Diana Shnaider 2-0 (-105)
Queen's Club
LONDON Beatriz Haddad Maia ML (+125)
![]()
Tough one to swallow. She fails to convert a match point late in the 2nd, then in the breaker she's up a mini break serving at 4-3 and hits back to back double faults which allows Emma to serve it out. Then in the 3rd she doesn't give a single break opportunity until her final service game when again she double faults to give Emma 2 break points and she converted the second.
LONDON Beatriz Haddad Maia ML (+125)
![]()
Tough one to swallow. She fails to convert a match point late in the 2nd, then in the breaker she's up a mini break serving at 4-3 and hits back to back double faults which allows Emma to serve it out. Then in the 3rd she doesn't give a single break opportunity until her final service game when again she double faults to give Emma 2 break points and she converted the second.
LONDON
Diana Shnaider -2.5 (-115)
Also considering her future here @ +1200. But her projected path to the finals after this match would be Keys then Rybakina. I absolutely think she can beat both players but she will be an underdog in those matches so it may be a better strategy and more profitable to just bet those straight up instead of the future bet. Especially since I'm already on her against Katie.
LONDON
Diana Shnaider -2.5 (-115)
Also considering her future here @ +1200. But her projected path to the finals after this match would be Keys then Rybakina. I absolutely think she can beat both players but she will be an underdog in those matches so it may be a better strategy and more profitable to just bet those straight up instead of the future bet. Especially since I'm already on her against Katie.
@JoseAlonso787
Both are on the larger end but I am more heavily invested in Kessler because of the value. I think the chances of her winning straight up are at least 50% at a minimum, and possibly much higher than that.
@JoseAlonso787
Both are on the larger end but I am more heavily invested in Kessler because of the value. I think the chances of her winning straight up are at least 50% at a minimum, and possibly much higher than that.
LONDON Diana Shnaider -2.5 (-115) Also considering her future here @ +1200. But her projected path to the finals after this match would be Keys then Rybakina. I absolutely think she can beat both players but she will be an underdog in those matches so it may be a better strategy and more profitable to just bet those straight up instead of the future bet. Especially since I'm already on her against Katie.
![]()
Got the win on the former Wolfpack. Didn't catch the first set but she was pretty dominant in the final two.
Now need the Gator to come through for me.
LONDON Diana Shnaider -2.5 (-115) Also considering her future here @ +1200. But her projected path to the finals after this match would be Keys then Rybakina. I absolutely think she can beat both players but she will be an underdog in those matches so it may be a better strategy and more profitable to just bet those straight up instead of the future bet. Especially since I'm already on her against Katie.
![]()
Got the win on the former Wolfpack. Didn't catch the first set but she was pretty dominant in the final two.
Now need the Gator to come through for me.
Cheers! What do you think of over 20.50 in Keys and Kudermetova matches tomorrow?
Both of those sound like good plays. I think Alexandrova is playing really well but Kuder's serve is on point right now too so I could definitely see a first set tiebreak. I like Shnaider to beat Keys but I do think it will go over.
Cheers! What do you think of over 20.50 in Keys and Kudermetova matches tomorrow?
Both of those sound like good plays. I think Alexandrova is playing really well but Kuder's serve is on point right now too so I could definitely see a first set tiebreak. I like Shnaider to beat Keys but I do think it will go over.
LONDON McCartney Kessler +3.5 (-105) Bonus plays: ML (+200) 2-0 (+475)
![]()
Happy to hit the game spread but disappointed because Kessler really should have been able to win that match. She just couldn't do anything good with Zheng's second serve. If Zheng is able to win 55% of her second serves she's practically unbeatable. Her 1stIn% is very consistently in the low 50s and she wins a very high percentage of those points. Which means you absolutely have to beat her on her second serve and most good players do.
One thing that I'm almost certain of is that she won't win over 50% of second serves against Raducanu. My advice would be to bet Raducanu as soon as the line opens, especially if she is an underdog but I kind of doubt she will be. Should be close odds either way.
LONDON McCartney Kessler +3.5 (-105) Bonus plays: ML (+200) 2-0 (+475)
![]()
Happy to hit the game spread but disappointed because Kessler really should have been able to win that match. She just couldn't do anything good with Zheng's second serve. If Zheng is able to win 55% of her second serves she's practically unbeatable. Her 1stIn% is very consistently in the low 50s and she wins a very high percentage of those points. Which means you absolutely have to beat her on her second serve and most good players do.
One thing that I'm almost certain of is that she won't win over 50% of second serves against Raducanu. My advice would be to bet Raducanu as soon as the line opens, especially if she is an underdog but I kind of doubt she will be. Should be close odds either way.
Hot Forum Topics
-
🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵
445,874
-
🏈🏈🏈 “To BEt, or not to BEt, that is the question” ...Fubah2's risky bets
301,346
-
Wednesday 09/09/2026
824
-
PART DEUX
344
-
🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets
253,344
-
Patriots vs Seahawks in-game live season kickoff
1,338
-
9/9 🫣🫣🔥🔥🔥
4,453
-
I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters
57,299
-
Couple thoughts
3,967
-
PART TROIS
238
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
