All Forums | Website Promotions

Shhhhh, dont tell anyone. This is the official thread for...

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 116801
Posts: 895
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2012
Posts: 109
Posted: #426
Quote Originally Posted by puppetm716:

Quote Originally Posted by JEFFTHEHAT:

Today we have OAK (B) and (C) if necessary.

Good luck

[/Quote/]

The play was listed. You are chasing the team. If it loses the 1st game then play the 2nd.

Sorry you guys missed it.


In all fairness I took "Today we have OAK (B) and (C) if necessary." as (B) for the official play and (C) for people who bet them the prior day and missed Jeff's correction before game time.

But on the other hand, these plays are team chases. It's fairly obvious that you're chasing the team until you win, regardless of situations such as the DH yesterday.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 3843
Posted: #427
Quote Originally Posted by NoDayButToday:


Ya no sh*t...but when did anybody say chase 2 games in the same day "1 play a day system"..???

might want to be more clear about it next time.....

This is never been a 1 game a day system. Might have 5 or 6 games in a day. Rotation system in the other thread is the only 1 game a day thread! 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2014
Posts: 110
Posted: #428
"today we have Oak (B) and (C) if necessary" thought he was referring to the f*ck up post where some might have been on a "c" play to start yesterday instead of the "b"....my fault I guess.

its all good, I get it...but when I actually spend the time to read and try to understand, I refer to the early system details where he stated a "ONE PLAY PER DAY SYSTEM, NOT FOR ACTION JUNKIES" and it turns out to be false, its tough to take.....I don't mind change when it makes sense, I just hope they are noted a bit better from here on out...
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2006
Posts: 18880
Posted: #429
was a no brainer....and i knew to bet gm 2 and still got shutout, cause i got big real life headaches here that overshadow gambling by all means. but i knew to get gm 2.....now we wait til fri  or get down on  s.f. @ +$ Or R.l.   this is easiest system to follow. once u get the swing of it....      for the haters i try to keep it simple...Bad News Bears we chase, gm.  A. @-150e.g.   -150/100  loses  , B. @ 2-1 e.g.  -500/250  loses   C.  @ -125 eg  -937.50  /750  loses ,   D. @ -130 e.g. 2210 /1700,rounded up from 1687.50     game D WINS!    THE SYSTEM, U SHMENDICK's  IS 1-0   ..   perfect , u recouped yr $$$ and ahead 112.50 !  1.12+ units!    that is why when BIGfknpoo bet 50 his first game he was a shmoe. he got no dough, to roll w/ these  systems, but im hangin baby.   do u haters get why the system is 1-0 after above example?    now go fk yr broke behind selves and get hep to the gambling vernacular and various fibriacci(sp) and martingale and reverse mart   etcetc etc etc    go fk yrselves.  see u friday babe.
bigFnPOO
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2014
Posts: 110
Posted: #430
Quote Originally Posted by JEFFTHEHAT:


This is never been a 1 game a day system. Might have 5 or 6 games in a day. Rotation system in the other thread is the only 1 game a day thread! 

Yes, it must have been the other thread...all good, I'll get rolling on Friday.  GL
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 202
Posted: #431
Quote Originally Posted by Ajw6717:


In all fairness I took "Today we have OAK (B) and (C) if necessary." as (B) for the official play and (C) for people who bet them the prior day and missed Jeff's correction before game time.

But on the other hand, these plays are team chases. It's fairly obvious that you're chasing the team until you win, regardless of situations such as the DH yesterday.

i definitely took like you did as well and didn't even think twice about it.  oh well, fairly upset that i've chased up until C game for me and it hit when i was off...but got to move on
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2001
Posts: 378
Posted: #432
WOW, just WOW. Honestly people. If you can't even understand a simple chase system, you shouldn't be betting on sports. PERIOD!!! Find something else to do with your money.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 1711
Posted: #433

Quote Originally Posted by bruin95:

WOW, just WOW. Honestly people. If you can't even understand a simple chase system, you shouldn't be betting on sports. PERIOD!!! Find something else to do with your money.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2014
Posts: 1431
Posted: #434
Hey poo. People add it up. You would have to risk $3,750 on a four 
game chase to win $100 freakin' dollars. Not worth the risk! Why not 
just go to 7-11 and get 100 beef and bean burritos and 100 
Dr. Pepper big gulps! Better than losing $3750 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2013
Posts: 298
Posted: #435
Quote Originally Posted by sunshine11:

