Posted:
#126
*ERRATUM*
Above post is for later's game *PICKS 09-07*
Timezone Issue.. My bad
0
PROGRESSIVE CHASE STRATEGY
Posted:
#129
This will be my last chase my fellow lurkers and followers.. A summary regarding this strategy will be posted once this chase is done..
Brushing up a new strategy. I might post my NFL/NBA Strategy this week on a new thread..
Also, to those who followed my post for this strategy.. I'm setting up something on Weebly for next year's MLB season along with my crew.
Thanks 
0
Posted:
#132
Remaining Balance: 11,627.61
*Results on Picks (09-08)*
Royals (4L Running) Risk: 750 (-1.5) Odds: 2.30 
Total Return: 1,725.00
Total Return: 1,725.00
Total Balance: 13,352.61
**FINAL BALANCE**
Summary will be posted on the 11th of September while my blog on weebly is still on the works.. Ill be posting the link of my weebly page probably by next year but ill keep you guys posted..
**FINAL BALANCE**
Summary will be posted on the 11th of September while my blog on weebly is still on the works.. Ill be posting the link of my weebly page probably by next year but ill keep you guys posted..
0
Posted:
#134
I'M BACK *terminator voice*It's MLB 2016 and I can't wait to start running this system. This year it'll be different. We've made some tweaks on the Chase System since we'll be starting at the start of the season. Changes on the new system will be in GREEN. Below are the details of the system:
PROGRESSIVE CHASE SYSTEM
The concept of this strategy is to bet on 1 or more pick (depending on your bankroll) in a progressive risk amount (1,2,4,8,16,32). If a pick is a win, no action is no longer needed. If a pick is a lose, bet twice on the team on their next game. For example:
Our pick for this game is Rays
Tampa Bay Rays v Baltimore Orioles – 2 : 6 (-1)
Tampa Bay Rays v Baltimore Orioles – 5 : 6 (-2)(Total loss-3)
Tampa Bay Rays v Baltimore Orioles – 2 : 0 (-4)(Total profit +1)
Last year, an MLB team has an average losing streak of 6.6%ish (6-7ish losing streak)
Ways on minimizing your loss using this strategy:
1. Start your bet on a team that has 3 loss in their last 3 games. Or, you can go the safer path which is 4-5 loss on their last 4-5 games.
2. If your 1st bet is a loss, your 2nd bet should be on pointspread (+1.5). You have an option to still bet on the moneyline but this is at your own risk.
3. Follow a maximum of 2 teams on your 1st run and always take into consideration your bankroll because your risk amount is progressive. This is what I’ll do, 5,000 on my bankroll, my 1st bet will be 75 which is 1.5% of my initial bankroll. Progressive of 75 will be (75, 150, 300, 600, 1200, 2400,…)
4. Take advantage betting on teams that has 5+ losing streak, I consider them ripe for picking. LOL.
Will start my bankroll at 5,000. As of the moment no WATCHLIST or PICKS will be posted. Probably by April 8 will get our 1st blood.
See you guys..
0
Posted:
#139
Awesome system after scanning your thread. Thank you for sharing. I have one Q - and the fact it's working, doesent warrant change, but I wonder IF you went same wagering routine at -1.0 run ( Astro's were 1.91 at Pinny), would the less payout hurt the overall results when you consider you would PUSH as apposed to lose any ONE game wins by the Fave?
Just curious and thanks again. I was tailing and went with the Astro's -1.0. Got on too late for the Jays game but would have likely gone the 1.0 there also, seeing their @ home and would only hit 8 innings if UP 1 after 9.
Cheers and continued success your way!!!
Just curious and thanks again. I was tailing and went with the Astro's -1.0. Got on too late for the Jays game but would have likely gone the 1.0 there also, seeing their @ home and would only hit 8 innings if UP 1 after 9.
Cheers and continued success your way!!!
