My mistake, KC/TX; TOR/CWS; and BAL/MIN are 4 game series we wont count them....and DET/CLE arent playin 3 games now.
TB/OAK; G team won game 1, L team won game 2; TB WINS !!!
LAA/SEA; G game1; G won game 2; already followed trend
NYY/BOS; G game 1; G won game 2; already followed trend
FLA/WAS; G game 1; L game 2; FLA to win game 3 (prediction)
ATL/PHI; G game 1; L game 2; PHI to win game 3 (prediction)
STL/PIT; G game 1; L game 2; STL to win game 3 (prediction)
CHC/CIN; L game 1; Even game 2; will not predict game 3
SF/NYM; even ranking game1; will not predict game 3
SD/HOU; G game 1; G game 2; already followed the trend
MIL/AZ; L game 1; Ggame 2; AZ to win game 3 (prediction)
COL/LAD; L game 1; L game 2; already followed the trend
9 games; 80% trend should have 7-2 record 4 already won so if you took the remaining 5 games 3 should follow the trend; (the LGL or GLG trend happens 60% of the time so far this season which is better than average.)
TB; PHI; STL; and FLA are all good teams AZ is spotty at best hmmmmmm I wish i didnt leave all my shit at work to go back and look at some more stuff...wanna trend Home vs Away and stuff to add to this.
Leans on TX, COL
0
GAME 3 DAY GAME 3 DAY GAME 3 DAY
My mistake, KC/TX; TOR/CWS; and BAL/MIN are 4 game series we wont count them....and DET/CLE arent playin 3 games now.
TB/OAK; G team won game 1, L team won game 2; TB WINS !!!
LAA/SEA; G game1; G won game 2; already followed trend
NYY/BOS; G game 1; G won game 2; already followed trend
FLA/WAS; G game 1; L game 2; FLA to win game 3 (prediction)
ATL/PHI; G game 1; L game 2; PHI to win game 3 (prediction)
STL/PIT; G game 1; L game 2; STL to win game 3 (prediction)
CHC/CIN; L game 1; Even game 2; will not predict game 3
SF/NYM; even ranking game1; will not predict game 3
SD/HOU; G game 1; G game 2; already followed the trend
MIL/AZ; L game 1; Ggame 2; AZ to win game 3 (prediction)
COL/LAD; L game 1; L game 2; already followed the trend
9 games; 80% trend should have 7-2 record 4 already won so if you took the remaining 5 games 3 should follow the trend; (the LGL or GLG trend happens 60% of the time so far this season which is better than average.)
TB; PHI; STL; and FLA are all good teams AZ is spotty at best hmmmmmm I wish i didnt leave all my shit at work to go back and look at some more stuff...wanna trend Home vs Away and stuff to add to this.
? I'M NEW HERE- THE SPORTS BOOK I PLAY AT HAS -1&1/2 LINE.
IS IT AN ALLOWABLE ? TO ASK WHAT BOOKS YOU ALL USE ?
This is an explanation of getting a -1 line:
I'm playing a combo to make the spread -1. This way I don't have
to worry about losing money to the 1/2 run on the RL but can still
increase the ML payout a bit. You need to bet enough on the ML so that
your winnings will cover your bet on the RL. This way, if the team you
picked wins by 1, it'll be a push as far as your money is concerned.
For
example, on my book the SD ML is -125 and the RL is +125. Let's say
you wanted to bet $100 on the game. You need to place enough on the ML
so that the money you win = $100. In this case, you bet $55 on the ML
to win $44. Then you take the remaining $45 and bet it on the RL
(which makes this bet even money).
In this scenario, you're
protected if SD wins by 1 run because you'll win your ML bet &
that'll cover the money you lost on the RL bet. You break even, as
opposed to betting on the RL and losing it all on that 1/2 run.
0
Quote Originally Posted by chiro111:
GOOD WORK MEN.
? I'M NEW HERE- THE SPORTS BOOK I PLAY AT HAS -1&1/2 LINE.
IS IT AN ALLOWABLE ? TO ASK WHAT BOOKS YOU ALL USE ?
This is an explanation of getting a -1 line:
I'm playing a combo to make the spread -1. This way I don't have
to worry about losing money to the 1/2 run on the RL but can still
increase the ML payout a bit. You need to bet enough on the ML so that
your winnings will cover your bet on the RL. This way, if the team you
picked wins by 1, it'll be a push as far as your money is concerned.
