Posted:
#51
Interested in who you got for today. I took rockies, cubs (waited for even line), and dbacks.
0
Wally's 'DOG CHASE' Series System
Posted:
#53
Another wrinkle in the system. The Reds (with their win last night) have been playing better IMO than the Marlins.
So, game 2 of the series has been cancelled.
If the Marlins do win tonight, depending on how it goes, game 3 may become a play. Update on this will come tomorrow.
May 5th, 2018
TWO plays today
Tigers (C)
Diamondbacks (B)
Happy Derby Day! 
0
Posted:
#54
Based on the combination of last night’s performance and the Marlins being a DOG today, there is VALUE in today’s game.
The reason this series is playing out like this (in terms of the system) is because these two teams are very similar in body of work and recent play. This is the first time this has happened and I don’t expect it to happen often.
This dog chase series system is all about VALUE! Sticking to the system will help us find SUCCESS. Let’s get it!
May 6th, 2018
Marlins (B)
0
Posted:
#56
DOG SERIES SYSTEM - thru END of Week 3* (v2.0): 25-1, +26.97u
Back tracking (through beginning of season) has v2.0 at: +38.53u
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1fEmLVR-VMS9ABFtq0QyUalkrs7nnPVUQHWRsVEQOWMY/edit?usp=sharing
Picks + Odds + Units are posted on the google doc daily!
The system is not going anywhere, be back tomorrow for a brand new week!
0
Posted:
#61
i’m still frustrated with this covers update as yesterday’s post was supposed to have May 8th, 2018 set at the top of the post. it’s hard for me to tolerate that.
in light of these continued issues, i have started a twitter handle: @WiseguyWally
going forward, i’m always going to have my picks posted on twitter! it’s simple and it’s reliable. i’ll try my best to post specific on here but i can’t guarantee.
follow me, i’ll toss you a follow back!
no series openers today, 2 plays:
May 9th, 2018
Mets (B)
Blue Jays (B)
0
Posted:
#62
***ATTENTION***
I made an error. thanks to supporter @sbradpowers I recognized that the Mets should not have been a play 5/8 + 5/9. I run a 2nd system internally and I mistakenly thought I was viewing one while working on the other.
My mistake is going to be reflected on the google tracking sheet. However, I am going to not reflect this in the total units. The reason i am doing this is because this sheet is created to publicly share with you and all others pure results of the system. There just is no easy way to simply show a human error in a system record/units total.
I want to be and will be as transparent as possible with all of you. If you’re reading this, thank you for your support!
We closed out the first half of the week successfully! Onto the 2nd half! See you all tomorrow 
0
Posted:
#69
First of all thank you for sharing... I don't mean to be rude, but I have a few questions about your system.
I see it started with a version and upgraded it to 2.0 that's perfect, but you comment that it has about 20 tabs open, so I'll ask you the question you always look at the same 20 statistics to determine if the dog is playing better or you are flexible? I mean, in some dogs you look at 12 statistics and you can already determine that you are playing better at your opinion.
The truth is that if it were 2 I think it is better because I myself am in favor of not making closed systems to some parameters and more I could tell you that baseball would be the best sport to do it this way, being a sport with 162 games in regular season a system with closed parameters is always very easy to mismatch or exception.
I can leave you an email if you want, I'm also working on dog systems, it would be nice to be able to chat and cross opinions.
0
Posted:
#70
@laitay77 no problem man! yes i do use the same ~20 statistics. I have created an extremely interactive google sheet that allows me to enter all data very easily. It's time consuming but at the end of the day it's worth it. The system doesn't cut corners. All data plays a specific role. I understand what you're saying that you'd rather have 2-12 statistics in use (I would too) but I have found success with the ~20 so why would I change, ya know?
We all have to put the hard work in if we want to find success! If you're able to create a successful dog system with less definitely let me know!
0
Posted:
#71
Quote Originally Posted by Wally1317:
@laitay77 no problem man! yes i do use the same ~20 statistics. I have created an extremely interactive google sheet that allows me to enter all data very easily. It's time consuming but at the end of the day it's worth it. The system doesn't cut corners. All data plays a specific role. I understand what you're saying that you'd rather have 2-12 statistics in use (I would too) but I have found success with the ~20 so why would I change, ya know? We all have to put the hard work in if we want to find success! If you're able to create a successful dog system with less definitely let me know!
@laitay77 no problem man! yes i do use the same ~20 statistics. I have created an extremely interactive google sheet that allows me to enter all data very easily. It's time consuming but at the end of the day it's worth it. The system doesn't cut corners. All data plays a specific role. I understand what you're saying that you'd rather have 2-12 statistics in use (I would too) but I have found success with the ~20 so why would I change, ya know? We all have to put the hard work in if we want to find success! If you're able to create a successful dog system with less definitely let me know!
You didn't understand my question, but you already answered it.... It was my fault because I have problems speaking English...
I don't see any problem in using 20 statistics, which I asked you if you were flexible in deciding if a dog was playing well, because being flexible if it's true that every day you have more work to decide the dog in question but that's what told you that an inflexible system in a sport with so many matches is very difficult not to fail.
The truth is that I don't have a 100% sure mlb dog system, I'm currently investigating one, which takes about 20 U flat bets, and in chase of G2, takes about 15 U.
This system I'm talking about doesn't almost use statistics, because I do understand some MLB but I'm an NHL guy. I think that by adding some important statistics to this sport the system could improve or make some more sense, nowadays it is a winner but it only takes 2 months of the season and needs some work!
If you want me to leave you my email in the pm just let me know if you are interested or if you have time.
If you not interested any problem friend and thanks for sharing!
0
Hot Forum Topics
