MLB SHUTOUT SYSTEM 2015
And the Golden Raspberry for the month of May goes to Don Mattingly. He continues to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory by his misuse of his starting pitcher staff.
[ WAGER ON ] { Qualifying team }
( A ) : Seattle 3 < L.A.Angels > 2 ![]()
@ - 133
( A ) : Colorado < Arizona > PPD.
( B ) : Atlanta 2 < Philadelphia > 5 ![]()
@ - 146
( C ) : Miami 4 < Washington > 6 ![]()
@ + 150
( C ) : L.A. Dodgers 3 < Milwaukee > 4 ![]()
@ - 173
Series net unit record for May : 5 - 0
( A ) : 5 - 4
( B ) : 0 - 4
( C ) : 0 - 2
( D ) : 0 - 0
( E ) : 0 - 0
( F ) : 0 - 0
And the Golden Raspberry for the month of May goes to Don Mattingly. He continues to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory by his misuse of his starting pitcher staff.
[ WAGER ON ] { Qualifying team }
( A ) : Seattle 3 < L.A.Angels > 2 ![]()
@ - 133
( A ) : Colorado < Arizona > PPD.
( B ) : Atlanta 2 < Philadelphia > 5 ![]()
@ - 146
( C ) : Miami 4 < Washington > 6 ![]()
@ + 150
( C ) : L.A. Dodgers 3 < Milwaukee > 4 ![]()
@ - 173
Series net unit record for May : 5 - 0
( A ) : 5 - 4
( B ) : 0 - 4
( C ) : 0 - 2
( D ) : 0 - 0
( E ) : 0 - 0
( F ) : 0 - 0
[ WAGER ON ] { Qualifying team }
( A ) : Colorado < Arizona >
( A ) : San Francisco < San Diego >
( C ) : Atlanta < Philadelphia >
( C ) : N.Y.Mets < Baltimore >
( D ) : Miami < Washington >
( D ) : L.A. Dodgers < Milwaukee >
C ya in the winners circle ![]()
A.R.
[ WAGER ON ] { Qualifying team }
( A ) : Colorado < Arizona >
( A ) : San Francisco < San Diego >
( C ) : Atlanta < Philadelphia >
( C ) : N.Y.Mets < Baltimore >
( D ) : Miami < Washington >
( D ) : L.A. Dodgers < Milwaukee >
C ya in the winners circle ![]()
A.R.
shouldn't there be two more A) level wagers today? Both Cincinnati and the Mets were shutout on Sunday and were off yesterday. Leaving a wager on of:
A)Pitt
A)Balt
Hope I didn't offend anyone, just wanting to understand the parameters of this chase and make sure I am playing the correct teams and levels.
shouldn't there be two more A) level wagers today? Both Cincinnati and the Mets were shutout on Sunday and were off yesterday. Leaving a wager on of:
A)Pitt
A)Balt
Hope I didn't offend anyone, just wanting to understand the parameters of this chase and make sure I am playing the correct teams and levels.
shouldn't there be two more A) level wagers today? Both Cincinnati and the Mets were shutout on Sunday and were off yesterday. Leaving a wager on of:
A)Pitt
A)Balt
Hope I didn't offend anyone, just wanting to understand the parameters of this chase and make sure I am playing the correct teams and levels.
shouldn't there be two more A) level wagers today? Both Cincinnati and the Mets were shutout on Sunday and were off yesterday. Leaving a wager on of:
A)Pitt
A)Balt
Hope I didn't offend anyone, just wanting to understand the parameters of this chase and make sure I am playing the correct teams and levels.
Plays for Tuesday May 05 :
[ WAGER ON ] { Qualifying team }
( A ) : Colorado < Arizona >
( A ) : San Francisco < San Diego >
( A ) : Pittsburgh < Cincinnati >
( C ) : Atlanta < Philadelphia >
( C ) : N.Y.Mets < Baltimore >
vs.
( A ) : Baltimore < N.Y. Mets >
( D ) : Miami < Washington >
( D ) : L.A. Dodgers < Milwaukee >
C ya in the winners circle ![]()
A.R.
