guys. When I first started this thread the plays were mainly based on the first couple of posts, however I have since noticed that there are stronger angles than just having a good home team coming off a loss against a loosing road team, although it does have weight. Currently my plays are based on several factors but ALL have to qualify as a play based on pf/pa for each team, to be more specific pf/pa @ home and pf/pa away.... then I use a specific equation to determine if it is a play or not.
0
guys. When I first started this thread the plays were mainly based on the first couple of posts, however I have since noticed that there are stronger angles than just having a good home team coming off a loss against a loosing road team, although it does have weight. Currently my plays are based on several factors but ALL have to qualify as a play based on pf/pa for each team, to be more specific pf/pa @ home and pf/pa away.... then I use a specific equation to determine if it is a play or not.
Wow. So Mr. Mind, do you think your recent success was from the tweaks you made or just luck? I'd like to start tailing, but would be devastated if you went on a bad streak due to bad luck and I got effed lol.
My bankroll is well below 50% of what I started at. Not good.
0
Wow. So Mr. Mind, do you think your recent success was from the tweaks you made or just luck? I'd like to start tailing, but would be devastated if you went on a bad streak due to bad luck and I got effed lol.
My bankroll is well below 50% of what I started at. Not good.
Its all in the hm. vs away. stats(PF:PA), I have a certain equation that I use with the #'s that determine if it is a qualifying play, the .500 + team at home coming off a loss is icing on the cake only if the #'s are there as well, I do the same equation for both 1H and game, one might qualify the other may not, hope that helps.
Also Min. is not a sub .500 team, and you are right 10% about Kobe, key injuries have a big impact on my plays.
Honestly TM I think its a little more of the tweaks than luck, but then again I have always been lucky....but i will take it any way i can. Yea, if your not confident do not tail, the main purpose at this point is to try and track my picks for this year and see if I can hit 57%+, tail at your own risk.
0
Quote Originally Posted by mindtides:
Its all in the hm. vs away. stats(PF:PA), I have a certain equation that I use with the #'s that determine if it is a qualifying play, the .500 + team at home coming off a loss is icing on the cake only if the #'s are there as well, I do the same equation for both 1H and game, one might qualify the other may not, hope that helps.
Also Min. is not a sub .500 team, and you are right 10% about Kobe, key injuries have a big impact on my plays.
Honestly TM I think its a little more of the tweaks than luck, but then again I have always been lucky....but i will take it any way i can. Yea, if your not confident do not tail, the main purpose at this point is to try and track my picks for this year and see if I can hit 57%+, tail at your own risk.
mvp, when I answered "thats correct" I was referring to having to wait for me to post the plays, even with kobe cleared to play, the #'s in that game still made it a no play for me.
0
mvp, when I answered "thats correct" I was referring to having to wait for me to post the plays, even with kobe cleared to play, the #'s in that game still made it a no play for me.
i have a few problems with ur system...one...you play an absurd amount of games...and two...u need a monster bankroll to continue daily with ur system...yes u have a winning record...57% to b exact...not bad...but not great...i applaud u for ur effort...if possible can u separate ur record by sport for bettors who dont play ncaa but play nba or vice versa...thx
0
i have a few problems with ur system...one...you play an absurd amount of games...and two...u need a monster bankroll to continue daily with ur system...yes u have a winning record...57% to b exact...not bad...but not great...i applaud u for ur effort...if possible can u separate ur record by sport for bettors who dont play ncaa but play nba or vice versa...thx
I am using this forum as a "testing" ground for something that is in the works, this will be an ongoing project with plays across different leagues. I post all plays I feel fit into my system model without separation, feel free to do so. 57% for a week is "not bad", 57% for a year or many can make you rich. And once again tail at your own risk.
0
I am using this forum as a "testing" ground for something that is in the works, this will be an ongoing project with plays across different leagues. I post all plays I feel fit into my system model without separation, feel free to do so. 57% for a week is "not bad", 57% for a year or many can make you rich. And once again tail at your own risk.
Hey Mindtides - I've been following you for a couple of weeks and I really appreciate your time and effort to post these plays. Your system is kicking A$$!!! Great day today so far - thanks again! Keep posting!!!
0
Hey Mindtides - I've been following you for a couple of weeks and I really appreciate your time and effort to post these plays. Your system is kicking A$$!!! Great day today so far - thanks again! Keep posting!!!
guys. When I first started this thread the plays were mainly based on the first couple of posts, however I have since noticed that there are stronger angles than just having a good home team coming off a loss against a loosing road team, although it does have weight. Currently my plays are based on several factors but ALL have to qualify as a play based on pf/pa for each team, to be more specific pf/pa @ home and pf/pa away.... then I use a specific equation to determine if it is a play or not.
rhgambler
Hot Forum Topics
