Posted:
#26
+240. He looks done to me
Everyone on Dimitrov, you know what this means!
Posted:
#27
Quote Originally Posted by jpot34:
@jtoler Yeah, but he's awesome on grass compared to Rune. Rune is giving him a go as I suspected.
is he though? rune is an all court player just because he doesnt have a ton of professional matches on grass isnt the end all be all. dimitriov lacks power and is now tired and doesnt go for it enough to bother rune too much. rune plays fast and can even dial it up a notch. he choked away the 2nd set given the break back and piss poor shots late in the set. now he's up against rune's youth. just because he's like 53-35 on grass doesnt tell the full story. the most telling thing is in 12 wimby appearances he's only gotten past the 3rd round twice. which means his grass wins came in smaller tourneys and he comes up small more times than not when it matters most. grigor is what he is.
@jtoler Yeah, but he's awesome on grass compared to Rune. Rune is giving him a go as I suspected.
Posted:
#28
Quote Originally Posted by jtoler:
Quote Originally Posted by jpot34: @jtoler Yeah, but he's awesome on grass compared to Rune. Rune is giving him a go as I suspected.is he though? rune is an all court player just because he doesnt have a ton of professional matches on grass isnt the end all be all. dimitriov lacks power and is now tired and doesnt go for it enough to bother rune too much. rune plays fast and can even dial it up a notch. he choked away the 2nd set given the break back and piss poor shots late in the set. now he's up against rune's youth. just because he's like 53-35 on grass doesnt tell the full story. the most telling thing is in 12 wimby appearances he's only gotten past the 3rd round twice. which means his grass wins came in smaller tourneys and he comes up small more times than not when it matters most. grigor is what he is.
Quote Originally Posted by jpot34: @jtoler Yeah, but he's awesome on grass compared to Rune. Rune is giving him a go as I suspected.is he though? rune is an all court player just because he doesnt have a ton of professional matches on grass isnt the end all be all. dimitriov lacks power and is now tired and doesnt go for it enough to bother rune too much. rune plays fast and can even dial it up a notch. he choked away the 2nd set given the break back and piss poor shots late in the set. now he's up against rune's youth. just because he's like 53-35 on grass doesnt tell the full story. the most telling thing is in 12 wimby appearances he's only gotten past the 3rd round twice. which means his grass wins came in smaller tourneys and he comes up small more times than not when it matters most. grigor is what he is.
Real ingredients; Papa Johns
Posted:
#37
Quote Originally Posted by jvarghese:
Lol for you guys to call Dimitrov a dominant grass player, is misconception. If he was a true dominant grass player, we'd be comparing him to Djokovic & Federer. Dimitrov has had all the potential in the world. There is only one problem, he has yet to win a coveted Slam.
Lol for you guys to call Dimitrov a dominant grass player, is misconception. If he was a true dominant grass player, we'd be comparing him to Djokovic & Federer. Dimitrov has had all the potential in the world. There is only one problem, he has yet to win a coveted Slam.
.....like I said.
Please don't put Dimitrov + dominant in the same sentence. Big no, no. (Especially to those reading this stuff who has no tennis knowledge).
Posted:
#38
Quote Originally Posted by jtoler:
Quote Originally Posted by jpot34: @jtoler Yeah, but he's awesome on grass compared to Rune. Rune is giving him a go as I suspected.is he though? rune is an all court player just because he doesnt have a ton of professional matches on grass isnt the end all be all. dimitriov lacks power and is now tired and doesnt go for it enough to bother rune too much. rune plays fast and can even dial it up a notch. he choked away the 2nd set given the break back and piss poor shots late in the set. now he's up against rune's youth. just because he's like 53-35 on grass doesnt tell the full story. the most telling thing is in 12 wimby appearances he's only gotten past the 3rd round twice. which means his grass wins came in smaller tourneys and he comes up small more times than not when it matters most. grigor is what he is.
Quote Originally Posted by jpot34: @jtoler Yeah, but he's awesome on grass compared to Rune. Rune is giving him a go as I suspected.is he though? rune is an all court player just because he doesnt have a ton of professional matches on grass isnt the end all be all. dimitriov lacks power and is now tired and doesnt go for it enough to bother rune too much. rune plays fast and can even dial it up a notch. he choked away the 2nd set given the break back and piss poor shots late in the set. now he's up against rune's youth. just because he's like 53-35 on grass doesnt tell the full story. the most telling thing is in 12 wimby appearances he's only gotten past the 3rd round twice. which means his grass wins came in smaller tourneys and he comes up small more times than not when it matters most. grigor is what he is.
@jtoler
Exactly my points. Spot on my friend.
Posted:
#43
Quote Originally Posted by EuroPro:
this guy has costed me a lifetime of money , time and time again just lets u down. has all the talent to be great. i think mentally he just cant do it.
this guy has costed me a lifetime of money , time and time again just lets u down. has all the talent to be great. i think mentally he just cant do it.
Been saying this for a long time. He just went and can't do it. He's too busy with the women. Cares more about that.
Hot Forum Topics
