• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Kalshi Referral Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • Polymarket Referral Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • Betr Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
      • Gemini Predictions Promo Code
    • NFL Week 3
      NFL Week 3
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Picks
      • Falcons-Packers Picks
      • Survivor Picks
      • Week 3 Odds
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | CFL

    Week 8 discussion/relative strengths

    12 Next Last»
    Indigo999
    spottie2935
    AussieDownUnder
    shooter19
    thirdperson
    Participants:
    Search model icon
    Views: 2548
    Posts: 31
    12 Next Last»
     
    Indigo999
    Indigo999
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2015
    Posts: 6619
    Posted: Aug. 5, 2017 - 11:01 PM ET #1

    STD:   14-8-1

    Favorites went 2-2 and OVERs went 3-1.

    Hamilton showed it DOES have a pulse after all and breaking some people's hearts with a backdoor cover.  

    Did the Sasquatches find a quarterback?

    Breaking the season down so far here are the results in different categories....

    Home favorites     8-13 ATS   11-10 O/U

    Home underdogs  4-4 ATS      5-3 O/U

    Past history has shown that the home favorite covering percentage is about average for the first 7 weeks of the season. Home dogs prior to this season covered about 52% before week 8, so that is pretty close to what we would expect.

    What isn't expected is the plethora of OVERs in the CFL, as prior to this season before week 8 UNDERs covered at a 53% clip.

    This correlates with what is going on in sports in general.......scoring is up in the NFL, in the NBA, in the NCAA and  in the NHL and the linemaker has taken notice and raised totals quite significantly.  Offenses are better and a combination of rule changes favoring  offenses and officials who are flag happy on defenders have given the advantage to the offense.  It is difficult these days to be a defender or an official for that matter.  Officiating seems to be getting worse and they are being called on it.....we see visual evidence all the time of missed calls that cost teams points and games.  It is isn't as easy as it looks,....if you've officiated games in any sport, it is a thankless profession and like offensive lineman in football you aren't really noticed much unless you've done something wrong.

    Here are my estimated lines and totals for week 8.  I am not estimating what Vegas will put out and we're finding every week that Vegas varies one or two lines/totals quite significantly from what I have.

    Redblacks         +2.5             Eskimos     55

    with Ray

    Montreal               -6              Toronto       53

    w/o Ray  

    Montreal             -11              Toronto        48

    Tiger Cats           +4               Bombers     55

    Riders               +3.5               Lions           52

       


    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    To remove first post, remove entire topic.
    STD:   14-8-1

    Favorites went 2-2 and OVERs went 3-1.

    Hamilton showed it DOES have a pulse after all and breaking some people's hearts with a backdoor cover.  

    Did the Sasquatches find a quarterback?

    Breaking the season down so far here are the results in different categories....

    Home favorites     8-13 ATS   11-10 O/U

    Home underdogs  4-4 ATS      5-3 O/U

    Past history has shown that the home favorite covering percentage is about average for the first 7 weeks of the season. Home dogs prior to this season covered about 52% before week 8, so that is pretty close to what we would expect.

    What isn't expected is the plethora of OVERs in the CFL, as prior to this season before week 8 UNDERs covered at a 53% clip.

    This correlates with what is going on in sports in general.......scoring is up in the NFL, in the NBA, in the NCAA and  in the NHL and the linemaker has taken notice and raised totals quite significantly.  Offenses are better and a combination of rule changes favoring  offenses and officials who are flag happy on defenders have given the advantage to the offense.  It is difficult these days to be a defender or an official for that matter.  Officiating seems to be getting worse and they are being called on it.....we see visual evidence all the time of missed calls that cost teams points and games.  It is isn't as easy as it looks,....if you've officiated games in any sport, it is a thankless profession and like offensive lineman in football you aren't really noticed much unless you've done something wrong.

    Here are my estimated lines and totals for week 8.  I am not estimating what Vegas will put out and we're finding every week that Vegas varies one or two lines/totals quite significantly from what I have.

    Redblacks         +2.5             Eskimos     55

    with Ray

    Montreal               -6              Toronto       53

    w/o Ray  

    Montreal             -11              Toronto        48

    Tiger Cats           +4               Bombers     55

    Riders               +3.5               Lions           52

       


     
    Indigo999
    Indigo999
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2015
    Posts: 6619
    Posted: Aug. 5, 2017 - 11:14 PM ET #2

    Divisional home dogs that lost last week as away dogs have been 4-7 ATS, 7-4 O/U.     Green Riders

    Home winless dogs have been 13-3 ATS, 12-3-1 O/U.......

