Posted:
#51
looking over the pdf for 2005 only the underdogs were played from 135 to 195.
0
mlb plus money system
Posted:
#55
Quote Originally Posted by Luckydan:
Why are MN +150 and SF +155 not A game plays? New series, both within the +135 to +195 parameters. I see Miami as a dog, thus a play also.
Good Luck
Why are MN +150 and SF +155 not A game plays? New series, both within the +135 to +195 parameters. I see Miami as a dog, thus a play also.
Good Luck
mn lost the last 3 games. I wasn't planning on playing every team that qualifyed. but try to pick the teams that have most likely a chance at winning the next 4 games. if I listed every team that qualifyed it might get real steep and I don't want to blow my bankroll and have to start over. on the other hand maybe it's just better to go with all the teams that qualify. whats your opinion. I didn't think a qualifing team had to be at the beginning of a series for first game but maybe wrong about this too.
0
Posted:
#57
Because one is playing only dogs, I am playing every one regardless of prior records. Because teams are playing poorly only gives you a better payout when they hit. I can control a dog system more than a high juice system with respect to money management. Your dog system has started off very well. It is doing better than the run line favorite system. While it could turn for the worse, I feel more confident in controlling my bankroll with it. If MN and SF split today, you would win at least half a unit. First time for them to be a dog of this size. I hate to give up that chance. If they both tank, I am willing to chase them. Both have very good managers and better talent than what they've shown so far. Beats chasing Houston, even though I would if the system dictates it. One man's opinion.
Good Luck.
Good Luck.
0
Posted:
#58
just like rc1 mentioned on page 2, this system has been out for a while and another poster (LasVegasSystems) dissected the hell out of it.
think about the point in a few weeks, when you have a couple d bets, a c bet, a few b bets, and a sprinkling of a. there are points, he explained,where youll lose about 60% of your bankroll in a couple days. THAT'S IDIOTIC. and like the great vanzack always says, chasing is for losers.
just tryin to help yall before you get knee deep in this. it happens far too often on this system&strategies section
think about the point in a few weeks, when you have a couple d bets, a c bet, a few b bets, and a sprinkling of a. there are points, he explained,where youll lose about 60% of your bankroll in a couple days. THAT'S IDIOTIC. and like the great vanzack always says, chasing is for losers.
just tryin to help yall before you get knee deep in this. it happens far too often on this system&strategies section
0
Posted:
#60
Quote Originally Posted by Luckydan:
Because one is playing only dogs, I am playing every one regardless of prior records. Because teams are playing poorly only gives you a better payout when they hit. I can control a dog system more than a high juice system with respect to money management. Your dog system has started off very well. It is doing better than the run line favorite system. While it could turn for the worse, I feel more confident in controlling my bankroll with it. If MN and SF split today, you would win at least half a unit. First time for them to be a dog of this size. I hate to give up that chance. If they both tank, I am willing to chase them. Both have very good managers and better talent than what they've shown so far. Beats chasing Houston, even though I would if the system dictates it. One man's opinion.
Good Luck.
Because one is playing only dogs, I am playing every one regardless of prior records. Because teams are playing poorly only gives you a better payout when they hit. I can control a dog system more than a high juice system with respect to money management. Your dog system has started off very well. It is doing better than the run line favorite system. While it could turn for the worse, I feel more confident in controlling my bankroll with it. If MN and SF split today, you would win at least half a unit. First time for them to be a dog of this size. I hate to give up that chance. If they both tank, I am willing to chase them. Both have very good managers and better talent than what they've shown so far. Beats chasing Houston, even though I would if the system dictates it. One man's opinion.
Good Luck.
I agree with you I think starting out on all teams that qualify isn't a bad idea at all. I'm going to include them on my chart later today.