For
example, on my book the SD ML is -125 and the RL is +125. Let's say
you wanted to bet $100 on the game. You need to place enough on the ML
so that the money you win = $100. In this case, you bet $55 on the ML
to win $44. Then you take the remaining $45 and bet it on the RL
(which makes this bet even money).
In this scenario, you're
protected if SD wins by 1 run because you'll win your ML bet &
that'll cover the money you lost on the RL bet. You break even, as
opposed to betting on the RL and losing it all on that 1/2 run.
Here is the injury list of the team we are focusing on; in case there are any key players not going to play today.
There are no ChiSox injuries to report
Toronto Injuries
Name
Pos
Updated
Injury
Status
Edwin Encarnacion
3B
04.25.2010
Arm
15-DAY DL
Encarnacion has been placed on the 15-day disabled list, retroactive to April 15, with a sore right arm.
Scott Richmond
SP
04.24.2010
Shoulder
60-DAY DL
Richmond is on the 60-day disabled list with a right shoulder injury and it not expected back until late July.
Brian Tallet
SP
04.22.2010
Forearm
15-DAY DL
Tallet has been placed on the 15-day disabled list with a sore throwing arm, but positive results on strength tests lead him to believe the injury is not too serious.
Dustin McGowan
SP
04.16.2010
Shoulder
60-DAY DL
McGowan has been transferred to the 60-day disabled list which clears space for the Jays 40-man roster. McGowan is unfortunately having a slow recovery from shoulder surgery and is uncertain of when he will return.
Jesse Litsch
SP
04.14.2010
Elbow
60-DAY DL
Litsch remains on the 60-day disabled list as he recovers from Tommy John Surgery but has begun throwing bullpen sessions and expects to be out until at least June as he still has some obstacles to overcome.
Marc Rzepczynski
SP
04.05.2010
Finger
15-DAY DL
Rzepczynski has been placed on the 15-day disabled list due to a fractured middle finger and targets a mid-May return.
Dirk Hayhurst
RP
03.12.2010
Shoulder
60-DAY DL
0
Here is the injury list of the team we are focusing on; in case there are any key players not going to play today.
There are no ChiSox injuries to report
Toronto Injuries
Name
Pos
Updated
Injury
Status
Edwin Encarnacion
3B
04.25.2010
Arm
15-DAY DL
Encarnacion has been placed on the 15-day disabled list, retroactive to April 15, with a sore right arm.
Scott Richmond
SP
04.24.2010
Shoulder
60-DAY DL
Richmond is on the 60-day disabled list with a right shoulder injury and it not expected back until late July.
Brian Tallet
SP
04.22.2010
Forearm
15-DAY DL
Tallet has been placed on the 15-day disabled list with a sore throwing arm, but positive results on strength tests lead him to believe the injury is not too serious.
Dustin McGowan
SP
04.16.2010
Shoulder
60-DAY DL
McGowan has been transferred to the 60-day disabled list which clears space for the Jays 40-man roster. McGowan is unfortunately having a slow recovery from shoulder surgery and is uncertain of when he will return.
Jesse Litsch
SP
04.14.2010
Elbow
60-DAY DL
Litsch remains on the 60-day disabled list as he recovers from Tommy John Surgery but has begun throwing bullpen sessions and expects to be out until at least June as he still has some obstacles to overcome.
Marc Rzepczynski
SP
04.05.2010
Finger
15-DAY DL
Rzepczynski has been placed on the 15-day disabled list due to a fractured middle finger and targets a mid-May return.
The two games I'm looking at right now are TOR & TB.
No interest in getting involved with BOS/NYY, not betting against Oswalt & not betting on Blackburn and MIN.
I think I agree TOR is the early lean. Floyd 0-4 vs TOR in his career (7.23/1.77/.317). Romero owned CWS his only start against them this year - 8 IP, 1 H, 2 ER, 2 BB, 12 K. Both TOR & TB have to travel tonight for games tomorrow - I wonder how that'll affect their lineups for today.
Unrelated note - did anyone see the line for Jimenez vs Kershaw? Wow...
0
Wow great job with the info everyone!
The two games I'm looking at right now are TOR & TB.
No interest in getting involved with BOS/NYY, not betting against Oswalt & not betting on Blackburn and MIN.
