your commentary on the ML 'system' you have brought forward, is, and always will be successful in handicapping the NBA ML..your research is showing a less risk factor by involving only certain match-up's....going into Parlay's, although tempting, will be your eventual financial collapse.. and a sad waste of your time, and money; regardless of any statement ever made anywhere in the handicapping industry, Parlay's are 'suckerbets' with the lowest % of wins in ALL of sports wagering, your after $ not a dream.. GO with the%. YOUR FORMULA IS A POSITIVE FACTOR, don't mis-lead it by incorporating parlays, take note; your BR plays a very significant role in this system, without 6.2k at your disposal, forget it. (minimum) I urge you to re: to my thread in pro hoops, under ML formula's, I have a great deal of value to share; if your interested....
0
your commentary on the ML 'system' you have brought forward, is, and always will be successful in handicapping the NBA ML..your research is showing a less risk factor by involving only certain match-up's....going into Parlay's, although tempting, will be your eventual financial collapse.. and a sad waste of your time, and money; regardless of any statement ever made anywhere in the handicapping industry, Parlay's are 'suckerbets' with the lowest % of wins in ALL of sports wagering, your after $ not a dream.. GO with the%. YOUR FORMULA IS A POSITIVE FACTOR, don't mis-lead it by incorporating parlays, take note; your BR plays a very significant role in this system, without 6.2k at your disposal, forget it. (minimum) I urge you to re: to my thread in pro hoops, under ML formula's, I have a great deal of value to share; if your interested....
Just a reminder on the Boston rule that is taking place tonight:
breakdown test of the new rule.
Boston: 5 road game losses ( 2 against cleveland, 2, agains orlando, 1 washington) 3-0 straight up against teams they can play ML against
Detroit Pistons: 9 loses on road (2 bulls, blazers, rockets, lakers, kings, mavs, knicks, magic) 3-0 straight up against teams they can play ML against
Phoenix Suns 9 loses on road 3 against the teams above OMMIT suns from list of teams you can play on the road.
New Orleans Hornets 7 loses. (2-utah, 2 port, sac, dal, den) 6-0 straight up against the bottom teams.
Add:
Hornets Pistons Celtics teams we can bet for on the road but only against: Miami, Seattle, La clippers, Memphis, and minnesota (12-0)
0
Just a reminder on the Boston rule that is taking place tonight:
breakdown test of the new rule.
Boston: 5 road game losses ( 2 against cleveland, 2, agains orlando, 1 washington) 3-0 straight up against teams they can play ML against
Detroit Pistons: 9 loses on road (2 bulls, blazers, rockets, lakers, kings, mavs, knicks, magic) 3-0 straight up against teams they can play ML against
Phoenix Suns 9 loses on road 3 against the teams above OMMIT suns from list of teams you can play on the road.
New Orleans Hornets 7 loses. (2-utah, 2 port, sac, dal, den) 6-0 straight up against the bottom teams.
Add:
Hornets Pistons Celtics teams we can bet for on the road but only against: Miami, Seattle, La clippers, Memphis, and minnesota (12-0)
As opposed to what Stash says, parlays are the way to go with these huge favs. Don't parlay a ton of them together, but 2 and 3 team parlays are fine.
With these huge favs if you just lose one you will be down more than a unit. So you have nothing to lose by parlaying two or three together. Because all you would lose is one unit.
0
As opposed to what Stash says, parlays are the way to go with these huge favs. Don't parlay a ton of them together, but 2 and 3 team parlays are fine.
With these huge favs if you just lose one you will be down more than a unit. So you have nothing to lose by parlaying two or three together. Because all you would lose is one unit.
I agree with lipps, this system was developed by me to only play 2 team parlays thats it..... whent here are more than 2 games on the night tha tyou can play which is usually rare you make it a smaller $ on a 3 team... i would not suggest doing 4 teams ever! it has a losing record!
3 team parlays stands at 18-8 respectfully!
0
I agree with lipps, this system was developed by me to only play 2 team parlays thats it..... whent here are more than 2 games on the night tha tyou can play which is usually rare you make it a smaller $ on a 3 team... i would not suggest doing 4 teams ever! it has a losing record!
Lippsman, I am not! i have been taking the last week and a half off from betting right now due to losing all my $$ i hope to be back in the game before the college basketball conference championships
0
Lippsman, I am not! i have been taking the last week and a half off from betting right now due to losing all my $$ i hope to be back in the game before the college basketball conference championships