Hey poo. People add it up. You would have to risk $3,750 on a four 
game chase to win $100 freakin' dollars. Not worth the risk! Why not 
just go to 7-11 and get 100 beef and bean burritos and 100 
Dr. Pepper big gulps! Better than losing $3750 

Why are there so many morons on here?  There is NO WAY IN HELL you would EVER bet $3,750 to win $100.  NEVER!!!  Why are so many of you so fricking incompetent?  If you EVER bet $3,750, you will be WINNING EVERYTHING YOU ALREADY LOST, PLUS $100 (if that is your unit).  Why do so many idiots keep stating this same BS?  Why is it so hard for any of you to understand the simplicity of a chase system?
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2014
Posts: 1431
Posted: #436
Your the fool. You lose $1600 on the first three games! Then on the fourth you have to risk $2210 to show a profit! Of only a $100 
Freakin dollars. Lol. A fool and his money are soon departed, eagle. 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2005
Posts: 4125
Posted: #437
Thanks everyone. This is a very entertaining thread. My record using this system.

0 - 0 for 0.00 profit - "nuff-Said"
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2013
Posts: 298
Posted: #438
Quote Originally Posted by sunshine11:

Your the fool. You lose $1600 on the first three games! Then on the fourth you have to risk $2210 to show a profit! Of only a $100 
Freakin dollars. Lol. A fool and his money are soon departed, eagle. 

No, you are just a friggin idiot.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2014
Posts: 78
Posted: #439
Quote Originally Posted by irage:

Thanks everyone. This is a very entertaining thread. My record using this system.

0 - 0 for 0.00 profit - "nuff-Said"

Ditto.  It's been fascinating trying to figure out when the various chases (the 3,4,5, and 6) begin and end, plus dealing with the haters, and the other mysteries of the "2 threads." It's like a forum, magic show, and soap opera all in one. I believe there's value to be had here, but it challenges one's patience.  In any event, I wish everyone the best of luck.
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2006
Posts: 18880
Posted: #440
bump the squares...whats the play today?  GSE
bigFnPOO
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 3843
Posted: #441
Ok guys today we have:

BAL (A)
COL +1.5 (A)
ATL (A)
ST.L (A)
MIA (A)

GL everyone

The Hat
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2013
Posts: 786
Posted: #442

Big card for these series,  I'm hoping we end these series quick. BOL to all

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 3843
Posted: #443
Quote Originally Posted by Chi-TownCovers:

Big card for these series,  I'm hoping we end these series quick. BOL to all


All the cards should be bigger now. We're only on the third series of my year. Don't over extend yourself on the chase. 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2013
Posts: 786
Posted: #444
[Quote: Originally Posted by JEFFTHEHAT]

All the cards should be bigger now. We're only on the third series of my year. Don't over extend yourself on the chase. 

[/Quote

Thanks for the advice, my unit bets are very low based on the parameters of this system but I will admit when I was on game (D) for Oakland (C for those that didn't see the mistake) I had a bit of sticker shock.  I'm fully aware that you could potentially be on 3 game D's at once!

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2014
Posts: 75
Posted: #445
Do you have to bet all those in order to be successful, Or is picking, depending on your bankroll, Ok?
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 3843
Posted: #446
Quote Originally Posted by Spartyparty81:

Do you have to bet all those in order to be successful, Or is picking, depending on your bankroll, Ok?

All I can say is it's never lost in 5 years but picking and choosing might have consequences as far as the duration of chase. Meaning you might pick a chase that goes to a (D) game and miss one that's hits on an (A) game.

GL

The Hat
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2013
Posts: 29
Posted: #447
Quote Originally Posted by JEFFTHEHAT:

Ok guys today we have:

BAL (A)
COL +1.5 (A)
ATL (A)
ST.L (A)
MIA (A)

GL everyone

The Hat


How about a more bold appearance for the official plays?
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 3843
Posted: #448
Quote Originally Posted by Columboknows:



How about a more bold appearance for the official plays?

Unfortunately Covers doesn't allow IPads to do that fancy stuff. At Ieast I  can't make it work. 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2010
Posts: 3843
Posted: #449
I sorta figured it out! 
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 4049
Posted: #450
I have to ask the question that i am sure has been asked and answered in the previous 18 pages of jibber-jabber : how is this different than the plays in the other thread?
All Forums | Website Promotions
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2025 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.