how the heck does one quantify wat exactly a "unit" is with this guy??....wat the hell is thirty units wen your bet amount fluctuates wildly depending on wat stage of desperation chase mode one happens to be in???...is it $500,$1000,$5000....half a bomb,full bomb,mega,super,duper bomb??
CG typically wagers $1000 a game. Therefore he rates $1000 as ONE UNIT. This is not Rocket Science melossinglet.
~~~~~ZOSO~~~~~
0
Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet:
how the heck does one quantify wat exactly a "unit" is with this guy??....wat the hell is thirty units wen your bet amount fluctuates wildly depending on wat stage of desperation chase mode one happens to be in???...is it $500,$1000,$5000....half a bomb,full bomb,mega,super,duper bomb??
CG typically wagers $1000 a game. Therefore he rates $1000 as ONE UNIT. This is not Rocket Science melossinglet.
The total wagered on the Oregon Ducks last night was actually $6000 / $5000.
The ticket above was for $3000 / $2500.
There are two other tickets for this game, $1200 / $1000 and $1800 / 1500.
For some reason I am having a problem getting the other tickets uploaded to post here. But, trust me, the total was $6000 / $5000 making this single game the largest wager CG has ever placed in his lifetime.
To keep things accurate, CG blew Three College Games yesterday afternoon losing $3300. So he was only 1-3 on the day but pocketed $1700 in total profit.
~~~~~ZOSO~~~~~
0
Quote Originally Posted by TheGoldenGoose:
https://postimg.org/image/6ohl3dh5p/
The total wagered on the Oregon Ducks last night was actually $6000 / $5000.
The ticket above was for $3000 / $2500.
There are two other tickets for this game, $1200 / $1000 and $1800 / 1500.
For some reason I am having a problem getting the other tickets uploaded to post here. But, trust me, the total was $6000 / $5000 making this single game the largest wager CG has ever placed in his lifetime.
To keep things accurate, CG blew Three College Games yesterday afternoon losing $3300. So he was only 1-3 on the day but pocketed $1700 in total profit.
In case you have not noticed... I am DONE beating this around the bush here at covers. If they want to take the greatest thread in covers history and banish it to the "website promotions" forum, then THAT is their business.
We are at the RX Forum and CG is 6-2 last 8 bombs and is kicking azz. You want to win? Come follow us at RX. You want to be Haters then stay away and get your azz handed to you during this winning streak.
Covers seems to have a history of chasing away great handicappers. At least that is what I've noticed in my 12 years here. Why? How the He!! should I know? I can only assume they want to promote their own Touts.
FOR THE LAST TIME... I WILL NOT RESPOND IN THIS THREAD.
I am DONE here.
OVER AND OUT
CPL XIX Winner. Punter. Scotch lover. Big Man.
0
Quote Originally Posted by TheGoldenGoose:
In case you have not noticed... I am DONE beating this around the bush here at covers. If they want to take the greatest thread in covers history and banish it to the "website promotions" forum, then THAT is their business.
We are at the RX Forum and CG is 6-2 last 8 bombs and is kicking azz. You want to win? Come follow us at RX. You want to be Haters then stay away and get your azz handed to you during this winning streak.
Covers seems to have a history of chasing away great handicappers. At least that is what I've noticed in my 12 years here. Why? How the He!! should I know? I can only assume they want to promote their own Touts.
FOR THE LAST TIME... I WILL NOT RESPOND IN THIS THREAD.
"the golden goose cried his way out of the box before, but using "all
you covers phaggots" has got to be time for banning. Website
promotions, college gambler thread."
Ban me???
I don't think so Goober... Maybe in your dreams you Crybaby.
Then Ganda adds this comment...
"I agree, and that thread should be deleted, Goose and others are steering traffic to another site mentioned numerous times.
And GoldenGoose has followed me in different threads calling me phaggot etc..."
LIAR LIAR PANTS ON FIRE YOU BROWN NOSING RAT.
I am following Ganda in different Threads?????
Name me ONE other Thread, JUST ONE OTHER THREAD, where I supposedly "followed you".
YOU CAN'T BECAUSE YOU ARE A LIAR.
So now I am back to STAY in this Thread. Defending my honor against those who are OUTRIGHT LIARS, CRYBABIES and RATS.