    Winless home dogs week>5    6-0 ATS, 5-0-1 O/U

    Tiger Cats


    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Divisional home dogs that lost last week as away dogs have been 4-7 ATS, 7-4 O/U.     Green Riders

    Home winless dogs have been 13-3 ATS, 12-3-1 O/U.......

    Winless home dogs week>5    6-0 ATS, 5-0-1 O/U

    Tiger Cats


     
    Indigo999
    Indigo999
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2015
    Posts: 6619
    Posted: Aug. 5, 2017 - 11:19 PM ET #3

    Teams off away dog losses now a home divisional dog to the same team as last week 4-7, 7-4 ATS.  Green Riders
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Teams off away dog losses now a home divisional dog to the same team as last week 4-7, 7-4 ATS.  Green Riders
     
    Indigo999
    Indigo999
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2015
    Posts: 6619
    Posted: Aug. 5, 2017 - 11:29 PM ET #4

    Home non-divisional dogs off 2 straight losses.

    30-14 ATS    Redblacks, Tiger Cats

    Teams that lost two straight, now a home non-divisional dog to a team that won on the road last game........

    6-7 ATS  Tiger Cats

    Home non-divisional dogs off two straight losses versus a team off a home win.........

    13-5-1 ATS  Redblacks
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Home non-divisional dogs off 2 straight losses.

    30-14 ATS    Redblacks, Tiger Cats

    Teams that lost two straight, now a home non-divisional dog to a team that won on the road last game........

    6-7 ATS  Tiger Cats

    Home non-divisional dogs off two straight losses versus a team off a home win.........

    13-5-1 ATS  Redblacks
     
    Indigo999
    Indigo999
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2015
    Posts: 6619
    Posted: Aug. 5, 2017 - 11:35 PM ET #5

    Unbeaten away favorites off a home win 5-8 ATS, 6-7 SU, 5-8 O/U

    This moves to 4-6 ATS, 5-5 SU, and 4-6 O/U in non-divisional games.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Unbeaten away favorites off a home win 5-8 ATS, 6-7 SU, 5-8 O/U

    This moves to 4-6 ATS, 5-5 SU, and 4-6 O/U in non-divisional games.
     
    Indigo999
    Indigo999
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2015
    Posts: 6619
    Posted: Aug. 6, 2017 - 8:26 AM ET #6

    Is it just me, or does anyone else notice that the Bombers and the Eskimos are almost mirror images of each other this year?

    Neither team has been crushing their opponents this year, who haven't exactly been elite, with the exception of the Esks' two very good wins versus the Lions.

    When the big four of the West start playing each other starting next week, THAT oughta be interesting, though I don't know how you can have many more games that have gone down to the wire, both straight up and/or against the spread as we have so far.  It's almost been like an NBA game...tune into the last 3 minutes and you've watched pretty much the whole game.  Still it's better because the CFL is NOT the NBA, and the NBA is basically unwatchable.

    I'd like to see Saskatchewan see the writing on the wall and say to themselves, "we're out of it this year, there's four teams that are better than us in our division, let's see if we have a quarterback that could be our future", and then play him.  Your backup came into the game in the fourth and got you two touchdowns, why not play the guy?

    Otherwise the Green Riders they are gonna have to go on a search to find THE MAN, or hope that a Matt Nichols-type falls in their lap, or try to get Travis Lulay to come to the Riders.  Lulay, without knowing much about him seems like a satisfied guy that has proven everything in this league and he doesn't seem the type to seek greener pastures, even if someone threw a bunch of money at him.  The guy is a winner and he could be a franchise changer for a team like the Riders.  

    Vince Young next year?.....yeah, seems a bit farfetched.  Pulling your hamstring first week  of training camp tells me you're not into football all that much.  
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Is it just me, or does anyone else notice that the Bombers and the Eskimos are almost mirror images of each other this year?

    Neither team has been crushing their opponents this year, who haven't exactly been elite, with the exception of the Esks' two very good wins versus the Lions.

    When the big four of the West start playing each other starting next week, THAT oughta be interesting, though I don't know how you can have many more games that have gone down to the wire, both straight up and/or against the spread as we have so far.  It's almost been like an NBA game...tune into the last 3 minutes and you've watched pretty much the whole game.  Still it's better because the CFL is NOT the NBA, and the NBA is basically unwatchable.

