MLB SHUTOUT SYSTEM 2015
[ WAGER ON ] { Qualifying team }
( A ) : St.Louis 0 < N.Y.Mets > 5 ![]()
@ + 110
( A ) : San Francisco 4 < L.A.Dodgers > 0 ![]()
@ + 123
( D ) : Miami 6 < Arizona > 7 ![]()
@ - 132
Series net unit record for May : 35 - 0
( A ) : 19 - 18
( B ) : 7 - 10
( C ) : 5 - 5
( D ) : 4 - 1
( E ) : 0 - 0
( F ) : 0 - 0
Leave it to the Marlins to get swept at home by the mighty Diamondbacks.
[ WAGER ON ] { Qualifying team }
( A ) : St.Louis 0 < N.Y.Mets > 5 ![]()
@ + 110
( A ) : San Francisco 4 < L.A.Dodgers > 0 ![]()
@ + 123
( D ) : Miami 6 < Arizona > 7 ![]()
@ - 132
Series net unit record for May : 35 - 0
( A ) : 19 - 18
( B ) : 7 - 10
( C ) : 5 - 5
( D ) : 4 - 1
( E ) : 0 - 0
( F ) : 0 - 0
Leave it to the Marlins to get swept at home by the mighty Diamondbacks.
i scaled back on my bet today, i knew Miami couldn't get it done, they are a joke of a team, and i might just fade them in their next series to help offset the amount i would have to bet on the cubs the next 2 games
We still have 2 bullets left in our Colt .45 " peacemaker." Lets hope that Cubs Ace Jon Lester brings home the bacon for us tomorrow evening in Phoenix. I trust that you've noticed our ( A ) series has finally turned positive.
i scaled back on my bet today, i knew Miami couldn't get it done, they are a joke of a team, and i might just fade them in their next series to help offset the amount i would have to bet on the cubs the next 2 games
We still have 2 bullets left in our Colt .45 " peacemaker." Lets hope that Cubs Ace Jon Lester brings home the bacon for us tomorrow evening in Phoenix. I trust that you've noticed our ( A ) series has finally turned positive.
We still have 2 bullets left in our Colt .45 " peacemaker." Lets hope that Cubs Ace Jon Lester brings home the bacon for us tomorrow evening in Phoenix. I trust that you've noticed our ( A ) series has finally turned positive.
I did indeed notice that. This has been fun to follow along. ![]()
We still have 2 bullets left in our Colt .45 " peacemaker." Lets hope that Cubs Ace Jon Lester brings home the bacon for us tomorrow evening in Phoenix. I trust that you've noticed our ( A ) series has finally turned positive.
I did indeed notice that. This has been fun to follow along. ![]()
[ WAGER ON ] { Qualifying team }
( A ) : Tampa Bay < Oakland >
( A ) : San Diego < L.A.Dodgers >
vs.
( A ) : L.A.Dodgers < San Diego >
( A ) : Kansas City < St.Louis >
( B ) : Pittsburgh < N.Y.Mets >
( E ) : Chicago Cubs < Arizona >
C ya in the winners circle ![]()
A.R.
[ WAGER ON ] { Qualifying team }
( A ) : Tampa Bay < Oakland >
( A ) : San Diego < L.A.Dodgers >
vs.
( A ) : L.A.Dodgers < San Diego >
( A ) : Kansas City < St.Louis >
( B ) : Pittsburgh < N.Y.Mets >
( E ) : Chicago Cubs < Arizona >
C ya in the winners circle ![]()
A.R.
[ WAGER ON ] { Qualifying team }
( A ) : Tampa Bay 5 < Oakland > 2 ![]()
@ - 132
( A ) : San Diego 1 < L.A.Dodgers > 2 ![]()
@ + 175
vs.
