Looks like Buffalo is only the only away team B2B play tonight. Although there 3 home teams on a B2B, I wonder how these plays have went this year. Maybe some over plays on these
0
Looks like Buffalo is only the only away team B2B play tonight. Although there 3 home teams on a B2B, I wonder how these plays have went this year. Maybe some over plays on these
jbrent95... nice job on catching the recs up. I meant to point out an error that Stakes made on his last "standings" post. On Feb 2 he said the over in 4g/6d (or 3g/5d previous, however you want to say it) was 32-20 (20-11) with losing record. He actually added a loss instead of a win to both of these. It should have been 33-20 (21-10 with losing rec). Ottawa had a losing rec on Feb. 1 and got blown by Was 4-7 which went WAY over. He counted that as an over loss instead of a win. So just adjust that one game the other way and it should be cool. Just thought I'd like to let you know.
Cheers
0
Hey Guys,
jbrent95... nice job on catching the recs up. I meant to point out an error that Stakes made on his last "standings" post. On Feb 2 he said the over in 4g/6d (or 3g/5d previous, however you want to say it) was 32-20 (20-11) with losing record. He actually added a loss instead of a win to both of these. It should have been 33-20 (21-10 with losing rec). Ottawa had a losing rec on Feb. 1 and got blown by Was 4-7 which went WAY over. He counted that as an over loss instead of a win. So just adjust that one game the other way and it should be cool. Just thought I'd like to let you know.
The first 3 games today are B2B for the away teams. But you gotta have some stones taking the Pens and Atlanta today. Well I could see the Pens pulling it off, but I believe that Philly has beaten Atlanta the last 10 games
0
The first 3 games today are B2B for the away teams. But you gotta have some stones taking the Pens and Atlanta today. Well I could see the Pens pulling it off, but I believe that Philly has beaten Atlanta the last 10 games
Not in UNO's system, but Habs in 3 in 4 situation at Calgary....Cal. has 4 in a row and two of those last "L"'s were at home. Before the break, Habs were 4-1 in with tired legs on the road & the opposing Home Team Total never hit the Over........Hmmmmmm....This definately goes against the norm + Pub. on the over fairly well.......I'll take a stab at under here............
0
Not in UNO's system, but Habs in 3 in 4 situation at Calgary....Cal. has 4 in a row and two of those last "L"'s were at home. Before the break, Habs were 4-1 in with tired legs on the road & the opposing Home Team Total never hit the Over........Hmmmmmm....This definately goes against the norm + Pub. on the over fairly well.......I'll take a stab at under here............
I went back thru jbrent's update thru 2/6. From there I've updated the records. Wow, what a pain it must have been to back-check this from the beginning!! Anyway, below is where we stand current going into tonight 2/12.
when visiting teams are 4g6d (3g5d)
home teams are 42-14 (28-5 w/ losing rec)
over is 33-22 (21-12 w/ losing rec)
when visiting teams are b2b,
home teams are 51-33 (33-15 w/ losing rec)
over is 46-37 (29-19 w/ losing rec)
both,
home teams are 26-11 (14-7 w/ losing rec)
over is 25-12 (16-5 w/ losing rec)
Note: When I calculated the "Both" record, I did not also add it into each 3g/5d and B2B recs. I treated it as a completely different animal and only added it into the "both." Hopefully that's the way this has been calculated so far.
A couple of interesting things: the Home team is 12-4 against a Visitor when the V is NOT a team w/a Losing record and is in the "both" category. Hmm. The OVERS in every situation agaist Losing V teams ALL look good. The 28-5 rec against Losers who are 3g/5d is solid money against any line. Do the math on that.
There's my 2 cents. This seems to be a great system to follow. Welcome back Stake. Hope the Honeymoon was great because you're now officially done having sex on a "regular basis." I know, I know ~ she's different, LOL. You'll see.
Stake, adding to your plays tonight should be:
Ott B2B (Loser): Home team here is 33-15 with Over 29-19\
Phi and the Ove
Minn B2B (Winner): Home team only 18-18 with Over 17-18
Yuk!
Cgy Both (Winner): Home team is 12-4 with Over only 9-7
LA
0
Hey Kids,
I went back thru jbrent's update thru 2/6. From there I've updated the records. Wow, what a pain it must have been to back-check this from the beginning!! Anyway, below is where we stand current going into tonight 2/12.
when visiting teams are 4g6d (3g5d)
home teams are 42-14 (28-5 w/ losing rec)
over is 33-22 (21-12 w/ losing rec)
when visiting teams are b2b,
home teams are 51-33 (33-15 w/ losing rec)
over is 46-37 (29-19 w/ losing rec)
both,
home teams are 26-11 (14-7 w/ losing rec)
over is 25-12 (16-5 w/ losing rec)
Note: When I calculated the "Both" record, I did not also add it into each 3g/5d and B2B recs. I treated it as a completely different animal and only added it into the "both." Hopefully that's the way this has been calculated so far.
A couple of interesting things: the Home team is 12-4 against a Visitor when the V is NOT a team w/a Losing record and is in the "both" category. Hmm. The OVERS in every situation agaist Losing V teams ALL look good. The 28-5 rec against Losers who are 3g/5d is solid money against any line. Do the math on that.
There's my 2 cents. This seems to be a great system to follow. Welcome back Stake. Hope the Honeymoon was great because you're now officially done having sex on a "regular basis." I know, I know ~ she's different, LOL. You'll see.
Stake, adding to your plays tonight should be:
Ott B2B (Loser): Home team here is 33-15 with Over 29-19\
Phi and the Ove
Minn B2B (Winner): Home team only 18-18 with Over 17-18
Yuk!
Cgy Both (Winner): Home team is 12-4 with Over only 9-7