MLB RPI SYSTEM

Seems we have some demand for a RL following as well. So from here on out I'm going to post the RL with Units as well.  I personally don't play the RL but if it comes to fruition, heck, I just may some day. I'll do my best with that RL UNit thing ok.

Also, It looks as though we have one series starting tomorrow, so far. CHW@ LAA. I always double check the morning of the beginning of a series because that RPI changes a lot the first half of the season.

Take LAA

WON 618.00 BUCKS using the run line instead of the ml. Thats just using 100.00 a unit and a lot less juice!!!!!!!

awesome bro!  I will start that thread underthe straight up plays. so that system, staring this weekend is up 6 units.  Ok. Im guna try it too along w/my straight plays. Even if FLA lost today, I think u woulda still been up right?

Totals:

Straight up 

A Game Wins: 6 

B Game Wins: 5 

C Game Wins: 1

Losses: 0 

Record: 12-0

Martingale: +12 Units. Labby +8 Units

Run Line

A Game wins: 1

B Game wins: 2

C Game Wins: 1

Loses: 0

Season: 4-0

+6Units (started the weekend of Friday 5/6/11)  

Will keep track of Mart/labby from here on out.

 

Totals:

Straight up 

A Game Wins: 6 

B Game Wins: 5 

C Game Wins: 1

Losses: 0 

Record: 12-0

Martingale: +12 Units. Labby +8 Units

A Games are down 4 units on the Labby

B Games are down 1 Unit on the Labby

Run Line

A Game wins: 1

B Game wins: 2

C Game Wins: 1

Loses: 0

Season: 4-0

+6Units (started the weekend of Friday 5/6/11)  

Will keep track of Mart/labby from here on out

 

I know the numbers are "not exact" for the labby but they are pretty close; as with martingale. +/-1% error rate. If numbers are off. Please look at winning percentage to figure out if this is for you.

well done mate !! 

LA Angels.

I'm going to go out and have to be the dumbass here.  I've read this thread a couple times.  First off, I really like what you are doing and how you are doing it.  Looks like an interesting system.  Saying that, I do have to ask about the specifics.  When you bet the first game of a series (or A bet) you bet a specific amount.  If the A bet does not come through you then bet on the next game of the series (which would make it the B bet) - now the amount fo the B bet is double that of the A bet?  so that you cover your intial loss?  And moving on if there had to be bet on the third game of a series (C bet) it would be raises proportional to make up for the losses on the first two bets?
I know this a probably a dumbass post, but I want to be up to speed with this.

Well, you can Labby or Martingale this system. The Martingale seems to produce faster results..Obviously.  I tend to Labby at times and at others I tend to Martingale (double up the bet). But once last year I was bitten by the double up system right at the all star break with Texas losing 4 straight to Baltimore.  Just to shed a little light..I tend to Labby when juice is really high and doubling up ruins your bankroll if you lose. A great example of that was last year when PIT played @ COL. Col juice was extremely high for absolutely no reason, IMO. Higher than normal. I tend to chase when a great/really good team is on the road due to less juice than playing at home.

I meant to say: I tend to double up when a great/really good team is on the road due to less juice than playing at home.

thanks again for posting this! I'm play on an aggressive labby myself and so far so good!

First post struck gold thanks.

Tonight we have an "A" & "B" game.

i found your system here and like it but in your rules u say

 If the lower RPI has been playing significantly better baseball over the last week or so, do not play the series

and TB been very good as of late actually won last 4 and have only lost 4 on the road all yr. they are 7-3 last 10

this series like a pretty even matchup except for the rpi and TB has to be so low because of the fact TB last 8 of first 9 games but since then have been amazing and only lost 6 more since. I do think that clev dont get swept but just wanted to ask

Husker you have a great reason for a "No Play" here according to what I wrote. I do see that whem TB got Longoria back they are a rejuvenated team as well.  Clv has been playing 500 ball in its last 8 or so games I believe. But the reason I took them as a play is because Clv hasnt started a "slide" yet. I believe Clv will eventially, and I also believe TB will make a run. So why the pick??? Because Clv hasnt been playn horrible.  They have shown signs of life.

i deff agree that Clev would win a game in this series was just being sure io understood what you had put.. i try not to run more then one series at a time cause not bnig enough bankroll to cover losses on both if both go to 3rd game lol.. GL.. to be honest i think anyone could bet this series for both teams i cant see either sweeping but thats based only on what i think from recent form of both teams

Both LAA & CLV won. LAA won RL as well. next plays coming this weekend. If you are playing the RL w/CLV, they have a "B" game tonight.

I can't find these RPI you talk about. I looked all over espn couldn't find it. Help please?:-)

Try this

https://espn.go.com/mlb/stats/rpi

As stated before you have to play both the ml and rl. Since Friday up over 1700.00. Great system so far!!!!!!!

Straight up 

A Game Wins: 7 

B Game Wins: 6 

C Game Wins: 1

Losses: 0 

Record: 14-0

 

 

Run Line

A Game wins: 1

B Game wins: 3

C Game Wins: 1

Loses: 0

Season: 5-0

+7 Units

just an fyi... seems the mlb rpi is tighter this year than last couple years. TB should come up and a few scrub teams should fall KC, PiT, Bal.   lets see though. Let the MLB RPI system God decide.