Plays for Tuesday May 05 :
[ WAGER ON ] { Qualifying team }
( A ) : Colorado < Arizona >
( A ) : San Francisco < San Diego >
( A ) : Pittsburgh < Cincinnati >
( C ) : Atlanta < Philadelphia >
( C ) : N.Y.Mets < Baltimore >
vs.
( A ) : Baltimore < N.Y. Mets >
( D ) : Miami < Washington >
( D ) : L.A. Dodgers < Milwaukee >
C ya in the winners circle ![]()
A.R.
shouldn't there be two more A) level wagers today? Both Cincinnati and the Mets were shutout on Sunday and were off yesterday. Leaving a wager on of:
A)Pitt
A)Balt
Hope I didn't offend anyone, just wanting to understand the parameters of this chase and make sure I am playing the correct teams and levels.
I think you are right on A game Pit.
It look like A game on Bal and C game on NYM
shouldn't there be two more A) level wagers today? Both Cincinnati and the Mets were shutout on Sunday and were off yesterday. Leaving a wager on of:
A)Pitt
A)Balt
Hope I didn't offend anyone, just wanting to understand the parameters of this chase and make sure I am playing the correct teams and levels.
I think you are right on A game Pit.
It look like A game on Bal and C game on NYM
GOOD DAY WOOT, so far skipping the A game has been a great idea, yea i know it will cost me some units, but this will only be a 5 game chase for me and the juice shouldn't be killer
Its all about your individual " comfort zone." APPLE." There is nothing wrong with making this a 5 or 4 or three game chase. The system allows for 6 bullets to be fired, but some of us have a risk aversion and rightly so.But like I have mentioned before, with greater risk comes the greater reward, so caveat emptor all you mugs.
And yea, it felt really nice to stand in the " winners circle " for the first time this month.
GOOD DAY WOOT, so far skipping the A game has been a great idea, yea i know it will cost me some units, but this will only be a 5 game chase for me and the juice shouldn't be killer
Its all about your individual " comfort zone." APPLE." There is nothing wrong with making this a 5 or 4 or three game chase. The system allows for 6 bullets to be fired, but some of us have a risk aversion and rightly so.But like I have mentioned before, with greater risk comes the greater reward, so caveat emptor all you mugs.
And yea, it felt really nice to stand in the " winners circle " for the first time this month.
What I don't understand, is how if the A game record is 144-144, it would "cost you any units?" Wouldn't you be SAVING units, instead? Are you guys only counting the wins, and not subtracting the losses, when a game loses? Forgive me but I am new to viewing this stuff and that part doesn't make any sense.
Here is a recap from last season's month of September.
Series record for September : 56 - 0
( A ) : 32 - 24
( B ) : 12 - 12
( C ) : 5 - 7
( D ) : 5 - 2
( E ) : 2 - 0
( F ) : 0 - 0
The 56 represents a total of 56 units net profit as well as 56 series that finished. In the first level ( A ), we won 32 series and lost 24 units. The loss is a temporary loss, because we continue trying to recoup those losses in the next level. We then recouped 12 of the 24 losses in level ( B ), so that left us with 12 more series to try and get a + 1 unit win along the way. So lets say ( for the point of being completely transparent ) that we had one of the September series that lost all 6 games. We would then list the full amount of loss in our net heading. That would have brought the month of September to a final tally of ( 55 - 63 ). Hopefully, we will never have to realize a full loss. However, if you are actually willing to follow this system through as a six game chase, we could theoretically suffer through two six games series defeats and still show a profit at the end of the season. Just something to consider and I hope this clears things up for you CASHEASY.
A.R.
What I don't understand, is how if the A game record is 144-144, it would "cost you any units?" Wouldn't you be SAVING units, instead? Are you guys only counting the wins, and not subtracting the losses, when a game loses? Forgive me but I am new to viewing this stuff and that part doesn't make any sense.
Here is a recap from last season's month of September.
