Posted:
#12651
Two quotes direct from CG's mouth...
1.) "But no1 wants to hear of my bad losses and barely any few brutal wins. How is 2-16 even possible in games where I'm tied or winning the spread with 5 min left in a game? Glad u brought up the facts baronman thank you. Bc when I mention it people thinking I'm lying or something in which I'm not. It's just unbelievable and you have showed the facts I always stated yet got called out on. Prob 50K or more swung bc of ridiculously bad luck. If had even bad luck and not worst of all time would be up $"
2.) "Right so 8-8 worst case not 2-16. If it "evens out" and "all people have bad losses but lucky wins" where are my lucky wins? Just bad losses of course"
****************************
1.) I know math has never been CG's strong suit but I couldn't help but chuckle when I read that. First off the 2-16 is NOT coming from Bermax.
But for arguments sake, lets say it is. Lets add 7 wins and give him a 9-9 record. We will average a $1100-1000 bet on all 7. If he won 7 more games at that exact price, he'd have $14,700 more. 50k? Almost CG, almost. The math you come to expect from this so called "professional."
2.) You wanna talk about a guy who blocks out the facts and just relies on emotion? You should look at CG. Just last week he got a MIRACLE on his Saints -3 bet with an OT 80 yard score after a missed 35 yard fg at the end of regulation. I also recall an absolute miracle cover of epic proportions with Michigan State vs Wisconsin among many, many other lucky wins.
Kid cracks me up, he really does. 