~~~~~ZOSO~~~~~
0
Quote Originally Posted by Ganda:
TSW went crying to Covers Help with this Gem...
"the golden goose cried his way out of the box before, but using "all
you covers phaggots" has got to be time for banning. Website
promotions, college gambler thread."
Ban me???
I don't think so Goober... Maybe in your dreams you Crybaby.
Then Ganda adds this comment...
"I agree, and that thread should be deleted, Goose and others are steering traffic to another site mentioned numerous times.
And GoldenGoose has followed me in different threads calling me phaggot etc..."
LIAR LIAR PANTS ON FIRE YOU BROWN NOSING RAT.
I am following Ganda in different Threads?????
Name me ONE other Thread, JUST ONE OTHER THREAD, where I supposedly "followed you".
YOU CAN'T BECAUSE YOU ARE A LIAR.
So now I am back to STAY in this Thread. Defending my honor against those who are OUTRIGHT LIARS, CRYBABIES and RATS.
Scal, I will get back to you on this tomorrow night. Didn't have a chance to sit down and relax all day today, running all kinds of errands, so I will call Nick tomorrow. Over the last 5 or 6 weeks he is really kicking azz.
Nick and I talked Saturday Night (I called him) and he was 0-3 on the day, a little bit down and gun-shy. He asked me what I thought of his late night Ducks bet and I told him straight out to go put more $ down, to just hammer the he!! out of this game. On a scale of 1 to 5 Units, if there ever was a maximum play Saturday, it was Oregon.
This was not a case of chasing. The Ducks wager was simply the very best pick of his four games on Saturday, a 5* play. Yes, a ballsy bet, but sometimes you have to let one fly. I have never believed in "flat-betting". Every bet stands alone as to it's own Unit Value.
Tonight's Play: San Diego Chargers -4 (-110) $1100/$1000
GLTA
~~~~~ZOSO~~~~~
0
Quote Originally Posted by scalabrine:
Ducks won. Good win.
How much is he down now?
Scal, I will get back to you on this tomorrow night. Didn't have a chance to sit down and relax all day today, running all kinds of errands, so I will call Nick tomorrow. Over the last 5 or 6 weeks he is really kicking azz.
Nick and I talked Saturday Night (I called him) and he was 0-3 on the day, a little bit down and gun-shy. He asked me what I thought of his late night Ducks bet and I told him straight out to go put more $ down, to just hammer the he!! out of this game. On a scale of 1 to 5 Units, if there ever was a maximum play Saturday, it was Oregon.
This was not a case of chasing. The Ducks wager was simply the very best pick of his four games on Saturday, a 5* play. Yes, a ballsy bet, but sometimes you have to let one fly. I have never believed in "flat-betting". Every bet stands alone as to it's own Unit Value.
Tonight's Play: San Diego Chargers -4 (-110) $1100/$1000
Scal, I will get back to you on this tomorrow night. Didn't have a chance to sit down and relax all day today, running all kinds of errands, so I will call Nick tomorrow. Over the last 5 or 6 weeks he is really kicking azz.
Nick and I talked Saturday Night (I called him) and he was 0-3 on the day, a little bit down and gun-shy. He asked me what I thought of his late night Ducks bet and I told him straight out to go put more $ down, to just hammer the he!! out of this game. On a scale of 1 to 5 Units, if there ever was a maximum play Saturday, it was Oregon.
This was not a case of chasing. The Ducks wager was simply the very best pick of his four games on Saturday, a 5* play. Yes, a ballsy bet, but sometimes you have to let one fly. I have never believed in "flat-betting". Every bet stands alone as to it's own Unit Value.
Tonight's Play: San Diego Chargers -4 (-110) $1100/$1000
GLTA
Goose, you are 100% off on this one and you know it. I hope for your sake you were drunk when you posted this because it's just flat out false and I'm sure CG would even be able to admit this. The bet amount (not the play) was a chase on any possible interpretation of the term.
Would CG have bet the Ducks no matter what? Sure, I believe that. Hell, he maybe would have added a lil on the play regardless of how he was doing on the day. Maybe $1,000 more to make it 2k? Who knows. If there is one thing we know about CG, it's that there is no plan or system involved to determine his bet amounts.
That said, there is a simple question that only requires a yes or no answer....
