Posted:
#102
Posted:
#116
Quote Originally Posted by Air1:
Hey guys, didn't okc lose 3 in a row just now against pho, cle and char?
Hey guys, didn't okc lose 3 in a row just now against pho, cle and char?
Yes, ATS they did. I just updated that now.
Anybody remember the spread on DEN last night 1Q? Can't remember if it was 1.5 or 2...
Quote Originally Posted by Air1:
Hey guys, didn't okc lose 3 in a row just now against pho, cle and char?
Hey guys, didn't okc lose 3 in a row just now against pho, cle and char?
Yes, ATS they did. I just updated that now.
Anybody remember the spread on DEN last night 1Q? Can't remember if it was 1.5 or 2...
Posted:
#117
Quote Originally Posted by The__Man:
Yes, ATS they did. I just updated that now.
Anybody remember the spread on DEN last night 1Q? Can't remember if it was 1.5 or 2...
Yes, ATS they did. I just updated that now.
Anybody remember the spread on DEN last night 1Q? Can't remember if it was 1.5 or 2...
-1½ -115 @pinnacle
Quote Originally Posted by The__Man:
Yes, ATS they did. I just updated that now.
Anybody remember the spread on DEN last night 1Q? Can't remember if it was 1.5 or 2...
Yes, ATS they did. I just updated that now.
Anybody remember the spread on DEN last night 1Q? Can't remember if it was 1.5 or 2...
-1½ -115 @pinnacle
Posted:
#118
Ok guys, spreadsheets are updated. Sorry for the delay, was out of town yesterday just got back in an hour ago. I just need the odds for the Nuggets 1Q yesterday. I usually go based off memory and don't have a problem, but I don't remember if it was 1.5 or 2! Gonna start tracking them from now on.
Plays for today!
CHI
LAC
SA (likely just a 0.5 unit)
Plays for today!
CHI
LAC
SA (likely just a 0.5 unit)
Ok guys, spreadsheets are updated. Sorry for the delay, was out of town yesterday just got back in an hour ago. I just need the odds for the Nuggets 1Q yesterday. I usually go based off memory and don't have a problem, but I don't remember if it was 1.5 or 2! Gonna start tracking them from now on.
Plays for today!
CHI
LAC
SA (likely just a 0.5 unit)
Plays for today!
CHI
LAC
SA (likely just a 0.5 unit)
Posted:
#119
Quote Originally Posted by cisco:
-1½ -115 @pinnacle
Thank you sensei!! You're the man.
Spreadsheets fully updated. Let me know if you catch a mistake though. I try my best but am still human.
Quote Originally Posted by cisco:
-1½ -115 @pinnacle
Thank you sensei!! You're the man.
Spreadsheets fully updated. Let me know if you catch a mistake though. I try my best but am still human.
Posted:
#120
yo the_man are you going to takeover the baseball systems, i am willing to help if you need some
and CISCO why is Orlando not in the road fav
also i came to check the baseball thread and found the basketball systems do you guys suggest to jump in or just wait for the baseball season
thanks for the good work guys
and CISCO why is Orlando not in the road fav
also i came to check the baseball thread and found the basketball systems do you guys suggest to jump in or just wait for the baseball season
thanks for the good work guys
yo the_man are you going to takeover the baseball systems, i am willing to help if you need some
and CISCO why is Orlando not in the road fav
also i came to check the baseball thread and found the basketball systems do you guys suggest to jump in or just wait for the baseball season
thanks for the good work guys
and CISCO why is Orlando not in the road fav
also i came to check the baseball thread and found the basketball systems do you guys suggest to jump in or just wait for the baseball season
thanks for the good work guys
Posted:
#123
thanks guys,, im also playing against ATS (dont have ml) SACRAMENTO at home CLEVLAND at home NEW JERSEY at home, i think 3 games chase is ok in these 1q games, and if you want, check MIAMI and OKC 2q ATS thanks guys 
thanks guys,, im also playing against ATS (dont have ml) SACRAMENTO at home CLEVLAND at home NEW JERSEY at home, i think 3 games chase is ok in these 1q games, and if you want, check MIAMI and OKC 2q ATS thanks guys 
Posted:
#124
Quote Originally Posted by ERBATIZ:
thanks guys,, im also playing against ATS (dont have ml) SACRAMENTO at home CLEVLAND at home NEW JERSEY at home, i think 3 games chase is ok in these 1q games, and if you want, check MIAMI and OKC 2q ATS thanks guys
thanks guys,, im also playing against ATS (dont have ml) SACRAMENTO at home CLEVLAND at home NEW JERSEY at home, i think 3 games chase is ok in these 1q games, and if you want, check MIAMI and OKC 2q ATS thanks guys
No.
Those three teams you are betting on tonight are 3 of the 4 worst 1Q teams in the league @ home.