    I'd like to see Saskatchewan see the writing on the wall and say to themselves, "we're out of it this year, there's four teams that are better than us in our division, let's see if we have a quarterback that could be our future", and then play him.  Your backup came into the game in the fourth and got you two touchdowns, why not play the guy?

    Otherwise the Green Riders they are gonna have to go on a search to find THE MAN, or hope that a Matt Nichols-type falls in their lap, or try to get Travis Lulay to come to the Riders.  Lulay, without knowing much about him seems like a satisfied guy that has proven everything in this league and he doesn't seem the type to seek greener pastures, even if someone threw a bunch of money at him.  The guy is a winner and he could be a franchise changer for a team like the Riders.  

    Vince Young next year?.....yeah, seems a bit farfetched.  Pulling your hamstring first week  of training camp tells me you're not into football all that much.  
     
    spottie2935
    spottie2935
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jun, 2001
    Posts: 23161
    Posted: Aug. 6, 2017 - 2:05 PM ET #7

    Nice query's.  

    Saskatchewan needs to run the ball like they did against the Argo's.

    18 rushes for 110 yards.  They have to take pressure off of their QB's.

    They have had QB problems for too long not to have addressed it more aggressively. 

    Running the ball or having a strong O' line  so you can run the ball.  
    When Saskatchewan has run the ball well they are 2-1 and 3-0 ATS.  Now granted the poor Eastern teams they ran against were Montreal 16-17 cover but lost by one, Hamilton 37-20, and Toronto 38-27. 

    To me it seems like since this is the only thing a small western Canada team has the people come no matter how good the team does.  I am not an expert, but it seems like the Mgmt has not done a good job getting talent.
    Spottie2935 on socials
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Nice query's.  

    Saskatchewan needs to run the ball like they did against the Argo's.

    18 rushes for 110 yards.  They have to take pressure off of their QB's.

    They have had QB problems for too long not to have addressed it more aggressively. 

    Running the ball or having a strong O' line  so you can run the ball.  
    When Saskatchewan has run the ball well they are 2-1 and 3-0 ATS.  Now granted the poor Eastern teams they ran against were Montreal 16-17 cover but lost by one, Hamilton 37-20, and Toronto 38-27. 

    To me it seems like since this is the only thing a small western Canada team has the people come no matter how good the team does.  I am not an expert, but it seems like the Mgmt has not done a good job getting talent.
     
    Indigo999
    Indigo999
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2015
    Posts: 6619
    Posted: Aug. 7, 2017 - 9:15 AM ET #8

    My belief is that running the ball and playing defense wins at home and quarterbacks and a passing game wins on the road in football.

    The reason that Montreal and Saskatchewan are winless on the road is that their quarterback play is bottom three in the league along with Hamilton, also winless.   And watch Toronto go winless on the road too if Ray is out for extended time.  Montreal has everything but consistent quarterback play, so I still could consider them as dogs, but the other teams on the road, I'll need double digits to want to contemplate putting money on them.

    The top four quarterbacks' teams are the Eskimos, Stampeders, Lions and Blue Bombers....their road record?  7-3-1 straight up and 7-4 ATS.....3-2 straight up and 4-1 ATS as away dogs.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    My belief is that running the ball and playing defense wins at home and quarterbacks and a passing game wins on the road in football.

    The reason that Montreal and Saskatchewan are winless on the road is that their quarterback play is bottom three in the league along with Hamilton, also winless.   And watch Toronto go winless on the road too if Ray is out for extended time.  Montreal has everything but consistent quarterback play, so I still could consider them as dogs, but the other teams on the road, I'll need double digits to want to contemplate putting money on them.

    The top four quarterbacks' teams are the Eskimos, Stampeders, Lions and Blue Bombers....their road record?  7-3-1 straight up and 7-4 ATS.....3-2 straight up and 4-1 ATS as away dogs.
     
    Indigo999
    Indigo999
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2015
    Posts: 6619
    Posted: Aug. 7, 2017 - 11:28 AM ET #9

    LInes are out.

    Mine in brackets.

    Ottawa          +2.5  (+2.5)     Edmonton  55   (55)

    Montreal                      no line

    Hamilton        +2.5  (+4)      Winnipeg    59.5  (55)

    Sask              +3. (+3.5)       BC             54.5  (52)
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    LInes are out.

