New York at New England (02/03/2008)
You are right in the fact that the Pats defense doesn't scare anybody...they don't need to. They just show up to play every week and hold you to less than 20 points. Which is conveniently enough to win every single game. You can't teach experience...and that's what this team has. The Giants need to rely on Strahan who is well beyond his years and Toomer who is a 3rd WR for their inspiration this week. Those are the only two players on the team who have been there before. That is going to play huge difference. The Pats are the better team...and the better team wins in the Super Bowl. Period. End of discussion. Please stop the delusions and discuss your opinion on why or why not the Giants will cover the spread.
The better team huh? That is what the Dallas Cowboys are saying, they are the better team. They sure had more pro bowlers then the Giants, but that didn't help.
Your team is your team. Are you willing to bet money on your team? I betting money on mine.
I think the Giants will win because the Pats ran for 44 yards. Giants had no trouble moving the ball, running and passing. The Giants have the better punter. Brady gave the ball away, 3 times. Patriots covered the spread once in the last 8. Best of all, Patriots are long overdue for a loss.
You are right in the fact that the Pats defense doesn't scare anybody...they don't need to. They just show up to play every week and hold you to less than 20 points. Which is conveniently enough to win every single game. You can't teach experience...and that's what this team has. The Giants need to rely on Strahan who is well beyond his years and Toomer who is a 3rd WR for their inspiration this week. Those are the only two players on the team who have been there before. That is going to play huge difference. The Pats are the better team...and the better team wins in the Super Bowl. Period. End of discussion. Please stop the delusions and discuss your opinion on why or why not the Giants will cover the spread.
The better team huh? That is what the Dallas Cowboys are saying, they are the better team. They sure had more pro bowlers then the Giants, but that didn't help.
Your team is your team. Are you willing to bet money on your team? I betting money on mine.
I think the Giants will win because the Pats ran for 44 yards. Giants had no trouble moving the ball, running and passing. The Giants have the better punter. Brady gave the ball away, 3 times. Patriots covered the spread once in the last 8. Best of all, Patriots are long overdue for a loss.
^^^ Get your facts straight!!
"Of course, now the Giants have to deal with a challenge that will be infinitely greater than the one New England offered back on Dec. 29. The Patriots haven't lost a Super Bowl in the three times they've reached that game under coach Bill Belichick. They also have strength in numbers. While Toomer and Strahan represent all of the Giants' Super Bowl experience, the Patriots boast 21 players who have played on a team that has advanced to that game. That's a hell of an advantage in a contest of this magnitude."
OK maybe i was 1 player off, but does that make it a incorrect fact?
and here's the link to the whole story....
https://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/playoffs07/columns/story?columnist=chadiha_jeffri&id=3207994
I've been on here for awhile now and NEVER post "incorrect facts" so before you want to call me out on what i post, maybe YOU should do your research and CHECK YOUR FACTS!!!!! If you dont, you just make yourself look like a FOOL!!!!!!
WTF, these main forums are not what it used to be.....![]()
^^^ Get your facts straight!!
"Of course, now the Giants have to deal with a challenge that will be infinitely greater than the one New England offered back on Dec. 29. The Patriots haven't lost a Super Bowl in the three times they've reached that game under coach Bill Belichick. They also have strength in numbers. While Toomer and Strahan represent all of the Giants' Super Bowl experience, the Patriots boast 21 players who have played on a team that has advanced to that game. That's a hell of an advantage in a contest of this magnitude."
OK maybe i was 1 player off, but does that make it a incorrect fact?
and here's the link to the whole story....
https://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/playoffs07/columns/story?columnist=chadiha_jeffri&id=3207994
I've been on here for awhile now and NEVER post "incorrect facts" so before you want to call me out on what i post, maybe YOU should do your research and CHECK YOUR FACTS!!!!! If you dont, you just make yourself look like a FOOL!!!!!!
WTF, these main forums are not what it used to be.....![]()
Some of you may remember that the week after Shockey went down, I proclaimed that the Giants were DONE......Boy was I wrong. I searched for my post where I said that, but couldn't find it.
In any event, I heard something last week on local sports talk radio that may have explained why I was wrong. Sid Rosenberg does a daily show on am790 the ticket, here in South Florida. Personally, I never liked they guy as he came across as cocky and pompous, but what he said last week made perfect sense to me. Apparently, he used to do sports talk radio in NY and was the host for the NYG pre game shows and claims to have connections inside the organization. He stated that the reason that Eli had struggled in the past was a direct result of Shockey coming back to the huddle after every single play and giving him crap about not throwing him the ball. After seeing the way that Eli has played in recent weeks, I gotta say that I believe what Sid said. Take it for what it's worth.