Series record for September : 56 - 0
( A ) : 32 - 24
( B ) : 12 - 12
( C ) : 5 - 7
( D ) : 5 - 2
( E ) : 2 - 0
( F ) : 0 - 0
The 56 represents a total of 56 units net profit as well as 56 series that finished. In the first level ( A ), we won 32 series and lost 24 units. The loss is a temporary loss, because we continue trying to recoup those losses in the next level. We then recouped 12 of the 24 losses in level ( B ), so that left us with 12 more series to try and get a + 1 unit win along the way. So lets say ( for the point of being completely transparent ) that we had one of the September series that lost all 6 games. We would then list the full amount of loss in our net heading. That would have brought the month of September to a final tally of ( 55 - 63 ). Hopefully, we will never have to realize a full loss. However, if you are actually willing to follow this system through as a six game chase, we could theoretically suffer through two six games series defeats and still show a profit at the end of the season. Just something to consider and I hope this clears things up for you CASHEASY.
A.R.
[ WAGER ON ] { Qualifying team }
( A ) : Colorado < Arizona > PPD
( A ) : San Francisco 6 < San Diego > 0 ![]()
@ + 110
( A ) : Pittsburgh 1 < Cincinnati > 7 ![]()
@ - 140
( C ) : Atlanta 9 < Philadelphia > 0 ![]()
@ - 145
( C ) : N.Y.Mets 3 < Baltimore > 2 ![]()
@ - 120
vs.
( A ) : Baltimore 2 < N.Y. Mets > 3 ![]()
@ + 118
( D ) : Miami 2 < Washington > 1 ![]()
@ + 165 ( best dog win to date )
( D ) : L.A. Dodgers 8 < Milwaukee > 2 ![]()
@ - 150
Series net unit record for May : 10 - 0
( A ) : 6 - 6
( B ) : 0 - 4
( C ) : 2 - 2
( D ) : 2 - 0
( E ) : 0 - 0
( F ) : 0 - 0
[ WAGER ON ] { Qualifying team }
( A ) : Colorado < Arizona > PPD
( A ) : San Francisco 6 < San Diego > 0 ![]()
@ + 110
( A ) : Pittsburgh 1 < Cincinnati > 7 ![]()
@ - 140
( C ) : Atlanta 9 < Philadelphia > 0 ![]()
@ - 145
( C ) : N.Y.Mets 3 < Baltimore > 2 ![]()
@ - 120
vs.
( A ) : Baltimore 2 < N.Y. Mets > 3 ![]()
@ + 118
( D ) : Miami 2 < Washington > 1 ![]()
@ + 165 ( best dog win to date )
( D ) : L.A. Dodgers 8 < Milwaukee > 2 ![]()
@ - 150
Series net unit record for May : 10 - 0
( A ) : 6 - 6
( B ) : 0 - 4
( C ) : 2 - 2
( D ) : 2 - 0
( E ) : 0 - 0
( F ) : 0 - 0
[ WAGER ON ] { Qualifying team }
( A ) : Colorado < Arizona >
( A ) : San Francisco < San Diego >
( A ) : Boston < Tampa Bay >
( A ) : Atlanta < Philadelphia >
( B ) : Pittsburgh < Cincinnati >
( B ) : Baltimore < N.Y. Mets >
* please note that Colorado will be involved in a DH today. Should they lose the first game, we will then move them up to a ( B ) level in the second game for today's card.
C ya in the winners circle ![]()
A.R.
[ WAGER ON ] { Qualifying team }
( A ) : Colorado < Arizona >
( A ) : San Francisco < San Diego >
( A ) : Boston < Tampa Bay >
( A ) : Atlanta < Philadelphia >
( B ) : Pittsburgh < Cincinnati >
( B ) : Baltimore < N.Y. Mets >
* please note that Colorado will be involved in a DH today. Should they lose the first game, we will then move them up to a ( B ) level in the second game for today's card.
C ya in the winners circle ![]()
A.R.
Thank you A.R. and thanks to GhostNL for the explanations. Duh! I should have figured that out. Just new to chase stuff and I must get used to the reasoning and accounting. You guys are pretty cool to not only post your results and plays, but to explain things. ![]()
And thank you dougiefresh for your input as well.
