since when does 25k/year qualify as riches? ![]()
Mack, the more you talk, the more idiotic you look. Just quit running your touting mouth and make picks. ![]()
BTW - you probably don't have more than 3 or 4 followers b/c noone here likes you. If you don't believe me, reread this thread. There are smart cappers posting here.
since when does 25k/year qualify as riches? ![]()
Mack, the more you talk, the more idiotic you look. Just quit running your touting mouth and make picks. ![]()
BTW - you probably don't have more than 3 or 4 followers b/c noone here likes you. If you don't believe me, reread this thread. There are smart cappers posting here.
Sims ANOTHER win for Money Mack..-> https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=212&sub=100758554
Didn't you start a tennis thread saying how great I am? Don't kid ypourself son, many here tail me and they are right. I'm the best. All this is just another chance for me to prove it..
Sims ANOTHER win for Money Mack..-> https://www.covers.com/postingforum/post01/showmessage.aspx?spt=212&sub=100758554
Didn't you start a tennis thread saying how great I am? Don't kid ypourself son, many here tail me and they are right. I'm the best. All this is just another chance for me to prove it..
Sims I make on average 50k a year. I have won over 75k the last 2 days and Ladbrokes suspend my accout activity for the 3rd time in 5 years, as they add up all their losses and try stop Mack train's momentum. Hee Hee. So I am out of action for awhile with regarding BIG Betting..
I know I am not popular, but as I said to you in the tennis forum this isn't a popularity contest. It's about picking winners and you can't show me a capper with more posters huge winners in the last 6 days then me. Those are the facts son
Sims I make on average 50k a year. I have won over 75k the last 2 days and Ladbrokes suspend my accout activity for the 3rd time in 5 years, as they add up all their losses and try stop Mack train's momentum. Hee Hee. So I am out of action for awhile with regarding BIG Betting..
I know I am not popular, but as I said to you in the tennis forum this isn't a popularity contest. It's about picking winners and you can't show me a capper with more posters huge winners in the last 6 days then me. Those are the facts son
Mack, please don't take this as hate because I don't feel like getting into this all over again. But if it is "all about making people money" you should really post how much you have on each game before the games are played (preferably in units, but I have a feeling you'll want to do $).
Obviously you made money today because you bet 18K on the under, but only $50 on the other bets. You did say the under was your main bet. However, let's say one of your big fans bet $200 on the under and $50 on each of the other bets. They would have lost money. Just makes sense to post your unit amounts before the games so they can make money the same way you do. At least that's my opinion. I'm not hating on you so please don't respond negatively.
Mack, please don't take this as hate because I don't feel like getting into this all over again. But if it is "all about making people money" you should really post how much you have on each game before the games are played (preferably in units, but I have a feeling you'll want to do $).
Obviously you made money today because you bet 18K on the under, but only $50 on the other bets. You did say the under was your main bet. However, let's say one of your big fans bet $200 on the under and $50 on each of the other bets. They would have lost money. Just makes sense to post your unit amounts before the games so they can make money the same way you do. At least that's my opinion. I'm not hating on you so please don't respond negatively.
Mack, please don't take this as hate because I don't feel like getting into this all over again. But if it is "all about making people money" you should really post how much you have on each game before the games are played (preferably in units, but I have a feeling you'll want to do $).
Obviously you made money today because you bet 18K on the under, but only $50 on the other bets. You did say the under was your main bet. However, let's say one of your big fans bet $200 on the under and $50 on each of the other bets. They would have lost money. Just makes sense to post your unit amounts before the games so they can make money the same way you do. At least that's my opinion. I'm not hating on you so please don't respond negatively.
I said I was Betting BIG on the under (Spain v Paraguay on this thread) and in my Nadal v Murray thread, I said I was betting half my roll. Not sure what else I can do! ![]()
Mack, please don't take this as hate because I don't feel like getting into this all over again. But if it is "all about making people money" you should really post how much you have on each game before the games are played (preferably in units, but I have a feeling you'll want to do $).