Quote Originally Posted by ERBATIZ:
thanks guys,, im also playing against ATS (dont have ml) SACRAMENTO at home CLEVLAND at home NEW JERSEY at home, i think 3 games chase is ok in these 1q games, and if you want, check MIAMI and OKC 2q ATS thanks guys
thanks guys,, im also playing against ATS (dont have ml) SACRAMENTO at home CLEVLAND at home NEW JERSEY at home, i think 3 games chase is ok in these 1q games, and if you want, check MIAMI and OKC 2q ATS thanks guys
No.
Those three teams you are betting on tonight are 3 of the 4 worst 1Q teams in the league @ home.
Posted:
#125
Hey guys, did some research, calculated first quarter average point margin.
You'd be surprised at the results.
While at home, about half the league has a positive margin of victory 1Q, on the road is a very different story. Only 6 teams: Miami (+4.3), Chicago (+3.6), Golden State (+1.9), Orlando (+1.0), Cleveland (+0.4) and San Antonio (+0.2) are in positive territory. Atlanta is flat at 0 points. Every other team is negative, including the great OKC (-1.5) and IND (-2.0). Makes sense as to why those two teams cost us.
None of this was accounted towards who is favoured in the game, just straight up who`s winning quarters on average. I`m shocked to see GS and CLE so high on the road. They actually could be included in this system straight up, ESPECIALLY if they are favoured. Getting rid of OKC and IND would make sense even though they are very good teams on paper. I know cisco was quick to jump off the ORL boat bc they cost him a loss right off the bat but they are one of the stronger road teams to be using.
Thought I`d post this as it peaked my interest.
You'd be surprised at the results.
While at home, about half the league has a positive margin of victory 1Q, on the road is a very different story. Only 6 teams: Miami (+4.3), Chicago (+3.6), Golden State (+1.9), Orlando (+1.0), Cleveland (+0.4) and San Antonio (+0.2) are in positive territory. Atlanta is flat at 0 points. Every other team is negative, including the great OKC (-1.5) and IND (-2.0). Makes sense as to why those two teams cost us.
None of this was accounted towards who is favoured in the game, just straight up who`s winning quarters on average. I`m shocked to see GS and CLE so high on the road. They actually could be included in this system straight up, ESPECIALLY if they are favoured. Getting rid of OKC and IND would make sense even though they are very good teams on paper. I know cisco was quick to jump off the ORL boat bc they cost him a loss right off the bat but they are one of the stronger road teams to be using.
Thought I`d post this as it peaked my interest.
Hey guys, did some research, calculated first quarter average point margin.
You'd be surprised at the results.
While at home, about half the league has a positive margin of victory 1Q, on the road is a very different story. Only 6 teams: Miami (+4.3), Chicago (+3.6), Golden State (+1.9), Orlando (+1.0), Cleveland (+0.4) and San Antonio (+0.2) are in positive territory. Atlanta is flat at 0 points. Every other team is negative, including the great OKC (-1.5) and IND (-2.0). Makes sense as to why those two teams cost us.
None of this was accounted towards who is favoured in the game, just straight up who`s winning quarters on average. I`m shocked to see GS and CLE so high on the road. They actually could be included in this system straight up, ESPECIALLY if they are favoured. Getting rid of OKC and IND would make sense even though they are very good teams on paper. I know cisco was quick to jump off the ORL boat bc they cost him a loss right off the bat but they are one of the stronger road teams to be using.
Thought I`d post this as it peaked my interest.
You'd be surprised at the results.
While at home, about half the league has a positive margin of victory 1Q, on the road is a very different story. Only 6 teams: Miami (+4.3), Chicago (+3.6), Golden State (+1.9), Orlando (+1.0), Cleveland (+0.4) and San Antonio (+0.2) are in positive territory. Atlanta is flat at 0 points. Every other team is negative, including the great OKC (-1.5) and IND (-2.0). Makes sense as to why those two teams cost us.
None of this was accounted towards who is favoured in the game, just straight up who`s winning quarters on average. I`m shocked to see GS and CLE so high on the road. They actually could be included in this system straight up, ESPECIALLY if they are favoured. Getting rid of OKC and IND would make sense even though they are very good teams on paper. I know cisco was quick to jump off the ORL boat bc they cost him a loss right off the bat but they are one of the stronger road teams to be using.
Thought I`d post this as it peaked my interest.
Hot Forum Topics
-
🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵
449,466
-
Serious Streak Survivor Strategies
1,918,167
-
Monday 09/21/2026
444
-
NFL LOCKED IN!
99,536
-
New York Giants @ Los Angeles Rams
4,640
-
Colts vs chiefs in-game live
1,728
-
***Macwesties * Mon. Sept. 21, 2026 * Birthday * NFL * MNF * Football Play***
3,457
-
?? KBO Plays 🥎
14,758
-
Where are they getting enough explosive offense to separate from New York by more than a touchdown
1,719
-
Week Two-Post Plays Here
1,426
Warning - External Link
Report User
Thank you for reporting
This content is abusive or harmful
This post is spam
An error has occurred
This post is spam
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
Delete Post
Are you sure you would like to remove this post?
Remove Thread
Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?
Scan Results
Login/Register
Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