Would CG have bet 6 grand on the Ducks if he was even, or up on the day?
Goose, you are way too smart to get this question wrong, even with your delusional support of the kid.
0
Quote Originally Posted by TheGoldenGoose:
Scal, I will get back to you on this tomorrow night. Didn't have a chance to sit down and relax all day today, running all kinds of errands, so I will call Nick tomorrow. Over the last 5 or 6 weeks he is really kicking azz.
Nick and I talked Saturday Night (I called him) and he was 0-3 on the day, a little bit down and gun-shy. He asked me what I thought of his late night Ducks bet and I told him straight out to go put more $ down, to just hammer the he!! out of this game. On a scale of 1 to 5 Units, if there ever was a maximum play Saturday, it was Oregon.
This was not a case of chasing. The Ducks wager was simply the very best pick of his four games on Saturday, a 5* play. Yes, a ballsy bet, but sometimes you have to let one fly. I have never believed in "flat-betting". Every bet stands alone as to it's own Unit Value.
Tonight's Play: San Diego Chargers -4 (-110) $1100/$1000
GLTA
Goose, you are 100% off on this one and you know it. I hope for your sake you were drunk when you posted this because it's just flat out false and I'm sure CG would even be able to admit this. The bet amount (not the play) was a chase on any possible interpretation of the term.
Would CG have bet the Ducks no matter what? Sure, I believe that. Hell, he maybe would have added a lil on the play regardless of how he was doing on the day. Maybe $1,000 more to make it 2k? Who knows. If there is one thing we know about CG, it's that there is no plan or system involved to determine his bet amounts.
That said, there is a simple question that only requires a yes or no answer....
Would CG have bet 6 grand on the Ducks if he was even, or up on the day?
Goose, you are way too smart to get this question wrong, even with your delusional support of the kid.
Scal, I will get back to you on this tomorrow night. Didn't have a chance to sit down and relax all day today, running all kinds of errands, so I will call Nick tomorrow. Over the last 5 or 6 weeks he is really kicking azz.
Nick and I talked Saturday Night (I called him) and he was 0-3 on the day, a little bit down and gun-shy. He asked me what I thought of his late night Ducks bet and I told him straight out to go put more $ down, to just hammer the he!! out of this game. On a scale of 1 to 5 Units, if there ever was a maximum play Saturday, it was Oregon.
This was not a case of chasing. The Ducks wager was simply the very best pick of his four games on Saturday, a 5* play. Yes, a ballsy bet, but sometimes you have to let one fly. I have never believed in "flat-betting". Every bet stands alone as to it's own Unit Value.
Tonight's Play: San Diego Chargers -4 (-110) $1100/$1000
GLTA
I'm not a fan of flat betting either, so we can agree on that.
But the main thing CG (and I think you for that matter) fail to understand, is the amount of the bet should have NOTHING to do with how much you are up or down on the day/week/month, etc. He bet 6g on the Ducks cause he was 0-3, -$3300 on the day, and was frustrated as all hell.
"Professional."
0
Quote Originally Posted by TheGoldenGoose:
Scal, I will get back to you on this tomorrow night. Didn't have a chance to sit down and relax all day today, running all kinds of errands, so I will call Nick tomorrow. Over the last 5 or 6 weeks he is really kicking azz.
Nick and I talked Saturday Night (I called him) and he was 0-3 on the day, a little bit down and gun-shy. He asked me what I thought of his late night Ducks bet and I told him straight out to go put more $ down, to just hammer the he!! out of this game. On a scale of 1 to 5 Units, if there ever was a maximum play Saturday, it was Oregon.
This was not a case of chasing. The Ducks wager was simply the very best pick of his four games on Saturday, a 5* play. Yes, a ballsy bet, but sometimes you have to let one fly. I have never believed in "flat-betting". Every bet stands alone as to it's own Unit Value.
Tonight's Play: San Diego Chargers -4 (-110) $1100/$1000
GLTA
I'm not a fan of flat betting either, so we can agree on that.
But the main thing CG (and I think you for that matter) fail to understand, is the amount of the bet should have NOTHING to do with how much you are up or down on the day/week/month, etc. He bet 6g on the Ducks cause he was 0-3, -$3300 on the day, and was frustrated as all hell.
