First of all only games OVER +4-4 are involved in DOUBLING up and where Pushes are involved,,old Dom only got to 0-4 and per covers won or you pushed so you got your money back so you are whole,,,,,,,,IMO if you double your play on a loss and get a push then you are not whole thus you re bet your # next outing but doubling only starts at -5 +5 or higher
Only one team at that level hit a push and that was New Mexico and they lost there last game after the push so you def got all your money back
First of all only games OVER +4-4 are involved in DOUBLING up and where Pushes are involved,,old Dom only got to 0-4 and per covers won or you pushed so you got your money back so you are whole,,,,,,,,IMO if you double your play on a loss and get a push then you are not whole thus you re bet your # next outing but doubling only starts at -5 +5 or higher
Only one team at that level hit a push and that was New Mexico and they lost there last game after the push so you def got all your money back
Thanx!!! I agree with you for scoring purposes, however, I think I will, for my personal purpose, I will consider it the same as a game played with no line. ie. the streak continues.
Thanx again for your input.
Thanx!!! I agree with you for scoring purposes, however, I think I will, for my personal purpose, I will consider it the same as a game played with no line. ie. the streak continues.
Thanx again for your input.
Actually I have read that post. it's a fairly decent system..a similar chase system but I would have to go back and do some of the math before I jumped into it.
The record for the year is 106-10 (chasing 3 games)...there is some verbiage in there saying that it would be up 36 units because of that record but I disagree....those 3 game chases that you lost you actually lose 8.26 units if you are chasing to win a full unit. So it drops it to a profit of 23.6 units for the year. Big difference.
I also couldn't find a valid reason why they were playing the over or under other than past results.
I like the system and definitely think they put some good research into it. So I would say tail it if you like. I am more comfortable with our system (mostly because I have already built the spreadsheets to keep track of it)
Best of luck tonight chaps!! ![]()
Actually I have read that post. it's a fairly decent system..a similar chase system but I would have to go back and do some of the math before I jumped into it.
The record for the year is 106-10 (chasing 3 games)...there is some verbiage in there saying that it would be up 36 units because of that record but I disagree....those 3 game chases that you lost you actually lose 8.26 units if you are chasing to win a full unit. So it drops it to a profit of 23.6 units for the year. Big difference.
I also couldn't find a valid reason why they were playing the over or under other than past results.
I like the system and definitely think they put some good research into it. So I would say tail it if you like. I am more comfortable with our system (mostly because I have already built the spreadsheets to keep track of it)
Best of luck tonight chaps!! ![]()
Airmail thank you as said you are our expert with NHL and probably all others,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Yes i like to keep it simple and this system is so simple anyone can follow its course,,,,,,and also anyone can pick it up very easily
dave ,,, yes we all can do what we like and BOL to you if you follow Old Dom,,,,,,,,,,,,Understand these long loseres are always questionable,,,,,,,,but if you continue to double you can't lose on most cases unless you find two bad plays playing each other which will happen occasionally,,,,,,,,,,,,
Airmail thank you as said you are our expert with NHL and probably all others,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Yes i like to keep it simple and this system is so simple anyone can follow its course,,,,,,and also anyone can pick it up very easily
dave ,,, yes we all can do what we like and BOL to you if you follow Old Dom,,,,,,,,,,,,Understand these long loseres are always questionable,,,,,,,,but if you continue to double you can't lose on most cases unless you find two bad plays playing each other which will happen occasionally,,,,,,,,,,,,
the plays for saturday are one page back for anyone intrestered,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,![]()
Airmail had a 3 teamer
cuse,,,
,NHL Kings,,,,,
,NBA Nuggets,,,![]()
almost got it,,,,,,
the plays for saturday are one page back for anyone intrestered,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,![]()
Airmail had a 3 teamer
cuse,,,
,NHL Kings,,,,,
,NBA Nuggets,,,![]()
almost got it,,,,,,
NBA
Indiana is 0-6 ATS their last 6
Minnesota is 6-0 ATS....betting LA Lakers
San Antonio is 0-5 last 5
oh and the big dog..Chicago Bulls 0-9-1 last 10..
NHL
Edmonton 4-0 last 4
Florida 0-4 last 4 (Edmonton Florida are playing each other)
New Jersey is 4-0 last 4 playing St. louis -140.
Lot of action to be had. Take it for what it's worth and good luck everyone. ![]()
NBA
Indiana is 0-6 ATS their last 6
Minnesota is 6-0 ATS....betting LA Lakers
San Antonio is 0-5 last 5
oh and the big dog..Chicago Bulls 0-9-1 last 10..
NHL
Edmonton 4-0 last 4
Florida 0-4 last 4 (Edmonton Florida are playing each other)
New Jersey is 4-0 last 4 playing St. louis -140.
