All Forums | Website Promotions

*** Start winning today @ http://www.veripicks.com ***

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 26114
Posts: 538
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 10104
Posted: #476
Quote Originally Posted by Lsports:

HOW DO YOU BET ALL THOSE PICKS??? IF YOU ARE A HUNDRED DOLLAR BETER YOU WOULD HAVE TO RISK 4100.00  DOLLARS TODAY ....LOL .... I THINK YOUR COMPUTER PICKING SYSTEM THINGY  IS ON TILT , IT IS CHASING LIKE A MOFO .. JUST LIKE A REAL LOSER .... GOOD LUCK WITH THAT ....PM  ME WHEN THE PRICE GOES TO 35.00 A MONTH



What's funnier is that you probably don't have a $4100 bankroll.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 10104
Posted: #477
-1055 for February.

2 picks which are losers because the line is listed at "0" were never changed to losers. They remain listed as winners (Wisconsin/Michigan OVER and Toledo ATS tonight).
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2010
Posts: 3786
Posted: #478

Guys, First of all, some of us are bigger than a $ 100 a game better and if you beleive in the system, you continue with it.

No one forces you to follow VP. If you are a hater than get a life and move on.

Books have good streaks and they have bad and VP says right on it that Money Management is key. 

VP, can you just explain to me why the system shot out so many picks yesterday?

 

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 10104
Posted: #479
If you would have faded Veripicks for the last 14 days, and played each game at $500/pick, you'd be sailing up 10K.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 114
Posted: #480

I dont think its ever a good idea to release 53 plays in one day ever..  I think the guys here are trying to win but a few observations.    If you go throught the lines on every game that they post you will notice that quite a few are dead numbers around their game time release.  I noticed on one particular Saturday that 3 o f the games were graded with lines long gone at gametime.  So instead of 10-8  you most likely would be 10-10.  

  I dont believe you can get access to the lines at the number posted.  this might shave a % or 2 of the record not sure..

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 10104
Posted: #481
Quote Originally Posted by ironman07:

I dont think its ever a good idea to release 53 plays in one day ever..  I think the guys here are trying to win but a few observations.    If you go throught the lines on every game that they post you will notice that quite a few are dead numbers around their game time release.  I noticed on one particular Saturday that 3 o f the games were graded with lines long gone at gametime.  So instead of 10-8  you most likely would be 10-10.  

  I dont believe you can get access to the lines at the number posted.  this might shave a % or 2 of the record not sure..



I made this observation early on, too.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 1581
Posted: #482
Ive been on both sides of he numbers. Ive won when VP has lost because i had a better number then he did. When your losing, you only see the negative.

Ride it out, lower your average bet. MONEY MANAGEMENT! itll get better.

He is smoking nba right now so ride it out. college will come around. the numbers dont lie. If you have been following since jan you are still up  a ton.

LONG TERM
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 1581
Posted: #483
did vp's bookie kidnap him?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 1581
Posted: #484
did vps bookie kidnap him?
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 10104
Posted: #485
Quote Originally Posted by bigrick2234:

did vps bookie kidnap him?

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 10104
Posted: #486
The system should have learned to start fading itself, since it "learns" each day.

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 10104
Posted: #487
Veripicks Last 14 Days:

-$2815 @ "to win $100" per pick.

2 winning days in those 14.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 1581
Posted: #488
Quote Originally Posted by SarahJPhilli:

Veripicks Last 14 Days:

-$2815 @ "to win $100" per pick.

2 winning days in those 14.



the sad thing is.... Even if you faded the system for those 14 days you would only be up 680$.... man bookies make a living off of people like this who bet 100 games a week
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 1581
Posted: #489
Quote Originally Posted by veripicks:

bigrick - the juice plays is the system getting ready for baseball. They are telling you they would be a play "usually" but the juice is too high. We don't want to play a ton of -300 -240 -175 games in baseball and show a huge winning percentage. I refuse to bet on anything higher than 130.

So if you enjoy laying BIG chalk then those are good plays - Veripicks will not be releasing them though.

We incorporated "fade" plays into our algorithm so it takes those into account when it's making the plays. We didn't like the idea of "fading" the system.



This was about 14 days ago. VP can you undo that update? weve had 2 weeks of getting our asses kicked. that update didnt accompish much of a STEP in the right direction....

prior to that update from what i rememeber.  we were liek  +1400 on the month. its been like a 5k swing since that update
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 10104
Posted: #490
Quote Originally Posted by bigrick2234:



the sad thing is.... Even if you faded the system for those 14 days you would only be up 680$.... man bookies make a living off of people like this who bet 100 games a week

If you faded the system on those 14 days, you would be UP around $2800. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 1581
Posted: #491
No sarah, Just like more times then none, you are wrong!!