    Mine in brackets.

    Ottawa          +2.5  (+2.5)     Edmonton  55   (55)

    Montreal                      no line

    Hamilton        +2.5  (+4)      Winnipeg    59.5  (55)

    Sask              +3. (+3.5)       BC             54.5  (52)
     
    Indigo999
    Indigo999
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2015
    Posts: 6619
    Posted: Aug. 7, 2017 - 11:30 AM ET #10

    Sask +3.5 (+3.5)      BC  54.5    52
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Sask +3.5 (+3.5)      BC  54.5    52
     
    Indigo999
    Indigo999
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2015
    Posts: 6619
    Posted: Aug. 7, 2017 - 11:35 AM ET #11

    Ricky Ray status evidently still not definite.

    Big difference in the totals of the Bombers 59.5 versus mine of 55 and 54.5 of Vegas versus mine of 52.  The Riders score much more at home and Winnipeg has been a scoring machine this year and someone has ssid NO MORE OVERs in their games.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Ricky Ray status evidently still not definite.

    Big difference in the totals of the Bombers 59.5 versus mine of 55 and 54.5 of Vegas versus mine of 52.  The Riders score much more at home and Winnipeg has been a scoring machine this year and someone has ssid NO MORE OVERs in their games.
     
    Indigo999
    Indigo999
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2015
    Posts: 6619
    Posted: Aug. 7, 2017 - 11:45 AM ET #12

    A home non-divisional dog, in a game where both teams score >20.....

    24-13-1   ATS            (+3.64)

    19-18-1   SU             (-.39)

    35-2-1     O/U           (+11.99)
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    A home non-divisional dog, in a game where both teams score >20.....

    24-13-1   ATS            (+3.64)

    19-18-1   SU             (-.39)

    35-2-1     O/U           (+11.99)
     
    Indigo999
    Indigo999
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2015
    Posts: 6619
    Posted: Aug. 7, 2017 - 5:18 PM ET #13

    Grey Cup odds....to be played in Ottawa this year.

    Edmonton +250
    Calgary +300
    Bombers +800
    Montreal +1000
    Lions +500

    The one that stands out is the Alouettes +1000,  They will win the East and the way it is set up if it is the same as last year, (correct me if I'm wrong) the number 4 seed of the West will go to the East and play the number two seed, which will be either Toronto or Ottawa.  The winner of that game will play the Eastern Division champions on their home ground.  So, if the Western divisional team in a crossover wins the first playoff round, as happened last year,  they then will have to go on the road for a second straight road playoff game, likely to be in Montreal.  Montreal has proven they can beat the best on their home ground....they and Calgary have by far the best defenses in the league.

    Likely West 4th seeds?   

    BC or Winnipeg.  

    Montreal COULD beat either of those teams on their home ground, which would put them in the championship at 10:1 odds.  Most commonly in the the NFL and the CFL the team with the worse regular season record covers...in the last 14 years of the Super Bowl, the team with the worse regular season record has covered, you can look it up. This has been 3-0 the last three years, though only 1-2 straight up in the CFL.

    Because I like to know such things, the team with the worse record in the regular season, in the playoffs has an ATS  record of 28-14 in the CFL database since 2007.

     It leaves all kinds of hedging opportunities for the Als....I haven't pulled the trigger on this yet, but I may.  

    They win the  division, they get a home playoff game and if they win, then the Grey Cup,...seems like a +EV play.  And a worse team, Ottawa, won it last year against the most dominant CFL team, beating the Stamps.  Is it for sure?.....of course not, that is why it is +1000.  

    If they got to the Grey Cup based on current form, they would be about +6 on a neutral field, +250 on the moneyline, in the championship game.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Grey Cup odds....to be played in Ottawa this year.

    Edmonton +250
    Calgary +300
    Bombers +800
    Montreal +1000
    Lions +500

    The one that stands out is the Alouettes +1000,  They will win the East and the way it is set up if it is the same as last year, (correct me if I'm wrong) the number 4 seed of the West will go to the East and play the number two seed, which will be either Toronto or Ottawa.  The winner of that game will play the Eastern Division champions on their home ground.  So, if the Western divisional team in a crossover wins the first playoff round, as happened last year,  they then will have to go on the road for a second straight road playoff game, likely to be in Montreal.  Montreal has proven they can beat the best on their home ground....they and Calgary have by far the best defenses in the league.

