Posted:
#351
02/02
Anti [A]
LA Clippers
Anti [A]
New York
Anti [A]
denver
0
JM Nba System Tracking Various Methods
Posted:
#359
7 kings JM (B) V1
830 jazz JM ( A ) V2
9 Hawks JM (B) V1
930 clippers JM (B) V3
not sure of official record. Seems JM is the usual.
got this from email for V1 today
Go grab your favorite beer and celebrate with me as we pull in the
11th (!!) consecutive [A] win with Boston last night! That's right,
we have won each and every single one of our last 11 [A] bets, with
no end to this mind-blowing winning streak anywhere in sight! The
NBA betting system takes advantage of a 3-game series, but it's so
incredibly accurate at predicting winners that the [A] bets alone
have been winning 100% of the time! The crazy thing is, the [A]
bets are the ones that are least likely to win of them all! Think
about it, if the [A] bets alone have not lost once
in the last 11 bets, can you just imagine what it's going to take
for us to lose an entire betting series?
0
Posted:
#360
i just wanted to thank nolemonasses for posting link in # 277 and was wondering if anyone can post a similar spreadsheet for baseball monthly. since theres more games.
0
Posted:
#361
V1record so far (finished series): 40-3
(A): 21-22
(B): 15-7
(C): 4-3
Lost series:
PHO 11/17-20
DET 12/07-10
UTA 01/17-21
V2 record so far (finished series): 18-1
(A): 13-6
(B): 2-4
(C): 3-1
Lost series:
MIN 10/30-11/03
V3 record so far (finished series): 43-2
(A): 23-21-1 (W-L-P)
(B): 17-4-1 (W-L-P)
(C): 3-1-1 (W-L-P)
Lost series:
CLE 12/04-07
TOR 01/29-02/02 (B bet and C bet were pushes according to covers.com)
(A): 21-22
(B): 15-7
(C): 4-3
Lost series:
PHO 11/17-20
DET 12/07-10
UTA 01/17-21
V2 record so far (finished series): 18-1
(A): 13-6
(B): 2-4
(C): 3-1
Lost series:
MIN 10/30-11/03
V3 record so far (finished series): 43-2
(A): 23-21-1 (W-L-P)
(B): 17-4-1 (W-L-P)
(C): 3-1-1 (W-L-P)
Lost series:
CLE 12/04-07
TOR 01/29-02/02 (B bet and C bet were pushes according to covers.com)
0
Posted:
#362
Quote Originally Posted by mcmister:
V1record so far (finished series): 40-3
(A): 21-22
(B): 15-7
(C): 4-3
Lost series:
PHO 11/17-20
DET 12/07-10
UTA 01/17-21
V2 record so far (finished series): 18-1
(A): 13-6
(B): 2-4
(C): 3-1
Lost series:
MIN 10/30-11/03
V3 record so far (finished series): 43-2
(A): 23-21-1 (W-L-P)
(B): 17-4-1 (W-L-P)
(C): 3-1-1 (W-L-P)
Lost series:
CLE 12/04-07
TOR 01/29-02/02 (B bet and C bet were pushes according to covers.com)
V1record so far (finished series): 40-3
(A): 21-22
(B): 15-7
(C): 4-3
Lost series:
PHO 11/17-20
DET 12/07-10
UTA 01/17-21
V2 record so far (finished series): 18-1
(A): 13-6
(B): 2-4
(C): 3-1
Lost series:
MIN 10/30-11/03
V3 record so far (finished series): 43-2
(A): 23-21-1 (W-L-P)
(B): 17-4-1 (W-L-P)
(C): 3-1-1 (W-L-P)
Lost series:
CLE 12/04-07
TOR 01/29-02/02 (B bet and C bet were pushes according to covers.com)
What are the differences in each version?
0
Posted:
#363
Same filters for all 3 versions.
v1 = all road games are out of conference
v2= 2 out of the 3 are out of conference
v3= all 3 road games can be in conference
Filter out key player injury
Filter out the best and worst road record
and some other slight filters that allow JM to claim a winner.
v1 = all road games are out of conference
v2= 2 out of the 3 are out of conference
v3= all 3 road games can be in conference
Filter out key player injury
Filter out the best and worst road record
and some other slight filters that allow JM to claim a winner.
