your commentary on the ML 'system' you have brought forward, is, and always will be successful in handicapping the NBA ML..your research is showing a less risk factor by involving only certain match-up's....going into Parlay's, although tempting, will be your eventual financial collapse.. and a sad waste of your time, and money; regardless of any statement ever made anywhere in the handicapping industry, Parlay's are 'suckerbets' with the lowest % of wins in ALL of sports wagering, your after $ not a dream.. GO with the%. YOUR FORMULA IS A POSITIVE FACTOR, don't mis-lead it by incorporating parlays, take note; your BR plays a very significant role in this system, without 6.2k at your disposal, forget it. (minimum) I urge you to re: to my thread in pro hoops, under ML formula's, I have a great deal of value to share; if your interested....
0
your commentary on the ML 'system' you have brought forward, is, and always will be successful in handicapping the NBA ML..your research is showing a less risk factor by involving only certain match-up's....going into Parlay's, although tempting, will be your eventual financial collapse.. and a sad waste of your time, and money; regardless of any statement ever made anywhere in the handicapping industry, Parlay's are 'suckerbets' with the lowest % of wins in ALL of sports wagering, your after $ not a dream.. GO with the%. YOUR FORMULA IS A POSITIVE FACTOR, don't mis-lead it by incorporating parlays, take note; your BR plays a very significant role in this system, without 6.2k at your disposal, forget it. (minimum) I urge you to re: to my thread in pro hoops, under ML formula's, I have a great deal of value to share; if your interested....
Just a reminder on the Boston rule that is taking place tonight:
breakdown test of the new rule.
Boston: 5 road game losses ( 2 against cleveland, 2, agains orlando, 1 washington) 3-0 straight up against teams they can play ML against
Detroit Pistons: 9 loses on road (2 bulls, blazers, rockets, lakers, kings, mavs, knicks, magic) 3-0 straight up against teams they can play ML against
Phoenix Suns 9 loses on road 3 against the teams above OMMIT suns from list of teams you can play on the road.
New Orleans Hornets 7 loses. (2-utah, 2 port, sac, dal, den) 6-0 straight up against the bottom teams.
Add:
Hornets Pistons Celtics teams we can bet for on the road but only against: Miami, Seattle, La clippers, Memphis, and minnesota (12-0)
0
Just a reminder on the Boston rule that is taking place tonight:
breakdown test of the new rule.
Boston: 5 road game losses ( 2 against cleveland, 2, agains orlando, 1 washington) 3-0 straight up against teams they can play ML against
Detroit Pistons: 9 loses on road (2 bulls, blazers, rockets, lakers, kings, mavs, knicks, magic) 3-0 straight up against teams they can play ML against
Phoenix Suns 9 loses on road 3 against the teams above OMMIT suns from list of teams you can play on the road.
New Orleans Hornets 7 loses. (2-utah, 2 port, sac, dal, den) 6-0 straight up against the bottom teams.
Add:
Hornets Pistons Celtics teams we can bet for on the road but only against: Miami, Seattle, La clippers, Memphis, and minnesota (12-0)
As opposed to what Stash says, parlays are the way to go with these huge favs. Don't parlay a ton of them together, but 2 and 3 team parlays are fine.
With these huge favs if you just lose one you will be down more than a unit. So you have nothing to lose by parlaying two or three together. Because all you would lose is one unit.
0
As opposed to what Stash says, parlays are the way to go with these huge favs. Don't parlay a ton of them together, but 2 and 3 team parlays are fine.
With these huge favs if you just lose one you will be down more than a unit. So you have nothing to lose by parlaying two or three together. Because all you would lose is one unit.
I agree with lipps, this system was developed by me to only play 2 team parlays thats it..... whent here are more than 2 games on the night tha tyou can play which is usually rare you make it a smaller $ on a 3 team... i would not suggest doing 4 teams ever! it has a losing record!
3 team parlays stands at 18-8 respectfully!
0
I agree with lipps, this system was developed by me to only play 2 team parlays thats it..... whent here are more than 2 games on the night tha tyou can play which is usually rare you make it a smaller $ on a 3 team... i would not suggest doing 4 teams ever! it has a losing record!
Lippsman, I am not! i have been taking the last week and a half off from betting right now due to losing all my $$ i hope to be back in the game before the college basketball conference championships
0
Lippsman, I am not! i have been taking the last week and a half off from betting right now due to losing all my $$ i hope to be back in the game before the college basketball conference championships
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.