Thank you A.R. and thanks to GhostNL for the explanations. Duh! I should have figured that out. Just new to chase stuff and I must get used to the reasoning and accounting. You guys are pretty cool to not only post your results and plays, but to explain things. ![]()
And thank you dougiefresh for your input as well.
Thank you A.R. and thanks to GhostNL for the explanations. Duh! I should have figured that out. Just new to chase stuff and I must get used to the reasoning and accounting. You guys are pretty cool to not only post your results and plays, but to explain things. ![]()
Thanks for the kind words CASH. Yea, the system is a season long grind and yea it has its specific nuances. It doesn't take too long before everyone who follows this system gets it down pat. We've got some very patient " vets " that give great input on a weekly basis. Welcome aboard and your ticket has been punched on the Pacific Surfliner sir.
A.R.
And thank you dougiefresh for your input as well.
Thank you A.R. and thanks to GhostNL for the explanations. Duh! I should have figured that out. Just new to chase stuff and I must get used to the reasoning and accounting. You guys are pretty cool to not only post your results and plays, but to explain things. ![]()
Thanks for the kind words CASH. Yea, the system is a season long grind and yea it has its specific nuances. It doesn't take too long before everyone who follows this system gets it down pat. We've got some very patient " vets " that give great input on a weekly basis. Welcome aboard and your ticket has been punched on the Pacific Surfliner sir.
A.R.
And thank you dougiefresh for your input as well.
Well, the football game in Coors Field is over and the Rockies lose by a touchdown 13-7. ![]()
We now move Colorado up to the ( B ) level in the second game which starts shortly against the Diamondbacks.
A.R.
Well, the football game in Coors Field is over and the Rockies lose by a touchdown 13-7. ![]()
We now move Colorado up to the ( B ) level in the second game which starts shortly against the Diamondbacks.
A.R.
[ WAGER ON ] { Qualifying team }
( A ) : Colorado 7 < Arizona > 13 ![]()
@ - 122
( A ) : San Francisco 1 < San Diego > 9 ![]()
@ - 119
( A ) : Boston 3 < Tampa Bay > 5 ![]()
@ - 120
( A ) : Atlanta 7 < Philadelphia > 5 ![]()
@ - 126
( B ) : Pittsburgh 0 < Cincinnati > 3 ![]()
@ - 145
( B ) : Baltimore 1 < N.Y. Mets > 5 ![]()
@ + 113
( B ) : Colorado 1 < Arizona > 5 ![]()
@ - 122
Series net unit record for May : 11 - 0
( A ) : 7 - 9
( B ) : 0 - 7
( C ) : 2 - 2
( D ) : 2 - 0
( E ) : 0 - 0
( F ) : 0 - 0
[ WAGER ON ] { Qualifying team }
( A ) : Colorado 7 < Arizona > 13 ![]()
@ - 122
( A ) : San Francisco 1 < San Diego > 9 ![]()
@ - 119
( A ) : Boston 3 < Tampa Bay > 5 ![]()
@ - 120
( A ) : Atlanta 7 < Philadelphia > 5 ![]()
@ - 126
( B ) : Pittsburgh 0 < Cincinnati > 3 ![]()
@ - 145
( B ) : Baltimore 1 < N.Y. Mets > 5 ![]()
@ + 113
( B ) : Colorado 1 < Arizona > 5 ![]()
@ - 122
Series net unit record for May : 11 - 0
( A ) : 7 - 9
( B ) : 0 - 7
( C ) : 2 - 2
( D ) : 2 - 0
( E ) : 0 - 0
( F ) : 0 - 0
Hot Forum Topics
-
🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵
449,018
-
PART DEUX
247
-
Friday 09/18/2026
759
-
The Three-Day Money Train
4,079
-
🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets
258,455
-
Trump's legacy?
25,442
-
NCAA FOOTBALL. 151
21,366
-
Week 3 Money
6,089
-
NCAA WEEK 3 ***Click here for GREATNESS***
7,018
-
We have picked a terrible time to have the stupidest president ever
29,073
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
