6 series out of 10 series already have followed the trend...
the other 9 games to be decided tonite...
out of the 15 series 12 should follow the trend of 80%...
6 series out of 10 series already have followed the trend...
the other 9 games to be decided tonite...
out of the 15 series 12 should follow the trend of 80%...
I missed the game Yankees , i wanted to play Yankees RL but its too late now.
I don't want bet TB-SEA
I think Crads will win and Col too but i don't bet these games.
But to come back on the series system from Glefkb01 i think cards will win the series cause they won the first game and they was the PR higher tahn phillies ( so 78.8 % win the series)
the same for roockies they won the first game so they will win this game tonight ( they had the PR lower than Padres at first game so 80% win the series)
I missed the game Yankees , i wanted to play Yankees RL but its too late now.
I don't want bet TB-SEA
I think Crads will win and Col too but i don't bet these games.
But to come back on the series system from Glefkb01 i think cards will win the series cause they won the first game and they was the PR higher tahn phillies ( so 78.8 % win the series)
the same for roockies they won the first game so they will win this game tonight ( they had the PR lower than Padres at first game so 80% win the series)
Now that you have all seen how well this betting model works, I am going to give you a hint
This system can be modified to play TOTALS
And the modified version of this system playing totals will not hit above 70%. It will hit above 80% (4 wins for each loss)
Sorry guys, I cannot give you the details as I promised that I will not discuss baseball in this site again in protest for the way this thread was moved to another section of the forum.
I might discuss that at therx.com when ready if ready
Now that you have all seen how well this betting model works, I am going to give you a hint
This system can be modified to play TOTALS
And the modified version of this system playing totals will not hit above 70%. It will hit above 80% (4 wins for each loss)
Sorry guys, I cannot give you the details as I promised that I will not discuss baseball in this site again in protest for the way this thread was moved to another section of the forum.
I might discuss that at therx.com when ready if ready
yes but texas don't fit in the system ( power rating + pitchers + series)
They fit only with pitchers and series cause they won the first game and tonight Lewis better than cahill )
yes but texas don't fit in the system ( power rating + pitchers + series)
They fit only with pitchers and series cause they won the first game and tonight Lewis better than cahill )
You can hit 70% or plus if you are selective.
You can't hit 70% if you pick 2,3, 4 or 5 games per day
But if you focus on the best plays, you can
The proof is right here
You can hit 70% or plus if you are selective.
You can't hit 70% if you pick 2,3, 4 or 5 games per day
But if you focus on the best plays, you can
The proof is right here
hello Nabil i sent you a MP
Tonight no games selected cause Yankees was the best game with all the rules ( Power rating + pitcher + series )
RL yankees was the best game today
After is very dangerous games like Cards or Rays
For me tonight i see cards don't see rays win cause lee and also i see roockies win in san diego)
hello Nabil i sent you a MP
Tonight no games selected cause Yankees was the best game with all the rules ( Power rating + pitcher + series )
RL yankees was the best game today
After is very dangerous games like Cards or Rays
For me tonight i see cards don't see rays win cause lee and also i see roockies win in san diego)
Just to Document what I noticed on the 80% Trends...WE CAN CALL IT OUR GAME 3 PREDICTOR
Tor/Cle (Tor was the greater ranked team and should win the series)![]()
NYY/Bal (NYY was the greater ranked team and should win the series)![]()
LAA/BOS (Bos was less ranked team but the Rankings are close and cant determine if they win the series or not...wait for game 3 rankings)![]()
KC/CWS (CWS was less ranked team but the Rankings are close and cant determine if they win the series or not...wait for game 3 rankings)PENDING
DET/MIN (MIN was greater ranked team but the Rankings are close and but MIN should have the edge to win the series by the ranking numbers)![]()
TX/OAK pending; TB/SEA pending
STL/PHI (STL was greater ranked team but the Rankings are close STL should have enough differential to win the series)Pending
NYM/CIN (CIN was less ranked team but the Rankings are close and cant determine if they win the series or not...wait for game 3 rankings)![]()
AZ/HOU (AZ was greater ranked team but should have enough differential to win series)![]()
COL/SD (COL was less ranked team and should win the series)PENDING