I'm not a fan of either team in this game, but I am leaning on taking the Giants and the points. I think that their pass rush will be quite effective and I'm impressed with the way the linebackers, especially Pierce have played the run. On offense, the Giants have looked quite impressive running the ball and I don't think that the Pats can stop the run. I do think that this will be a close game and that's why I'm taking the Giants. I only wish I had jumped on the 14 points when it opened. Also have a slight lean on the under and am sure that I will be playing numerous props.
I am going to Vegas for this game so I won't be around on game day to discuss the game or post emoticons during the game. (still can't believe that my wife is letting me go
) Best of luck to all my friends with your picks.
I look forward to seeing you all again next year!![]()
Some of you may remember that the week after Shockey went down, I proclaimed that the Giants were DONE......Boy was I wrong. I searched for my post where I said that, but couldn't find it.
In any event, I heard something last week on local sports talk radio that may have explained why I was wrong. Sid Rosenberg does a daily show on am790 the ticket, here in South Florida. Personally, I never liked they guy as he came across as cocky and pompous, but what he said last week made perfect sense to me. Apparently, he used to do sports talk radio in NY and was the host for the NYG pre game shows and claims to have connections inside the organization. He stated that the reason that Eli had struggled in the past was a direct result of Shockey coming back to the huddle after every single play and giving him crap about not throwing him the ball. After seeing the way that Eli has played in recent weeks, I gotta say that I believe what Sid said. Take it for what it's worth.
I'm not a fan of either team in this game, but I am leaning on taking the Giants and the points. I think that their pass rush will be quite effective and I'm impressed with the way the linebackers, especially Pierce have played the run. On offense, the Giants have looked quite impressive running the ball and I don't think that the Pats can stop the run. I do think that this will be a close game and that's why I'm taking the Giants. I only wish I had jumped on the 14 points when it opened. Also have a slight lean on the under and am sure that I will be playing numerous props.
I am going to Vegas for this game so I won't be around on game day to discuss the game or post emoticons during the game. (still can't believe that my wife is letting me go
) Best of luck to all my friends with your picks.
I look forward to seeing you all again next year!![]()
Last time a blowout was predicted and won was actually the Niners over the Chargers 49-26 as a 18 point favorite.
Preseason doesn't mean shit. If you want to back the Giants come up with better reasoning. Good luck playing the "due" angle.
Last time a blowout was predicted and won was actually the Niners over the Chargers 49-26 as a 18 point favorite.
Preseason doesn't mean shit. If you want to back the Giants come up with better reasoning. Good luck playing the "due" angle.
Hopefully, I'll have a few tax questions for you when I get back. ![]()
Hopefully, I'll have a few tax questions for you when I get back. ![]()
Just so you know Wonbad....the odds are actually in favor of the team winning 3 in a row when two teams meet 3 times in one season. Since the AFL NFL merger in 1970 this has happened 18 times including the Giants and Cowboys this season. 11 out of 18 times one of those teams have won all 3 games. Now Im not saying that the preseason meeting this year even counts as a game but even if it does you say your an odds kinda guy.....11-7 means the odds are not in your favor here
Just so you know Wonbad....the odds are actually in favor of the team winning 3 in a row when two teams meet 3 times in one season. Since the AFL NFL merger in 1970 this has happened 18 times including the Giants and Cowboys this season. 11 out of 18 times one of those teams have won all 3 games. Now Im not saying that the preseason meeting this year even counts as a game but even if it does you say your an odds kinda guy.....11-7 means the odds are not in your favor here
there still is lots of great info on here Lefty....you just have to sift through the shouting match to get to it. No need to find another place, Im sure im not the only one who appreciates your input.
![]()
there still is lots of great info on here Lefty....you just have to sift through the shouting match to get to it. No need to find another place, Im sure im not the only one who appreciates your input.
![]()
As we said last week, no team in the NFL this year is more balanced than Green Bay. We're not surprised to see their Quality Stat beatdown of New York here ... although the Giants were similarly outmatched against Dallas, and that turned out pretty well for them. But Dallas at least showed some weaknesses that offered the Giants a glimmer of hope. Green Bay shows none. This game looks to be even more one-sided than the other conference title game, with Green Bay holding definite advantages in everything: Quality Stats, weather, health, location and certainly intangibles with a 38-year-old legend QB. It's a pretty clear-cut choice.
The final score: Green Bay 34, New York 14
As we said last week, no team in the NFL this year is more balanced than Green Bay. We're not surprised to see their Quality Stat beatdown of New York here ... although the Giants were similarly outmatched against Dallas, and that turned out pretty well for them. But Dallas at least showed some weaknesses that offered the Giants a glimmer of hope. Green Bay shows none. This game looks to be even more one-sided than the other conference title game, with Green Bay holding definite advantages in everything: Quality Stats, weather, health, location and certainly intangibles with a 38-year-old legend QB. It's a pretty clear-cut choice.