0
Posted:
#364
Quote Originally Posted by mcmister:
V1record so far (finished series): 40-3
(A): 21-22
(B): 15-7
(C): 4-3
Lost series:
PHO 11/17-20
DET 12/07-10
UTA 01/17-21
V2 record so far (finished series): 18-1
(A): 13-6
(B): 2-4
(C): 3-1
Lost series:
MIN 10/30-11/03
V3 record so far (finished series): 43-2
(A): 23-21-1 (W-L-P)
(B): 17-4-1 (W-L-P)
(C): 3-1-1 (W-L-P)
Lost series:
CLE 12/04-07
TOR 01/29-02/02 (B bet and C bet were pushes according to covers.com)
V1record so far (finished series): 40-3
(A): 21-22
(B): 15-7
(C): 4-3
Lost series:
PHO 11/17-20
DET 12/07-10
UTA 01/17-21
V2 record so far (finished series): 18-1
(A): 13-6
(B): 2-4
(C): 3-1
Lost series:
MIN 10/30-11/03
V3 record so far (finished series): 43-2
(A): 23-21-1 (W-L-P)
(B): 17-4-1 (W-L-P)
(C): 3-1-1 (W-L-P)
Lost series:
CLE 12/04-07
TOR 01/29-02/02 (B bet and C bet were pushes according to covers.com)
Is this JM Buying 3 points??
or AJM (Were you play the home team?)?
0
Posted:
#369
Quote Originally Posted by mcmister:
V1record so far (finished series): 40-3
(A): 21-22
(B): 15-7
(C): 4-3
Lost series:
PHO 11/17-20
DET 12/07-10
UTA 01/17-21
V2 record so far (finished series): 18-1
(A): 13-6
(B): 2-4
(C): 3-1
Lost series:
MIN 10/30-11/03
V3 record so far (finished series): 43-2
(A): 23-21-1 (W-L-P)
(B): 17-4-1 (W-L-P)
(C): 3-1-1 (W-L-P)
Lost series:
CLE 12/04-07
TOR 01/29-02/02 (B bet and C bet were pushes according to covers.com)
V1record so far (finished series): 40-3
(A): 21-22
(B): 15-7
(C): 4-3
Lost series:
PHO 11/17-20
DET 12/07-10
UTA 01/17-21
V2 record so far (finished series): 18-1
(A): 13-6
(B): 2-4
(C): 3-1
Lost series:
MIN 10/30-11/03
V3 record so far (finished series): 43-2
(A): 23-21-1 (W-L-P)
(B): 17-4-1 (W-L-P)
(C): 3-1-1 (W-L-P)
Lost series:
CLE 12/04-07
TOR 01/29-02/02 (B bet and C bet were pushes according to covers.com)
very helpfull,thak you.
have you kept track of AJM as well?
0
Posted:
#372
Quote Originally Posted by jamese182:
can anywun tell whats the record of wins and losses if u Filter out key player injury and Filter out the best and worst road record..and is this system worth it?
First, The Labby is always more effective than a true chase (double up, double up).
Secondly, just add up the win/loss records above... how many + units do you get? Even following the JM rules strictly you have 102 wins 6 losses. 6 losses cost you about 90 units. So you'd be up 12 units. This is buying points, etc. etc. You don't have to do that.... Still 12 units is 12 units. Don't shoot the messenger.
can anywun tell whats the record of wins and losses if u Filter out key player injury and Filter out the best and worst road record..and is this system worth it?
First, The Labby is always more effective than a true chase (double up, double up).
Secondly, just add up the win/loss records above... how many + units do you get? Even following the JM rules strictly you have 102 wins 6 losses. 6 losses cost you about 90 units. So you'd be up 12 units. This is buying points, etc. etc. You don't have to do that.... Still 12 units is 12 units. Don't shoot the messenger.
0
Hot Forum Topics