MIL/LAD, SF/FLA, CHC/PIT, and ATL/WAS are game 1 pendings
Just to Document what I noticed on the 80% Trends...WE CAN CALL IT OUR GAME 3 PREDICTOR
Tor/Cle (Tor was the greater ranked team and should win the series)![]()
NYY/Bal (NYY was the greater ranked team and should win the series)![]()
LAA/BOS (Bos was less ranked team but the Rankings are close and cant determine if they win the series or not...wait for game 3 rankings)![]()
KC/CWS (CWS was less ranked team but the Rankings are close and cant determine if they win the series or not...wait for game 3 rankings)PENDING
DET/MIN (MIN was greater ranked team but the Rankings are close and but MIN should have the edge to win the series by the ranking numbers)![]()
TX/OAK pending; TB/SEA pending
STL/PHI (STL was greater ranked team but the Rankings are close STL should have enough differential to win the series)Pending
NYM/CIN (CIN was less ranked team but the Rankings are close and cant determine if they win the series or not...wait for game 3 rankings)![]()
AZ/HOU (AZ was greater ranked team but should have enough differential to win series)![]()
COL/SD (COL was less ranked team and should win the series)PENDING
MIL/LAD, SF/FLA, CHC/PIT, and ATL/WAS are game 1 pendings
MIL/LAD (Predict ?? to win series, Rankings close will wait for game 2)
SF/FLA (Predict ?? to win series, Rankings close wait for game 2)
CHC/PIT (Predict ?? to win series, Rankings close wait for game 2)
ATL/WAS (Predict ?? to win series, ranking pending)
TB/SEA (Predict TB to win series)
MIL/LAD (Predict ?? to win series, Rankings close will wait for game 2)
SF/FLA (Predict ?? to win series, Rankings close wait for game 2)
CHC/PIT (Predict ?? to win series, Rankings close wait for game 2)
ATL/WAS (Predict ?? to win series, ranking pending)
TB/SEA (Predict TB to win series)
Idiots like you are always amusing... when the system works over 500 plays you will have something...until then you don't.
Might be time to verse yourself in some math partner...such as :
Law of probability & Standard Deviation
Its great that your doing well but making claims that this system can hit over 70% long term is obsurd. If the system is that good I would recommend that you take out a loan and start betting $10,000 per play. Because if its half of what you claim you'd be a millionaire in no time.
Problem is math does funny things...your system could start 50-0 and then go 0-50 just as fast. Do your talking after the full season ![]()
And whose system is this anyway? Is this Nabils or Sixten's ? I have seen both take credit so i wanted to make sure for the record ![]()
I
Idiots like you are always amusing... when the system works over 500 plays you will have something...until then you don't.
Might be time to verse yourself in some math partner...such as :
Law of probability & Standard Deviation
Its great that your doing well but making claims that this system can hit over 70% long term is obsurd. If the system is that good I would recommend that you take out a loan and start betting $10,000 per play. Because if its half of what you claim you'd be a millionaire in no time.
Problem is math does funny things...your system could start 50-0 and then go 0-50 just as fast. Do your talking after the full season ![]()
And whose system is this anyway? Is this Nabils or Sixten's ? I have seen both take credit so i wanted to make sure for the record ![]()
I
Idiots like you are always amusing... when the system works over 500 plays you will have something...until then you don't.
Might be time to verse yourself in some math partner...such as :
Law of probability & Standard Deviation
Its great that your doing well but making claims that this system can hit over 70% long term is obsurd. If the system is that good I would recommend that you take out a loan and start betting $10,000 per play. Because if its half of what you claim you'd be a millionaire in no time.
Problem is math does funny things...your system could start 50-0 and then go 0-50 just as fast. Do your talking after the full season ![]()
And whose system is this anyway? Is this Nabils or Sixten's ? I have seen both take credit so i wanted to make sure for the record ![]()
I
Idiots like me ? Look at yourself in a mirror, you MORON
I have been using this approach for the last 16 YEARS
I started using it at a time when you were crawling around in your caca and urine loaded diapers trying to figure out the difference between a spoon and a fork
As long as there are morons like you on this Earth, the sportsbooks have nothing to worry about
You are a moron and you will die a moron
P.S. : Don't worry about my math. I am a graduate of one of the best engineering schools in America
Idiots like you are always amusing... when the system works over 500 plays you will have something...until then you don't.