    Likely West 4th seeds?   

    BC or Winnipeg.  

    Montreal COULD beat either of those teams on their home ground, which would put them in the championship at 10:1 odds.  Most commonly in the the NFL and the CFL the team with the worse regular season record covers...in the last 14 years of the Super Bowl, the team with the worse regular season record has covered, you can look it up. This has been 3-0 the last three years, though only 1-2 straight up in the CFL.

    Because I like to know such things, the team with the worse record in the regular season, in the playoffs has an ATS  record of 28-14 in the CFL database since 2007.

     It leaves all kinds of hedging opportunities for the Als....I haven't pulled the trigger on this yet, but I may.  

    They win the  division, they get a home playoff game and if they win, then the Grey Cup,...seems like a +EV play.  And a worse team, Ottawa, won it last year against the most dominant CFL team, beating the Stamps.  Is it for sure?.....of course not, that is why it is +1000.  

    If they got to the Grey Cup based on current form, they would be about +6 on a neutral field, +250 on the moneyline, in the championship game.

     
    AussieDownUnder
    AussieDownUnder
    Hall of Fame
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jun, 2013
    Posts: 21208
    Posted: Aug. 7, 2017 - 5:25 PM ET #14

    Quote Originally Posted by Indigo999:

    A home non-divisional dog, in a game where both teams score >20.....

    24-13-1   ATS            (+3.64)

    19-18-1   SU             (-.39)

    35-2-1     O/U           (+11.99)

    WOW Indigo.. That is very impressive find...

    Narrowed it down a little as well to take out playoffs and total higher than 50

    25-1 to the over.. Now the question is, can Ottawa score 21+ points against Eskies? I say yes as the Eskimos have allowed 21+ points in 11 times in their last 13 road games..
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by Indigo999:

    A home non-divisional dog, in a game where both teams score >20.....

    24-13-1   ATS            (+3.64)

    19-18-1   SU             (-.39)

    35-2-1     O/U           (+11.99)

    WOW Indigo.. That is very impressive find...

    Narrowed it down a little as well to take out playoffs and total higher than 50

    25-1 to the over.. Now the question is, can Ottawa score 21+ points against Eskies? I say yes as the Eskimos have allowed 21+ points in 11 times in their last 13 road games..
     
    Indigo999
    Indigo999
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2015
    Posts: 6619
    Posted: Aug. 7, 2017 - 5:39 PM ET #15

    Good to see you Aussie,

    Even if we take out the opponent scoring >20,...if the home dog scores >20 in a regular season....

    points>20 and HD  and playoffs=0

    96-33-3 ATS
    84-47-1 SU
    89-39-4 O/U
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Good to see you Aussie,

    Even if we take out the opponent scoring >20,...if the home dog scores >20 in a regular season....

    points>20 and HD  and playoffs=0

    96-33-3 ATS
    84-47-1 SU
    89-39-4 O/U
     
    spottie2935
    spottie2935
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jun, 2001
    Posts: 23161
    Posted: Aug. 8, 2017 - 12:59 AM ET #16

    Good stuff as always Indigo. 


    I like the Alouettes to win the East but I have a hard time thinking the weak East can pull the upset again.  If you are looking just for an easy hedge opportunity then I am behind that 100%.  This is setting up to be a nice play, but the CFL is out of this world crazy at times.

    I think I will have 2 or 3 plays this week.  Waiting on some lines to show or move.
    Spottie2935 on socials
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Good stuff as always Indigo. 


    I like the Alouettes to win the East but I have a hard time thinking the weak East can pull the upset again.  If you are looking just for an easy hedge opportunity then I am behind that 100%.  This is setting up to be a nice play, but the CFL is out of this world crazy at times.

    I think I will have 2 or 3 plays this week.  Waiting on some lines to show or move.
     
    Indigo999
    Indigo999
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2015
    Posts: 6619
    Posted: Aug. 8, 2017 - 6:32 AM ET #17

    Hi Spot,....yes, with hedging in mind....I would basically be betting that the Als would win the division and have the Eastern final at home, most probably against the West's fourth best team, where I would have them anywhere from 0 to +4 at home.  

    At 10 to 1, I could hedge the East Conference final as well before the Grey Cup if I wanted to.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Hi Spot,....yes, with hedging in mind....I would basically be betting that the Als would win the division and have the Eastern final at home, most probably against the West's fourth best team, where I would have them anywhere from 0 to +4 at home.  

