Washington vs Chicago Picks & Props
WAS vs CHW Picks
MLB PicksEV Model Rating
Star rating: 3 out of 5
The leading projection system (THE BAT X) projects Colson Montgomery in the 20th percentile when assessing his batting average ability.. Colson Montgomery is penciled in 6th in the lineup in this game, which would be a downgrade from his 75% rate of hitting in the top-half of the batting order this year.. Cold weather is strongly correlated with less offense (and more whiffs), and the weather forecast calls for the coldest weather of all games today at 50°.. Batting from the same side that Foster Griffin throws from, Colson Montgomery will be at a disadvantage in today's matchup.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 3 out of 5
Luis Garcia Jr. has primarily hit in the top-half of the batting order this year (82% of the time), but he is projected to bat 8th on the lineup card in this game.. Cold weather is strongly correlated with less offense (and more whiffs), and the weather forecast calls for the coldest weather of all games today at 50°.. Playing on the road typically reduces hitter metrics in all categories due to the lack of home field advantage, which ought to be the case for Luis Garcia Jr. in today's matchup.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 3 out of 5
Cold weather is strongly correlated with less offense (and more whiffs), and the weather forecast calls for the coldest weather of all games today at 50°.. Batting from the same side that Foster Griffin throws from, Munetaka Murakami will be in a tough position in today's matchup.. The leading projection system (THE BAT X) estimates Munetaka Murakami's true offensive skill to be a .354, indicating that he has experienced some positive variance this year given the .065 discrepancy between that figure and his actual .419 wOBA.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
The leading projection system (THE BAT X) projects CJ Abrams in the 80th percentile when estimating his overall offensive ability.. CJ Abrams is projected to hit 4th in the lineup today.. The leading projection system (THE BAT) projects Guaranteed Rate Field as the 5th-best ballpark in baseball for boosting offensive stats to LHB.. Batting from the opposite that Bryan Hudson throws from, CJ Abrams will have an edge in today's game.. CJ Abrams will probably have the upper hand against every reliever from start to finish, since the bullpen of the Chicago White Sox has just 1 same-handed RP.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
The leading projection system (THE BAT X) projects Miguel Vargas in the 93rd percentile when assessing his overall offensive talent.. Miguel Vargas is projected to hit 2nd in the lineup in this matchup.. The #5 venue in MLB for boosting offensive stats to right-handed batters, per the leading projection system (THE BAT), is Guaranteed Rate Field.. HRs are generally more common at parks with shallow fences, and Guaranteed Rate Field has the 3rd-shallowest among all parks.. Miguel Vargas will have the handedness advantage over Foster Griffin today.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
The leading projection system (THE BAT X) projects Everson Pereira in the 83rd percentile when it comes to his home run skill.. Everson Pereira is projected to bat 4th in the lineup today.. The #5 venue in MLB for boosting offensive stats to right-handed batters, per the leading projection system (THE BAT), is Guaranteed Rate Field.. HRs are generally more common at parks with shallow fences, and Guaranteed Rate Field has the 3rd-shallowest among all parks.. Everson Pereira will have the benefit of the platoon advantage against Foster Griffin today.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 4 out of 5
Munetaka Murakami projects as the 2nd-best home run batter in the game, via the leading projection system (THE BAT X).. Munetaka Murakami is projected to bat 3rd on the lineup card in this game.. The leading projection system (THE BAT) projects Guaranteed Rate Field as the 5th-best ballpark in baseball for boosting offensive stats to LHB.. Munetaka Murakami pulls many of his flyballs (34.7% — 81st percentile) and will have a big advantage hitting them towards baseball's 9th-shallowest RF fences today.. Munetaka Murakami will benefit from the home field advantage in today's matchup, which figures to boost all of his stats.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 3 out of 5
When estimating his BABIP talent, James Wood is projected as the best hitter in the game by the leading projection system (THE BAT X).. James Wood is projected to bat 1st in the lineup in today's game.. The leading projection system (THE BAT) projects Guaranteed Rate Field as the 5th-best ballpark in baseball for boosting offensive stats to LHB.. Batting from the opposite that Bryan Hudson throws from, James Wood will have an advantage in today's matchup.. James Wood is apt to have an edge against every reliever for the whole game, since the bullpen of the Chicago White Sox only has 1 same-handed RP.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 3 out of 5
Daylen Lile's batting average ability is projected to be in the 93rd percentile according to the leading projection system (THE BAT X).. Daylen Lile is projected to bat 2nd in the lineup in this matchup.. The leading projection system (THE BAT) projects Guaranteed Rate Field as the 5th-best ballpark in baseball for boosting offensive stats to LHB.. HRs are generally more common at parks with shallow fences, and Guaranteed Rate Field has the 3rd-shallowest among all parks.. Hitting from the opposite that Bryan Hudson throws from, Daylen Lile will have an advantage today.
