Looks like Buffalo is only the only away team B2B play tonight. Although there 3 home teams on a B2B, I wonder how these plays have went this year. Maybe some over plays on these
0
Looks like Buffalo is only the only away team B2B play tonight. Although there 3 home teams on a B2B, I wonder how these plays have went this year. Maybe some over plays on these
jbrent95... nice job on catching the recs up. I meant to point out an error that Stakes made on his last "standings" post. On Feb 2 he said the over in 4g/6d (or 3g/5d previous, however you want to say it) was 32-20 (20-11) with losing record. He actually added a loss instead of a win to both of these. It should have been 33-20 (21-10 with losing rec). Ottawa had a losing rec on Feb. 1 and got blown by Was 4-7 which went WAY over. He counted that as an over loss instead of a win. So just adjust that one game the other way and it should be cool. Just thought I'd like to let you know.
Cheers
0
Hey Guys,
jbrent95... nice job on catching the recs up. I meant to point out an error that Stakes made on his last "standings" post. On Feb 2 he said the over in 4g/6d (or 3g/5d previous, however you want to say it) was 32-20 (20-11) with losing record. He actually added a loss instead of a win to both of these. It should have been 33-20 (21-10 with losing rec). Ottawa had a losing rec on Feb. 1 and got blown by Was 4-7 which went WAY over. He counted that as an over loss instead of a win. So just adjust that one game the other way and it should be cool. Just thought I'd like to let you know.
The first 3 games today are B2B for the away teams. But you gotta have some stones taking the Pens and Atlanta today. Well I could see the Pens pulling it off, but I believe that Philly has beaten Atlanta the last 10 games
0
The first 3 games today are B2B for the away teams. But you gotta have some stones taking the Pens and Atlanta today. Well I could see the Pens pulling it off, but I believe that Philly has beaten Atlanta the last 10 games
Not in UNO's system, but Habs in 3 in 4 situation at Calgary....Cal. has 4 in a row and two of those last "L"'s were at home. Before the break, Habs were 4-1 in with tired legs on the road & the opposing Home Team Total never hit the Over........Hmmmmmm....This definately goes against the norm + Pub. on the over fairly well.......I'll take a stab at under here............
0
Not in UNO's system, but Habs in 3 in 4 situation at Calgary....Cal. has 4 in a row and two of those last "L"'s were at home. Before the break, Habs were 4-1 in with tired legs on the road & the opposing Home Team Total never hit the Over........Hmmmmmm....This definately goes against the norm + Pub. on the over fairly well.......I'll take a stab at under here............
I went back thru jbrent's update thru 2/6. From there I've updated the records. Wow, what a pain it must have been to back-check this from the beginning!! Anyway, below is where we stand current going into tonight 2/12.
when visiting teams are 4g6d (3g5d)
home teams are 42-14 (28-5 w/ losing rec)
over is 33-22 (21-12 w/ losing rec)
when visiting teams are b2b,
home teams are 51-33 (33-15 w/ losing rec)
over is 46-37 (29-19 w/ losing rec)
both,
home teams are 26-11 (14-7 w/ losing rec)
over is 25-12 (16-5 w/ losing rec)
Note: When I calculated the "Both" record, I did not also add it into each 3g/5d and B2B recs. I treated it as a completely different animal and only added it into the "both." Hopefully that's the way this has been calculated so far.
A couple of interesting things: the Home team is 12-4 against a Visitor when the V is NOT a team w/a Losing record and is in the "both" category. Hmm. The OVERS in every situation agaist Losing V teams ALL look good. The 28-5 rec against Losers who are 3g/5d is solid money against any line. Do the math on that.
There's my 2 cents. This seems to be a great system to follow. Welcome back Stake. Hope the Honeymoon was great because you're now officially done having sex on a "regular basis." I know, I know ~ she's different, LOL. You'll see.
Stake, adding to your plays tonight should be:
Ott B2B (Loser): Home team here is 33-15 with Over 29-19\
Phi and the Ove
Minn B2B (Winner): Home team only 18-18 with Over 17-18
Yuk!
Cgy Both (Winner): Home team is 12-4 with Over only 9-7
LA
0
Hey Kids,
I went back thru jbrent's update thru 2/6. From there I've updated the records. Wow, what a pain it must have been to back-check this from the beginning!! Anyway, below is where we stand current going into tonight 2/12.
when visiting teams are 4g6d (3g5d)
home teams are 42-14 (28-5 w/ losing rec)
over is 33-22 (21-12 w/ losing rec)
when visiting teams are b2b,
home teams are 51-33 (33-15 w/ losing rec)
over is 46-37 (29-19 w/ losing rec)
both,
home teams are 26-11 (14-7 w/ losing rec)
over is 25-12 (16-5 w/ losing rec)
Note: When I calculated the "Both" record, I did not also add it into each 3g/5d and B2B recs. I treated it as a completely different animal and only added it into the "both." Hopefully that's the way this has been calculated so far.
A couple of interesting things: the Home team is 12-4 against a Visitor when the V is NOT a team w/a Losing record and is in the "both" category. Hmm. The OVERS in every situation agaist Losing V teams ALL look good. The 28-5 rec against Losers who are 3g/5d is solid money against any line. Do the math on that.
There's my 2 cents. This seems to be a great system to follow. Welcome back Stake. Hope the Honeymoon was great because you're now officially done having sex on a "regular basis." I know, I know ~ she's different, LOL. You'll see.
Stake, adding to your plays tonight should be:
Ott B2B (Loser): Home team here is 33-15 with Over 29-19\
Phi and the Ove
Minn B2B (Winner): Home team only 18-18 with Over 17-18
Yuk!
Cgy Both (Winner): Home team is 12-4 with Over only 9-7
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.