Posted:
#2901
Ncaab ATS Streak Breakers for 2013/2014
Posted:
#2904
Morning boys was a nice cover win with Madison but they should had covered in regulation with ease, they just let down at very end of game as they had that win and did pizz me off when went into OT as i did not need a win that way.But all's well that ends well i guess
Cap 16 I don't understand your post can you explain it
Currently 6-8 ATS Losing Streaks are Covering at 71%, total record for the year I have is 22-9.
??? ATS streak record is 6-8??? or are you saying teams on a 6 thru 8 loss streak are covering at 71%
As i have 17 teams with a loss streak have gone or reached a higher level from 0-6 to 0-11 this year with another 11 covering at 0-6 and Okie St pending play at 0-6
your 22-9 is interesting but can you explain ???
Posted:
#2907
what was strange yesterday was the 3-0 win streaks all lost with exception of 1 i believe going against recent records and 0-4 streaks went just the opposite and almost all covered against its current records,So both took a drastic turn around last night
3-0 Ucla only win and other 3 lose,,3-1 and actually go as sys is designed but against its current records
0-4 Monmouth can't cover and other 3 do cover 3-1 going against their current records although as sys is designed
very strange change of events but that's gambling
What was nice was we got our cover and SU win with our top Large play as the night before and now we have loyla Marymount today with a 10 unit cover expected
Posted:
#2908
0-4 last nite went 2-2 with cin and kent st. covering, puts it at 13-21 since 2/5: 0-5 is 10-15 since 2/5: 0-6 is 9-1 since 2/5 with LMU up tonite: 0-7 is 3-2 since 1/25 with ok st. up 2/22:
4-0 is 18-16 since 2/5: 5-0 is7-8 since 2/4: 6-0 is 3-6 since 2/5 and 7-0 is 4-1 since 1/28 with woff and nc up tonite and fresno st. 2/22.
hope this is close to your records stevo , thanks for all you do and gl tonite
Posted:
#2909
Quote Originally Posted by stevo1:
Morning boys was a nice cover win with Madison but they should had covered in regulation with ease, they just let down at very end of game as they had that win and did pizz me off when went into OT as i did not need a win that way.But all's well that ends well i guess
Morning boys was a nice cover win with Madison but they should had covered in regulation with ease, they just let down at very end of game as they had that win and did pizz me off when went into OT as i did not need a win that way.But all's well that ends well i guess
Cap 16 I don't understand your post can you explain it
Currently 6-8 ATS Losing Streaks are Covering at 71%, total record for the year I have is 22-9.
??? ATS streak record is 6-8??? or are you saying teams on a 6 thru 8 loss streak are covering at 71%
As i have 17 teams with a loss streak have gone or reached a higher level from 0-6 to 0-11 this year with another 11 covering at 0-6 and Okie St pending play at 0-6
your 22-9 is interesting but can you explain ???
Currently teams that are on a 6 game losing streak ATS thru 8 game losing streak ATS are covering at 71%.
Posted:
#2912
Mr Bmw i owe you an apology as i failed to look at those streak records from 2/5/14 close to today as just looked at overall records for season(7-6) and you must adjust although always keeping an eye on season records too but failed to review progress from 2/5/14.Please accept my apologies 
The 7-0 win streaks since 2/5/14 have gone 0-3
and we have a play in Wofford to not cover today at a 10 unit play at 300% they don't cover so the play is Furman
____________________________________
we also have 7-0 N Carolina as BMW posted to not cover and another 10 Unit play on Duke
_______________________________________
and Loyla marymount as previously noted at 0-6
and another 10 unit play and yes does look like a nice 5 unit parlay in the works
________________________________________
Tanks BMW as i'm still in a fog working on all these other
streak levels 
Posted:
#2918
Cap can you confirm your post
east ILL
N dakota
both went to 0-11 b4 covering
________________
Ind Pur covered on 2/6
Ecu covered on 2/1
this is it for 0-8 loss streaks
______________________
0-7 loss streaks we had 12 cover (12-4)
Wright St 12/1
S Utah 12/21
Geo St12/22
Bradly 1/4
BC 1/11
St Johns 1/18
Fla St 1/18
Marq 1/20
Loy Myrmt 1/23
Rice 1/25
Oregon 1/26
cent fla 2/1
__________________
0-6 streak records to date (11-16)
I have the 11 teams if need to verify
3 is correct and 2 that did not is correct and naturally 0-6 is correct with madison cover last night
Posted:
#2923
0-4 last nite went 2-2 with cin and kent st. covering, puts it at 13-21 since 2/5: 0-5 is 10-15 since 2/5: 0-6 is 9-1 since 2/5 with LMU up tonite: 0-7 is 3-2 since 1/25 with ok st. up 2/22:
4-0 is 18-16 since 2/5: 5-0 is7-8 since 2/4: 6-0 is 3-6 since 2/5 and 7-0 is 4-1 since 1/28 with woff and nc up tonite and fresno st. 2/22.
hope this is close to your records stevo , thanks for all you do and gl tonite
I do not agree with your 4-0 record and if include 2/5 i have 14 covers not 18 and i do have 18 no covers where you have 16
4-0 record for me is 14-18
5-0 record is 5-9
6-0 record is 3-5
7-0 record is 3-0
all these records are as of 2/5/14 after Close as 2/5 plays are not included in counts
Posted:
#2925
PLAYS TODAY
The 7-0 win streaks since 2/5/14 have gone 0-3
and we have a play in Wofford to not cover today at a 10 unit play at 300% they don't cover so the play is Furman
____________________________________
we also have 7-0 N Carolina as BMW posted to not cover and another 10 Unit play on Duke
_______________________________________
Loyla Marymount at 0-6 and another 10 unit play to cover
__________________________
3 team parlay for 5 units
Hot Forum Topics
