All Forums | Systems & Strategies

SUPERBOWL system for Frauds 100%

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 25651
Posts: 103
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 230
Posted: #51
Here are the numbers...

AFC
Denver +107.125 / -1 TO
New England +54.625 / +25 TO
Houston +48.812 / +12 TO
Cincy +13 / +4 TO
Baltimore +1.562 / +9 TO
Colts -11.812 / -12 TO

NFC
San Fran +67.437 / +9 TO
Seabirds +44.437 / +13 TO
ATL +26.062 / +13 TO
GB +22.687 / +7 TO
Wash +5.5 / +17 TO
Minn -13.437 / -1 TO
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 230
Posted: #52
Where can I find the Total Defense scoring rankings??
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 230
Posted: #53
The playoff seeding kind of coincides with these rankings...
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 91
Posted: #54
Thanks for picking up on this! I was hoping someone would jump in.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 1150
Posted: #55
So does this mean it will most likely be Denver vs San Fran?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 3644
Posted: #56
Quote Originally Posted by VegasSB:

Here are the numbers...

AFC
Denver +107.125 / -1 TO
New England +54.625 / +25 TO
Houston +48.812 / +12 TO
Cincy +13 / +4 TO
Baltimore +1.562 / +9 TO
Colts -11.812 / -12 TO

NFC
San Fran +67.437 / +9 TO
Seabirds +44.437 / +13 TO
ATL +26.062 / +13 TO
GB +22.687 / +7 TO
Wash +5.5 / +17 TO
Minn -13.437 / -1 TO

So by dawniedawgs' system, SF Vs. Denver, then NE; thus the Ravens.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2012
Posts: 628
Posted: #57
not so sure about the system but 9ers will win and cover the 3.5 in 2013...bol
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 3644
Posted: #58
Once again,
system works for year '13
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 91
Posted: #59
Well....is anyone following this system this year?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 134
Posted: #60
Just curious how this own last year?  Balt was the worst afc team with regards to ypg?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2011
Posts: 3644
Posted: #61
System's up for '13
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 134
Posted: #62
I thought it was a Super Bowl system?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2013
Posts: 171
Posted: #63
How did system win last year when they were a pathetic +1.562? The turnovers were decent but they need to be +45 or more yards ahead, on average for each opponent through 16weeks. Confused on that 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2013
Posts: 171
Posted: #64
Quote Originally Posted by VegasSB:

Here are the numbers...

AFC
Denver +107.125 / -1 TO
New England +54.625 / +25 TO
Houston +48.812 / +12 TO
Cincy +13 / +4 TO
Baltimore +1.562 / +9 TO
Colts -11.812 / -12 TO

NFC
San Fran +67.437 / +9 TO
Seabirds +44.437 / +13 TO
ATL +26.062 / +13 TO
GB +22.687 / +7 TO
Wash +5.5 / +17 TO
Minn -13.437 / -1 TO

According to this, it should of been Patriots vs Niners. Baltimore didn't even qualify!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2013
Posts: 171
Posted: #65
I ran the numbers through Week 16 and here are the results. Note I only listed teams in the +yds because they are the only teams with a shot. I showed KC because their defense is leading in some defensive categories:

Super Bowl 2014

===
AFC
===

DENVER:
Yards vs opponent average: +94.7yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 3
SOS Ranking: 32/32 .430%
Fumble Recovery's: 8
Interceptions: 17
Turnover +/-: (-1)

CINCINNATI: 
Yards vs opponent average: +55.7yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 5
SOS Ranking: 12/32 .508%
Fumble Recovery's: 11
Interceptions: 17
Turnover +/-: (+2)

NEW ENGLAND:
Yards vs opponent average: +13yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 3
SOS Ranking: 14/32 .508%
Fumble Recovery's: 12
Interceptions: 17
Turnover +/-: (+10)

KANSAS CITY:
Yards vs opponent average: -27.6yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 7
SOS Ranking: 28/32 .473%
Fumble Recovery's: 15
Interceptions: 20
Turnover +/-: (+17)

SAN DIEGO:
Yards vs opponent average: +23.6
Defensive Touchdowns: 1
SOS Ranking: 31/32 .457%
Fumble Recovery's: 6
Interceptions: 11
Turnover +/-: (-3)

====
NFC - (+35yd avg to qualify)
====

NEW ORLEANS:
Yards vs opponent average: +88.2yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 0
SOS Ranking: 3/32 .539%
Fumble Recovery's: 7
Interceptions: 11
Turnover +/-: (-1)

