Posted:
#126
Quote Originally Posted by n3gative:
definitely an attention person
definitely an attention person
it's W.H.O.R.E, get it right!!!
ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED?!?!??!!!
0
Djokovic - O/U on how many slams he finishes with, 10.5
Posted:
#129
Quote Originally Posted by gridironguy:
andy murray
del potro (pushed him 5 sets in semis)
tomic (still sucks lol)
etc, etc, etc.......all of the young guns......
will stop Djoko from getting to the heights that Fed and Rafa have reached and are reaching. respectively
Joker has now won 1 out of the 6 slams that have been played since i started this thread.
he had won 4 of the last 5 at the time i started this post.
wow.
0
Posted:
#133
Quote Originally Posted by nbafan88:
You have issues dude. Nadal will never beat Joker again off a clay surface
You have issues dude. Nadal will never beat Joker again off a clay surface
UNDER 10.5 is what I proclaimed on 1/31/2012 right after he had just won his 4th slam in the last 5.
he has won a grand total of ONE out of SIX slams since then
ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED???
0
Posted:
#135
Djokovic isn't a "next level" type of player? Are you kidding me? He had one of the most dominating years in the history of any sport 2 years ago. Federer is not going to beat Djokovic consistently at this point of his career. Nadal and Djokovic will go back and forth and Murray will win a couple more by the time his career ends, but Djokovic is a healthier player than Nadal and has played great over the last 3 years or so. I'd definitely go over and Nadal will likely come close to Roger also, but he has to spread out his major wins better for his legacy to be viewed as great as Fed. No doubt hes probably the best clay court player ever, but he needs to do more on other surfaces.
0
Posted:
#137
Quote Originally Posted by nbafan88:
You have issues dude. Nadal will never beat Joker again off a clay surface
You have issues dude. Nadal will never beat Joker again off a clay surface
sorry, Rafa's 13 slam wins including 6 straight wins over Joker, were in the way. can you repeat that?
1 slam title out of the last 7 since i began this thread.
how did i know right after he won 4 of the previous 5 slams, that this would happen??
0
Posted:
#140
Quote Originally Posted by Mcmanus:
I have to admit the obvious...As time goes on it looks like I was wrong about Joker getting into double digits for slams..But he's 26 and has time of course
Not saying he can't do it but I'm unsure at this point
I have to admit the obvious...As time goes on it looks like I was wrong about Joker getting into double digits for slams..But he's 26 and has time of course
Not saying he can't do it but I'm unsure at this point we are all right and wrong about this sports thing from time to time, but you live to fight another day and win another bet.
as for your avatar, ferocious fernando vargas, i believed back in Dec 2000 that his team should have never put him in the ring with Tito Trinidad when Fernando was so young. it was bad for his career to have his first huge fight at that young age before he was truly ready to beat a savvy vet.
unlike Fernando's career which was nowhere near as good as his talent was, you will be just fine my friend
0
Posted:
#143
Quote Originally Posted by gridironguy:
djoko got perennial choker murray in australia 2011 final
djoko got blown out by fed in french semis
djoko was fortunate that rafa had a broken foot while playing wimb final
djoko was fortunate that rafa had to miss hardcourt season to heal from broken foot so was not 100% during us open final
djoko needed 5 sets in australia to beat perennial choker murray
djoko needed 5 sets to beat rafa in the final
his 4 slams in the last 12 mos is a great achievement, but is not *as* impressive in overall dominance as what fed AND rafa have accomplished
djoko is not a 'next level' kind of player, hence 5 slams vs rafa's 10 though they are just 11 mos apart in age
if you only look at the end result, and now HOW they got there to the slam wins, you are just any other sports fan. don't be just "any other sports fan", be an intellectual and break it down
cheers mate
How woeful this post is to read a number of years after it was posted.
0
Hot Forum Topics