( A ) : L.A.Dodgers 2 < San Diego > 1 ![]()
@ - 172
( A ) : Kansas City 5 < St.Louis > 0 ![]()
@ - 107
( B ) : Pittsburgh 4 < N.Y.Mets > 1 ![]()
@ - 142
( E ) : Chicago Cubs 4 < Arizona > 5 ![]()
@ - 118
Series net unit record for May : 39 - 0
( A ) : 22 - 19
( B ) : 8 - 10
( C ) : 5 - 5
( D ) : 4 - 1
( E ) : 0 - 1
( F ) : 0 - 0
The dunce Cap of the month passes on from Don Mattingly to Joe Maddon. Why he chose to pitch to the most dangerous hitter on the Diamondbacks with his team up by 2 runs is beyond any sense of reason. All this happened with 2 outs. Once again, defeat was snatched from the jaws of victory. ![]()
[ WAGER ON ] { Qualifying team }
( A ) : Tampa Bay 5 < Oakland > 2 ![]()
@ - 132
( A ) : San Diego 1 < L.A.Dodgers > 2 ![]()
@ + 175
vs.
( A ) : L.A.Dodgers 2 < San Diego > 1 ![]()
@ - 172
( A ) : Kansas City 5 < St.Louis > 0 ![]()
@ - 107
( B ) : Pittsburgh 4 < N.Y.Mets > 1 ![]()
@ - 142
( E ) : Chicago Cubs 4 < Arizona > 5 ![]()
@ - 118
Series net unit record for May : 39 - 0
( A ) : 22 - 19
( B ) : 8 - 10
( C ) : 5 - 5
( D ) : 4 - 1
( E ) : 0 - 1
( F ) : 0 - 0
The dunce Cap of the month passes on from Don Mattingly to Joe Maddon. Why he chose to pitch to the most dangerous hitter on the Diamondbacks with his team up by 2 runs is beyond any sense of reason. All this happened with 2 outs. Once again, defeat was snatched from the jaws of victory. ![]()
[ WAGER ON ] { Qualifying team }
( A ) : Milwaukee < Atlanta >
( A ) : Kansas City < St.Louis >
( B ) : San Diego < L.A.Dodgers >
( F ) : Chicago Cubs < Arizona >
C ya in the winners circle ![]()
A.R.
[ WAGER ON ] { Qualifying team }
( A ) : Milwaukee < Atlanta >
( A ) : Kansas City < St.Louis >
( B ) : San Diego < L.A.Dodgers >
( F ) : Chicago Cubs < Arizona >
C ya in the winners circle ![]()
A.R.
[ WAGER ON ] { Qualifying team }
( A ) : Milwaukee 2 < Atlanta > 3 ![]()
@ + 124
( A ) : Kansas City 3 < St.Louis > 2 ![]()
@ - 115
( B ) : San Diego 0 < L.A.Dodgers > 2 ![]()
@ + 152
( F ) : Chicago Cubs 9 < Arizona > 6 ![]()
@ - 125
Series net unit record for May : 41 - 0
( A ) : 23 - 20
( B ) : 8 - 11
( C ) : 5 - 5
( D ) : 4 - 1
( E ) : 0 - 1
( F ) : 1 - 0
[ WAGER ON ] { Qualifying team }
( A ) : Milwaukee 2 < Atlanta > 3 ![]()
@ + 124
( A ) : Kansas City 3 < St.Louis > 2 ![]()
@ - 115
( B ) : San Diego 0 < L.A.Dodgers > 2 ![]()
@ + 152
( F ) : Chicago Cubs 9 < Arizona > 6 ![]()
@ - 125
Series net unit record for May : 41 - 0
( A ) : 23 - 20
( B ) : 8 - 11
( C ) : 5 - 5
( D ) : 4 - 1
( E ) : 0 - 1
( F ) : 1 - 0
[ WAGER ON ] { Qualifying team }
( A ) : Oakland < Tampa Bay >
( A ) : Miami < Baltimore >
( A ) : L.A.Dodgers < San Diego >
vs.
( C ) : San Diego < L.A.Dodgers >
( B ) : Milwaukee < Atlanta >
C ya in the winners circle ![]()
A.R.
[ WAGER ON ] { Qualifying team }
( A ) : Oakland < Tampa Bay >
( A ) : Miami < Baltimore >
( A ) : L.A.Dodgers < San Diego >
vs.
( C ) : San Diego < L.A.Dodgers >
( B ) : Milwaukee < Atlanta >
C ya in the winners circle ![]()
A.R.