Lot of action to be had. Take it for what it's worth and good luck everyone. ![]()
My bad Bando's - I was going off of memory rather than my spreadsheet.
Yes NJ v FL I have got 1.17 units to win 2..i dont like the play but it's only the 1st of 3 so I am prepared to be chasing but who knows Fl could pull one out.
and stl i have 1.4 to win 1
![]()
My bad Bando's - I was going off of memory rather than my spreadsheet.
Yes NJ v FL I have got 1.17 units to win 2..i dont like the play but it's only the 1st of 3 so I am prepared to be chasing but who knows Fl could pull one out.
and stl i have 1.4 to win 1
![]()
wife is pretty good capper,,,,,,Known at casino ,,iceprincess
Posting her plays for the hell of it
Red Wings gm Under
oilers gm Under
capitals puck line
shes not bad in NBA either
has Rockets
Hawks
Knicks
wife is pretty good capper,,,,,,Known at casino ,,iceprincess
Posting her plays for the hell of it
Red Wings gm Under
oilers gm Under
capitals puck line
shes not bad in NBA either
has Rockets
Hawks
Knicks
NHL
Edmonton 4-0 last 4
Florida 0-4 last 4 (Edmonton Florida are playing each other)
New Jersey is 4-0 last 4 playing St. louis -140.
Florida is playing NJ
Emonton is playing Blues,,,,,,,![]()
NHL
Edmonton 4-0 last 4
Florida 0-4 last 4 (Edmonton Florida are playing each other)
New Jersey is 4-0 last 4 playing St. louis -140.
Florida is playing NJ
Emonton is playing Blues,,,,,,,![]()
Airmails number i believe is wrong for indy they arent 0-9-1 their last 10. They got a cover as 3 point dogs on 11/30.
But they are 0-4 their last 4
Airmails number i believe is wrong for indy they arent 0-9-1 their last 10. They got a cover as 3 point dogs on 11/30.
But they are 0-4 their last 4
Airmails number i believe is wrong for indy they arent 0-9-1 their last 10. They got a cover as 3 point dogs on 11/30.
But they are 0-4 their last 4
sorry that should read chicago, not indy up above
Airmails number i believe is wrong for indy they arent 0-9-1 their last 10. They got a cover as 3 point dogs on 11/30.
But they are 0-4 their last 4
sorry that should read chicago, not indy up above
NBA
Indiana is 0-6 ATS their last 6
Minnesota is 6-0 ATS....betting LA Lakers
San Antonio is 0-5 last 5
oh and the big dog..Chicago Bulls 0-9-1 last 10..
NHL
Edmonton 4-0 last 4
Florida 0-4 last 4 (Edmonton Florida are playing each other)
New Jersey is 4-0 last 4 playing St. louis -140.
Lot of action to be had. Take it for what it's worth and good luck everyone. ![]()
so this makes florida a strong play correct?
NBA
Indiana is 0-6 ATS their last 6
Minnesota is 6-0 ATS....betting LA Lakers
San Antonio is 0-5 last 5
oh and the big dog..Chicago Bulls 0-9-1 last 10..
NHL
Edmonton 4-0 last 4
Florida 0-4 last 4 (Edmonton Florida are playing each other)
New Jersey is 4-0 last 4 playing St. louis -140.
Lot of action to be had. Take it for what it's worth and good luck everyone. ![]()
so this makes florida a strong play correct?
i have been reading along and playing along with this thread for about a week now. i really love the system and the results. just wanted to say, when a team continues a streak past 4, weather winning or losing. wouldnt it be better instead of jsut doubling your bet to make it 2.1 to cover the juice as well?
i have been reading along and playing along with this thread for about a week now. i really love the system and the results. just wanted to say, when a team continues a streak past 4, weather winning or losing. wouldnt it be better instead of jsut doubling your bet to make it 2.1 to cover the juice as well?
hey bob,
I spent most of my time on old wagerline...hardly post anymore but still watch...have you considered totals? I ask because right now in ncaab they are 200-202 for non overtime games...probably even out there too right? started looking night before last at 3-0 and 0-3 and only 1 out of I think 4 stopped the streak...but there was 1 game (Wash St) that was 4-0 to the over, total was 148 (so take the under) and landed on 140...safely under...I know it's only one day but something to add to your arsenal?
Thanks for all you do.
hey bob,
I spent most of my time on old wagerline...hardly post anymore but still watch...have you considered totals? I ask because right now in ncaab they are 200-202 for non overtime games...probably even out there too right? started looking night before last at 3-0 and 0-3 and only 1 out of I think 4 stopped the streak...but there was 1 game (Wash St) that was 4-0 to the over, total was 148 (so take the under) and landed on 140...safely under...I know it's only one day but something to add to your arsenal?
Thanks for all you do.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.