Posted:
#51
damn you are right they are version 2 my bad
0
JM Nba System Tracking Various Methods
Posted:
#52
Quote Originally Posted by pokerpro40k:
Version 4:
Version 4:
Bank: $1000
Labby:
1) 5-5-5-5
1a) 5-5-5-5
Oct27
1) Sacramento +7 -170 $17 to win $10
1a) Portland PK -170 $17 to win $10
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Standard JM ABC
Bank: $1000
A-Bet Sacramento +7 -170 $17 to win $10
A-Bet Portland PK -170 $17 to win $10
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Anti JM Labby
1) 5-5-5-5
1a) 5-5-5-5
Bank: $1000
1) Minnesota -3 -110 $11 to win $10
2) LA Clippers +3 -110 $11 to win $10
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Anti JM ABC
Bank: $1000
A-Bet Minnesota -3 -110 $11 to win $10
A-Bet LA Clippers +3 -110 $11 to win $10
Why would you pay -170 to buy a -3 to a pickem, when you could just take Sac on the ML (which is a pickem) for around -145?
0
Posted:
#64
I used last season as a backtest for v3 and it came up poop using AJM buying no points.
44-13-2 (count the 2 pushes as losses because you lose two games and push one. So really 44-15)
that's playing 3-game roadies vs same conf.
I also checked on 3-game roadies vs 2 of 3 from same conf and it finished 9-3
These are both bad numbers when chasing even without buying points.
0
Posted:
#65
Quote Originally Posted by smitler:
spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=0AhVKY8GzoikLdFBsbUl0T2NFX2hncGQ0QnJ4QnhuRlE&hl=en&output=html
spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=0AhVKY8GzoikLdFBsbUl0T2NFX2hncGQ0QnJ4QnhuRlE&hl=en&output=html
Thanks Smitler! 
0
Posted:
#66
Quote Originally Posted by pokerpro40k:
Version 2:
Version 2:
Bank: $1000
Labby:
1) 5-5-5-5
1a) 5-5-5-5
Oct27
1) Sacramento +7 -170 $17 to win $10 
1a) Portland PK -170 $17 to win $10
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Standard JM ABC
Bank: $1000
A-Bet Sacramento +7 -170 $17 to win $10
A-Bet Portland PK -170 $17 to win $10
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Anti JM Labby
1) 5-5-5-5
1a) 5-5-5-5
Bank: $1000
1) Minnesota -3 -110 $11 to win $10 
2) LA Clippers +3 -110 $11 to win $10
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Anti JM ABC
Bank: $1000
A-Bet Minnesota -3 -110 $11 to win $10
A-Bet LA Clippers +3 -110 $11 to win $10
0
Posted:
#68
Version 2: Labby
Record: 2-0 (2-0)
Profit: $20
Risked: $37
ROI: 54%
Line 1) x-5-5-x
Line 1a) x-5-5-x
----------------------------------------------
Version 2: ABC
Record: 2-0 (2-0)
Profit: $20
Risked: $37
ROI: 54%
ABets: 2-0
-------------------------------------------------
Anti JM Version 2: Labby
Record: 0-2
Profit: -$22
Risked: $22
ROI: -100%
Line 1) 5-5-5-5-11
Line 1a) 5-5-5-5-11
--------------------------------------------------------
Anti JM Version 2: ABC
Record: 0-2
Profit: -$22
Risked: $22
ROI: -100%
B-Bet 10/29 Sacramento vs New Jersey
B-Bet 10/30 Portland vs New York
0
Posted:
#73
Few points to make and responses so here goes.
- Much credit goes to sahlsa for posting the schedule. I just formatted and re-posted. Its a first draft but I wanted to get it out there for you guys. I will continue to improve the format. Post any suggestions.
- LSU both "real" records (not JM's record) for V1 and V2 combined were 80-2 last season. AJM you do not buy any points. I have bought 1/2 point on occasion but I don't believe that 1/2 point would have turned any of the two losers into winners. It just may have won a chase sooner within the series.
- I purchased JM Version 1 years ago and those are the only official emails I receive. So can't confirm anything from JM on V2 and V3
- I would not play both JM and AJM without having a Betus account for AJM and any other account for JM. Betus lines are almost always at least 1/2 point off in AJM's favor. Many times you can get a 3 point difference by playing AJM -110 at Betus and only buying 2 points @-150 at other books.
- I don't believe Version 3 and Version 4 will work if you choose to martingale. Good luck with the labby.
- pp40k you are going to be busy trying to keep up with all these versions and associated money management methods. I hope you see it through to seasons-end.
0
Posted:
#75
Quote Originally Posted by smdio:
Wouldn't the play be -against- SAC and Portland? Since they both won last night... ?
Wouldn't the play be -against- SAC and Portland? Since they both won last night... ?
i dont want to start asking a million questions because i have teh pdf of jm version 2, but why would a play be against Portland and SAC?? is this a different version??? thanks alot guys
0
Hot Forum Topics