EV Model Rating
Star rating: 3 out of 5
Luis Garcia Jr.'s batting average skill is projected to be in the 92nd percentile according to the leading projection system (THE BAT X).. The leading projection system (THE BAT) projects Guaranteed Rate Field as the 5th-best ballpark in baseball for boosting offensive stats to LHB.. HRs are generally more common at parks with shallow fences, and Guaranteed Rate Field has the 3rd-shallowest among all parks.. Luis Garcia Jr. will have the handedness advantage over Bryan Hudson in today's matchup.. The Chicago White Sox have just 1 same-handed RP in their bullpen, so Luis Garcia Jr. has a strong chance of holding the platoon advantage against every reliever all game.
WAS vs CHW Consensus Picks
WAS vs CHW Props
| GAME & PLAYER PROPS | PROJECTIONS | ANALYSIS | BEST ODDS | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MONEYLINE
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL
|
|||||||
|
SPREAD
WAS
+1.5 spread
-0.19
PROJECTION
-1.7
DIFFERENCE
4.65%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
C. Montgomery
(SS)
0.5 Total Hits
0.72
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
11.27%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
L. Garcia Jr.
(2B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.69
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
9.17%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
M. Murakami
(3B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.66
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
8.59%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
J. Wood
(LF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.91
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
3.71%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
N. Nunez
(SS)
0.5 Total Hits
0.75
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
3.68%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
J. Vivas
(2B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.69
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
2.69%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
C. Abrams
(SS)
0.5 Total Hits
0.86
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
1.46%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
D. Lile
(RF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.98
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
0.88%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
E. Quero
(C)
0.5 Total Hits
0.93
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
0.44%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
D. Hill
(CF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.68
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
-0.16%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
L. Acuna
(2B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.78
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
-0.84%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
M. Vargas
(3B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.93
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
-0.99%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
C. Meidroth
(SS)
0.5 Total Hits
1.00
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-2.54%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
E. Pereira
(CF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.78
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
-3.93%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
B. House
(3B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.96
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-5.4%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HITS
J. Young
(CF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.89
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
-6.86%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
J. Wood
(LF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.73
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
6.66%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
B. House
(3B)
1.5 Total Bases
0.96
PROJECTION
-0.5
DIFFERENCE
6.39%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
M. Vargas
(3B)
1.5 Total Bases
1.62
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
6.14%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
C. Abrams
(SS)
1.5 Total Bases
1.52
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
5.26%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
D. Lile
(RF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.53
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
1.1%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
C. Meidroth
(SS)
1.5 Total Bases
1.27
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
-2.49%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
C. Montgomery
(SS)
1.5 Total Bases
1.30
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
-5.48%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
E. Quero
(C)
1.5 Total Bases
1.26
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
-6.56%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
J. Vivas
(2B)
1.5 Total Bases
1.02
PROJECTION
-0.5
DIFFERENCE
-17.74%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
J. Young
(CF)
1.5 Total Bases
0.89
PROJECTION
-0.6
DIFFERENCE
-30%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
L. Acuna
(2B)
1.5 Total Bases
0.78
PROJECTION
-0.7
DIFFERENCE
-30%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
E. Pereira
(CF)
1.5 Total Bases
0.78
PROJECTION
-0.7
DIFFERENCE
-30%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
L. Garcia Jr.
(2B)
1.5 Total Bases
0.78
PROJECTION
-0.7
DIFFERENCE
-30%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
N. Nunez
(SS)
1.5 Total Bases
0.75
PROJECTION
-0.7
DIFFERENCE
-30%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
D. Hill
(CF)
1.5 Total Bases
0.68
PROJECTION
-0.8
DIFFERENCE
-30%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
T. Murray
(2B)
1.5 Total Bases
0.61
PROJECTION
-0.9
DIFFERENCE
-30%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL BASES
M. Murakami
(3B)
1.5 Total Bases
0.66
PROJECTION
-0.8
DIFFERENCE
-30%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
C. Abrams
(SS)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.14
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-1.93%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
