Exclusive $60 Bonus
CODE: COVERS60
Free College Football Expert and Computer Picks For Every Game Oct. 3, 2026
Predicted Score
Team |
Predicted Score |
Spread |
Total |
ML |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
18.62 |
+13.5 +100 |
o50.0 -110 |
+450 |
|
|
33.16 |
-13.5 -108 |
u50.5 -108 |
-575 |
Predicted Score
Team |
Predicted Score |
Spread |
Total |
ML |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
21.46 |
+13.5 -108 |
o56.5 -105 |
+450 |
|
|
36.27 |
-13.5 -105 |
u56.5 -106 |
-549 |
Predicted Score
Team |
Predicted Score |
Spread |
Total |
ML |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
27.06 |
-5.5 -108 |
o47.5 -115 |
-210 |
|
|
21.60 |
+5.5 +100 |
u49.0 -110 |
+190 |
Predicted Score
Team |
Predicted Score |
Spread |
Total |
ML |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
26.20 |
-1.5 -115 |
o52.5 -110 |
-125 |
|
|
25.60 |
+1.5 -105 |
u53.5 -110 |
+125 |
Predicted Score
Team |
Predicted Score |
Spread |
Total |
ML |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
34.19 |
-11.5 -110 |
o55.5 -105 |
-500 |
|
|
22.48 |
+11.5 -105 |
u57.0 -115 |
+450 |
Predicted Score
Team |
Predicted Score |
Spread |
Total |
ML |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
24.44 |
+7.5 -110 |
o57.5 -110 |
+270 |
|
|
32.67 |
-7.5 -102 |
u58.5 -115 |
-300 |
Predicted Score
Team |
Predicted Score |
Spread |
Total |
ML |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
32.57 |
-14.5 -105 |
o48.5 -105 |
-649 |
|
|
16.19 |
+14.5 -112 |
u49.5 -110 |
+525 |
Predicted Score
Team |
Predicted Score |
Spread |
Total |
ML |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
31.66 |
-13.5 -108 |
o49.5 -105 |
-530 |
|
|
18.00 |
+13.5 +100 |
u50.5 -113 |
+450 |
Predicted Score
Team |
Predicted Score |
Spread |
Total |
ML |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
14.84 |
+19.5 -110 |
o51.0 -110 |
+1000 |
|
|
35.16 |
-19.5 -105 |
u51.5 -110 |
-1300 |
Predicted Score
Team |
Predicted Score |
Spread |
Total |
ML |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
22.16 |
+6.5 -115 |
o48.5 -110 |
+190 |
|
|
29.41 |
-6.5 -105 |
u50.5 -108 |
-210 |
Predicted Score
Team |
Predicted Score |
Spread |
Total |
ML |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
24.35 |
+1.5 -115 |
o46.5 -110 |
-108 |
|
|
25.68 |
-1.5 +100 |
u47.5 -110 |
-102 |
Predicted Score
Team |
Predicted Score |
Spread |
Total |
ML |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
41.29 |
-24.5 -105 |
o56.5 -105 |
-2200 |
|
|
17.11 |
+24.5 -108 |
u57.5 -115 |
+1300 |
Predicted Score
Team |
Predicted Score |
Spread |
Total |
ML |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
21.41 |
+6.0 -115 |
o48.5 -115 |
+190 |
|
|
27.98 |
-6.0 -105 |
u49.5 -110 |
-205 |
Predicted Score
Team |
Predicted Score |
Spread |
Total |
ML |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
20.91 |
+2.5 -110 |
o44.5 -105 |
+112 |
|
|
22.75 |
-2.5 -105 |
u44.5 -105 |
-118 |
Predicted Score
Team |
Predicted Score |
Spread |
Total |
ML |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
33.26 |
-9.5 -112 |
o56.5 -110 |
-365 |
|
|
25.11 |
+9.5 -102 |
u57.5 -108 |
+310 |
Predicted Score
Team |
Predicted Score |
Spread |
Total |
ML |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
23.08 |
+3.5 -110 |
o48.5 -105 |
+150 |
|
|
27.06 |
-3.5 +100 |
u48.5 -110 |
-162 |
Predicted Score
Team |
Predicted Score |
Spread |
Total |
ML |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
24.23 |
+7.0 -115 |
o55.5 -110 |
+225 |
|
|
31.05 |
-7.0 -105 |
u56.5 -110 |
-250 |
Predicted Score
Team |
Predicted Score |
Spread |
Total |
ML |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
22.59 |
+3.5 -125 |
o50.5 -110 |
+125 |
|
|
26.44 |
-3.5 +105 |
u51.0 -115 |
-138 |
Predicted Score
Team |
Predicted Score |
Spread |
Total |
ML |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
19.01 |
+10.5 -118 |
o48.5 -110 |
+285 |
|
|
28.96 |
-10.5 -104 |
u49.5 -105 |
-355 |
Predicted Score
Team |
Predicted Score |
Spread |
Total |
ML |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
25.23 |
-2.5 -115 |
o48.5 -115 |
-142 |
|
|
22.77 |
+2.5 +100 |
u50.5 -122 |
+130 |
Predicted Score
Team |
Predicted Score |
Spread |
Total |
ML |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
25.20 |
-6.5 -110 |
o40.5 -110 |
-335 |
|
|
16.63 |
+8.5 -110 |
u41.5 -110 |
+300 |
Predicted Score
Team |
Predicted Score |
Spread |
Total |
ML |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
24.59 |
+12.5 -105 |
o60.5 -110 |
+390 |
|
|
37.95 |
-12.5 -110 |
u60.5 -110 |
-485 |
Playable to 58%.
