Posted:
#1
This guy is playing on a different level right now. Have to take a shot with these odds. Who's with me?
Zverev +750
Zverev +7.5 games
0
Zverev +750 over Fed
...
Search 
Views: 1471
Posts: 14
Posted:
#6
He earned that win vs. Murray. Don't forget Murray was a set away from losing 3-0 to Stepanek at RG.
This will be ugly, and quick. Federer would eat this S&V shit for breakfast when it was a normalcy on tour, and better than anyone ever could.
He'll murder the ball with high percentage approach shots to his feet. Then you're left with Zverev half-volleying when Fed is inside the baseline.
Fed should trash him with a double break 1S 6-2. Zverev's level won't drop, and Fed will be content to 6-4/6-3 single break him the rest of the way.
This will be ugly, and quick. Federer would eat this S&V shit for breakfast when it was a normalcy on tour, and better than anyone ever could.
He'll murder the ball with high percentage approach shots to his feet. Then you're left with Zverev half-volleying when Fed is inside the baseline.
Fed should trash him with a double break 1S 6-2. Zverev's level won't drop, and Fed will be content to 6-4/6-3 single break him the rest of the way.
0
Posted:
#11
I understand he beat Murray but Murray was HORRIBLE. He broke Zverev twice in the first and got broken twice back once from 40-0 up and the other time from serving for the set.
One of the worst matches I've seen Murray play. Multiple passing shots into the net, little to no use of the lob.
I think he can only trouble Fed if he serves extremely well but there has to be a drop in level just for the fact he hs to play 2 top level guys in a row unlike Istomin who played Djoko and then a decent player in Busta
If Fed has a routine first set,match won't be close
0
Posted:
#14
Easy to say now, but if you're looking for a cinderella run from an unknown, stick to women's tennis. The women show far less consistency, and even their best player (Serena) can lose early sometimes. In women's tennis, an unknown can make a deep run.
In men's tennis, the top players are far more consistent. This is really an exception tournament in that Murray and Djokovic got bounced early.
Typically, men the pull the upsets are one and done. Either they played an incredible match that won't be duplicable, or just a strategy that flustered someone like Zverev did with his net work vs. Murray.
Typically the emotion and typically long match wheres the underdog out, and they're gone by the next round. Only deep run I can think of off the top of my head were either a Soderling or Del Potro maybe, but those were actually top well known guys at the time.
P.S. When the line seems high and has value, that's typically a teller that the dude has no chance. If the line is so low that it's not worth it to bite, that's when you'd typically want to take the underdog. Big lines work much better in women's tennis where people lose all the time.
0
Hot Forum Topics
