Posted:
#26
dumb ass texas didnt even foul
0-2 for the day
0-2 for the day
0
35-13 last 9 days system
Posted:
#37
Here is your backtest:
Full NBA Regular Season and playoffs (1993 thru 2005) - that's 28,350 NBA games...
3,789 games qualified for this system (that is, both teams playing - their previous 2 games were identical results (both over or both under) - you bet the opposite of the trend). I did not count pushes - So if a team went under-push-under - they did not qualify for the test...only true under under or over over were counted ...
Results?
64 pushes
1847 wins
1878 losses.
About what you would expect...GL
Full NBA Regular Season and playoffs (1993 thru 2005) - that's 28,350 NBA games...
3,789 games qualified for this system (that is, both teams playing - their previous 2 games were identical results (both over or both under) - you bet the opposite of the trend). I did not count pushes - So if a team went under-push-under - they did not qualify for the test...only true under under or over over were counted ...
Results?
64 pushes
1847 wins
1878 losses.
About what you would expect...GL
0
Posted:
#38
Quote Originally Posted by MeMyselfandEye:
Here is your backtest:
Full NBA Regular Season and playoffs (1993 thru 2005) - that's 28,350 NBA games...
3,789 games qualified for this system (that is, both teams playing - their previous 2 games were identical results (both over or both under) - you bet the opposite of the trend). I did not count pushes - So if a team went under-push-under - they did not qualify for the test...only true under under or over over were counted ...
Results?
64 pushes
1847 wins
1878 losses.
About what you would expect...GL
Here is your backtest:
Full NBA Regular Season and playoffs (1993 thru 2005) - that's 28,350 NBA games...
3,789 games qualified for this system (that is, both teams playing - their previous 2 games were identical results (both over or both under) - you bet the opposite of the trend). I did not count pushes - So if a team went under-push-under - they did not qualify for the test...only true under under or over over were counted ...
Results?
64 pushes
1847 wins
1878 losses.
About what you would expect...GL
wow nice work
thanks alot
im not surprised at the results
we are probably seeing this even out now with yesterdays results
im gonna play it small a couple of days anyway just to see how it goes
0
Posted:
#40
Quote Originally Posted by MeMyselfandEye:
Here is your backtest:
Full NBA Regular Season and playoffs (1993 thru 2005) - that's 28,350 NBA games...
3,789 games qualified for this system (that is, both teams playing - their previous 2 games were identical results (both over or both under) - you bet the opposite of the trend). I did not count pushes - So if a team went under-push-under - they did not qualify for the test...only true under under or over over were counted ...
Results?
64 pushes
1847 wins
1878 losses.
About what you would expect...GL
Here is your backtest:
Full NBA Regular Season and playoffs (1993 thru 2005) - that's 28,350 NBA games...
3,789 games qualified for this system (that is, both teams playing - their previous 2 games were identical results (both over or both under) - you bet the opposite of the trend). I did not count pushes - So if a team went under-push-under - they did not qualify for the test...only true under under or over over were counted ...
Results?
64 pushes
1847 wins
1878 losses.
About what you would expect...GL
just out of curiosity and maybe so that I can backtest other strategies...
How the FUCK did you backtest all those years? Would be a huge help in testing other stuff...
very nice though...the help's appreciated.
0
Hot Forum Topics