TCU's defense has played at a high level early in 2026. North Carolina managed only 15 points against TCU in their season opener, but scored 55 points across their subsequent two games. UCF scored 44 points and had 390 yards of total offense the week before TCU held them to 21 points and 266 yards.
BYU's offense could struggle in Week 5.
Playable to 52%.
BYU's offensive metrics look dominant early in 2026, but they scored 63 points against Utah Tech and 41 points against Colorado State. Utah Tech is an FCS program that doesn't have the size or speed to be competitive on the road against a ranked FBS opponent. Colorado State has allowed 100 points combined in their last two games.
Demond Williams Jr. averages 41.3 yards per game on the ground and should continue seeing plenty of work in that arena given that Washington's top two running backs, Quaid Carr and Jayden Limar, remain out due to injury. Strong matchup against USC (108th in EPA per play, 109th in front seven havoc).
Play Washington down to +7.5. Washington has been stout up front (third in stuff rate, ninth in EPA per rush), and USC hasn't gotten its ground game going (79th in EPA per rush). That might make the Trojans more one-dimensional offensively than is ideal, especially with WR1 Trent Mosley injured. USC's defense (108th in EPA per play) is simply bad, and Demond Williams Jr. nearly always piles up production when playing down in competition.
Miami vs. Clemson is one of the biggest matchups on the Week 5 slate, and I’m backing the Hurricanes to cover the 16.5-point spread. Clemson is coming off a 24-10 win over California after traveling across the country, and now the Tigers face a much tougher test against the No. 4 team in the country. Miami has little room for error as it aims for another College Football Playoff berth while playing a relatively easy schedule. Clemson will be the toughest opponent the Hurricanes have faced this season, but Miami should have a significant talent advantage. I’m comfortable taking Miami up to 20.5.
Regardless of the weather, Miami's ground attack will have a field day against a Clemson defense that has struggled to stop the run (130th in success rate) thanks largely to an outgunned defensive front (135th in line yards).
First-quarter Under 10.5, but pass at 9.5. Both offenses have started slowly against FBS competition, making this a natural correlation with my full-game Under.
Under 50.5 is my favorite look, playable down to 48.5. Both offenses struggle to prevent Havoc, both defenses create it, and Colorado lacks explosiveness. Inefficient early-down offense should create obvious passing situations and plenty of drive-killing negative plays.
Boise State is the highest-rated Group of Six school in my power rankings. However, it didn’t cover as large a home favorite against South Dakota a couple of weeks ago. It’s tough getting a ton of margin consistently when Boise State runs a slow tempo that ranks No. 131 in plays per minute on offense. Finally, it is hard to cover three touchdowns when Utah State is only allowing 22 points on defense this year.
Temple has one of the country's most underrated offenses (13th in EPA per play) and one of the worst defenses (125th in EPA per play). Against a South Florida team that's 14th in offensive success rate (51.5%), points will be scored. The Over is in play for me at 50.5 or better.
Army could easily be 3-0 entering this game but blew a 10-point lead with five minutes left against South Florida in Week 2. South Florida completed a 38-yard touchdown pass on fourth down in the final seconds. What would this line be if that pass wasn’t completed? My hypothesis is at least -3 and likely -3.5. I think Louisiana Tech’s statistical profile is too much influenced by an 80-6 win over Northwestern State in Week 1. Northwestern State ranks No. 123 (out of 128) in my FCS power rankings.
The Rutgers Scarlet Knights defense has looked far from amazing this year, but the Indiana Hoosiers have already struggled to put up points against other mediocre FBS defensive units. Western Kentucky ranks 132nd of 138 teams nationally in defensive EPA (0.33 per play), and the Hoosiers still only put up 38 points against them. I like the Under on Indiana's total down to 38.5 points.
While the Indiana Hoosiers have put up big numbers in their first two games, the offensive production has come down significantly over the past two weeks. It's now been three straight weeks in which the Hoosiers have played to totals of 55 or less. The Rutgers Scarlet Knights won't score much against an Indiana squad allowing 9.8 ppg, so I'm backing the Under at totals of 54.5 or higher.