I think I agree TOR is the early lean. Floyd 0-4 vs TOR in his career (7.23/1.77/.317). Romero owned CWS his only start against them this year - 8 IP, 1 H, 2 ER, 2 BB, 12 K. Both TOR & TB have to travel tonight for games tomorrow - I wonder how that'll affect their lineups for today.
Unrelated note - did anyone see the line for Jimenez vs Kershaw? Wow...
Shields 4-1 career vs OAK (3.59/1.13/2.36) and dominated them earlier this year - 7 IP, 6 H, 2 ER, 1 BB, 12 K. Braden has gotten roughed up a bit by TB (career 3-2, 4.91/1.55/.268) & was pounded for 6 ER in 4 IP with 3 BB & 1 K a couple starts ago. TB has a poor average against lefties but have hit 10 HR and scored the 2nd most runs against them.
Tough call here...TB also fits the "Game 3" trend. Might play both them and TOR, gotta see which would be the POD.
0
Shields 4-1 career vs OAK (3.59/1.13/2.36) and dominated them earlier this year - 7 IP, 6 H, 2 ER, 1 BB, 12 K. Braden has gotten roughed up a bit by TB (career 3-2, 4.91/1.55/.268) & was pounded for 6 ER in 4 IP with 3 BB & 1 K a couple starts ago. TB has a poor average against lefties but have hit 10 HR and scored the 2nd most runs against them.
Tough call here...TB also fits the "Game 3" trend. Might play both them and TOR, gotta see which would be the POD.
TB should have most of their regular lineup. Zobrist had an off-day Friday, Upton was off Tuesday. No way they sit Longo vs a lefty (.333), and if they sit Pena that's fine (.171 vs lefties). Crawford doesn't hit lefties well (.217) so he may be a day-off candidate - but he was off Sunday & the team was off Monday.
0
TB should have most of their regular lineup. Zobrist had an off-day Friday, Upton was off Tuesday. No way they sit Longo vs a lefty (.333), and if they sit Pena that's fine (.171 vs lefties). Crawford doesn't hit lefties well (.217) so he may be a day-off candidate - but he was off Sunday & the team was off Monday.
I am playing TB -1 also, but Braden has pitched well in every other start this year besides TB. There's reason to believe he may be able to tame TB this time around.
I like Romero vs Floyd much better.
Good luck everyone!
0
POD: TOR -1
I am playing TB -1 also, but Braden has pitched well in every other start this year besides TB. There's reason to believe he may be able to tame TB this time around.
(red=hot)(blue=rain/snow) WHIP /BWHIP/Bera/Strk/Advantage TOR:
104.7 L Romero, R
(3-1, 3.00 ERA) 1.07
1.284.02L1+5.6
CWS: 99.1 R
Floyd, G
(1-3, 6.89 ERA) 1.811.364.12W1
BAL:
98.2 L Matusz (2-2, 3.93 ERA)1.361.343.18L1
MIN:
101.1 R Blackburn
(2-1, 5.79 ERA) 1.62
1.032.44W1 +2.9
TB: 108.0 R
Shields,J
(4-0, 3.15 ERA) 1.301.07 3.12L1+6.4
OAK:
101.6 L Braden (3-2, 4.14 ERA) 1.191.19 3.13W1 Possible Thunder Storm 8-12mph winds WSW
SD: 101.1 R Correia (4-2, 3.97
ERA)1.211.10 2.88W2+6.0
HOU: 95.1
R Oswalt (2-4, 2.48 ERA) 1.15 1.163.38L3 Possible Thunder Storm 8-12mph windsESE
NYY: 104.5 R Burnett, A. (4-0, 1.99
ERA) 1.161.283.69W6+4.1
BOS:
100.4 L Lester (2-2, 3.93 ERA)
1.311.906.61L2 Very Windy 15-20 mph winds WNW
As requested i added BullpenWHIP, BullpenERA, And some weather info under the game... If the game is highlighted in Red = Heatwave or very hot, Blue = rain/ snow /heavy wind
0
(red=hot)(blue=rain/snow) WHIP /BWHIP/Bera/Strk/Advantage TOR:
104.7 L Romero, R
(3-1, 3.00 ERA) 1.07
1.284.02L1+5.6
CWS: 99.1 R
Floyd, G
(1-3, 6.89 ERA) 1.811.364.12W1
BAL:
98.2 L Matusz (2-2, 3.93 ERA)1.361.343.18L1
MIN:
101.1 R Blackburn
(2-1, 5.79 ERA) 1.62
1.032.44W1 +2.9
TB: 108.0 R
Shields,J
(4-0, 3.15 ERA) 1.301.07 3.12L1+6.4
OAK:
101.6 L Braden (3-2, 4.14 ERA) 1.191.19 3.13W1 Possible Thunder Storm 8-12mph winds WSW
SD: 101.1 R Correia (4-2, 3.97
ERA)1.211.10 2.88W2+6.0
HOU: 95.1
R Oswalt (2-4, 2.48 ERA) 1.15 1.163.38L3 Possible Thunder Storm 8-12mph windsESE
NYY: 104.5 R Burnett, A. (4-0, 1.99
ERA) 1.161.283.69W6+4.1
BOS:
100.4 L Lester (2-2, 3.93 ERA)
1.311.906.61L2 Very Windy 15-20 mph winds WNW