I'm not a fan of flat betting either, so we can agree on that.
But the main thing CG (and I think you for that matter) fail to understand, is the amount of the bet should have NOTHING to do with how much you are up or down on the day/week/month, etc. He bet 6g on the Ducks cause he was 0-3, -$3300 on the day, and was frustrated as all hell.
"Professional."
Thing is, he bet 1k on the Ducks and only added more when he was already 0-2 and soon to be 0-3 since Memphis was getting crushed. Yet gooseo the clown says that's not chasing lol.
v
0
Quote Originally Posted by rangerz2478:
I'm not a fan of flat betting either, so we can agree on that.
But the main thing CG (and I think you for that matter) fail to understand, is the amount of the bet should have NOTHING to do with how much you are up or down on the day/week/month, etc. He bet 6g on the Ducks cause he was 0-3, -$3300 on the day, and was frustrated as all hell.
"Professional."
Thing is, he bet 1k on the Ducks and only added more when he was already 0-2 and soon to be 0-3 since Memphis was getting crushed. Yet gooseo the clown says that's not chasing lol.
Be careful... tsw will go crying to Covers Help to get you banned for "g-a-y bashing" and Ganda will lie through his teeth in support for him.
Hey Goose, what's that wet, smacking noise? Is it a tilapia fed sack slapping against your chin?
I got no problem with a little bashing and harassing, but at least man up and admit it. You followed me in the soccer forum and called me and the others there phaggots. That's fine, you got boxed for it, but now you're denying it just because your post got taken down? Weak.
CPL XIX Winner. Punter. Scotch lover. Big Man.
0
Quote Originally Posted by TheGoldenGoose:
Be careful... tsw will go crying to Covers Help to get you banned for "g-a-y bashing" and Ganda will lie through his teeth in support for him.
Hey Goose, what's that wet, smacking noise? Is it a tilapia fed sack slapping against your chin?
I got no problem with a little bashing and harassing, but at least man up and admit it. You followed me in the soccer forum and called me and the others there phaggots. That's fine, you got boxed for it, but now you're denying it just because your post got taken down? Weak.
"Baronman post ur plays in ur own thread. How many times are u going to come into my thread and post ur teaser BS? We get it u think teasers are great.... No1 else does tho."
********************
0
"Baronman post ur plays in ur own thread. How many times are u going to come into my thread and post ur teaser BS? We get it u think teasers are great.... No1 else does tho."
What could better demonstrate a total state of disillusionment than Vanzack, claiming to know what represents professionalism in gambling when he can't even hit 30% of his NFL picks?
0
What could better demonstrate a total state of disillusionment than Vanzack, claiming to know what represents professionalism in gambling when he can't even hit 30% of his NFL picks?
I'm not a fan of flat betting either, so we can agree on that.
But the main thing CG (and I think you for that matter) fail to understand, is the amount of the bet should have NOTHING to do with how much you are up or down on the day/week/month, etc. He bet 6g on the Ducks cause he was 0-3, -$3300 on the day, and was frustrated as all hell.
"Professional."
No, That's NOT the way it happened. I called HIM. He did not call ME. We talked about his 0-3 Saturday and my input was that the Ducks were far and away his best bet of the day. It wasn't a question of chasing. It was a matter of switching from flat-betting weakness to Unit-betting strength.
And you will see more of it as CG makes his adjustments from flat-betting to a more hybrid type of Unit betting.
~~~~~ZOSO~~~~~
0
Quote Originally Posted by rangerz2478:
I'm not a fan of flat betting either, so we can agree on that.
But the main thing CG (and I think you for that matter) fail to understand, is the amount of the bet should have NOTHING to do with how much you are up or down on the day/week/month, etc. He bet 6g on the Ducks cause he was 0-3, -$3300 on the day, and was frustrated as all hell.
"Professional."
No, That's NOT the way it happened. I called HIM. He did not call ME. We talked about his 0-3 Saturday and my input was that the Ducks were far and away his best bet of the day. It wasn't a question of chasing. It was a matter of switching from flat-betting weakness to Unit-betting strength.
And you will see more of it as CG makes his adjustments from flat-betting to a more hybrid type of Unit betting.
I am following Ganda in different Threads?????
Hot Forum Topics
