Posted:
#201
Post #12
Quote Originally Posted by cisco:
I take no credit for this system. I'm sure it's been done a million times.
0
NBA
Posted:
#202
Quote Originally Posted by Bodisattva:
Sorry for botching the "quote" area above. For anyone wanting to do the ATS chase, I think a 4 game chase makes sense. Less juice and harder to win than the ML chase. Then a system loss is basically the same either way and the extra game gives the ATS system a fair shot.
Sorry for botching the "quote" area above. For anyone wanting to do the ATS chase, I think a 4 game chase makes sense. Less juice and harder to win than the ML chase. Then a system loss is basically the same either way and the extra game gives the ATS system a fair shot.
Great idea 
Remember this for next season. 
0
Posted:
#203
Quote Originally Posted by cisco:
Great idea
Remember this for next season.
I agree! Amazing proposition.
Honestly, some of those ML game 3's get PRETTY scary when you have to click "confirm bet". Not exactly a non-stress situation when you're dumping half your account on one outcome...
0
Posted:
#204
Quote Originally Posted by The__Man:
I agree! Amazing proposition.
Honestly, some of those ML game 3's get PRETTY scary when you have to click "confirm bet". Not exactly a non-stress situation when you're dumping half your account on one outcome...
I agree! Amazing proposition.
Honestly, some of those ML game 3's get PRETTY scary when you have to click "confirm bet". Not exactly a non-stress situation when you're dumping half your account on one outcome...
I've been running a Home 2Q ATS system at the Rx. A 4 game lost chase would lose about as much as most 3 game 1Q ML lost chases, the distribution would just be a little different.
The system is 62-0 this year for SAS, CHI, OKC, and MIA (they qualify because they are so good at home and one of the big 3 is always on the floor in the 2Q).
ADG mentioned something about it earlier in the thread; I'd be interested to see how he has broken it down.
0
Hot Forum Topics
