Vegas vs KenPom System
Hank, I feel like you would always just be betting on the favorite, as it would have a better adjd in nearly all cases....
ACTUALLY YOU WOULD BE TAKING MOSTLY UNDERDOGS.
Hank, I feel like you would always just be betting on the favorite, as it would have a better adjd in nearly all cases....
ACTUALLY YOU WOULD BE TAKING MOSTLY UNDERDOGS.
Unless I am understanding you wrong, Are you saying
THE TEAM WITH THE HIGHER DEFENSIVE NUMBER COVERS THE SPREAD.
Unless I am understanding you wrong, Are you saying
THE TEAM WITH THE HIGHER DEFENSIVE NUMBER COVERS THE SPREAD.
Beaver,
I'm been noticing this trend myself for a couple weeks now, and playing a few angles off this "system" which has been successful over the last 3 days. I started to post a message in poolman's thread about this same exact angle you are referring to, but then accidently deleted my post before hitting submit. I didn't have the time or energy to type it all in again....mainly because his thread was so literary challenged and hard to read.
I will be posting my results probably sometime tonight or tomorrow from backtesting a similar theory to the one you are trying to develop here. A small piece of info that I can give you before then is to rely primarily on the opening line, and don't put too much stock into movements thereafter. Always keep in mind that the books have to move their lines based on $ coming in on either side to get the final figures as close to 50/50 as possible to earn their juice at least.
The early results of some of my backtesting is closer to 75% btw....and that's a combination of sides and totals. In fact I've found a very good angle on totals I'll be sharing later.
The only thing I'll say and plea for is that we don't overblow this whole "theory" and so-called "system". There are some underlying fundamental reason's for playing an angle to this theory that we all should be keeping as our primary reason for playing a side. The most glaring reasoning behind this "theory" and other "systems" that are frequently posted on this site, is that if the line seems fishy or doesn't seem to make sense....there's a strong reason for the books to be posting it there.
I'll be back later on with summary post.....I appreciate this forum and the many good users out there that share their picks and angles.
MM
Beaver,
I'm been noticing this trend myself for a couple weeks now, and playing a few angles off this "system" which has been successful over the last 3 days. I started to post a message in poolman's thread about this same exact angle you are referring to, but then accidently deleted my post before hitting submit. I didn't have the time or energy to type it all in again....mainly because his thread was so literary challenged and hard to read.
I will be posting my results probably sometime tonight or tomorrow from backtesting a similar theory to the one you are trying to develop here. A small piece of info that I can give you before then is to rely primarily on the opening line, and don't put too much stock into movements thereafter. Always keep in mind that the books have to move their lines based on $ coming in on either side to get the final figures as close to 50/50 as possible to earn their juice at least.
The early results of some of my backtesting is closer to 75% btw....and that's a combination of sides and totals. In fact I've found a very good angle on totals I'll be sharing later.
The only thing I'll say and plea for is that we don't overblow this whole "theory" and so-called "system". There are some underlying fundamental reason's for playing an angle to this theory that we all should be keeping as our primary reason for playing a side. The most glaring reasoning behind this "theory" and other "systems" that are frequently posted on this site, is that if the line seems fishy or doesn't seem to make sense....there's a strong reason for the books to be posting it there.
I'll be back later on with summary post.....I appreciate this forum and the many good users out there that share their picks and angles.
MM
Lasalle would also be a play if the line moves to 14
maybe i am missing somthing here.......but wouldnt Xavier be the play if the line is 14.......Ken Pom has Xavier beating LaSalle 88-70 which is 4 points above the Vegas line?
Lasalle would also be a play if the line moves to 14
maybe i am missing somthing here.......but wouldnt Xavier be the play if the line is 14.......Ken Pom has Xavier beating LaSalle 88-70 which is 4 points above the Vegas line?
Hank-The team with the better D is ranked lower.So are you saying take the team with the lowest ranked AD.Taking the highest would be taking the least best defensive team of the two?Thanks
THE KENPOM NUMBERS ARE NOT RATINGS OR RANKINGS OR HOW GOOD A TEAM IS, THEY ARE HOW EFFICIENT A TEAM IS AT ANY ONE POSITION. IT CHANGES DAILY. THE WORST TEAM ON THE BOARD COULD HAVE THE HIGHEST DEFENSIVE NUMBERS AND THE LOWEST OFFENSIVE NUMBER AND STILL COVER A SPREAD.