[Quote: Originally Posted by orhane] Years of backtesting and analysis has shown me that if you can't win on single bets without chase you won't win on chasing either. Sep if you count in ROI. [/Quote
and your point is?
[Quote: Originally Posted by orhane] Years of backtesting and analysis has shown me that if you can't win on single bets without chase you won't win on chasing either. Sep if you count in ROI. [/Quote
and your point is?
Years of backtesting and analysis has shown me that if you can't win on single bets without chase you won't win on chasing either. Sep if you count in ROI.
As this is an open internet thread, every poster is entitled to his / her own belief and opinion. While you are not alone in your belief, in this specific thread the fast majority of followers are more than happy with the results. Had you taken the time to read a few pages in the beginning of this thread, you would have found that :
A : This is a high risk / high reward system. ( its not for everybody )
B. This is a very straight forward / mechanical system. ( those that don't want to spend hours handicapping games will find this one very simple to apply ).
C. This system is able to withstand the loss of one or two full series and still show a net profit at the end of the season.
D. You have the option when to start your chase in order to lesson the risk.
E. No one who followed this system from last year was disappointed in so doing and the results so far this month have been positive.
If this system is not in your comfort zone, then stay where you feel that you have the chance for the most success.
A.R.
Years of backtesting and analysis has shown me that if you can't win on single bets without chase you won't win on chasing either. Sep if you count in ROI.
As this is an open internet thread, every poster is entitled to his / her own belief and opinion. While you are not alone in your belief, in this specific thread the fast majority of followers are more than happy with the results. Had you taken the time to read a few pages in the beginning of this thread, you would have found that :
A : This is a high risk / high reward system. ( its not for everybody )
B. This is a very straight forward / mechanical system. ( those that don't want to spend hours handicapping games will find this one very simple to apply ).
C. This system is able to withstand the loss of one or two full series and still show a net profit at the end of the season.
D. You have the option when to start your chase in order to lesson the risk.
E. No one who followed this system from last year was disappointed in so doing and the results so far this month have been positive.
If this system is not in your comfort zone, then stay where you feel that you have the chance for the most success.
A.R.
Allison - Congrats on the ' F ' cash ! Cubbies also got it done for us last year on one of only two chases that went to stage ' F'.
Appreciate your time.
See you in the ' winner's circle ' , Time to get the picture taken. That's JUSTICE.
Allison - Congrats on the ' F ' cash ! Cubbies also got it done for us last year on one of only two chases that went to stage ' F'.
Appreciate your time.
See you in the ' winner's circle ' , Time to get the picture taken. That's JUSTICE.
Allison - Congrats on the ' F ' cash ! Cubbies also got it done for us last year on one of only two chases that went to stage ' F'.
Appreciate your time.
See you in the ' winner's circle ' , Time to get the picture taken. That's JUSTICE.
Well, well, well...look what the cat drug in.
A.R.
Allison - Congrats on the ' F ' cash ! Cubbies also got it done for us last year on one of only two chases that went to stage ' F'.
Appreciate your time.
See you in the ' winner's circle ' , Time to get the picture taken. That's JUSTICE.
Well, well, well...look what the cat drug in.
A.R.
[ WAGER ON ] { Qualifying team }
( A ) : Oakland 7 < Tampa Bay > 2 ![]()
@ - 120
( A ) : Miami 5 < Baltimore > 2 ![]()
@ + 100
( A ) : L.A.Dodgers 3 < San Diego > 11 ![]()
@ - 125
vs.
( C ) : San Diego 11 < L.A.Dodgers > 3 ![]()
@ + 125
( B ) : Milwaukee 1 < Atlanta > 2 ![]()
@ - 105
Series net unit record for May : 44 - 0
( A ) : 25 - 21
( B ) : 8 - 12
( C ) : 6 - 5
( D ) : 4 - 1
( E ) : 0 - 1
( F ) : 1 - 0
[ WAGER ON ] { Qualifying team }
( A ) : Oakland 7 < Tampa Bay > 2 ![]()
@ - 120
( A ) : Miami 5 < Baltimore > 2 ![]()
@ + 100
( A ) : L.A.Dodgers 3 < San Diego > 11 ![]()
@ - 125
vs.
