Posted:
#1
2* Swiatek to win the AO +229
1* Sinner to win the AO +675
.5* Medvedev to win the AO +930
1
Australian Open from the King
Posted:
#14
Quote Originally Posted by UnderdogKing:
1* Tomjanovic +1.5 sets (+110) over Ostapenko
1* Tomjanovic +1.5 sets (+110) over Ostapenko
1* Parlay (+104): Rudd -550 over Purcell/Hurkacz -420 over Mensik/Zheng -255 over Boulter
(2-0) +2.14u 
Rolling along so far this tournament. AO future plays remain in play with Swiatek and Medvedev coming up clutch.
I'm not liking the card tonight and going to protect profits. I see better opportunities tomorrow. Here are my leans and not official plays for the night:
Etcheverry +2.5 sets +125
Machac +140
Marasozsan + 5 games
Anisimova +145
Parks +1.5 sets +300
1
Posted:
#21
I like De Minaur here myself. I think the over is the play.
Form wise, they’re both playing great. I’ll take the counter puncher over the base line attacker at plus money, any day of the week especially considering this counter punchers court coverage capability and solid service game.
0
Posted:
#22
Two things I think the public could be considering for the line drop.
1:) Rublev’s recent 3-0 win against someone who should be considered a threat, (Korda.) On paper this is a decent triumph comparatively.
2:) Rublev and De Minaur’s most recent match up went Rublevs way.
I can see a lot of people favouring Rublev based on these two things.
0
Posted:
#23
Quote Originally Posted by AverageAllstar:
Two things I think the public could be considering for the line drop. 1:) Rublev’s recent 3-0 win against someone who should be considered a threat, (Korda.) On paper this is a decent triumph comparatively. 2:) Rublev and De Minaur’s most recent match up went Rublevs way. I can see a lot of people favouring Rublev based on these two things.
Two things I think the public could be considering for the line drop. 1:) Rublev’s recent 3-0 win against someone who should be considered a threat, (Korda.) On paper this is a decent triumph comparatively. 2:) Rublev and De Minaur’s most recent match up went Rublevs way. I can see a lot of people favouring Rublev based on these two things.
I'm Aussie and followed De Minaur his entire career.
He has literally no weapons at all to trouble the top 10 players in the world. Never has, never will. He's been all talk leading into this tournament. Telling the public he's sick and tired of everyone saying he rarely does anything against the best.
He is what he is. Speedy Gonzalez and that's it. Physically unimposing. We are seeing exactly what he is all about now against Rublev. This is De Minaur's ceiling.
1
Posted:
#25
Quote Originally Posted by UnderdogKing:
1* De Minaur +110 over Rublev
1* De Minaur +110 over Rublev
1* Khachanov +2.5 sets (-107) over Sinner
(0-2) -2.07u
Gave back early tournament profits. Didn't get a chance to watch the De Minaur match, but looks like he ran out of gas after taking the 2nd and 3rd set tie breaks. De Minaur and Rublev are pretty similar players in that neither has the weapons to challenge the top 5 players in the world (Djoker, Alcaraz, Medvedev, Sinner, Zverev) on the games biggest stages. I expect Sinner to take care of business vs Rublev. I did watch the Sinner vs Khachanov match, and the Russian did play well enough and had opportunities to take the 2nd set, but failed to do so. .
1* Kalinskaya -145 over Paolini
1* Kecmanovic +2.5 sets (+160) over Alcaraz
1* Parlay (+106): Norrie +2.5 sets (-200) over Zverev/Azarenka -270 over Yastremska
1* Parlay (+110): Zheng -500 over Dodin/Hurkacz -265 over Cazaux/Sinner -370 over Rublev
0
Hot Forum Topics
