March Madness Picks Against the Spread for Thursday, March 19

JD Yonke - Betting Analyst at Covers.com
JD Yonke • Betting Analyst 7+ years betting experience
Updated: Mar 18, 2026 , 12:05 PM ET • 4 min read

Our March Madness against the spread picks for Thursday, March 19, pick BYU against Texas, Ohio State over TCU, and more.

AJ Dybantsa BYU Cougars Big 12 college basketball
Photo By - Reuters Connect. AJ Dybantsa does a broadcast interview after a win over Texas Tech.

Merry Christmas, college hoops fans — the 2026 NCAA Tournament arrives with a full slate of games on Thursday.

From the opening tip of TCU vs. Ohio State to the nightcap of Idaho vs. Houston, there are 16 games of March Madness on opening day that provide betting opportunities. 

Here are my March Madness picks against the spread for each one of Thursday’s games.

March Madness picks against the spread for Thursday, March 19

Matchup Pick
TCU TCU vs Ohio State Ohio State Ohio State (-2.5)
Troy Troy vs Nebraska Nebraska Nebraska (-13)
South Florida South Florida vs Louisvilla Louisville South Florida (+5)
Missouri High Point vs Wisconsin Wisconsin Wisconsin (-10)
Missouri Siena vs Duke Duke Missouri (+28.5)
Missouri McNeese State vs Vanderbilt Vanderbilt Vanderbilt (-11.5)
Missouri North Dakota State vs Michigan State Michigan State Missouri (+16.5)
Hawaii Hawaii vs Arkansas Arkansas Arkansas (-15)
Missouri VCU vs UNC North Carolina UNC (-2.5)
Missouri Howard vs Michigan Michigan Michigan (-31)
Texas Texas vs BYU BYU BYU (-2.5)
Texas A&M Texas A&M vs Saint Mary's Saint Mary's Saint Mary's (-3)
Missouri Penn vs Illinois Illinois Missouri (+24.5)
Missouri Saint Louis vs Georgia Georgia Georgia (-2)
Missouri Kennesaw State vs Gonzaga Gonzaga Gonzaga (-20.5)
Missouri Idaho vs Houston Houston Missouri (+23.5)

Lines courtesy of bet365.

Enjoying Covers content? Add us as a preferred source on your Google account Add as a preferred source on Google

Expert March Madness Round 1 picks for Thursday

No. 9 TCU vs No. 8 Ohio State (-2.5): Ohio State Ohio State -2.5

Ohio State has been the better team lately, ranking 36 spots higher in BartTorvik since the start of February. The Buckeyes have the much more accomplished offense, ranking 16th in effective field goal percentage in that span (TCU 304th). It helps to have two go-to guards (Bruce Thornton and John Mobley Jr.) in March.

No. 13 Troy vs No. 4 Nebraska (-13): Nebraska Nebraska -13

Nebraska is hungry for its first-ever March Madness victory and will give a strong showing against a very beatable opponent. The Cornhuskers are a well-coached team under Fred Hoiberg and rank within the Top 15 at KenPom. Troy simply isn’t very good at anything in particular and had the nation’s 226th most-difficult schedule (yawn). 

No. 11 South Florida vs No. 6 Louisville (-5): South Florida South Florida +5

There are glaring issues with Louisville, which went 3-7 in Quad-1 games on the road and ranks 357th in Haslametrics’ Away From Home grade and 363rd in Paper Tiger Factor. USF is one of the hottest teams in the country, carrying an 11-game win streak (8-3 ATS in that span) into the Big Dance.

No. 12 High Point vs No. 5 Wisconsin: Wisconsin Wisconsin -10

High Point will be a trendy pick given its 14-game winning streak, but keep in mind that the Panthers didn’t play a single team ranked within KenPom’s Top 150 during that stretch and have the No. 341 strength of schedule. Flynn Clayman’s squad forces 16.4 turnovers per game (third nationally), but Wisconsin has great guard play, takes care of the ball (8.9 turnovers per game, ninth nationally), and is red hot (No. 9 on BartTorvik since February 1).

No. 16 Siena vs No. 1 Duke: Missouri Siena +28.5

Duke will likely be without two starters (Caleb Foster and Patrick Ngongba, combined +15.5 BPR) and is simply in survive-and-advance mode. Siena is 6-2 ATS in its last eight games and will slow down the pace (319th in adjusted tempo) to limit possessions, making it difficult to find a margin.

No. 12 McNeese State vs No. 5 Vanderbilt: Vanderbilt Vanderbilt -11.5

McNeese has covered the spread just seven times in 18 games outside of Lake Charles and checks in at 334th in Away From Home grade. The Cowboys lost by 12+ to both Santa Clara (67-79) and Michigan (71-112) in their only two games against March Madness teams.