( C ) : San Diego 11 < L.A.Dodgers > 3 ![]()
@ + 125
( B ) : Milwaukee 1 < Atlanta > 2 ![]()
@ - 105
Series net unit record for May : 44 - 0
( A ) : 25 - 21
( B ) : 8 - 12
( C ) : 6 - 5
( D ) : 4 - 1
( E ) : 0 - 1
( F ) : 1 - 0
[ WAGER ON ] { Qualifying team }
( B ) : L.A. Angels < San Diego >
( C ) : L.A. Dodgers < Atlanta >
C ya in the winners circle ![]()
A.R.
[ WAGER ON ] { Qualifying team }
( B ) : L.A. Angels < San Diego >
( C ) : L.A. Dodgers < Atlanta >
C ya in the winners circle ![]()
A.R.
[ WAGER ON ] { Qualifying team }
( B ) : L.A. Angels 4 < San Diego > 3 ![]()
@ - 125
( C ) : L.A. Dodgers 6 < Atlanta > 3 ![]()
@ - 182
Series net unit record for May : 46 - 0
( A ) : 25 - 21
( B ) : 9 - 12
( C ) : 7 - 5
( D ) : 4 - 1
( E ) : 0 - 1
( F ) : 1 - 0
[ WAGER ON ] { Qualifying team }
( B ) : L.A. Angels 4 < San Diego > 3 ![]()
@ - 125
( C ) : L.A. Dodgers 6 < Atlanta > 3 ![]()
@ - 182
Series net unit record for May : 46 - 0
( A ) : 25 - 21
( B ) : 9 - 12
( C ) : 7 - 5
( D ) : 4 - 1
( E ) : 0 - 1
( F ) : 1 - 0
[ WAGER ON ] { Qualifying team }
( A ) : Toronto < Chicago White Sox >
( A ) : Oakland < Detroit >
C ya in the winners circle ![]()
A.R.
[ WAGER ON ] { Qualifying team }
( A ) : Toronto < Chicago White Sox >
( A ) : Oakland < Detroit >
C ya in the winners circle ![]()
A.R.
@ KEVINWILSON
Welcome aboard the Pacific Surfliner sir. It's a long season and to get you up to speed, please read the following posts in this thread : 3 / 19 / 141.
If you have further questions, please ask away. Your ticket has been punched for the first stop July 12th in Cincinnati.
A.R.
@ KEVINWILSON
Welcome aboard the Pacific Surfliner sir. It's a long season and to get you up to speed, please read the following posts in this thread : 3 / 19 / 141.
If you have further questions, please ask away. Your ticket has been punched for the first stop July 12th in Cincinnati.
A.R.
[ WAGER ON ] { Qualifying team }
( A ) : Toronto 10 < Chicago White Sox > 9 ![]()
@ - 155
( A ) : Oakland 0 < Detroit > 1 ![]()
@ + 102
Series net unit record for May : 47 - 0
( A ) : 26 - 22
( B ) : 9 - 12
( C ) : 7 - 5
( D ) : 4 - 1
( E ) : 0 - 1
( F ) : 1 - 0
[ WAGER ON ] { Qualifying team }
( A ) : Toronto 10 < Chicago White Sox > 9 ![]()
@ - 155
( A ) : Oakland 0 < Detroit > 1 ![]()
@ + 102
Series net unit record for May : 47 - 0
( A ) : 26 - 22
( B ) : 9 - 12
( C ) : 7 - 5
( D ) : 4 - 1
( E ) : 0 - 1
( F ) : 1 - 0
Hot Forum Topics
-
🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵
449,019
-
PART DEUX
248
-
Friday 09/18/2026
759
-
The Three-Day Money Train
4,087
-
🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets
258,456
-
Trump's legacy?
25,443
-
NCAA FOOTBALL. 151
21,368
-
Week 3 Money
6,126
-
NCAA WEEK 3 ***Click here for GREATNESS***
7,034
-
We have picked a terrible time to have the stupidest president ever
29,073
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