Might be time to verse yourself in some math partner...such as :
Law of probability & Standard Deviation
Its great that your doing well but making claims that this system can hit over 70% long term is obsurd. If the system is that good I would recommend that you take out a loan and start betting $10,000 per play. Because if its half of what you claim you'd be a millionaire in no time.
Problem is math does funny things...your system could start 50-0 and then go 0-50 just as fast. Do your talking after the full season ![]()
And whose system is this anyway? Is this Nabils or Sixten's ? I have seen both take credit so i wanted to make sure for the record ![]()
I
Idiots like me ? Look at yourself in a mirror, you MORON
I have been using this approach for the last 16 YEARS
I started using it at a time when you were crawling around in your caca and urine loaded diapers trying to figure out the difference between a spoon and a fork
As long as there are morons like you on this Earth, the sportsbooks have nothing to worry about
You are a moron and you will die a moron
P.S. : Don't worry about my math. I am a graduate of one of the best engineering schools in America
So teamrankings.com has been around for 16 years? ![]()
And you have been doing it for 16 years .... so why now tell all of us morons about your amazing system now? Why not make a few million and just sell us morons the book?
Your just another tout... making claims you can't keep...but I am sure you will have another angle when the losing streak comes.
Also...were you not leaving this site? Think you said you were out of here? Your all talk and no walk...like most touts
So teamrankings.com has been around for 16 years? ![]()
And you have been doing it for 16 years .... so why now tell all of us morons about your amazing system now? Why not make a few million and just sell us morons the book?
Your just another tout... making claims you can't keep...but I am sure you will have another angle when the losing streak comes.
Also...were you not leaving this site? Think you said you were out of here? Your all talk and no walk...like most touts
Well said..
Sparty...the guy said he used the "same approach" NOT the source of teamranking.com. Your idoit excuses to bash are without merit and clueless. So go fuck yourself and say out of the thread if you do not like it.. It's that simple.
Well said..
Sparty...the guy said he used the "same approach" NOT the source of teamranking.com. Your idoit excuses to bash are without merit and clueless. So go fuck yourself and say out of the thread if you do not like it.. It's that simple.
Apparently our sincere basher likes to tail Gamehunter and play every one of his picks b/c the law of numbers..
.
Jump on his space and read his playbook. ![]()
Apparently our sincere basher likes to tail Gamehunter and play every one of his picks b/c the law of numbers..
.
Jump on his space and read his playbook. ![]()
So teamrankings.com has been around for 16 years? ![]()
And you have been doing it for 16 years .... so why now tell all of us morons about your amazing system now? Why not make a few million and just sell us morons the book?
Your just another tout... making claims you can't keep...but I am sure you will have another angle when the losing streak comes.
Also...were you not leaving this site? Think you said you were out of here? Your all talk and no walk...like most touts
I am all talk ? ![]()
Try this : 12-4
Isn't that 75 % ?
We not only talk but we also deliver, you moron
Take a seat and learn.
If you need to go to the restroom while the class is in session, all you have to do is raise your hand
.
So teamrankings.com has been around for 16 years? ![]()
And you have been doing it for 16 years .... so why now tell all of us morons about your amazing system now? Why not make a few million and just sell us morons the book?
Your just another tout... making claims you can't keep...but I am sure you will have another angle when the losing streak comes.
Also...were you not leaving this site? Think you said you were out of here? Your all talk and no walk...like most touts
I am all talk ? ![]()
Try this : 12-4
Isn't that 75 % ?
We not only talk but we also deliver, you moron
Take a seat and learn.
If you need to go to the restroom while the class is in session, all you have to do is raise your hand
.
if that trend continues... These would be my plays for game 3
COL to win
; CWS to win
; Tex to win![]()
LOTS OF PEEPS ON SD last night... COINCIDENCE??????
Rest of the game 3 picks today as the NL finishes up their series:
WAS to win; SF to win; LAD to win
LEANS on SEA; STL; HOU; CHC
if that trend continues... These would be my plays for game 3
COL to win
; CWS to win
; Tex to win![]()
LOTS OF PEEPS ON SD last night... COINCIDENCE??????
Rest of the game 3 picks today as the NL finishes up their series:
WAS to win; SF to win; LAD to win
LEANS on SEA; STL; HOU; CHC

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.