Hank-The team with the better D is ranked lower.So are you saying take the team with the lowest ranked AD.Taking the highest would be taking the least best defensive team of the two?Thanks
THE KENPOM NUMBERS ARE NOT RATINGS OR RANKINGS OR HOW GOOD A TEAM IS, THEY ARE HOW EFFICIENT A TEAM IS AT ANY ONE POSITION. IT CHANGES DAILY. THE WORST TEAM ON THE BOARD COULD HAVE THE HIGHEST DEFENSIVE NUMBERS AND THE LOWEST OFFENSIVE NUMBER AND STILL COVER A SPREAD.
maybe i am missing somthing here.......but wouldnt Xavier be the play if the line is 14.......Ken Pom has Xavier beating LaSalle 88-70 which is 4 points above the Vegas line?
The point of this system is to fade kenpom and tail Vegas, so we would take La Salle
maybe i am missing somthing here.......but wouldnt Xavier be the play if the line is 14.......Ken Pom has Xavier beating LaSalle 88-70 which is 4 points above the Vegas line?
The point of this system is to fade kenpom and tail Vegas, so we would take La Salle
EACH TEAM HAS AN ADJO NUMBER AND ADJD NUMBER FOR OFFENSE AND DEFENSE. I TRY TO PLAY A TEAM WERE BOTH NUMBERS ARE HIGHER. HOWEVER, THE ADJD NUMBER CARRIES THE MOST WEIGHT. IT ACTUALLY WORKS BETTER ON TV GAMES.
Thanks for the tip hank. Have you documented this, or back tested it at all? I will keep an eye on the ADJD numbers
EACH TEAM HAS AN ADJO NUMBER AND ADJD NUMBER FOR OFFENSE AND DEFENSE. I TRY TO PLAY A TEAM WERE BOTH NUMBERS ARE HIGHER. HOWEVER, THE ADJD NUMBER CARRIES THE MOST WEIGHT. IT ACTUALLY WORKS BETTER ON TV GAMES.
Thanks for the tip hank. Have you documented this, or back tested it at all? I will keep an eye on the ADJD numbers
Thanks for the tip hank. Have you documented this, or back tested it at all? I will keep an eye on the ADJD numbers
I ONLY PLAYED THE TV GAMES WHERE BOTH THE OFFENSE AND DEFENSE NUMBERS WERE HIGH FOR THE SAME TEAM AND IT IS 63% THIS MONTH. HAD ONE BAD DAY, WENT 2-7. THE OTHERS WERE BETWEEN 55 AND 70 %.
Thanks for the tip hank. Have you documented this, or back tested it at all? I will keep an eye on the ADJD numbers
I ONLY PLAYED THE TV GAMES WHERE BOTH THE OFFENSE AND DEFENSE NUMBERS WERE HIGH FOR THE SAME TEAM AND IT IS 63% THIS MONTH. HAD ONE BAD DAY, WENT 2-7. THE OTHERS WERE BETWEEN 55 AND 70 %.
Both lines have moved.
Official plays for Tuesday are:
La Salle +14
Tennessee +6
I am hoping that they will both be public fades as well, right now they both are.
La Salle has 32%
Tenn has 36%
(Those numbers are according to pregame.com)
Both lines have moved.
Official plays for Tuesday are:
La Salle +14
Tennessee +6
I am hoping that they will both be public fades as well, right now they both are.
La Salle has 32%
Tenn has 36%
(Those numbers are according to pregame.com)
The point of this system is to fade kenpom and tail Vegas, so we would take La Salle
FOR EXAMPLE
I LOVE TO PLAY 3 TEAMER 8Pts teasers..... AND I HAVE THE FOLLOWING GAMES IN MIND... TELL ME WHAT DO U SUGGEST
XAVIER -6.5
OSU--2.5
TEXAS -10
UTAH +.5
ANY THOUGHTS .. OR IF U LIKE ANY OTHER GAMES IS WELCOMED -
The point of this system is to fade kenpom and tail Vegas, so we would take La Salle
FOR EXAMPLE
I LOVE TO PLAY 3 TEAMER 8Pts teasers..... AND I HAVE THE FOLLOWING GAMES IN MIND... TELL ME WHAT DO U SUGGEST
XAVIER -6.5
OSU--2.5
TEXAS -10
UTAH +.5
ANY THOUGHTS .. OR IF U LIKE ANY OTHER GAMES IS WELCOMED -
Beaver,
I'm been noticing this trend myself for a couple weeks now, and playing a few angles off this "system" which has been successful over the last 3 days. I started to post a message in poolman's thread about this same exact angle you are referring to, but then accidently deleted my post before hitting submit. I didn't have the time or energy to type it all in again....mainly because his thread was so literary challenged and hard to read.