The final score: Green Bay 34, New York 14
Some of you may remember that the week after Shockey went down, I proclaimed that the Giants were DONE......Boy was I wrong. I searched for my post where I said that, but couldn't find it.
In any event, I heard something last week on local sports talk radio that may have explained why I was wrong. Sid Rosenberg does a daily show on am790 the ticket, here in South Florida. Personally, I never liked they guy as he came across as cocky and pompous, but what he said last week made perfect sense to me. Apparently, he used to do sports talk radio in NY and was the host for the NYG pre game shows and claims to have connections inside the organization. He stated that the reason that Eli had struggled in the past was a direct result of Shockey coming back to the huddle after every single play and giving him crap about not throwing him the ball. After seeing the way that Eli has played in recent weeks, I gotta say that I believe what Sid said. Take it for what it's worth.
I'm not a fan of either team in this game, but I am leaning on taking the Giants and the points. I think that their pass rush will be quite effective and I'm impressed with the way the linebackers, especially Pierce have played the run. On offense, the Giants have looked quite impressive running the ball and I don't think that the Pats can stop the run. I do think that this will be a close game and that's why I'm taking the Giants. I only wish I had jumped on the 14 points when it opened. Also have a slight lean on the under and am sure that I will be playing numerous props.
I am going to Vegas for this game so I won't be around on game day to discuss the game or post emoticons during the game. (still can't believe that my wife is letting me go
) Best of luck to all my friends with your picks.
I look forward to seeing you all again next year!![]()
Have a safe trip, my friend and Good luck.
Some of you may remember that the week after Shockey went down, I proclaimed that the Giants were DONE......Boy was I wrong. I searched for my post where I said that, but couldn't find it.
In any event, I heard something last week on local sports talk radio that may have explained why I was wrong. Sid Rosenberg does a daily show on am790 the ticket, here in South Florida. Personally, I never liked they guy as he came across as cocky and pompous, but what he said last week made perfect sense to me. Apparently, he used to do sports talk radio in NY and was the host for the NYG pre game shows and claims to have connections inside the organization. He stated that the reason that Eli had struggled in the past was a direct result of Shockey coming back to the huddle after every single play and giving him crap about not throwing him the ball. After seeing the way that Eli has played in recent weeks, I gotta say that I believe what Sid said. Take it for what it's worth.
I'm not a fan of either team in this game, but I am leaning on taking the Giants and the points. I think that their pass rush will be quite effective and I'm impressed with the way the linebackers, especially Pierce have played the run. On offense, the Giants have looked quite impressive running the ball and I don't think that the Pats can stop the run. I do think that this will be a close game and that's why I'm taking the Giants. I only wish I had jumped on the 14 points when it opened. Also have a slight lean on the under and am sure that I will be playing numerous props.
I am going to Vegas for this game so I won't be around on game day to discuss the game or post emoticons during the game. (still can't believe that my wife is letting me go
) Best of luck to all my friends with your picks.
I look forward to seeing you all again next year!![]()
Have a safe trip, my friend and Good luck.
Have a safe trip, my friend and Good luck.
Have a safe trip, my friend and Good luck.
Thanks for your informative post....Please don't hesitate to post anything else that you think might help us handicap this game.
Wassup my brother ![]()
I returned your email last night let me know if it went through.
Lefty and some others are right about this thread and I'm not sure what's worse this thread and the ego's or the other websites trying to compare the 1972 Dolphins versus the 2007 Patriots?
How can anyone compare 2 teams from different era's with a different set of rules? Plain and simple the 1972 Dolphins were great in their time and the 2007 Pats are the great team of 2007. I hate going through ESPN,NFL.com,etc,etc,seeing the same topic over and over again 72' Dolphins vs the 07' Pats give me a break if anyone can give a correct statement about who is the better of 2 teams from different era's is either full of $hit or a football god.
![]()
Thanks for your informative post....Please don't hesitate to post anything else that you think might help us handicap this game.
Wassup my brother ![]()
I returned your email last night let me know if it went through.
Lefty and some others are right about this thread and I'm not sure what's worse this thread and the ego's or the other websites trying to compare the 1972 Dolphins versus the 2007 Patriots?
How can anyone compare 2 teams from different era's with a different set of rules? Plain and simple the 1972 Dolphins were great in their time and the 2007 Pats are the great team of 2007. I hate going through ESPN,NFL.com,etc,etc,seeing the same topic over and over again 72' Dolphins vs the 07' Pats give me a break if anyone can give a correct statement about who is the better of 2 teams from different era's is either full of $hit or a football god.
![]()
Hot Forum Topics
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