PHILADELPHIA:
Yards vs opponent average: +28.2yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 2
SOS Ranking: 20/32 .496%
Fumble Recovery's: 11
Interceptions: 17
Turnover +/-: (+10)

ARIZONA:
Yards vs opponent average: +24yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 5
SOS Ranking: 7/32 .520%
Fumble Recovery's: 10
Interceptions: 20
Turnover +/-: (+1)

SEATTLE:
Yards vs opponent average: +17.1yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 3
SOS Ranking: 11/32 .516%
Fumble Recovery's: 11
Interceptions: 26
Turnover +/-: (+18)

SAN FRANCISCO: 
Yards vs opponent average: +14.4yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 5
SOS Ranking: 9/32 .520%
Fumble Recovery's: 11
Interceptions: 17
Turnover +/-: (+10)

CAROLINA:
Yards vs opponent average: +17.5yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 3
SOS Ranking: 1/32 .543
Fumble Recovery's: 10
Interceptions: 19
Turnover +/-: (+12)
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 134
Posted: #66
Look at the SOS at the afc teams as a whole.   
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2013
Posts: 171
Posted: #67
I would say front runners as of Week 16 are:

AFC:
Cincinnati - leads AFC in TD's, impressive yds vs opponent, decent ratio, and tough schedule.
New England (if they manage to increase yds in Week 17)
Denver - negative in turnovers

NFC:
New Orleans has chance but negative in turnovers
Seattle if they increase their yds vs opponent
Arizona has tougher schedule than Philly plus more scores.

Thoughts anyone???
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2013
Posts: 171
Posted: #68
I'm liking Carolina over SF too. More yards, toughest schedule, better ratio, more INT's.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2013
Posts: 171
Posted: #69
Ill just pick up this thread to see how it does since I'm tracking it now lol. I love to handicap games so I will provid good opinion and summaries when the season wraps up. Together, I'm sure we can predict which two teams will for sure be in the SB for 2014! Update to come.....
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 33
Posted: #70
Quote Originally Posted by Deano-:

I ran the numbers through Week 16 and here are the results. Note I only listed teams in the +yds because they are the only teams with a shot. I showed KC because their defense is leading in some defensive categories:

Super Bowl 2014

===
AFC
===

DENVER:
Yards vs opponent average: +94.7yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 3
SOS Ranking: 32/32 .430%
Fumble Recovery's: 8
Interceptions: 17
Turnover +/-: (-1)

CINCINNATI: 
Yards vs opponent average: +55.7yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 5
SOS Ranking: 12/32 .508%
Fumble Recovery's: 11
Interceptions: 17
Turnover +/-: (+2)

NEW ENGLAND:
Yards vs opponent average: +13yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 3
SOS Ranking: 14/32 .508%
Fumble Recovery's: 12
Interceptions: 17
Turnover +/-: (+10)

KANSAS CITY:
Yards vs opponent average: -27.6yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 7
SOS Ranking: 28/32 .473%
Fumble Recovery's: 15
Interceptions: 20
Turnover +/-: (+17)

SAN DIEGO:
Yards vs opponent average: +23.6
Defensive Touchdowns: 1
SOS Ranking: 31/32 .457%
Fumble Recovery's: 6
Interceptions: 11
Turnover +/-: (-3)

====
NFC - (+35yd avg to qualify)
====

NEW ORLEANS:
Yards vs opponent average: +88.2yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 0
SOS Ranking: 3/32 .539%
Fumble Recovery's: 7
Interceptions: 11
Turnover +/-: (-1)

PHILADELPHIA:
Yards vs opponent average: +28.2yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 2
SOS Ranking: 20/32 .496%
Fumble Recovery's: 11
Interceptions: 17
Turnover +/-: (+10)

ARIZONA:
Yards vs opponent average: +24yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 5
SOS Ranking: 7/32 .520%
Fumble Recovery's: 10
Interceptions: 20
Turnover +/-: (+1)

SEATTLE:
Yards vs opponent average: +17.1yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 3
SOS Ranking: 11/32 .516%
Fumble Recovery's: 11
Interceptions: 26
Turnover +/-: (+18)

SAN FRANCISCO: 
Yards vs opponent average: +14.4yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 5
SOS Ranking: 9/32 .520%
Fumble Recovery's: 11
Interceptions: 17
Turnover +/-: (+10)

CAROLINA:
Yards vs opponent average: +17.5yds
Defensive Touchdowns: 3
SOS Ranking: 1/32 .543
Fumble Recovery's: 10
Interceptions: 19
Turnover +/-: (+12)


Do you have updated numbers ??? TIA
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2013
Posts: 171
Posted: #71
I will by tonight my friend 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2013
Posts: 171
Posted: #72
Only thing that concerns me is last years results. No one has chimed in to verify why Balt was the play last year. They were only 1yd better than their opponents??? I'm going to analyze each team and make logical decisions based on the systems parameters... 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 134
Posted: #73

Of those that are +35yds, only Cincinnati has a + TO ratio.  That doesn't mean I would pick them at all.    I don't see how you can bet against Seattle to win it all, based on these numbers. 