L. Garcia Jr.
(2B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.12
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-9.2%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
J. Wood
(LF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.20
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-12.14%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
M. Vargas
(3B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.15
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-16.01%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
M. Murakami
(3B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.20
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-22.7%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
B. House
(3B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.10
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-22.76%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
E. Pereira
(CF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.11
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-25.55%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
C. Montgomery
(SS)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.14
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-26.22%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
D. Lile
(RF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.08
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-30%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
J. Vivas
(2B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.05
PROJECTION
-0.5
DIFFERENCE
-30%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
D. Hill
(CF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.06
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-30%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
N. Nunez
(SS)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.05
PROJECTION
-0.5
DIFFERENCE
-30%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
T. Murray
(2B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.05
PROJECTION
-0.5
DIFFERENCE
-30%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
E. Quero
(C)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.05
PROJECTION
-0.5
DIFFERENCE
-30%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
C. Meidroth
(SS)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.03
PROJECTION
-0.5
DIFFERENCE
-30%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
L. Acuna
(2B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.03
PROJECTION
-0.5
DIFFERENCE
-30%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL HOME RUNS
J. Young
(CF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.02
PROJECTION
-0.5
DIFFERENCE
-30%
EV
|
|||||||
|
STRIKEOUTS THROWN
B. Hudson
(RP)
1.5 Strikeouts Thrown
0.96
PROJECTION
-0.5
DIFFERENCE
5.2%
EV
|
|||||||
|
STRIKEOUTS THROWN
F. Griffin
(SP)
4.5 Strikeouts Thrown
5.05
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-4.07%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
C. Abrams
(SS)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.64
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
16.27%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
M. Vargas
(3B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.59
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
14.71%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
E. Pereira
(CF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.52
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
14.15%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
M. Murakami
(3B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.68
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
13.91%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
J. Wood
(LF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.60
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
11.73%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
D. Lile
(RF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.50
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
10.86%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
L. Garcia Jr.
(2B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.47
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
10.67%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
C. Montgomery
(SS)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.53
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
8.66%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
E. Quero
(C)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.42
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
4.48%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
J. Vivas
(2B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.35
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
-1.43%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
J. Young
(CF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.34
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
-2.78%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
L. Acuna
(2B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.28
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
-4.12%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
D. Hill
(CF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.32
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
-6.16%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
T. Murray
(2B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.28
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
-6.87%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
N. Nunez
(SS)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.35
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
-7.39%
EV
|
|||||||
|
TOTAL RBIS
C. Meidroth
(SS)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.32
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
-7.65%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
J. Wood
(LF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.37
PROJECTION
+0.9
DIFFERENCE
12.89%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
M. Vargas
(3B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.19
PROJECTION
+0.7
DIFFERENCE
11.05%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
B. House
(3B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.04
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
10.93%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
M. Murakami
(3B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.99
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
10.5%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
C. Abrams
(SS)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.08
PROJECTION
+0.6
DIFFERENCE
10.27%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
E. Pereira
(CF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.77
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
8.24%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
D. Lile
(RF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.06
PROJECTION
+0.6
DIFFERENCE
7.31%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
L. Garcia Jr.
(2B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.71
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
1.25%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
C. Meidroth
(SS)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.85
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
0.74%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
E. Quero
(C)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.77
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
0.46%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
C. Montgomery
(SS)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.76
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
0.4%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
J. Young
(CF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.58
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
-2.5%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
L. Acuna
(2B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.38
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
-7.39%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
J. Vivas
(2B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.41
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
-7.71%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
D. Hill
(CF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.34
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
-7.9%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
N. Nunez
(SS)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.48
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
-8.51%
EV
|
|||||||
|
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
T. Murray
(2B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.16
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-18.09%
EV
|
|||||||
- Proj. Diff: Low to High
- Proj. Diff: High to Low
- Proj. Rating: Low to High
- Proj. Rating: High to Low
- +EV: Low to High
- +EV: High to Low
MONEYLINE
TOTAL
SPREAD
WAS
+1.5 spread
-0.19
PROJECTION
-1.7
DIFFERENCE
4.65%
EV
TOTAL HITS
C. Montgomery
(SS)