Baylor is a tough matchup (13th in EPA per play), especially for RBs (7th in rushing success rate; 2.8 yards per rush allowed). Arizona State hasn't gotten the ground game going (121st in EPA per rush, 108th in rushing success rate) and won't here, either.
Playable to 53%.
The strength of the Baylor roster is their defense, with new defensive coordinator Joe Klanderman already showing why he was hired this past offseason. Baylor has held Auburn to 3.2 yards per carry, Prairie View to 1.4 yards per carry, and Colorado to 2.1 yards per carry already in 2026.
First-quarter Under 12.5 is playable down to 10.5. Both offenses play slowly, while poor third-down defense can extend possessions and burn clock. Both defenses also tighten up in the red zone, creating opportunities for field goals instead of touchdowns.
Over 55.5 is playable up to 56.5. Both offenses rank in the 83rd percentile or better in explosive-play rate, while neither defense consistently prevents explosives or gets off the field on late downs.
This is the same system that brought us mega-productive wideouts like Nick Nash and Danny Scudero, and now Clark is next up as the heir apparent. He paces San Jose State with 35 targets --- eight more than any other teammate --- and can smash against a bad Hawaii defense (124th in success rate).
San Jose State nearly always features a potent, aerial-led offense under offensive coordinator Craig Stutzmann. This year's version has Jabari Bates' legs to provide a rushing element that's been absent in recent years, so Hawaii's defense (124th in success rate) will be on its back heels.
Our experts and prediction models are hard at work analyzing the data. Check back shortly for today's picks, or explore our Computer Picks for inspiration.
The table above lets you know how profitable and helpful our sports betting computer picks have been across the last 100 college football games played. Our NCAAF computer picks use expert data to review odds and generate moneyline, spread, and total bets for every game throughout the season.
Listed in the table are unit details, which show the total profit or loss based on a bettor placing $100 on each of the last 100 college football picks made by the computer, on both the opening and closing lines.
Take advantage of these free college football picks before you wager any money at sportsbooks.
As human beings, we're bound to be biased with our picks and potentially fall into the trap of swinging with the public. With advanced stats growing in popularity and getting harder to track, college football computer predictions are starting to become more relied on.
Betting on a moneyline simply means you're picking the outright winner of the game, regardless of the scoring margin or total. If the team you choose wins, then your bet hits. Here's what it will look like over at your favorite sportsbook:
| Team | Moneyline |
|---|---|
| Alabama Crimson Tide | -120 |
| Missouri Tigers | +150 |
In this case, Alabama is favored to win the game as its moneyline odds have a minus sign (-) in front of the number. The favorites will have the minus sign present, and the underdogs will have a plus sign (+). Easy, right?
Betting the spread gives your bet a bit more breathing room. Here, you don't need to sweat out a team to win. Instead, you can wager on the point differential on the scoreboard.
Betting on the spread is a good idea when the moneyline profits aren't enticing. There's no point betting on Alabama as a heavy -1500 favorite over Missouri. But taking Missouri to keep the scoring margin within a certain frame will get you more bang for your buck.
| Team | Spread |
|---|---|
| Alabama Crimson Tide | -24.5 (-105) |
| Missouri Tigers | +24.5 (-115) |
In this example, the Tide are favored to dominate their game against Missouri, outperforming them by at least 24.5 points.
If Alabama does win by more than 25 points, that would mean the Crimson Tide covered the spread. But if the Tide won by just 20 points, then that would mean the Tigers "covered the spread" instead.
If you think the outcome of a game could flip in either direction, then an Over/Under is the way to go. This bet relies on the combined score from both teams and whether it goes Over or Under the point total listed at sportsbooks. Then, who cares who wins?
| Team | Total |
|---|---|
| Alabama Crimson Tide | O 52.5 (-110) |
| Missouri Tigers | U 52.5 (-110) |
In this example, oddsmakers have set the total score for the game at 52.5 points. The choice is now up to you. If you think the Tide and Tigers will score a combined total of more than 52.5 points, 53 points or more, then pick the Over. If you're thinking otherwise, then bet the Under, and the bet will hit if they score fewer than 52.5 points.
If the set number was a whole number like 52 points and the two teams score exactly that amount, then it is considered a push and you'd get your money back.
Use these additional college football betting resources to compare markets, find more picks, and research specific betting angles before placing a wager.
If you're ready to bet on college football picks, you first need to find the right sportsbook. Our betting sites guide offers secure banking, the best odds, bonuses, and reliable customer service options for you.
More than a dozen Covers college football picks are released throughout the week during the season, covering all the biggest games and matchups.
Covers provides free NCAA football picks covering many markets, including point spreads, totals, moneylines, player props, and more.