Amanda has beat her several times before but I think this is their first on grass?
Amanda will likely get frustrated and cough up a set to Aryna, seems as she is good for set 1. Than gets frustrated in set 2 when she loses a little steam, and fights her inner demons to stay focused. She will need to stay calm and cool to beat Aryna. I believe she can get her again here
To be THE MAN, you got to BEAT the man
0
Quote Originally Posted by JLamp:
Anisimova vs Swiatek final
Amanda has beat her several times before but I think this is their first on grass?
Amanda will likely get frustrated and cough up a set to Aryna, seems as she is good for set 1. Than gets frustrated in set 2 when she loses a little steam, and fights her inner demons to stay focused. She will need to stay calm and cool to beat Aryna. I believe she can get her again here
Bencic is playing really solid in this wimbledon and is hard to beat so far. She doesnt make many errors and is good on the attack. Iga will be ready for whatever attack Bencic has in mind to counter Iga's aggressive fundamental tennis. Iga just seems to be fully primed for this Wimbledon stage and will force Bencic into some costly errors. Going to need a near perfect game to beat Iga.
To be THE MAN, you got to BEAT the man
0
Quote Originally Posted by Tittylankaluver:
What if bencic wins ?
Bencic is playing really solid in this wimbledon and is hard to beat so far. She doesnt make many errors and is good on the attack. Iga will be ready for whatever attack Bencic has in mind to counter Iga's aggressive fundamental tennis. Iga just seems to be fully primed for this Wimbledon stage and will force Bencic into some costly errors. Going to need a near perfect game to beat Iga.
Are you making two different parlays with either of two from one match winning ? You do know you would get a better “effective” odds if you just bet on Swiatek as a single bet then right ? - you only do parlays if both bets in it contain value - else you are just multiplying the juice you paying
2
Are you making two different parlays with either of two from one match winning ? You do know you would get a better “effective” odds if you just bet on Swiatek as a single bet then right ? - you only do parlays if both bets in it contain value - else you are just multiplying the juice you paying
@jvarghese That's a degenerate way of thinking. That's not the ultimate parlay. The options are limited. There are a few combos. Had there have been say 16 players and you chose both the underdogs and they hit. Now that would be the ultimate parlay.
A hedge for all the parlays Husky has.
0
Quote Originally Posted by elmaniac8:
@jvarghese That's a degenerate way of thinking. That's not the ultimate parlay. The options are limited. There are a few combos. Had there have been say 16 players and you chose both the underdogs and they hit. Now that would be the ultimate parlay.
Are you making two different parlays with either of two from one match winning ? You do know you would get a better “effective” odds if you just bet on Swiatek as a single bet then right ? - you only do parlays if both bets in it contain value - else you are just multiplying the juice you paying
Yeah might as well add Sab+Ben parlay and Ani+Ben. Cover all the bases lol.
Also there's no reason to parlay in the first place when the matches won't be played simultaneously.
1
Quote Originally Posted by Calde13:
Are you making two different parlays with either of two from one match winning ? You do know you would get a better “effective” odds if you just bet on Swiatek as a single bet then right ? - you only do parlays if both bets in it contain value - else you are just multiplying the juice you paying
Yeah might as well add Sab+Ben parlay and Ani+Ben. Cover all the bases lol.
Also there's no reason to parlay in the first place when the matches won't be played simultaneously.
Quote Originally Posted by Calde13: Are you making two different parlays with either of two from one match winning ? You do know you would get a better “effective” odds if you just bet on Swiatek as a single bet then right ? - you only do parlays if both bets in it contain value - else you are just multiplying the juice you paying Yeah might as well add Sab+Ben parlay and Ani+Ben. Cover all the bases lol. Also there's no reason to parlay in the first place when the matches won't be played simultaneously.
To be THE MAN, you got to BEAT the man
0
Quote Originally Posted by bringit:
Quote Originally Posted by Calde13: Are you making two different parlays with either of two from one match winning ? You do know you would get a better “effective” odds if you just bet on Swiatek as a single bet then right ? - you only do parlays if both bets in it contain value - else you are just multiplying the juice you paying Yeah might as well add Sab+Ben parlay and Ani+Ben. Cover all the bases lol. Also there's no reason to parlay in the first place when the matches won't be played simultaneously.
Adding: Parlay @ +423 Iga -2.5 Games Bencic to win 1 set - Yes
If I were to give you the mathematical formula that explained why this bet is awful (value wise) would that change your way and adapt in the future or would I speak for deaf ears because then I won’t bother
0
Quote Originally Posted by HuskyNation1:
Adding: Parlay @ +423 Iga -2.5 Games Bencic to win 1 set - Yes
If I were to give you the mathematical formula that explained why this bet is awful (value wise) would that change your way and adapt in the future or would I speak for deaf ears because then I won’t bother
Quote Originally Posted by HuskyNation1: Adding: Parlay @ +423 Iga -2.5 Games Bencic to win 1 set - Yes If I were to give you the mathematical formula that explained why this bet is awful (value wise) would that change your way and adapt in the future or would I speak for deaf ears because then I won’t bother
I am alll good with any + money bets. Yes I do see value in certain bets, but there is many instances where I just go all in. This isnt even a large bet by any means because I rarely bet Game spreads. I am +$6k in these last 2 days carefully strategically doing the bets. Aiming for $10k. 1 way or another lol
To be THE MAN, you got to BEAT the man
0
Quote Originally Posted by Calde13:
Quote Originally Posted by HuskyNation1: Adding: Parlay @ +423 Iga -2.5 Games Bencic to win 1 set - Yes If I were to give you the mathematical formula that explained why this bet is awful (value wise) would that change your way and adapt in the future or would I speak for deaf ears because then I won’t bother
I am alll good with any + money bets. Yes I do see value in certain bets, but there is many instances where I just go all in. This isnt even a large bet by any means because I rarely bet Game spreads. I am +$6k in these last 2 days carefully strategically doing the bets. Aiming for $10k. 1 way or another lol
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.