My units won't reflect the 12-1 record because I didn't play all the games and some I doubled up on and with Montreal tonight I will be tripled on in 1 series. Right now you would be up 12 units minus what you lost on TB if you would of played them...
0
My units won't reflect the 12-1 record because I didn't play all the games and some I doubled up on and with Montreal tonight I will be tripled on in 1 series. Right now you would be up 12 units minus what you lost on TB if you would of played them...
So with the Montreal win, I have 3 wins in their current series. This kind of goes against the system, since you are only supposed to get the 1 win then move on. But everybody will do their own tweak to personalize the system. This presents a fork in the road.
1) Do I count the TB series which most wouldn't of played?
2) Do I just do a total for every series and see where it ends at the end of the year?
3) Should I just write off the TB loss? Should I continue to chase TB their next home game? Or should I divide the TB loss amongst the next 10 series and see where it ends up?
Interesting? lol
0
So with the Montreal win, I have 3 wins in their current series. This kind of goes against the system, since you are only supposed to get the 1 win then move on. But everybody will do their own tweak to personalize the system. This presents a fork in the road.
1) Do I count the TB series which most wouldn't of played?
2) Do I just do a total for every series and see where it ends at the end of the year?
3) Should I just write off the TB loss? Should I continue to chase TB their next home game? Or should I divide the TB loss amongst the next 10 series and see where it ends up?
SRTZEE is that you in the picture? anyway this system is very good and I will thanks you for winning me money last night I had 200 easiest 200 i have made.
0
SRTZEE is that you in the picture? anyway this system is very good and I will thanks you for winning me money last night I had 200 easiest 200 i have made.
Has anyone looked at the opposite of this system? A three game chase for the home team to lose?
So far the series record is (21-0) 13 home teams lost Game 1 of their home series. (13-0) 5 home teams lost Game 2 of their home series (5-0) 3 home teams lost Game 3 of their home series. (3-0)
What if we played the road team to win - they would more than likely be the dog getting anywhere on average from +120 to +190. At least the risk would be kept down. Betting $100 on the first game to win $190, sounds a lot better than betting $190 to make $100, losing, then chasing with $400 or so to make $290.
Of course I will probably eat these words if the current pending game 3's lose. I figure if the three road dogs lose, then you are not down as much if you had bet three home favorites (with heavy chalk) and lost.
I know I shouldn't post in this thread, but just wondered if anyone thought about it.
0
Has anyone looked at the opposite of this system? A three game chase for the home team to lose?
So far the series record is (21-0) 13 home teams lost Game 1 of their home series. (13-0) 5 home teams lost Game 2 of their home series (5-0) 3 home teams lost Game 3 of their home series. (3-0)
What if we played the road team to win - they would more than likely be the dog getting anywhere on average from +120 to +190. At least the risk would be kept down. Betting $100 on the first game to win $190, sounds a lot better than betting $190 to make $100, losing, then chasing with $400 or so to make $290.
Of course I will probably eat these words if the current pending game 3's lose. I figure if the three road dogs lose, then you are not down as much if you had bet three home favorites (with heavy chalk) and lost.
I know I shouldn't post in this thread, but just wondered if anyone thought about it.
GM 3 - Bos (next play Sat.) GM 3 - SJS (next play Sat.) GM 2 - Chi (next play Sun.) GM 2 - Ana (next play Fri.) GM 2 - Clm (next play Fri.) GM 2 - Wash (next play Sat.) GM 1 - Car (next play Fri.)
Of course, we would bet these teams to lose.
0
Just for grins, the current pending series are:
GM 3 - Bos (next play Sat.) GM 3 - SJS (next play Sat.) GM 2 - Chi (next play Sun.) GM 2 - Ana (next play Fri.) GM 2 - Clm (next play Fri.) GM 2 - Wash (next play Sat.) GM 1 - Car (next play Fri.)
Has anyone looked at the opposite of this system? A three game chase for the home team to lose?
So far the series record is (21-0) 13 home teams lost Game 1 of their home series. (13-0) 5 home teams lost Game 2 of their home series (5-0) 3 home teams lost Game 3 of their home series. (3-0)
What if we played the road team to win - they would more than likely be the dog getting anywhere on average from +120 to +190. At least the risk would be kept down. Betting $100 on the first game to win $190, sounds a lot better than betting $190 to make $100, losing, then chasing with $400 or so to make $290.
Of course I will probably eat these words if the current pending game 3's lose. I figure if the three road dogs lose, then you are not down as much if you had bet three home favorites (with heavy chalk) and lost.
I know I shouldn't post in this thread, but just wondered if anyone thought about it.
Yeah I like the thought process but Im sure Top 16 teams probably sweep 3 game homers somewhat often. I do like chasing the +'s rather than huge chalk but I dont like chasing period.
Somethin to watch tho
0
Quote Originally Posted by usakangy:
Has anyone looked at the opposite of this system? A three game chase for the home team to lose?
So far the series record is (21-0) 13 home teams lost Game 1 of their home series. (13-0) 5 home teams lost Game 2 of their home series (5-0) 3 home teams lost Game 3 of their home series. (3-0)
What if we played the road team to win - they would more than likely be the dog getting anywhere on average from +120 to +190. At least the risk would be kept down. Betting $100 on the first game to win $190, sounds a lot better than betting $190 to make $100, losing, then chasing with $400 or so to make $290.
Of course I will probably eat these words if the current pending game 3's lose. I figure if the three road dogs lose, then you are not down as much if you had bet three home favorites (with heavy chalk) and lost.
I know I shouldn't post in this thread, but just wondered if anyone thought about it.
Yeah I like the thought process but Im sure Top 16 teams probably sweep 3 game homers somewhat often. I do like chasing the +'s rather than huge chalk but I dont like chasing period.
GM 3 - Bos (next play Sat.) Pending GM 3 - SJS (next play Sat.) Pending GM 2 - Chi (next play Sun.) Pending GM 2 - Ana (next play Fri.) Lost to DAL 5-2 this one is done. GM 2 - Clm (next play Fri.) Beat MON 4-3 on to Game 3 GM 2 - Wash (next play Sat.) Pending GM 1 - Car (next play Fri.) Beat OTT on to Game 2
0
Update:
GM 3 - Bos (next play Sat.) Pending GM 3 - SJS (next play Sat.) Pending GM 2 - Chi (next play Sun.) Pending GM 2 - Ana (next play Fri.) Lost to DAL 5-2 this one is done. GM 2 - Clm (next play Fri.) Beat MON 4-3 on to Game 3 GM 2 - Wash (next play Sat.) Pending GM 1 - Car (next play Fri.) Beat OTT on to Game 2
Hot Forum Topics