    At 10 to 1, I could hedge the East Conference final as well before the Grey Cup if I wanted to.
     
    spottie2935
    spottie2935
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jun, 2001
    Posts: 23161
    Posted: Aug. 8, 2017 - 8:22 AM ET #18

    Quote Originally Posted by Indigo999:

    Hi Spot,....yes, with hedging in mind....I would basically be betting that the Als would win the division and have the Eastern final at home, most probably against the West's fourth best team, where I would have them anywhere from 0 to +4 at home.  

    At 10 to 1, I could hedge the East Conference final as well before the Grey Cup if I wanted to.

    Your thought process is very strong, If this plays out like it should I like the Alouettes to be in the cup final !  Good fortune as always. 

    Spottie2935 on socials
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by Indigo999:

    Hi Spot,....yes, with hedging in mind....I would basically be betting that the Als would win the division and have the Eastern final at home, most probably against the West's fourth best team, where I would have them anywhere from 0 to +4 at home.  

    At 10 to 1, I could hedge the East Conference final as well before the Grey Cup if I wanted to.

    Your thought process is very strong, If this plays out like it should I like the Alouettes to be in the cup final !  Good fortune as always. 

     
    Indigo999
    Indigo999
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2015
    Posts: 6619
    Posted: Aug. 8, 2017 - 10:25 PM ET #19

    Play:

    1)  Ottawa +2.5

    Unbeaten away favorites are play againsts. Ottawa a classic underachiever this year so far.

    In my opinion this, or next week in Winnipeg is where some wheels will fall off for the Eskimos.

    Teams that are away non-divisional favorites that will be dogs their next game have been 8-17 ATS, 11-14 straight up.

    Teams that average >25 points/game have been 31-22 ATS as home dogs, 18-12 ATS in non-divisional games.  This moves to 7-0-2 ATS if our play ON team is off back to back losses.

    HD and tA(points)>25 and not DIV and p:L and pp:L


    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Play:

    1)  Ottawa +2.5

    Unbeaten away favorites are play againsts. Ottawa a classic underachiever this year so far.

    In my opinion this, or next week in Winnipeg is where some wheels will fall off for the Eskimos.

    Teams that are away non-divisional favorites that will be dogs their next game have been 8-17 ATS, 11-14 straight up.

    Teams that average >25 points/game have been 31-22 ATS as home dogs, 18-12 ATS in non-divisional games.  This moves to 7-0-2 ATS if our play ON team is off back to back losses.

    HD and tA(points)>25 and not DIV and p:L and pp:L


     
    Indigo999
    Indigo999
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2015
    Posts: 6619
    Posted: Aug. 8, 2017 - 10:28 PM ET #20

    To give a greater amount of games I queried the above without the parameter is needing to be a dog at home.

    H and tA(points)>25 and not DIV and p:L and pp:L

    22-4-2 ATS, 23-5 ATS
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    To give a greater amount of games I queried the above without the parameter is needing to be a dog at home.

    H and tA(points)>25 and not DIV and p:L and pp:L

    22-4-2 ATS, 23-5 ATS
     
    Indigo999
    Indigo999
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2015
    Posts: 6619
    Posted: Aug. 8, 2017 - 11:01 PM ET #21

    H and tA(points)>25 and not DIV and p:L and pp:L

    22-4-2 ATS (+11.82), 23-5 (+14.43) straight up
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    H and tA(points)>25 and not DIV and p:L and pp:L

    22-4-2 ATS (+11.82), 23-5 (+14.43) straight up
     
    shooter19
    shooter19
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2009
    Posts: 22
    Posted: Aug. 9, 2017 - 6:39 PM ET #22

    Jeez Indigo. You must have some street cred cuz the line is up to Ottawa -2.5 on Pinny. I love the number you got. I feel Esks are over hyped and we see that this weekend. I remember last years east final where Edmonton was favoured in Ottawa by 3 and got killed. I see the same this game too. Also like the TiCats to get their first W. I'm playing the first game after a coach firing card. Haha.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Jeez Indigo. You must have some street cred cuz the line is up to Ottawa -2.5 on Pinny. I love the number you got. I feel Esks are over hyped and we see that this weekend. I remember last years east final where Edmonton was favoured in Ottawa by 3 and got killed. I see the same this game too. Also like the TiCats to get their first W. I'm playing the first game after a coach firing card. Haha.
     
