which is what i called for but did count under 61.5 TT Citadel because i did post that
9-2 wed YTD 382-307
4 team parlay i won 3 of the 4 2 team parlay i won both so 5-1 there and gave out 4 opinions toledo winner, alabama winner, liberty ml winner over mercer loser 3-1
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.