Posted:
#26
Smh. Why am I on this play.
0
Medvedev to win +260!
Posted:
#31
Quote Originally Posted by skillahmang:
@PossessionTaken There are 2 games. NPC can you stay quiet. smh.
@PossessionTaken There are 2 games. NPC can you stay quiet. smh.
There are 5 matches? - This guy is a joke of course, so he will just pick something random - but the two women's semifinales the market has priced more or less spot on (imo)
Purcell/Thomson should not be -150 - so that will be my bet today - and I will watch from a distance as this guy decides who to bet on depending on who he finds most attractive 
Don't mention the frogs - we don't want to scare the toddler - we want him to sleep
0
Posted:
#34
Quote Originally Posted by CMac12:
Quote Originally Posted by skillahmang: Smh. Why am I on this play. how you thought medvedev was the play at +260 is beyond me. The line told the story!
Quote Originally Posted by skillahmang: Smh. Why am I on this play. how you thought medvedev was the play at +260 is beyond me. The line told the story!
Sometimes something at +100000 is the right play or something at -1000 - it depends on what the underlying probability is - the mindset you put forth here was exactly what made some bookmakers go broke meeting the "hole in one gang" in the 90's.
Don't mention the frogs - we don't want to scare the toddler - we want him to sleep
0
Posted:
#35
What makes this a joke is that he would have taken that bet if it was +220 instead of +260, because they only take it because they like how he played last game, because he has a cool cap or that chick is way more hot than her opponent - which, not surprisingly, is not how you beat a Trillion dollar industry that lives and breathes sports and odds.
Don't mention the frogs - we don't want to scare the toddler - we want him to sleep
0
Posted:
#37
Quote Originally Posted by Calde13:
Quote Originally Posted by CMac12: Quote Originally Posted by skillahmang: Smh. Why am I on this play. how you thought medvedev was the play at +260 is beyond me. The line told the story! Sometimes something at +100000 is the right play or something at -1000 - it depends on what the underlying probability is - the mindset you put forth here was exactly what made some bookmakers go broke meeting the "hole in one gang" in the 90's.
Quote Originally Posted by CMac12: Quote Originally Posted by skillahmang: Smh. Why am I on this play. how you thought medvedev was the play at +260 is beyond me. The line told the story! Sometimes something at +100000 is the right play or something at -1000 - it depends on what the underlying probability is - the mindset you put forth here was exactly what made some bookmakers go broke meeting the "hole in one gang" in the 90's.
they went broke because they made a bunch of bets that lost!
ask Billy Walters about line value. 
0
Posted:
#39
Quote Originally Posted by CMac12:
Quote Originally Posted by Calde13: Quote Originally Posted by CMac12: Quote Originally Posted by skillahmang: Smh. Why am I on this play. how you thought medvedev was the play at +260 is beyond me. The line told the story! Sometimes something at +100000 is the right play or something at -1000 - it depends on what the underlying probability is - the mindset you put forth here was exactly what made some bookmakers go broke meeting the "hole in one gang" in the 90's. they went broke because they made a bunch of bets that lost! ask Billy Walters about line value.
Quote Originally Posted by Calde13: Quote Originally Posted by CMac12: Quote Originally Posted by skillahmang: Smh. Why am I on this play. how you thought medvedev was the play at +260 is beyond me. The line told the story! Sometimes something at +100000 is the right play or something at -1000 - it depends on what the underlying probability is - the mindset you put forth here was exactly what made some bookmakers go broke meeting the "hole in one gang" in the 90's. they went broke because they made a bunch of bets that lost! ask Billy Walters about line value.
They went broke because they didn't know how to price an "unlikely" event properly
Don't get the Billy Walters reference ? - Have you just learned about him and wanted to show you knew something that has been something in this space or what?
Don't mention the frogs - we don't want to scare the toddler - we want him to sleep
0
Posted:
#40
It is like if you go out and ask all your friends how many of you should be in a room - for it being more likely than not that at least two of those people share birthdays - ALL of them who do not understand or use math would guess too high - it is 29 ppl in case you do not understand how to calculate it.
Don't mention the frogs - we don't want to scare the toddler - we want him to sleep
0
Posted:
#41
Quote Originally Posted by Calde13:
It is like if you go out and ask all your friends how many of you should be in a room - for it being more likely than not that at least two of those people share birthdays - ALL of them who do not understand or use math would guess too high - it is 29 ppl in case you do not understand how to calculate it.
It is like if you go out and ask all your friends how many of you should be in a room - for it being more likely than not that at least two of those people share birthdays - ALL of them who do not understand or use math would guess too high - it is 29 ppl in case you do not understand how to calculate it.
0
Posted:
#42
Quote Originally Posted by Calde13:
Quote Originally Posted by CMac12: Quote Originally Posted by Calde13: Quote Originally Posted by CMac12: Quote Originally Posted by skillahmang: Smh. Why am I on this play. how you thought medvedev was the play at +260 is beyond me. The line told the story! Sometimes something at +100000 is the right play or something at -1000 - it depends on what the underlying probability is - the mindset you put forth here was exactly what made some bookmakers go broke meeting the "hole in one gang" in the 90's. they went broke because they made a bunch of bets that lost! ask Billy Walters about line value. They went broke because they didn't know how to price an "unlikely" event properlyDon't get the Billy Walters reference ? - Have you just learned about him and wanted to show you knew something that has been something in this space or what?
Quote Originally Posted by CMac12: Quote Originally Posted by Calde13: Quote Originally Posted by CMac12: Quote Originally Posted by skillahmang: Smh. Why am I on this play. how you thought medvedev was the play at +260 is beyond me. The line told the story! Sometimes something at +100000 is the right play or something at -1000 - it depends on what the underlying probability is - the mindset you put forth here was exactly what made some bookmakers go broke meeting the "hole in one gang" in the 90's. they went broke because they made a bunch of bets that lost! ask Billy Walters about line value. They went broke because they didn't know how to price an "unlikely" event properlyDon't get the Billy Walters reference ? - Have you just learned about him and wanted to show you knew something that has been something in this space or what?
0
Posted:
#50
Quote Originally Posted by ABooksNightmare:
How does he have any units left... Are we using the metric system here...
How does he have any units left... Are we using the metric system here...
It's obvious he just counts dollars as units like some people do, which IMO defeats the purpose of units. I thought a bankroll is supposed to be 100 units no matter how much cash it is overall?
To this schmuck 47 units is 47 dollars I believe
Banned for using a burning $ emoji. Lol. TRUMP 2024!!!
0
Hot Forum Topics