    Indigo999
    Indigo999
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2015
    Posts: 6619
    Posted: Aug. 9, 2017 - 7:15 PM ET #23

    Good to see you shooter.....Hamilton shows up in a lot of my indicated plays, I just don't know if I can play them.  Winnipeg a scoring machine which is a recipe for success on the road and Mo Liggett is back who is a difference maker...plus they go through teams like water in the last three minutes if and when they need to, and they're playing a team that gave up 60 points a few weeks back....I'll say one thing, if Hamilton is in this one, they're gonna have to score a ton this week.

    BC is also an indicated play, which I'm on the fence about.  The past two weeks and this week have been very, very tough and favorites have been 5-3 and OVERs 7-1, typically not good for me.

    The 80/20 left/right brained decision making percentage is there for weeks like this,....I can have all the data, but my right brain (feeling/gut part) has to go along with the information  gleened that my left brain (rational part) loves. 

    This week, my right brain is freaking out like the robot on Lost in Space...."WARNING WILL ROBINSON!!!!!, WARNING, DON'T DONATE YOUR BANKROLL!!  CAUTION!!  CAUTION!!"

      

    So, you're probably right that Hamilton will do it for you.....I just don't think I'll get on the horse with you on that one.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Good to see you shooter.....Hamilton shows up in a lot of my indicated plays, I just don't know if I can play them.  Winnipeg a scoring machine which is a recipe for success on the road and Mo Liggett is back who is a difference maker...plus they go through teams like water in the last three minutes if and when they need to, and they're playing a team that gave up 60 points a few weeks back....I'll say one thing, if Hamilton is in this one, they're gonna have to score a ton this week.

    BC is also an indicated play, which I'm on the fence about.  The past two weeks and this week have been very, very tough and favorites have been 5-3 and OVERs 7-1, typically not good for me.

    The 80/20 left/right brained decision making percentage is there for weeks like this,....I can have all the data, but my right brain (feeling/gut part) has to go along with the information  gleened that my left brain (rational part) loves. 

    This week, my right brain is freaking out like the robot on Lost in Space...."WARNING WILL ROBINSON!!!!!, WARNING, DON'T DONATE YOUR BANKROLL!!  CAUTION!!  CAUTION!!"

      

    So, you're probably right that Hamilton will do it for you.....I just don't think I'll get on the horse with you on that one.
     
    Indigo999
    Indigo999
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2015
    Posts: 6619
    Posted: Aug. 9, 2017 - 8:04 PM ET #24

    Betting percentages on the King of Covers Contest.

    Edmonton/Ottawa OVER 59%
    BC/Sask OVER 58%
    Winn/Ham UNDER 57%

    Lions -2  71%
    Eskimos +2- 65%
    Bombers -2- 63%

    We have a reverse line movement game in the Redblack game....some people swear by this, which is when the public picks one side and the line moves the opposite way.  Commonly, but not always, the public loses in this case.  According to others, it means that "smart" and/or "big money" has gone against the public.  It doesn't happen often in the CFL, but  it often does in NCAA football and when it does there is always a call that Billy Walters has entered the building.  A lot of it is rumors and inuendo that  fly around  and very few people actually really know who's behind reverse line movement and books aren't all that keen for others to know the who and the why.

    Walters made a ton in college football, but his winning percentage was about 55% to have made his fortune.  And that is a lesson for new bettors, making a fortune was done by hitting a ton of singles first and then the homeruns came later.  Hitting singles should be your emphasis for the first 10 years of your betting life....wish I had a guy that told me that when I started out.

    The books have done their job with the Bomber/Tiger Cat total as the majority are on the UNDER.  Bookmakers in their perfect world, are like the discount stores of the world....they make junk look attractive by pricing it "on sale" and what (mostly) women would not normally buy, they will because the price is sooooo attractive.  

    "Honey I got it on sale."  

    "Yeah, did you get my beer?"

    Covers' contest are a great way to find out what the public is thinking...I estimate the public is wrong about 55% (there's that percentage again) of the time.  Some that want to learn can use those percentages to get off a play that they "love", and a very, very few will just fade who the public loves.

    I actually use a smilar filter in college football.    I bet away underdogs almost exclusively and if the covers contest has my indicated away dog at over 50% of the public on them, my play becomes a no-play.  I've found that despite a historical 60% covering percentage for my indicated plays, if the public is in love with them, the covering percentage becomes around 45-50%.

    if anyone wants to dedicate themselves to this, take a look at the KOC list this year and look at the away underdogs that the public likes...if greater than 50% of the picks are on the dog. and you keep track this year, you'll see that they will cover less than 50% of the time.  In the past I've gone back over at least 5 years of past betting history to check this out....they never win over the course of a season.