0
Posted:
#140
Quote Originally Posted by takethepnts:
Awesome system after scanning your thread. Thank you for sharing. I have one Q - and the fact it's working, doesent warrant change, but I wonder IF you went same wagering routine at -1.0 run ( Astro's were 1.91 at Pinny), would the less payout hurt the overall results when you consider you would PUSH as apposed to lose any ONE game wins by the Fave?
Just curious and thanks again. I was tailing and went with the Astro's -1.0. Got on too late for the Jays game but would have likely gone the 1.0 there also, seeing their @ home and would only hit 8 innings if UP 1 after 9.
Cheers and continued success your way!!!
Awesome system after scanning your thread. Thank you for sharing. I have one Q - and the fact it's working, doesent warrant change, but I wonder IF you went same wagering routine at -1.0 run ( Astro's were 1.91 at Pinny), would the less payout hurt the overall results when you consider you would PUSH as apposed to lose any ONE game wins by the Fave?
Just curious and thanks again. I was tailing and went with the Astro's -1.0. Got on too late for the Jays game but would have likely gone the 1.0 there also, seeing their @ home and would only hit 8 innings if UP 1 after 9.
Cheers and continued success your way!!!
Actually, about a month ago during Spring Training. My partner and I talked about it. Your feedback is actually cool, it minimize the risk. Unfortunately, our bookies don't offer -1/+1 runline.
Assuming that we have an option to bet on -1/+1 runline; we would do it on the 2nd chase. Why? We want to maximize the winning on the 1st chase, especially if your betting limit is 1.5% of your BR.
Thanks man for your feedback and compliment.. Cheers
0
Posted:
#141
Ah ok thanks for the reply. So if I'm understanding correctly, The Jays you would have still chased at -1.5 (1st chase) and -1.0 on the Astro's (2nd chase) ?
OR -
Did ya mean Game 1) Both chases, You go after -1.5 and then kick in the -1/+1 in the 2nd Wager of the progression itself per series?
You wanna maximize the 1st LEG of the Progression or the 1st of 2 chases?
Thank you for clarifying. And I'm not too sure where you guys are investing from, but there are plenty of decent online establishments that do offer the +1/-1 now . Not all are created totally equal on the odds ofcourse, but at the very least they do allow an investor that option.
Have a super Sunday and Good Luck Always sir!
OR -
Did ya mean Game 1) Both chases, You go after -1.5 and then kick in the -1/+1 in the 2nd Wager of the progression itself per series?
You wanna maximize the 1st LEG of the Progression or the 1st of 2 chases?
Thank you for clarifying. And I'm not too sure where you guys are investing from, but there are plenty of decent online establishments that do offer the +1/-1 now . Not all are created totally equal on the odds ofcourse, but at the very least they do allow an investor that option.
Have a super Sunday and Good Luck Always sir!
0
Posted:
#143
We're sorry for not being able to post our picks for today. Internet here went down. Aggravating that my 2nd chase on the Jays went to smoke.. I could have won.
@takethepnts, to answer your question. We maximize on the 1st bet. If they lose, we will just stick with the moneyline. But we also take into consideration the value of the line. It's not worth investing especially if you're chasing if the odds is below 1.75. Then again, it's how you minimize the risk.
@takethepnts, to answer your question. We maximize on the 1st bet. If they lose, we will just stick with the moneyline. But we also take into consideration the value of the line. It's not worth investing especially if you're chasing if the odds is below 1.75. Then again, it's how you minimize the risk.
0
Posted:
#150
Heya Numb3rz, I ran across a few fellas who don't have the -1.0 / +1.0 option, So the way they get around having more or less the same wager only broken into two bets is to drop off certain amount on the 'ML' (Like today M's were 1,73) and -1.5 (2.40). As apposed to the full amount at M's -1.0 ( 2.15). In the end - I believe the odds are quite similar to Making the 1 wager of -1.0, with the ONE Run wins giving you the ML win and offsetting the loss on the -1.5 line in essence pushing like one would taking the -1.0 line alone.
Just a thought. Again thanks for sharing the system / selections friend!
Just a thought. Again thanks for sharing the system / selections friend!
0
Hot Forum Topics
