MLB SHUTOUT SYSTEM 2015

Here is how I would play the labby line if I started following your system today. I have 3 lines for each game progression consisting of 4 numbers of 1/2 unit each. Bet to win the 2 outside numbers total. With each win cross off those two numbers. With a loss add that loss to the end of the line.

I like this system because it takes the sting out of a team winning 6 in a row. For example if A game KC goes on a 6 game win streak, I'd lose roughly 6 units plus juice instead of 74 plus juice if you kept doubling up.

I'll show the lines for a few days using $10 as a unit size for easy math. We are betting to win $10 on each team. For a dog, bet $10 to win more. When I do this, I will either just pocket the extra gains or lower the number on any losses. Will deal with this when it comes up.

• A: 5-5-5-5  Sox $11 to win $10
• A: 5-5-5-5  Houston $10 to win $13
• A: 5-5-5-5
• B: 5-5-5-5  Miami $10 to win $12.50
• B: 5-5-5-5
• B: 5-5-5-5
• C: 5-5-5-5 Cubs $20 to win $10
• C: 5-5-5-5
• C: 5-5-5-5

After Saturday's games here are the labby lines.

Plays  for  Sunday  July 26 :



 [ WAGER ON ]              { Qualifying team }

( A ) : St. Louis                 < Atlanta >

( A ) : Arizona                 < Milwaukee >

( A ) : Philadelphia         < Chicago Cubs >

( B ) : Houston               < Kansas City >

( C ) : Miami                   < San Diego >

( D ) : Chicago Cubs      < Philadelphia >

big card for todays plays.

C ya in the winners circle 

For Sunday games here are the labby lines. Note that I am skipping betting on Philly A game as I'm on Cubs D game.

I could have split the $13 on the A game lines but for such a small amount, I just let it go to AZ to make both risk amounts close.

The above is a good example of labby line risk. How much would you be risking if you have chased betting against Philly to the D game? I'm risking 1.8 units to win 1 unit. I think the lines for the 3 Philly wins were something like -170, -240 and -200. Even at $10 unit size your losses would be $17, $64.80, $184. So, today to win all that back plus a $10 unit you would need to risk $496.80 @      -180 to win $276.

Something to think about.

Results  for  Sunday  July 26 :



 [ WAGER ON ]              { Qualifying team }

( A ) : St. Louis                 < Atlanta > 

        @  -  200

( A ) : Arizona                 < Milwaukee > 

        @  -  117

( A ) : Philadelphia         < Chicago Cubs > 

        @  +  199

( B ) : Houston               < Kansas City > 

       @  +  100

( C ) : Miami                   < San Diego > 

       @  +  100

( D ) : Chicago Cubs      < Philadelphia > 

        @  -  185

Plays  for  Monday  July 27 :



    [ WAGER ON ]            { Qualifying team }

( A ) : San Francisco          < Milwaukee >

( B ) : Baltimore                 < Atlanta >

( C ) : Cleveland                 < Kansas City >

C ya in the winners circle. 

Results  for  Monday  July 27 :



    [ WAGER ON ]            { Qualifying team }

( A ) : San Francisco          < Milwaukee > 

         @  -  155

( B ) : Baltimore                 < Atlanta > 

        @  -  150

( C ) : Cleveland                 < Kansas City > 

        @  -105

Plays  for  Tuesday  July 28 :


  [ WAGER ON ]            { Qualifying team }

( D ) : Cleveland               < Kansas City >

( D ) : N.Y.Mets                 < San Diego >

( E ) : Toronto                   < Philadelphia >

C ya in the winners circle. 

You seem to only post when the system is reaching the upper limits. Congratulations on pointing out the obvious. I made it very clear ( if you had bother to read post # 3 what my intentions were ). But let me repeat myself once again : " I will be using a martingale , but feel free to use a progressive betting sequence that you are most comfortable with." 

Now if you have issues with me using a Marty, that's not really a concern of yours now is it ? There is no gun pointed at your head to use a Marty or to even post here as a matter of fact. Bettors have the right to make their own judgments about the validity of any system.

 Caveat Emptor.

Results  for  Tuesday  July 28 :


  [ WAGER ON ]            { Qualifying team }

( D ) : Cleveland               < Kansas City > 

        @  -  115

( D ) : N.Y.Mets                 < San Diego > 

        @  -  124

( E ) : Toronto                   < Philadelphia 

        @  -  226 

Plays  for  Wednesday  July 29 :


  [ WAGER ON ]            { Qualifying team }

( A ) : N.Y.Mets                 < San Diego >

( A ) : Cincinnati                < St. Louis >

( E ) : Cleveland               < Kansas City >

( F ) : Toronto                  < Philadelphia >

I hope to c ya in the winners circle. 

AR, just to be clear, I was in no way trying to bash your system when I posted about the labby line betting. I simply wanted to offer an option for those looking to reduce some risk.

You got the E game win today and we both need to have Toronto come through tonight to avoid a system loss. BOL

Results  for  Wednesday  July 29 :


  [ WAGER ON ]            { Qualifying team }

( A ) : N.Y.Mets              < San Diego > 

        @  -  101

( A ) : Cincinnati                < St. Louis > 

         @  +  155

( E ) : Cleveland               < Kansas City > 

         @  -  158

( F ) : Toronto                  < Philadelphia > 

        @  -  240

Plays  for  Thursday  July 30 :

  [ WAGER ON ]             { Qualifying team }

( A ) : Philadelphia         < Atlanta > 

( A ) : Colorado               < St. Louis > 

( B ) : N.Y.Mets               < San Diego >

C ya in the winners circle. 

Hi Dan,

            I really appreciate and I'm sure that other followers of your posts heartily approve of any insights that you may choose to offer. Its very refreshing to hear other positive points of view and we really all have the same goal here on this forum. To end the season on a positive note. There is no perfect system, we only hope to be on the right side when we decide to get off of the train.

A.R.

Results  for  Thursday  July 30 :

  [ WAGER ON ]             { Qualifying team }

( A ) : Philadelphia         < Atlanta > 

        @  +  112 

( A ) : Colorado               < St. Louis > 

        @  +  200 

( B ) : N.Y.Mets               < San Diego > 

        @  -  102

Id like to give a huge shout out to both of the closing pitchers for the Rockies and the Mets. They managed to both give up three runs in the 9th inning which all but guaranteed that both teams snatched defeat from the jaws of victory.