0.5 Total Hits
0.72
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
11.27%
EV
TOTAL HITS
L. Garcia Jr.
(2B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.69
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
9.17%
EV
TOTAL HITS
M. Murakami
(3B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.66
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
8.59%
EV
TOTAL HITS
J. Wood
(LF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.91
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
3.71%
EV
TOTAL HITS
N. Nunez
(SS)
0.5 Total Hits
0.75
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
3.68%
EV
TOTAL HITS
J. Vivas
(2B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.69
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
2.69%
EV
TOTAL HITS
C. Abrams
(SS)
0.5 Total Hits
0.86
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
1.46%
EV
TOTAL HITS
D. Lile
(RF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.98
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
0.88%
EV
TOTAL HITS
E. Quero
(C)
0.5 Total Hits
0.93
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
0.44%
EV
TOTAL HITS
D. Hill
(CF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.68
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
-0.16%
EV
TOTAL HITS
L. Acuna
(2B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.78
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
-0.84%
EV
TOTAL HITS
M. Vargas
(3B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.93
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
-0.99%
EV
TOTAL HITS
C. Meidroth
(SS)
0.5 Total Hits
1.00
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-2.54%
EV
TOTAL HITS
E. Pereira
(CF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.78
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
-3.93%
EV
TOTAL HITS
B. House
(3B)
0.5 Total Hits
0.96
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-5.4%
EV
TOTAL HITS
J. Young
(CF)
0.5 Total Hits
0.89
PROJECTION
+0.4
DIFFERENCE
-6.86%
EV
TOTAL BASES
J. Wood
(LF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.73
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
6.66%
EV
TOTAL BASES
B. House
(3B)
1.5 Total Bases
0.96
PROJECTION
-0.5
DIFFERENCE
6.39%
EV
TOTAL BASES
M. Vargas
(3B)
1.5 Total Bases
1.62
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
6.14%
EV
TOTAL BASES
C. Abrams
(SS)
1.5 Total Bases
1.52
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
5.26%
EV
TOTAL BASES
D. Lile
(RF)
1.5 Total Bases
1.53
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
1.1%
EV
TOTAL BASES
C. Meidroth
(SS)
1.5 Total Bases
1.27
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
-2.49%
EV
TOTAL BASES
C. Montgomery
(SS)
1.5 Total Bases
1.30
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
-5.48%
EV
TOTAL BASES
E. Quero
(C)
1.5 Total Bases
1.26
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
-6.56%
EV
TOTAL BASES
J. Vivas
(2B)
1.5 Total Bases
1.02
PROJECTION
-0.5
DIFFERENCE
-17.74%
EV
TOTAL BASES
J. Young
(CF)
1.5 Total Bases
0.89
PROJECTION
-0.6
DIFFERENCE
-30%
EV
TOTAL BASES
L. Acuna
(2B)
1.5 Total Bases
0.78
PROJECTION
-0.7
DIFFERENCE
-30%
EV
TOTAL BASES
E. Pereira
(CF)
1.5 Total Bases
0.78
PROJECTION
-0.7
DIFFERENCE
-30%
EV
TOTAL BASES
L. Garcia Jr.
(2B)
1.5 Total Bases
0.78
PROJECTION
-0.7
DIFFERENCE
-30%
EV
TOTAL BASES
N. Nunez
(SS)
1.5 Total Bases
0.75
PROJECTION
-0.7
DIFFERENCE
-30%
EV
TOTAL BASES
D. Hill
(CF)
1.5 Total Bases
0.68
PROJECTION
-0.8
DIFFERENCE
-30%
EV
TOTAL BASES
T. Murray
(2B)
1.5 Total Bases
0.61
PROJECTION
-0.9
DIFFERENCE
-30%
EV
TOTAL BASES
M. Murakami
(3B)
1.5 Total Bases
0.66
PROJECTION
-0.8
DIFFERENCE
-30%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
C. Abrams
(SS)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.14
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-1.93%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
L. Garcia Jr.
(2B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.12
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-9.2%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
J. Wood
(LF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.20
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-12.14%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
M. Vargas
(3B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.15
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-16.01%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
M. Murakami
(3B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.20
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-22.7%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
B. House
(3B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.10
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-22.76%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
E. Pereira
(CF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.11
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-25.55%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
C. Montgomery
(SS)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.14
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-26.22%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
D. Lile
(RF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.08
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-30%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
J. Vivas
(2B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.05
PROJECTION
-0.5
DIFFERENCE
-30%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
D. Hill
(CF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.06
PROJECTION
-0.4
DIFFERENCE
-30%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
N. Nunez
(SS)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.05
PROJECTION
-0.5
DIFFERENCE
-30%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
T. Murray
(2B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.05
PROJECTION
-0.5
DIFFERENCE
-30%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
E. Quero
(C)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.05
PROJECTION
-0.5
DIFFERENCE
-30%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
C. Meidroth
(SS)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.03
PROJECTION
-0.5
DIFFERENCE
-30%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
L. Acuna
(2B)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.03
PROJECTION
-0.5
DIFFERENCE
-30%
EV
TOTAL HOME RUNS
J. Young
(CF)
0.5 Total Home Runs
0.02
PROJECTION
-0.5
DIFFERENCE
-30%
EV
STRIKEOUTS THROWN
B. Hudson
(RP)
1.5 Strikeouts Thrown
0.96
PROJECTION
-0.5
DIFFERENCE
5.2%
EV
STRIKEOUTS THROWN
F. Griffin
(SP)