I will be posting my results probably sometime tonight or tomorrow from backtesting a similar theory to the one you are trying to develop here. A small piece of info that I can give you before then is to rely primarily on the opening line, and don't put too much stock into movements thereafter. Always keep in mind that the books have to move their lines based on $ coming in on either side to get the final figures as close to 50/50 as possible to earn their juice at least.
The early results of some of my backtesting is closer to 75% btw....and that's a combination of sides and totals. In fact I've found a very good angle on totals I'll be sharing later.
The only thing I'll say and plea for is that we don't overblow this whole "theory" and so-called "system". There are some underlying fundamental reason's for playing an angle to this theory that we all should be keeping as our primary reason for playing a side. The most glaring reasoning behind this "theory" and other "systems" that are frequently posted on this site, is that if the line seems fishy or doesn't seem to make sense....there's a strong reason for the books to be posting it there.
I'll be back later on with summary post.....I appreciate this forum and the many good users out there that share their picks and angles.
MM
mm, that's what I've been trying to say here and elsewhere. Forget about the line moves once Vegas sets the opening lines. Use the openers as your determining factor if the play qualifies. Now Hank has a great point as far as a filter with his defensive ratings. Got to look into that.
Beaver,
I'm been noticing this trend myself for a couple weeks now, and playing a few angles off this "system" which has been successful over the last 3 days. I started to post a message in poolman's thread about this same exact angle you are referring to, but then accidently deleted my post before hitting submit. I didn't have the time or energy to type it all in again....mainly because his thread was so literary challenged and hard to read.
I will be posting my results probably sometime tonight or tomorrow from backtesting a similar theory to the one you are trying to develop here. A small piece of info that I can give you before then is to rely primarily on the opening line, and don't put too much stock into movements thereafter. Always keep in mind that the books have to move their lines based on $ coming in on either side to get the final figures as close to 50/50 as possible to earn their juice at least.
The early results of some of my backtesting is closer to 75% btw....and that's a combination of sides and totals. In fact I've found a very good angle on totals I'll be sharing later.
The only thing I'll say and plea for is that we don't overblow this whole "theory" and so-called "system". There are some underlying fundamental reason's for playing an angle to this theory that we all should be keeping as our primary reason for playing a side. The most glaring reasoning behind this "theory" and other "systems" that are frequently posted on this site, is that if the line seems fishy or doesn't seem to make sense....there's a strong reason for the books to be posting it there.
I'll be back later on with summary post.....I appreciate this forum and the many good users out there that share their picks and angles.
MM
mm, that's what I've been trying to say here and elsewhere. Forget about the line moves once Vegas sets the opening lines. Use the openers as your determining factor if the play qualifies. Now Hank has a great point as far as a filter with his defensive ratings. Got to look into that.
So...
If the line can move the system is 2-1.
If only the opening line is allowed, the system is 1-0.
If only using the opening line there are no plays today.
If the line can move there are 2 plays(La Salle and Tennessee) and two more that might become plays:
Michigan St(if the line moves to 2)
and Illinois St (if the line moves to 4)
I might have to add in a stipulation that requires plays to be public fades, this would avoid playing games like Michigan State where the only reason it would become a play is heavy public betting.
Thoughts???
So...
If the line can move the system is 2-1.
If only the opening line is allowed, the system is 1-0.
If only using the opening line there are no plays today.
If the line can move there are 2 plays(La Salle and Tennessee) and two more that might become plays:
Michigan St(if the line moves to 2)
and Illinois St (if the line moves to 4)
I might have to add in a stipulation that requires plays to be public fades, this would avoid playing games like Michigan State where the only reason it would become a play is heavy public betting.
Thoughts???
when your using kenpom every factor comes into play! you will not make any money using it they you are! both those plays you picked should lose tonight based on other factors involved with these games. good luck but i am on vandy huge tonight just like i was with cal and coll of char.
BOL
when your using kenpom every factor comes into play! you will not make any money using it they you are! both those plays you picked should lose tonight based on other factors involved with these games. good luck but i am on vandy huge tonight just like i was with cal and coll of char.
BOL
Hot Forum Topics
-
Monday 9/14/2026
646
-
I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters
57,671
-
NFL LOCKED IN!
97,168
-
Trump's legacy?
25,357
-
Couple Beers
1,534
-
Week One-Post Week One Plays Here
1,796
-
Betting NFL isnt the same anymore Tapping out.
1,066
-
We have picked a terrible time to have the stupidest president ever
26,733
-
People trying to say NFL isn’t scripted…..
1,906
-
NCAA FOOTBALL. 151
19,193
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