Would you pick Denver or New Orleans based on their offensive numbers...and terrible defense?   I wouldn't.  

I will be awaiting the updated numbers to see if anything stands out, but as of now my picks are Denver/Cincinatti and Seattle/Green Bay.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2013
Posts: 171
Posted: #74
Super Bowl 2014

====
AFC
====

DENVER:
Yards vs opponent average: +101.3
Defensive Touchdowns: 3
Games vs Playoff Teams: 7
SOS Ranking: 32/32 .430%
Fumble Recovery's: 9
Interceptions: 17
Turnover +/-: Flat
ST Rank: 21

CINCINNATI: 
Yards vs opponent average: +62.9
Defensive Touchdowns: 6
Games vs Playoff Teams: 5
SOS Ranking: 12/32 .508%
Fumble Recovery's: 11
Interceptions: 20
Turnover +/-: (+1)
ST Rank: 12

NEW ENGLAND:
Yards vs opponent average: +11.4
Defensive Touchdowns: 3
Games vs Playoff Teams: 4
SOS Ranking: 14/32 .508%
Fumble Recovery's: 12
Interceptions: 17
Turnover +/-: (+9)
ST Rank: 2

KANSAS CITY:
Yards vs opponent average: -30.5
Defensive Touchdowns: 7
Games vs Playoff Teams: 6
SOS Ranking: 28/32 .473%
Fumble Recovery's: 15
Interceptions: 21
Turnover +/-: (+18)
ST Rank: 1

SAN DIEGO:
Yards vs opponent average: +26.8 
Defensive Touchdowns: 1
Games vs Playoff Teams: 7
SOS Ranking: 31/32 .457%
Fumble Recovery's: 6
Interceptions: 11
Turnover +/-: (-4)
ST Rank: 15

INDIANAPOLIS:
Yards vs opponent average: -15.3
Defensive Touchdowns: 2
Games vs Playoff Teams: 7
SOS Ranking: 30/32 .471%
Fumble Recovery's: 12
Interceptions: 15
Turnover +/-: +13
ST Rank: 17






 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2013
Posts: 171
Posted: #75

====
NFC 
====

NEW ORLEANS:
Yards vs opponent average: +93.7
Defensive Touchdowns: 0
Games vs Playoff Teams: 6
SOS Ranking: 3/32 .539%
Fumble Recovery's: 7
Interceptions: 12
Turnover +/-: flat
ST Rank: 24

PHILADELPHIA:
Yards vs opponent average: +23.1
Defensive Touchdowns: 2
Games vs Playoff Teams: 5
SOS Ranking: 20/32 .496%
Fumble Recovery's: 12
Interceptions: 19
Turnover +/-: (+12)
ST Rank: 25

GREENBAY:
Yards vs opponent average: +28
Defensive Touchdowns: 2
Games vs Playoff Teams: 3
SOS Ranking: 6/32 .533%
Fumble Recovery's: 11
Interceptions: 11
Turnover +/-: -3
ST Rank: 19

SEATTLE:
Yards vs opponent average: +65.4 
Defensive Touchdowns: 4
Games vs Playoff Teams: 7
SOS Ranking: 11/32 .516%
Fumble Recovery's: 11
Interceptions: 28
Turnover +/-: (+20)
ST Rank: 5

SAN FRANCISCO: 
Yards vs opponent average: +6.9 
Defensive Touchdowns: 5
Games vs Playoff Teams: 8
SOS Ranking: 9/32 .520%
Fumble Recovery's: 12
Interceptions: 18
Turnover +/-: (+12)
ST Rank: 7

CAROLINA:
Yards vs opponent average: +15.5
Defensive Touchdowns: 4
Games vs Playoff Teams: 6
SOS Ranking: 1/32 .543
Fumble Recovery's: 10
Interceptions: 20
Turnover +/-: (+11)
ST Rank: 13
All Forums | Systems & Strategies
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gambling
Betting Sites
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
21+
Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
Covers is verified safe by:
Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.