    This year in NCAA college football the public so far likes FIU +17 in week 1 to cover over UCF.


    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Betting percentages on the King of Covers Contest.

    Edmonton/Ottawa OVER 59%
    BC/Sask OVER 58%
    Winn/Ham UNDER 57%

    Lions -2  71%
    Eskimos +2- 65%
    Bombers -2- 63%

    We have a reverse line movement game in the Redblack game....some people swear by this, which is when the public picks one side and the line moves the opposite way.  Commonly, but not always, the public loses in this case.  According to others, it means that "smart" and/or "big money" has gone against the public.  It doesn't happen often in the CFL, but  it often does in NCAA football and when it does there is always a call that Billy Walters has entered the building.  A lot of it is rumors and inuendo that  fly around  and very few people actually really know who's behind reverse line movement and books aren't all that keen for others to know the who and the why.

    Walters made a ton in college football, but his winning percentage was about 55% to have made his fortune.  And that is a lesson for new bettors, making a fortune was done by hitting a ton of singles first and then the homeruns came later.  Hitting singles should be your emphasis for the first 10 years of your betting life....wish I had a guy that told me that when I started out.

    The books have done their job with the Bomber/Tiger Cat total as the majority are on the UNDER.  Bookmakers in their perfect world, are like the discount stores of the world....they make junk look attractive by pricing it "on sale" and what (mostly) women would not normally buy, they will because the price is sooooo attractive.  

    "Honey I got it on sale."  

    "Yeah, did you get my beer?"

    Covers' contest are a great way to find out what the public is thinking...I estimate the public is wrong about 55% (there's that percentage again) of the time.  Some that want to learn can use those percentages to get off a play that they "love", and a very, very few will just fade who the public loves.

    I actually use a smilar filter in college football.    I bet away underdogs almost exclusively and if the covers contest has my indicated away dog at over 50% of the public on them, my play becomes a no-play.  I've found that despite a historical 60% covering percentage for my indicated plays, if the public is in love with them, the covering percentage becomes around 45-50%.

    if anyone wants to dedicate themselves to this, take a look at the KOC list this year and look at the away underdogs that the public likes...if greater than 50% of the picks are on the dog. and you keep track this year, you'll see that they will cover less than 50% of the time.  In the past I've gone back over at least 5 years of past betting history to check this out....they never win over the course of a season.

    This year in NCAA college football the public so far likes FIU +17 in week 1 to cover over UCF.


     
     
    thirdperson
    thirdperson
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2005
    Posts: 9416
    Posted: Aug. 9, 2017 - 11:39 PM ET #25

    Most unusual line movement has to be Ottawa as favourite instead of Edmonton.  Normally, winners keep winning while losers lose.  However not impossible for Ottawa which tends to play better (4-1 ATS?) against Edmonton in previous meetings.  Champions are often overrated but oddly Ottawa seems to be covering pointspreads well?  Also isn't Edmonton's ton of injuries supposed to matter eventually?
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Most unusual line movement has to be Ottawa as favourite instead of Edmonton.  Normally, winners keep winning while losers lose.  However not impossible for Ottawa which tends to play better (4-1 ATS?) against Edmonton in previous meetings.  Champions are often overrated but oddly Ottawa seems to be covering pointspreads well?  Also isn't Edmonton's ton of injuries supposed to matter eventually?
    All Forums | CFL
    12 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 449,485 Covers arrow
    • Giants vs Rams MNF in-game live 2,481 Covers arrow
    • Monday 09/21/2026 460 Covers arrow
    • Serious Streak Survivor Strategies 1,918,168 Covers arrow
    • ***Macwesties * Mon. Sept. 21, 2026 * Birthday * NFL * MNF * Football Play*** 4,120 Covers arrow
    • NFL LOCKED IN! 99,546 Covers arrow
    • New York Giants @ Los Angeles Rams 5,053 Covers arrow
    • Where are they getting enough explosive offense to separate from New York by more than a touchdown 2,563 Covers arrow
    • ?? KBO Plays 🥎 14,770 Covers arrow
    • Monday Night 4,401 Covers arrow

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.