March Madness betting tools


No. 14 North Dakota State vs No. 3 Michigan State: Missouri North Dakota State +16.5

This will be a slugfest as both teams play at a slow tempo, crash the boards, and have a defense-first identity. The Bison force opponents outside the arc (364th in 3-point rate over the last month), and that’s not Sparty’s strong suit (7.7 made threes per game). Tom Izzo’s squad doesn’t play well outside of East Lansing (290th in Away From Home grade) and is in the midst of a cold stretch (220th in Momentum).

No. 13 Hawaii vs No. 5 Arkansas: Arkansas Arkansas -15

Arkansas has the lowest turnover rate in the country (10.7%), whereas Hawaii apparently loves to give the ball away, ranking 318th with a 16.5% turnover rate. The Rainbow Warriors aren’t efficient on offense (212th in adjusted efficiency), went 0-4 in Quad-2 games, and faced the No. 230 strength of schedule.

No. 11 VCU vs No. 6 North Carolina: UNC North Carolina -2.5

VCU has pretty metrics, but the Rams are 2-4 in Quad-1 games and rely on getting to the line on offense. That makes this a tough matchup as UNC is the third-best team at avoiding fouls.

No. 16 Howard vs No. 1 Michigan: Michigan Michigan -31

This one will attract a lot of Howard attention as the Bison are on a remarkable 12-1 ATS run, whereas Michigan is 0-5 ATS since the L.J. Cason injury. Here’s the thing — all that does is create value on an elite Wolverines squad against a 16 seed that faced the No. 364 strength of schedule and was blown out by Duke (56-93), Missouri (67-88), and even Northwestern (60-80) in its only three games against Power Conference opponents.

No. 11 Texas vs No. 6 BYU: BYU BYU -2.5

BYU has the best player in this tournament (A.J. Dybansta) — and also the second best player in this game (Robert Wright) — which has to be enough to win at least one game, right? The Cougars have kept chugging along offensively since the Richie Saunders injury and just need to find enough stops against a Texas team that similarly plays little defense.

No. 10 Texas A&M vs No. 7 Saint Mary's: Saint Mary's Saint Mary's -3

If Saint Mary’s can control the pace (298th in adjusted tempo to A&M’s 29th) at all, it should win. The Gaels have the superior metrics everywhere you look and face a free-falling A&M squad that ranks 344th in Momentum and 322nd in Paper Tiger Factor.

No. 14 Penn vs No. 3 Illinois: Missouri Penn +24.5

Penn has been an undervalued team in the market, covering 16 of its last 18 games. The Quakers are consistent, play well away from home, and have momentum. The Ivy League has shown well in the Round of 64 lately.

No. 9 Saint Louis vs No. 8 Georgia: Georgia Georgia -2

I’m siding with Georgia in the Battle of Epic Pace due to Saint Louis’ poor form and inability to travel well. The Billikens are 0-4 ATS in their last four and rank outside BartTorvik’s Top 100 since February 1. They’re 4-9-1 ATS outside of Chaifetz Arena and rank a ghastly 364th in Away From Home grade.

No. 9 Kennesaw State vs No. 3 Gonzaga: Gonzaga Gonzaga -20.5

Kennesaw doesn’t do much of anything well, whereas Gonzaga ranks 10th in KenPom and has an elite defense (ninth in adjusted efficiency). The Owls are reliant on getting to the rim offensively, which is a point of no entry against Graham Ike & Co.

No. 15 Idaho vs No. 2 Houston: Missouri Idaho +23.5

Idaho’s metrics are better than you might expect from a No. 15 seed. The Vandals have a Top-75 defense over the last month and rank third in defensive rebounding — a necessary strength from any mid-major against a Houston team whose MO is to crash the offensive glass.

Odds are correct at the time of publishing and are subject to change.
Not intended for use in MA.
Affiliate Disclosure: Our team of experts has thoroughly researched and handpicked each product that appears on our website. We may receive compensation if you sign up through our links.

Pages related to this topic

JD Yonke
Betting Analyst

JD is a diehard college football fan with five years of experience writing betting and fantasy content for publications such as SportsGrid, Fantasy Points, Fantrax, and Devy Watch. An avid reader, he uses his inclination to look at things with an exhausting and in-depth, analytic viewpoint combined with a love for statistics and metrics to form a well-rounded handicapping approach.

e's an integral member of the niche (but growing!) college fantasy football community, twice traveling to Canton, OH for the Fantasy Football Expo as a member of the CFF King's Classic drafting squad. His specialization in college football DFS and prop betting taught him that there are exploitable markets to be found and that narrowing your focus is integral to being a profitable bettor.

A lifelong Californian who grew up playing baseball, basketball, football, and lacrosse, he's glad to share a passionate love for sports with this wonderful community.

Popular Content

Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo