Anybody else that finds it interesting that Milkman 33 seems to turn up whenever a system is doing bad. Never has anything positive to say. Always negative. Some people...
0
Anybody else that finds it interesting that Milkman 33 seems to turn up whenever a system is doing bad. Never has anything positive to say. Always negative. Some people...
Anybody else that finds it interesting that Milkman 33 seems to turn up whenever a system is doing bad. Never has anything positive to say. Always negative. Some people...
Pete, don't worry about it. He's noticeably absent on the NHL thread where we're doing great. Remember how he disappeared after we netted 50 units in MLB?
0
Quote Originally Posted by pete22:
Anybody else that finds it interesting that Milkman 33 seems to turn up whenever a system is doing bad. Never has anything positive to say. Always negative. Some people...
Pete, don't worry about it. He's noticeably absent on the NHL thread where we're doing great. Remember how he disappeared after we netted 50 units in MLB?
sdiinc thanks for all the work... i remember u doing really good during mlb... for nhl, nfl, nba, have u played this system for them in previous yrs, or back-tested them? or is it just like a trial run right now?
0
sdiinc thanks for all the work... i remember u doing really good during mlb... for nhl, nfl, nba, have u played this system for them in previous yrs, or back-tested them? or is it just like a trial run right now?
sdiinc thanks for all the work... i remember u doing really good during mlb... for nhl, nfl, nba, have u played this system for them in previous yrs, or back-tested them? or is it just like a trial run right now?
Crook, last year I did very well in NFL, 58% ATS. I thought we could improve on that by adding a few additional filters this year. It just hasn't worked out thus far, and as I look at other handicapper types, I see them struggling as well. I'm going to tweak the NFL formula by weighting the more recent games and reducing the weight of the earlier season games and see what that does.
I predicted, but didn't post last year's NBA or NHL stuff. Both were backtested and tweaked on about 10 years of data. On the NHL I used a similar progressive method as I did with MLB, and it was extremely profitable for the 2nd half of the season. I really wanted to get away from that money management model, although if I were using it now it would be doing very well.
I didn't have good data for the NBA, so began with all new formula this year.
I know on these forums people have a very short time span, but until I've got a few hundred events to track, I don't consider it statistically significant, so I'll just keep plowing ahead. I do have greater hopes for the NBA though with the high number of events.
0
Quote Originally Posted by crookedIcon:
sdiinc thanks for all the work... i remember u doing really good during mlb... for nhl, nfl, nba, have u played this system for them in previous yrs, or back-tested them? or is it just like a trial run right now?
Crook, last year I did very well in NFL, 58% ATS. I thought we could improve on that by adding a few additional filters this year. It just hasn't worked out thus far, and as I look at other handicapper types, I see them struggling as well. I'm going to tweak the NFL formula by weighting the more recent games and reducing the weight of the earlier season games and see what that does.
I predicted, but didn't post last year's NBA or NHL stuff. Both were backtested and tweaked on about 10 years of data. On the NHL I used a similar progressive method as I did with MLB, and it was extremely profitable for the 2nd half of the season. I really wanted to get away from that money management model, although if I were using it now it would be doing very well.
I didn't have good data for the NBA, so began with all new formula this year.
I know on these forums people have a very short time span, but until I've got a few hundred events to track, I don't consider it statistically significant, so I'll just keep plowing ahead. I do have greater hopes for the NBA though with the high number of events.
So we finished November 31-31. The bright point is that the final 5 days of the month were 14-7. Let's hope this represents an increase in the formula accuracy as a result of a growing body of data to work from.
Dec 1:
ORL +9 GS +3.5
0
So we finished November 31-31. The bright point is that the final 5 days of the month were 14-7. Let's hope this represents an increase in the formula accuracy as a result of a growing body of data to work from.