I think many bettors are blinded by 'greed' Let me explain, do odds of 2.00 really hold value? It's the bookie playing mind games with you. They WANT you to take those 2.00 odds. They certainly don't want bettors taking low risk, low rewards odds. You see what i'm saying here?
Hello!
I do see what you are saying. There IS value at + odds, of course. Think futures. + odds hit all the time, and, - 1000 lose quite frequently too. But. Its about playing the -1000 odd at the right time, in the right circumstances.
"He belongs in the Vampire Hall of Fame, because he always draws blood."
Quote Originally Posted by Lyon_Juninho:
I think many bettors are blinded by 'greed' Let me explain, do odds of 2.00 really hold value? It's the bookie playing mind games with you. They WANT you to take those 2.00 odds. They certainly don't want bettors taking low risk, low rewards odds. You see what i'm saying here?
Hello!
I do see what you are saying. There IS value at + odds, of course. Think futures. + odds hit all the time, and, - 1000 lose quite frequently too. But. Its about playing the -1000 odd at the right time, in the right circumstances.
GOOD MORNING FRAUD! IT'S NICE TO SEE YOU HAD TO CREATE ANOTHER ACCOUNT TO TALK TO YOURSELF. THAT WILL GET YOU BANNED REALLY QUICK! ENJOY YOUR FAKE WINNING...YOU WILL BE GONE SOON.
Hello Jim,
I'm not sure what you are talking about, I only have this account!
Cheers my friend.
"He belongs in the Vampire Hall of Fame, because he always draws blood."
Quote Originally Posted by jimc0911:
GOOD MORNING FRAUD! IT'S NICE TO SEE YOU HAD TO CREATE ANOTHER ACCOUNT TO TALK TO YOURSELF. THAT WILL GET YOU BANNED REALLY QUICK! ENJOY YOUR FAKE WINNING...YOU WILL BE GONE SOON.
Hello Jim,
I'm not sure what you are talking about, I only have this account!
PART I: Understanding "Juiced Odds" - Paying a Premium For Time ~ CONTINUED DUE TO CHARACTER LIMIT OF 4,000 An experienced bettor, with a large bankroll - can win a substantial amount of money (accumulated through 95%+ winning percentages) by picking these spots and paying for "less to go wrong" in the remaining time on the clock. This - is the general premise - and one that I hope to illustrate to you all in documenting plays.
When will you be posting part 2 of this?
The soccer forums voice of reason. Obsessed.
Quote Originally Posted by Mezzi:
PART I: Understanding "Juiced Odds" - Paying a Premium For Time ~ CONTINUED DUE TO CHARACTER LIMIT OF 4,000 An experienced bettor, with a large bankroll - can win a substantial amount of money (accumulated through 95%+ winning percentages) by picking these spots and paying for "less to go wrong" in the remaining time on the clock. This - is the general premise - and one that I hope to illustrate to you all in documenting plays.
Quote Originally Posted by Mezzi: PART I: Understanding "Juiced Odds" - Paying a Premium For Time ~ CONTINUED DUE TO CHARACTER LIMIT OF 4,000 An experienced bettor, with a large bankroll - can win a substantial amount of money (accumulated through 95%+ winning percentages) by picking these spots and paying for "less to go wrong" in the remaining time on the clock. This - is the general premise - and one that I hope to illustrate to you all in documenting plays. When will you be posting part 2 of this?
Good morning!
I likely will have more time to write during work week days at some point. I'm a bit less active on weekends!
There's obviously a lot more to say on this topic and discuss some of the finer points.
That said, hopefully my plays over this week have illustrated this theory. Absent that 1 PSG loss (which was me pushing and extending myself unnecessarily, and was a mistake on my part, I would have been up 30.
"He belongs in the Vampire Hall of Fame, because he always draws blood."
Quote Originally Posted by Twentysixblack:
Quote Originally Posted by Mezzi: PART I: Understanding "Juiced Odds" - Paying a Premium For Time ~ CONTINUED DUE TO CHARACTER LIMIT OF 4,000 An experienced bettor, with a large bankroll - can win a substantial amount of money (accumulated through 95%+ winning percentages) by picking these spots and paying for "less to go wrong" in the remaining time on the clock. This - is the general premise - and one that I hope to illustrate to you all in documenting plays. When will you be posting part 2 of this?
Good morning!
I likely will have more time to write during work week days at some point. I'm a bit less active on weekends!
There's obviously a lot more to say on this topic and discuss some of the finer points.
That said, hopefully my plays over this week have illustrated this theory. Absent that 1 PSG loss (which was me pushing and extending myself unnecessarily, and was a mistake on my part, I would have been up 30.
Toluca v. Tigres, scored 2-2 now. Locked in Under 5.5 @ - 1458 29,160 to win 2000
Red card, which was overturned on VAR in 85th certainly could have put this wager at risk, but, you cannot plan or predict for Red Cards, Penalties and fluke mistake goals wheb making these wagers. This match, which ended 3-2, also shows to demonstrate why the Under 5 or Under 5.5 provided me with either a cushion push if I took U5, and obviously a win, with Under 5.5. I prefer these Buffer cushions because instead of living on the edge where 1 goal would have lost the match, i am making the teams score 2 goals on me to lose it.
Again, paying a premium for time and probably of 2 goals being scored, in a match that I've eyed and keyed in on as likely not getting any more goals, especially 2 goals from ooen play, to beat me.
Solid win, of $2,000 heading into Europa League Semi.
Also, I think from now on wheb I place wager, so I can place it more in real time and communicate it, i will do following.
Match, locked @ odds, and Win Amount. Its less to type out and you can extrapolate my risk amount yourselves by calculating odds, which would be easy because I usually risk to win even amounts like 500, 1000, 2000.
27 - 1 - 3 [] + $17,000.00
"He belongs in the Vampire Hall of Fame, because he always draws blood."
Quote Originally Posted by Mezzi:
Toluca v. Tigres, scored 2-2 now. Locked in Under 5.5 @ - 1458 29,160 to win 2000
Red card, which was overturned on VAR in 85th certainly could have put this wager at risk, but, you cannot plan or predict for Red Cards, Penalties and fluke mistake goals wheb making these wagers. This match, which ended 3-2, also shows to demonstrate why the Under 5 or Under 5.5 provided me with either a cushion push if I took U5, and obviously a win, with Under 5.5. I prefer these Buffer cushions because instead of living on the edge where 1 goal would have lost the match, i am making the teams score 2 goals on me to lose it.
Again, paying a premium for time and probably of 2 goals being scored, in a match that I've eyed and keyed in on as likely not getting any more goals, especially 2 goals from ooen play, to beat me.
Solid win, of $2,000 heading into Europa League Semi.
Also, I think from now on wheb I place wager, so I can place it more in real time and communicate it, i will do following.
Match, locked @ odds, and Win Amount. Its less to type out and you can extrapolate my risk amount yourselves by calculating odds, which would be easy because I usually risk to win even amounts like 500, 1000, 2000.
1-1 30th minute. 2 goals to beat me in next 15 minutes.
Hot Forum Topics