:)

perhaps ill just spell it out for you to show you that you are wrong

last 14 days

102-119  46% -2815

If we flip flopped it (faded it)

we have 119-102 54% +680

Now let me go even further and explain it to you Since you are CLEARly not understanding. Lets just Assume that you are like almost every other better here and are placing bets with a conventional bookie or online site. we pay something called juice on loosing bets.

119x100= 11900
102x110=11220

11900-11220=680


Is this making sense to you? or are you just here to post negaive feedback like the douche that you are?


 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 1581
Posted: #492
Next time you should put a little thought into your comment before you hit enter


 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 306
Posted: #493

Quote Originally Posted by bigrick2234:

Next time you should put a little thought into your comment before you hit enter


 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 91
Posted: #494
sara come clean  What book do you work for ???   and whats your real name ???? you must think we are all assholes on here .. for us to think that we think you are a girl ... GUYS ITS PLAIN AND SIMPLE  SHE IS A HE ... AND HDE WORLS FOR ONE OF THE BOOKS ... HE IS KEEPING AN EYE IN THINGS AROUND HERE ,,, SARA DO ME A FAVOR AND BE OUT WITH YOUR GARBAGE...
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 10104
Posted: #495
Quote Originally Posted by bigrick2234:

No sarah, Just like more times then none, you are wrong!!

:)

perhaps ill just spell it out for you to show you that you are wrong

last 14 days

102-119  46% -2815

If we flip flopped it (faded it)

we have 119-102 54% +680

Now let me go even further and explain it to you Since you are CLEARly not understanding. Lets just Assume that you are like almost every other better here and are placing bets with a conventional bookie or online site. we pay something called juice on loosing bets.

119x100= 11900
102x110=11220

11900-11220=680


Is this making sense to you? or are you just here to post negaive feedback like the douche that you are?




Oh man, my mistake, I have to dumb it down for you:

1) You would not be -2800 (this counts as a "net gain" in my world, IE: not losing money).

2) If you want to count what you WOULD be up, then you are actually making it worse: you wouldn't have lost $2800, and you would have profited $600-$700, meaning you are +$3400 to +$3500 compared to playing Veripicks plays.

Good job though. 

Your avatar is 100% correct: you're an ass. 
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 10104
Posted: #496
Quote Originally Posted by Lsports:

sara come clean  What book do you work for ???   and whats your real name ???? you must think we are all assholes on here .. for us to think that we think you are a girl ... GUYS ITS PLAIN AND SIMPLE  SHE IS A HE ... AND HDE WORLS FOR ONE OF THE BOOKS ... HE IS KEEPING AN EYE IN THINGS AROUND HERE ,,, SARA DO ME A FAVOR AND BE OUT WITH YOUR GARBAGE...

LOL.

E-Mail Jason Logan at Covers and ask him if I'm a woman since I blog for this website, imbecile. 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 91
Posted: #497
LOL.

E-Mail Jason Logan at Covers and ask him if I'm a woman since I blog for this website, imbecile. 
 
 
 
 
oh yes i will do that right away ....!!!   (fart noise)
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 1581
Posted: #498
but sarah that Is NOTTTT what you said!

you said if you faded, you would be UP 2800. Which leads readers to believe that if you faded the system you would have 2800 in your account.

No need to dumb it down just make sure what youre trying to say and what youre acually saying are along the same lines.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 1581
Posted: #499
The Fact is 

If you did not play a single game at all you would be at 0$ which is +2800 on veripicks. but not quite UP $2800. Most people would assume that up 2800 is +2800.

Now going on what you said, IF you FADED veripicks you would have a positive gain of 680$.

so... please tell me how you are right and im wrong? because the math i learned in 3rd grade is telling me that im right... maybe your experience as a covers blogger and your math degree could point me in the right direction?
 
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 10104
Posted: #500
Quote Originally Posted by bigrick2234:

The Fact is 

If you did not play a single game at all you would be at 0$ which is +2800 on veripicks. but not quite UP $2800. Most people would assume that up 2800 is +2800.

Now going on what you said, IF you FADED veripicks you would have a positive gain of 680$.

so... please tell me how you are right and im wrong? because the math i learned in 3rd grade is telling me that im right... maybe your experience as a covers blogger and your math degree could point me in the right direction?

This isn't worth my time. You're the same guy who asked for a free day pass, you bum.

Veripicks: 1-1 so far today.
All Forums | Website Promotions
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gambling
Betting Sites
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
21+
Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
Covers is verified safe by:
Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.