4.5 Strikeouts Thrown
5.05
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
-4.07%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
C. Abrams
(SS)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.64
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
16.27%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
M. Vargas
(3B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.59
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
14.71%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
E. Pereira
(CF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.52
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
14.15%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
M. Murakami
(3B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.68
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
13.91%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
J. Wood
(LF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.60
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
11.73%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
D. Lile
(RF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.50
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
10.86%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
L. Garcia Jr.
(2B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.47
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
10.67%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
C. Montgomery
(SS)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.53
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
8.66%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
E. Quero
(C)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.42
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
4.48%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
J. Vivas
(2B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.35
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
-1.43%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
J. Young
(CF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.34
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
-2.78%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
L. Acuna
(2B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.28
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
-4.12%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
D. Hill
(CF)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.32
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
-6.16%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
T. Murray
(2B)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.28
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
-6.87%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
N. Nunez
(SS)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.35
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
-7.39%
EV
TOTAL RBIS
C. Meidroth
(SS)
0.5 Total RBIs
0.32
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
-7.65%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
J. Wood
(LF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.37
PROJECTION
+0.9
DIFFERENCE
12.89%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
M. Vargas
(3B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.19
PROJECTION
+0.7
DIFFERENCE
11.05%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
B. House
(3B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.04
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
10.93%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
M. Murakami
(3B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.99
PROJECTION
+0.5
DIFFERENCE
10.5%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
C. Abrams
(SS)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.08
PROJECTION
+0.6
DIFFERENCE
10.27%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
E. Pereira
(CF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.77
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
8.24%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
D. Lile
(RF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
2.06
PROJECTION
+0.6
DIFFERENCE
7.31%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
L. Garcia Jr.
(2B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.71
PROJECTION
+0.2
DIFFERENCE
1.25%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
C. Meidroth
(SS)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.85
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
0.74%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
E. Quero
(C)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.77
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
0.46%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
C. Montgomery
(SS)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.76
PROJECTION
+0.3
DIFFERENCE
0.4%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
J. Young
(CF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.58
PROJECTION
+0.1
DIFFERENCE
-2.5%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
L. Acuna
(2B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.38
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
-7.39%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
J. Vivas
(2B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.41
PROJECTION
-0.1
DIFFERENCE
-7.71%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
D. Hill
(CF)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.34
PROJECTION
-0.2
DIFFERENCE
-7.9%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
N. Nunez
(SS)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.48
PROJECTION
0.0
DIFFERENCE
-8.51%
EV
HITS+RUNS+RBIS
T. Murray
(2B)
1.5 Hits+Runs+RBIs
1.16
PROJECTION
-0.3
DIFFERENCE
-18.09%
EV
WAS vs CHW Trends
Check back shortly to see trends for this matchup
WAS vs CHW Top User Picks
Washington Team Leaders
| Rank | Leader | L10 | Units |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | SamGiancano | 6-4-0 | +10435 |
| 2 | StevenB606 | 6-3-1 | +9840 |
| 3 | Genghis518 | 6-3-1 | +8150 |
| 4 | TheChamp1 | 5-5-0 | +7510 |
| 5 | Acurapartsman | 8-2-0 | +7170 |
| 6 | hogster | 7-3-0 | +7050 |
| 7 | Jayahaa | 6-4-0 | +6345 |
| 8 | sniperswife | 7-3-0 | +6300 |
| 9 | hilldog23 | 5-5-0 | +6195 |
| 10 | billypg | 6-3-1 | +6120 |
| All Nationals Money Leaders | |||
Chi. White Sox Team Leaders
| Rank | Leader | L10 | Units |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | OMREBEL02 | 8-2-0 | +8445 |
| 2 | checkers | 7-3-0 | +6665 |
| 3 | bamabilly | 6-4-0 | +6655 |
| 4 | hogster | 8-2-0 | +6105 |
| 5 | cfox69 | 7-3-0 | +5770 |
| 6 | SPERRL | 8-2-0 | +5750 |
| 7 | mindsusan12 | 8-2-0 | +5675 |
| 8 | RAZORAZE283 | 7-3-0 | +5670 |
| 9 | CastlemontDB91 | 7-3-0 | +5580 |
| 10 | umikumakolu13 | 6-4-0 | +5370 |
| All White Sox Money Leaders | |||