Alright I'll eat crow on that one. It's been done a million times in my threads i can do it once.
Having said that, I posted at 15-7 and before Big Ben went down and I was fully confident even at 15-7 the ending of this game would be completely different (obviously).
0
Alright I'll eat crow on that one. It's been done a million times in my threads i can do it once.
Having said that, I posted at 15-7 and before Big Ben went down and I was fully confident even at 15-7 the ending of this game would be completely different (obviously).
And just so the pathetic peasants on covers want more of a reasoning while I'll be on Green Bay here is one. Skins haven't beat a team with a winning record all year and have a top 5 vile rush defense in the entire nfl national fixed league.
And just so the pathetic peasants on covers want more of a reasoning while I'll be on Green Bay here is one. Skins haven't beat a team with a winning record all year and have a top 5 vile rush defense in the entire nfl national fixed league.
Packers haven't beaten a team that had a winning record when they played them.
Skins have the fewest rushing attempts against them at home then any other team in their home games. I'm guessing a lot of junk runs on draws or at end of games when they're way up.
0
Packers haven't beaten a team that had a winning record when they played them.
Skins have the fewest rushing attempts against them at home then any other team in their home games. I'm guessing a lot of junk runs on draws or at end of games when they're way up.
Releasing Green Bay now. Playing horrible skins playing great at home. Green Bay has no shot yada yada. Green Bay delivers
Who in the world thinks Green Bay has no shot? I would like a single covers poster to back CG's statement (as though he's on the big-time dog NO ONE thinks can win in Green Bay)...
0
Releasing Green Bay now. Playing horrible skins playing great at home. Green Bay has no shot yada yada. Green Bay delivers
Who in the world thinks Green Bay has no shot? I would like a single covers poster to back CG's statement (as though he's on the big-time dog NO ONE thinks can win in Green Bay)...
Releasing Green Bay now. Playing horrible skins playing great at home. Green Bay has no shot yada yada. Green Bay delivers
Who in the world thinks Green Bay has no shot? I would like a single covers poster to back CG's statement (as though he's on the big-time dog NO ONE thinks can win in Green Bay)...
0
Releasing Green Bay now. Playing horrible skins playing great at home. Green Bay has no shot yada yada. Green Bay delivers
Who in the world thinks Green Bay has no shot? I would like a single covers poster to back CG's statement (as though he's on the big-time dog NO ONE thinks can win in Green Bay)...
Did the jersey cockmunch really use the "word" RELEASAL?
And what's the latest over/under on the new account? I say 3 days...
...my man,glad you noticed..thought i was hearing things....do NOT be fooled by the studious,bespectacled look..this is the college gambler we all know and loathe.i think we can all be in "agreeance" on that one as the great fred durst wud say.
0
Quote Originally Posted by DUDE-I-TOLD-YOU:
Did the jersey cockmunch really use the "word" RELEASAL?
And what's the latest over/under on the new account? I say 3 days...
...my man,glad you noticed..thought i was hearing things....do NOT be fooled by the studious,bespectacled look..this is the college gambler we all know and loathe.i think we can all be in "agreeance" on that one as the great fred durst wud say.
N!GG@ you of all people should not be throwing around a big word like conquer. Beating Van by 2 little games...and still falling WAYYYYYY behind the $$$ is NOT CONQUERING, @sshat!
"b-b-but, this is the worst year i've had in 9 years...buh-buh-but...I BEAT VANZACK!" Congrats Mea, you theoretically beat a guy on the internet...all while FACTUALLY LOSING $50,000+.
YOU DA MAN
you are greatness kid. I don't care what anyone says.. YOU. ARE. LIVING. A. DREAM.
0
con·quer
successfully overcome (a problem or weakness).
N!GG@ you of all people should not be throwing around a big word like conquer. Beating Van by 2 little games...and still falling WAYYYYYY behind the $$$ is NOT CONQUERING, @sshat!
"b-b-but, this is the worst year i've had in 9 years...buh-buh-but...I BEAT VANZACK!" Congrats Mea, you theoretically beat a guy on the internet...all while FACTUALLY LOSING $50,000+.
YOU DA MAN
you are greatness kid. I don't care what anyone says.. YOU. ARE. LIVING. A. DREAM.
The funny (and entirely accurate) part of the whole CG vs Vanzack thing is CG could hit 60% while Vanzack hits 40%, and Vanzack would STILL be in better shape relatively speaking.
Keep sniffing and drinking drunk you pathetic excuse for a human being.
0
The funny (and entirely accurate) part of the whole CG vs Vanzack thing is CG could hit 60% while Vanzack hits 40%, and Vanzack would STILL be in better shape relatively speaking.
Keep sniffing and drinking drunk you pathetic excuse for a human being.
The funny (and entirely accurate) part of the whole CG vs Vanzack thing is CG could hit 60% while Vanzack hits 40%, and Vanzack would STILL be in better shape relatively speaking.
Keep sniffing and driving drunk you pathetic excuse for a human being.
0
The funny (and entirely accurate) part of the whole CG vs Vanzack thing is CG could hit 60% while Vanzack hits 40%, and Vanzack would STILL be in better shape relatively speaking.
Keep sniffing and driving drunk you pathetic excuse for a human being.
And just so the pathetic peasants on covers want more of a reasoning while I'll be on Green Bay here is one. Skins haven't beat a team with a winning record all year and have a top 5 vile rush defense in the entire nfl national fixed league.
CG: You might wanna look up the true definition of the word "peasant." I"m feeling charitable so I'll provide the non farmer version for you....
peas·ant
'pez(?)nt/
noun
informal
an ignorant, rude, or unsophisticated person; a person of low social status.
There is not a single poster on covers who you aren't beneath, and the highlighted part pretty much was made to define you. If you were simply a bad gambler, I'd keep my mouth shut. But you are so much worse than that, most importantly as a human being.
And just so the pathetic peasants on covers want more of a reasoning while I'll be on Green Bay here is one. Skins haven't beat a team with a winning record all year and have a top 5 vile rush defense in the entire nfl national fixed league.
CG: You might wanna look up the true definition of the word "peasant." I"m feeling charitable so I'll provide the non farmer version for you....
peas·ant
'pez(?)nt/
noun
informal
an ignorant, rude, or unsophisticated person; a person of low social status.
There is not a single poster on covers who you aren't beneath, and the highlighted part pretty much was made to define you. If you were simply a bad gambler, I'd keep my mouth shut. But you are so much worse than that, most importantly as a human being.
LOL amazing he's clinging to being ahead of Vanzack in the supercontest.
CG's comparing himself to vanzack is like a homeless man telling the president how to run the country.
CG is a horrible gambler, but he's a even worse person.
your point is perfectly fair,rangerz......however i think at times some of your elected presidents have been less qualified than your average homeless man.....how many times i wished for a homeless man to take over when george dubya was runnin shiit...
0
Quote Originally Posted by rangerz2478:
LOL amazing he's clinging to being ahead of Vanzack in the supercontest.
CG's comparing himself to vanzack is like a homeless man telling the president how to run the country.
CG is a horrible gambler, but he's a even worse person.
your point is perfectly fair,rangerz......however i think at times some of your elected presidents have been less qualified than your average homeless man.....how many times i wished for a homeless man to take over when george dubya was runnin shiit...
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
"
Established in 1995,
...and unfortunately the worst part is he looks completely straight/sober in these videos.........strait-jacket,please!!!!!!
Hot Forum Topics