0
Posted:
#62
this forum is meant to have cappers help cappers and i hate seeing cappers fall down this slippery slope of thinking a SYSTEM can get you to win BIG MONEY. ask any prominent professional handicapper on covers and they will all say this is bologna.
however on the note of systems, i do respect some of the consistent system creators on this forum like therizz and cisco and even neilsy
however on the note of systems, i do respect some of the consistent system creators on this forum like therizz and cisco and even neilsy
0
Posted:
#63
Quote Originally Posted by Shabazlyq:
this forum is meant to have cappers help cappers and i hate seeing cappers fall down this slippery slope of thinking a SYSTEM can get you to win BIG MONEY. ask any prominent professional handicapper on covers and they will all say this is bologna.
however on the note of systems, i do respect some of the consistent system creators on this forum like therizz and cisco and even neilsy
this forum is meant to have cappers help cappers and i hate seeing cappers fall down this slippery slope of thinking a SYSTEM can get you to win BIG MONEY. ask any prominent professional handicapper on covers and they will all say this is bologna.
however on the note of systems, i do respect some of the consistent system creators on this forum like therizz and cisco and even neilsy
i played almost the same sytem last year the 2h of the season i did very good playing the +underdogs
0
Posted:
#64
Quote Originally Posted by Shabazlyq:
what lasvegassystems emailed me proving its worthlessness in 2010
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Anojo4_0kvDSdFhZNTQ1Nm1LdEJaSm1TREc0MzVDZlE
what lasvegassystems emailed me proving its worthlessness in 2010
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Anojo4_0kvDSdFhZNTQ1Nm1LdEJaSm1TREc0MzVDZlE
I payed for picks with this system in 2010 and I agree it didn't fair to well. I was with jamesjones for a couple of weeks his pick selection was around 8 or 9 games at a time. I think luckydan is probably correct that if one is too picky and choses only 4 or 5 games out of everything that qualifys it could end up with really bad pick selection and lose any bankroll that was built up.
0
Posted:
#68
Quote Originally Posted by Shabazlyq:
just like rc1 mentioned on page 2, this system has been out for a while and another poster (LasVegasSystems) dissected the hell out of it.
think about the point in a few weeks, when you have a couple d bets, a c bet, a few b bets, and a sprinkling of a. there are points, he explained,where youll lose about 60% of your bankroll in a couple days. THAT'S IDIOTIC. and like the great vanzack always says, chasing is for losers.
just tryin to help yall before you get knee deep in this. it happens far too often on this system&strategies section
just like rc1 mentioned on page 2, this system has been out for a while and another poster (LasVegasSystems) dissected the hell out of it.
think about the point in a few weeks, when you have a couple d bets, a c bet, a few b bets, and a sprinkling of a. there are points, he explained,where youll lose about 60% of your bankroll in a couple days. THAT'S IDIOTIC. and like the great vanzack always says, chasing is for losers.
just tryin to help yall before you get knee deep in this. it happens far too often on this system&strategies section
just thinking about what your saying and I think this way if one game say like atl does an a bet on apr 4 and a b bet on apr 7 and doesn't get to a c bet till may 7 then I think this is too long of a wait and probably would drop bets C and d and start over with a bet on that team. as I tried to back track this system there were a few teams where c bet didn't come up for 2 or 3 weeks later I didn't skip any teams when I backtracked. I only got through the american league when I backtracked this.
0
Posted:
#71
[Quote: Originally Posted by jv040] my book has was on -1.5 they do now .I guess I could put it on the chart. I think most services go by covers opening lines. I thought closing lines might be more accurate. could be wrong.
funny same thing happened to my yesterday with clevland,it was +1.5 so i did not play it
funny same thing happened to my yesterday with clevland,it was +1.5 so i did not play it
0
Posted:
#74
I decided i'm listing all A bets as a place of reference and not betting till B bet. this way I'm cutting down on the # of plays and my bankroll won't be so bogged down. B bets will be 1 unit and C bets will be 2 units. D bets will be 3 units. this is just a suggestion and everyone can do A bets if they want to.
0
Hot Forum Topics
