| Current Record 28-0 6-1-09 LAD (Game 1) Good Luck |
Run Line Blitz System
Current Record 26-0
I'm new to this system, but I can't figure out why this game wasn't counted as a loss?? Or for that matter a win? LAA lost 5-2 that game so I don't understand how it could not be counted as something. I apologize if I am wrong in thinking this, I'm just trying to figure it out.
Current Record 26-0
I'm new to this system, but I can't figure out why this game wasn't counted as a loss?? Or for that matter a win? LAA lost 5-2 that game so I don't understand how it could not be counted as something. I apologize if I am wrong in thinking this, I'm just trying to figure it out.
I'm new to this system, but I can't figure out why this game wasn't counted as a loss?? Or for that matter a win? LAA lost 5-2 that game so I don't understand how it could not be counted as something. I apologize if I am wrong in thinking this, I'm just trying to figure it out.
wryan its a chase system, Bet 1 was LAA and it lost, the next day Bet 2 was the PHI and it won. so therefore the bet won and doesnt count as a lost. remember we're chasing.
I'm new to this system, but I can't figure out why this game wasn't counted as a loss?? Or for that matter a win? LAA lost 5-2 that game so I don't understand how it could not be counted as something. I apologize if I am wrong in thinking this, I'm just trying to figure it out.
wryan its a chase system, Bet 1 was LAA and it lost, the next day Bet 2 was the PHI and it won. so therefore the bet won and doesnt count as a lost. remember we're chasing.
NYY opened at -175
SD opened at -200
Are you only wagering on A.L. teams? If not, the Padres should be the play.
SD -1.5 (+145)
NYY -1.5 (-105)
...take your pick.
NYY opened at -175
SD opened at -200
Are you only wagering on A.L. teams? If not, the Padres should be the play.
SD -1.5 (+145)
NYY -1.5 (-105)
...take your pick.
NYY opened at -175
SD opened at -200
Are you only wagering on A.L. teams? If not, the Padres should be the play.
SD -1.5 (+145)
NYY -1.5 (-105)
...take your pick.
The Yankees opened anywheres between -175 and -205 depending on where u looked. San Diego opened anywhere from -170 to -200.
If you go by Vegas then the Yankees opened -190 or -200. SD opened -165, -170 and -175.
My book wasn't even close, the Yanks were a huge fav compared to the Padres. Actually SD wasn't even in the top 3.
The Yankees are the play 2nite.
Mo 'em down A.J.. u son of a bitch sellout
NYY opened at -175
SD opened at -200
Are you only wagering on A.L. teams? If not, the Padres should be the play.
SD -1.5 (+145)
NYY -1.5 (-105)
...take your pick.
The Yankees opened anywheres between -175 and -205 depending on where u looked. San Diego opened anywhere from -170 to -200.
If you go by Vegas then the Yankees opened -190 or -200. SD opened -165, -170 and -175.
My book wasn't even close, the Yanks were a huge fav compared to the Padres. Actually SD wasn't even in the top 3.
The Yankees are the play 2nite.
Mo 'em down A.J.. u son of a bitch sellout
NYY opened at -175
SD opened at -200
Are you only wagering on A.L. teams? If not, the Padres should be the play.
SD -1.5 (+145)
NYY -1.5 (-105)
...take your pick.
There are variables that come into play on calculating the RL. Mainly, the reason for the huge + number for SD on the RL is that they are not a high scoring team. Couple that to the fact that they are palying at home and if they're winning will only hit 8 innings...the chances of them winning by 1 are larger than the Yanks, despite the latter being at home, too.
NYY opened at -175
SD opened at -200
Are you only wagering on A.L. teams? If not, the Padres should be the play.
SD -1.5 (+145)
NYY -1.5 (-105)
...take your pick.
There are variables that come into play on calculating the RL. Mainly, the reason for the huge + number for SD on the RL is that they are not a high scoring team. Couple that to the fact that they are palying at home and if they're winning will only hit 8 innings...the chances of them winning by 1 are larger than the Yanks, despite the latter being at home, too.
Just caught up on reading the past few pages - LAD for 6/3/09, correct?
Correct, the Dodgers will be the overwhelming favorite 2morrow. With their incredible comeback 2nite, I love the RL 2morrow behind Chad!!
Another day @ the office.. another good night's sleep!
Just caught up on reading the past few pages - LAD for 6/3/09, correct?
Correct, the Dodgers will be the overwhelming favorite 2morrow. With their incredible comeback 2nite, I love the RL 2morrow behind Chad!!
Another day @ the office.. another good night's sleep!
I am getting on board with you guys however I have found a couple of losses. All I did was go by the lines that were posted by covers back to the begininning of the season. I have losses on the following days
Please correct me if I'm wrong, overall you would still be up 1800$ assuming you chase 3 but it has not gone 29-0, at least I don't think
I am getting on board with you guys however I have found a couple of losses. All I did was go by the lines that were posted by covers back to the begininning of the season. I have losses on the following days
Please correct me if I'm wrong, overall you would still be up 1800$ assuming you chase 3 but it has not gone 29-0, at least I don't think
I am getting on board with you guys however I have found a couple of losses. All I did was go by the lines that were posted by covers back to the begininning of the season. I have losses on the following days
Please correct me if I'm wrong, overall you would still be up 1800$ assuming you chase 3 but it has not gone 29-0, at least I don't think
The chase is for 6 games, not 3. The system will only take a loss if it loses 6 consecutive games.
I am getting on board with you guys however I have found a couple of losses. All I did was go by the lines that were posted by covers back to the begininning of the season. I have losses on the following days
Please correct me if I'm wrong, overall you would still be up 1800$ assuming you chase 3 but it has not gone 29-0, at least I don't think
The chase is for 6 games, not 3. The system will only take a loss if it loses 6 consecutive games.
100$ bettor would have to lay 3200$ to win 100$ if it ever went to game 6. That's a little steep, but if you have that kind of dough why not make it a 10 game chase then you can pretty much guarantee no losses ever.
I'm exagerrating but I hope you see my point
100$ bettor would have to lay 3200$ to win 100$ if it ever went to game 6. That's a little steep, but if you have that kind of dough why not make it a 10 game chase then you can pretty much guarantee no losses ever.
I'm exagerrating but I hope you see my point
Hot Forum Topics
-
🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵
449,480
-
Giants vs Rams MNF in-game live
2,476
-
Monday 09/21/2026
459
-
Serious Streak Survivor Strategies
1,918,168
-
NFL LOCKED IN!
99,544
-
***Macwesties * Mon. Sept. 21, 2026 * Birthday * NFL * MNF * Football Play***
4,066
-
New York Giants @ Los Angeles Rams
5,050
-
Where are they getting enough explosive offense to separate from New York by more than a touchdown
2,550
-
?? KBO Plays 🥎
14,765
-
Take the Giants Moneyline tonight - Really
2,796
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
