Colorado Lawmakers Approve Additional Sports Betting Protections

Geoff Zochodne - Sports Betting Journalist at Covers.com
Geoff Zochodne • Senior News Analyst 15+ years betting experience
Updated: May 14, 2026 , 02:15 PM ET • 3 min read

Senate Bill 131 was passed by the Colorado legislature this week, legislation that would put restrictions on the frequency and methods of deposit for state sports bettors.

Photo By - Reuters Connect. General view of the starting line up cards as Atlanta Braves and Colorado Rockies fans enter before the game at Coors Field. Ron Chenoy-Imagn Images

Some sports bettors in the Centennial State may soon have to tweak their wagering ways, as legislation passed on Wednesday by Colorado lawmakers will put several additional consumer protections in place.

Covers Icon
Key Takeaways
  • Colorado lawmakers approved a bill adding new sports betting protections, including a ban on credit card deposits and a limit of six deposits per day.
  • The legislation would also stop sportsbooks from sending promotional texts or push notifications and restrict ads aimed at underage bettors.
  • Supporters say the bill strengthens consumer protections, which could slightly reduce state tax revenue from sports betting.

Senate Bill 131 was approved by the Colorado State Senate on a 20-15 vote. 

The legislation, which now heads to Democratic Gov. Jared Polis’ desk for a possible signature, would prohibit Colorado's online sports betting licensees from accepting more than six separate deposits from a player in a day. Credit card deposits would be banned completely by the bill.

It would also bar online sportsbook operators from sending push notifications or text messages to try to get bettors to wager or deposit more. Bookmakers and their marketing affiliates would be prohibited from targeting underage bettors with their advertising efforts as well.

Round of applause

S.B. 131 underwent some tweaking during its legislative passage, but backers (such as the Campaign for Fairer Gambling) say its protections are needed and welcome. 

“We applaud the Senate and the leadership of bill sponsors Sens. Matt Ball and Byron Pelton and Reps. Dan Woog and Steven Woodrow for championing this precedent-setting legislation,” responsible gambling consultant Brianne Doura-Schawohl said in a statement. “It is heartening to see the Colorado legislature prioritize the well-being of its constituents with these revolutionary consumer protections. We strongly urge Gov. Jared Polis to sign this bill, which will establish Colorado as a national leader in sports betting protections.”

Whether Polis will sign the bill remains to be seen. Nevertheless, the efforts of Colorado lawmakers are another sign of the ongoing interest from state lawmakers in tinkering with and tightening restrictions on online sportsbook operators. 

That interest comes amid the rise of prediction markets and their offering of sports-related event contracts for trading. The federally regulated exchanges continue to try to skirt state-level regulation and taxation, which has put them in the crosshairs of state gambling regulators and lawmakers seeking to emphasize the consumer protections of their locally authorized gambling operators. 

Enjoying Covers content? Add us as a preferred source on your Google account Add as a preferred source on Google

Everybody's doing it

Colorado’s new restrictions would come with a small cost to the state. There would be a small tax revenue loss of approximately $2 million combined over the next three fiscal years, according to a May 7 fiscal note

That, however, is far less significant than what the originally envisioned bill would have done, which would have been to also ban all prop bets. The anti-prop provision was ultimately removed from the finished product. 

The tax revenue projected to be lost would be mostly due to the ban on credit card deposits. However, major online sportsbook operators like DraftKings and FanDuel have already been prohibiting credit card usage on their own, so the fiscal hit will be even more minimized. 

“Because the use of credit cards in sports betting is already banned for the majority of the sports betting market … the fiscal note assumes the ban will only result in less wagers by individuals with a gambling problem, which are assumed to account for 1% of wagers based on market research,” the May 7 report said. “The decrease in wagers is expected to proportionally decrease the amount of payments to players and to revenue collected by the Division of Gaming.”

Pages related to this topic

Geoff Zochodne, Covers Sports Betting Journalist
Senior News Analyst

Geoff has been writing about the legalization and regulation of sports betting in Canada and the United States for more than four years. His work has included coverage of launches in New York, Ohio, and Ontario, numerous court proceedings, and the decriminalization of single-game wagering by Canadian lawmakers. As an expert on the growing online gambling industry in North America, Geoff has appeared on and been cited by publications and networks such as Axios, TSN Radio, and VSiN. Prior to joining Covers, he spent 10 years as a journalist reporting on business and politics, including a stint at the Ontario legislature. More recently, Geoff’s work has focused on the pending launch of a competitive iGaming market in Alberta, the evolution of major companies within the gambling industry, and efforts by U.S. state regulators to rein in offshore activity and college player prop betting.

Popular Content

Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo