Posted:
#9801
Print that last post up and put it on the fridge so next time you have a bad run you can remember what your goal is
0
Moving to Vegas to become a full time pro handicapper
Posted:
#9803
Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet:
there is no winning "theory" on how to beat the game...its maths and probability plain and simple..you CANT beat maths no matter wat "theory" you use.
if sumone has the discipline to walk away the very second they are up then that is how to profit...but,like all casino games,the longer you play the closer you are to losing..its very,very simple....thats why they try to keep people there with free drinks,bright lights,no clocks so you lose track of time.....the more you win the better for them cos they know that you will just stay longer and get greedy.they know its human psychology to keep chasing more/being greedy....very,very few can walk away with one win under their belt
My point was hit 3/5 you're up and time to cash as it won't get any better unless a crazy run..
0
Posted:
#9806
Quote Originally Posted by collegegambler:
When I play roulete here is my strategy... And I only play 5 times a year haven't yet out here once.. Pick number 17 as my base. Play two to the left of it and two to the right of it. $15 a hand. $3 on each of the 5 numbers. Double up if I hit the next spin. Go back to normal if no repeat...
When I play roulete here is my strategy... And I only play 5 times a year haven't yet out here once.. Pick number 17 as my base. Play two to the left of it and two to the right of it. $15 a hand. $3 on each of the 5 numbers. Double up if I hit the next spin. Go back to normal if no repeat...
That srat as as good as any and if friendly tip-wise with the dealer he'll try to his that section of the wheel..I've heard they can but just like dice setting.Nevr seen it with my own play.
0
Posted:
#9808
Quote Originally Posted by bk1374:
Walking away "up" is a fallacy too, unless you literally never play again. What difference does it make if you walk away and wait 5 minutes, 5 days, 5 weeks or 5 years? None. Unless there are structural changes to the game/payouts, it's the same. The odds and randomness of it do not change.
Walking away "up" is a fallacy too, unless you literally never play again. What difference does it make if you walk away and wait 5 minutes, 5 days, 5 weeks or 5 years? None. Unless there are structural changes to the game/payouts, it's the same. The odds and randomness of it do not change.
Crazy talk trying to "beat" roulette. 
yep,of course you are correct...the smaller the sample size the better so,statistically speaking,your greatest chance to win in roullette,if choosing say red or black,would be to simply play one spin and throw everything you have on it...this seems crazy of course but reduces the house edge to the smallest it can possibly be.
but of course the more times you come back the better the chances you lose.but go once a year and put $50,000 down one spin and the odds are at least more in your favour
0
Posted:
#9810
Quote Originally Posted by BunkMoreland:
this thread is sick. not the CG posting his plays part but the rest of you foosl living and dying on who he should take, what you think he is doing wrong etc. bunch of losers
this thread is sick. not the CG posting his plays part but the rest of you foosl living and dying on who he should take, what you think he is doing wrong etc. bunch of losers
Cg is the one who moved to vegas to give this a shot. he should and is doing it his way, u think he would move to vegas and take advice from idiots on a gambling forum to risk HIS money?
CG took a big balls bet, went out and got drunk with some broad as the game played out and you fools are sitting home on a friday night on the computer chatting back n forth of you hoping he loses lol
you guys are pathetic and thats a fact
you have the nerve to write this the other day and now you're in here worried about what CG is eating? The irony of you calling other posters pathetic is astounding.
Why don't you just get on your knees and suck CG's coc.kk. It's clear that you're falling in love with him
0
Posted:
#9814
People crack me up. When you are losing, this thread is bumped every 3 seconds. When you win it is similar to a ghost town.
It really is sad that people want other people to fail out of jealousy. They will never admit to the jealousy, but its there.
Goodluck and I hope you have continued success. I personally think you are betting to high for your BR, but its your choice, not mine. 
0
Posted:
#9819
Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet:
yep,of course you are correct...the smaller the sample size the better so,statistically speaking,your greatest chance to win in roullette,if choosing say red or black,would be to simply play one spin and throw everything you have on it...this seems crazy of course but reduces the house edge to the smallest it can possibly be.
but of course the more times you come back the better the chances you lose.but go once a year and put $50,000 down one spin and the odds are at least more in your favour
Incorrect. The expected value is the same regardless of sample size. The variance is simply greater on a small sample. Just like you can double up on one spin, you can be wiped out in a single wrist flip.
0
Hot Forum Topics