As requested i added BullpenWHIP, BullpenERA, And some weather info under the game... If the game is highlighted in Red = Heatwave or very hot, Blue = rain/ snow /heavy wind
Vixen I took a look at the predictions and the different models - interesting info, but none seem too reliable. I like the site's information, but I think we're better pulling info from there and everywhere else we do & coming to our own conclusions. We've been pretty good at it so far, and the growing contributions can only help us.
0
Vixen I took a look at the predictions and the different models - interesting info, but none seem too reliable. I like the site's information, but I think we're better pulling info from there and everywhere else we do & coming to our own conclusions. We've been pretty good at it so far, and the growing contributions can only help us.
Vixen I took a look at the predictions and the different models - interesting info, but none seem too reliable. I like the site's information, but I think we're better pulling info from there and everywhere else we do & coming to our own conclusions. We've been pretty good at it so far, and the growing contributions can only help us.
Yes I looked at the rest of the games too and it's unremarkable for the most part. BOL!
0
Quote Originally Posted by SixTen:
Vixen I took a look at the predictions and the different models - interesting info, but none seem too reliable. I like the site's information, but I think we're better pulling info from there and everywhere else we do & coming to our own conclusions. We've been pretty good at it so far, and the growing contributions can only help us.
Yes I looked at the rest of the games too and it's unremarkable for the most part. BOL!
That TOR line shift is strange - only player that could be sitting to cause that much of a swing would be Vernon Wells...and he's played 16 straight DAYS, not games, so it's certainly possible. I can't find anything confirming that though...
0
That TOR line shift is strange - only player that could be sitting to cause that much of a swing would be Vernon Wells...and he's played 16 straight DAYS, not games, so it's certainly possible. I can't find anything confirming that though...
Their website has Wells in the lineup...I don't see any big differences. Ruiz is playing 1B instead of Overbay, but I'm pretty sure Overbay doesn't command line-altering respect. Weird.
0
Their website has Wells in the lineup...I don't see any big differences. Ruiz is playing 1B instead of Overbay, but I'm pretty sure Overbay doesn't command line-altering respect. Weird.
In New Yankee stadium... over has been 6-1 when the winds are 10-20 mph West ---> North West
Will be researching more into that trend right now...
Opps not New Yankee stadium... but Fenway.... The over is 6-1 both
at NY stadium and Fenway when the winds are 10+ mph... is that a
coincidence or a sign?
0
Quote Originally Posted by GrandMasterAL:
In New Yankee stadium... over has been 6-1 when the winds are 10-20 mph West ---> North West
Will be researching more into that trend right now...
Opps not New Yankee stadium... but Fenway.... The over is 6-1 both
at NY stadium and Fenway when the winds are 10+ mph... is that a
coincidence or a sign?
As long as you don't see any major lineup/pitching/weather changes, we gotta trust the system here - it's done well for us so far.
Hart I went with TB -1 and COL -1 today...but with TB, don't be surprised if Braden pitches well against them. He's been great outside of one start, which was against TB.
Good luck everyone!
0
Don't fear the line!
As long as you don't see any major lineup/pitching/weather changes, we gotta trust the system here - it's done well for us so far.
Hart I went with TB -1 and COL -1 today...but with TB, don't be surprised if Braden pitches well against them. He's been great outside of one start, which was against TB.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.