Obviously you made money today because you bet 18K on the under, but only $50 on the other bets. You did say the under was your main bet. However, let's say one of your big fans bet $200 on the under and $50 on each of the other bets. They would have lost money. Just makes sense to post your unit amounts before the games so they can make money the same way you do. At least that's my opinion. I'm not hating on you so please don't respond negatively.
I said I was Betting BIG on the under (Spain v Paraguay on this thread) and in my Nadal v Murray thread, I said I was betting half my roll. Not sure what else I can do! ![]()
I said I was Betting BIG on the under (Spain v Paraguay on this thread) and in my Nadal v Murray thread, I said I was betting half my roll. Not sure what else I can do! ![]()
Maybe you do exactly the same thing that everyone else on the board does?
If told your followers that you had $50 (or maybe .5 units) on each Paraguay bet and $1800 (or maybe 18 units) on the under before the game, then they could have scaled their bets accordingly. What part of this is so difficult to understand?
You made money because of the amounts you bet on that game. However, if one of your followers didn't scale their bets the same way they could have gone 1-5 and lost money, while you went 1-5 and made an absolute killing.
If, as you say, it's all about making people money, wouldn't you want to give them an idea of how much more you have on the under compared to the Paraguay bets? Saying you're "big" on the under doesn't help them much with that. I imagine that a lot of the people that tailed you on that game may have lost money. You say that's the most important thing to you, so I thought I might help you make them more money.
I said I was Betting BIG on the under (Spain v Paraguay on this thread) and in my Nadal v Murray thread, I said I was betting half my roll. Not sure what else I can do! ![]()
Maybe you do exactly the same thing that everyone else on the board does?
If told your followers that you had $50 (or maybe .5 units) on each Paraguay bet and $1800 (or maybe 18 units) on the under before the game, then they could have scaled their bets accordingly. What part of this is so difficult to understand?
You made money because of the amounts you bet on that game. However, if one of your followers didn't scale their bets the same way they could have gone 1-5 and lost money, while you went 1-5 and made an absolute killing.
If, as you say, it's all about making people money, wouldn't you want to give them an idea of how much more you have on the under compared to the Paraguay bets? Saying you're "big" on the under doesn't help them much with that. I imagine that a lot of the people that tailed you on that game may have lost money. You say that's the most important thing to you, so I thought I might help you make them more money.
Maybe you do exactly the same thing that everyone else on the board does?
If told your followers that you had $50 (or maybe .5 units) on each Paraguay bet and $1800 (or maybe 18 units) on the under before the game, then they could have scaled their bets accordingly. What part of this is so difficult to understand?
You made money because of the amounts you bet on that game. However, if one of your followers didn't scale their bets the same way they could have gone 1-5 and lost money, while you went 1-5 and made an absolute killing.
If, as you say, it's all about making people money, wouldn't you want to give them an idea of how much more you have on the under compared to the Paraguay bets? Saying you're "big" on the under doesn't help them much with that. I imagine that a lot of the people that tailed you on that game may have lost money. You say that's the most important thing to you, so I thought I might help you make them more money.
So your saying people are too dumb to get the fact I said that the under was my main play and that I was betting big on it and that "I was taking stabs" at Paraguay at long odds...
You can't be serious. I get bashed for naming figures and get bashed for not naming figures...Unreal the amount of hate I get on these forums, even though I am hitting something like 75% the past 18 months...
Dear god ![]()
Maybe you do exactly the same thing that everyone else on the board does?
If told your followers that you had $50 (or maybe .5 units) on each Paraguay bet and $1800 (or maybe 18 units) on the under before the game, then they could have scaled their bets accordingly. What part of this is so difficult to understand?
You made money because of the amounts you bet on that game. However, if one of your followers didn't scale their bets the same way they could have gone 1-5 and lost money, while you went 1-5 and made an absolute killing.
If, as you say, it's all about making people money, wouldn't you want to give them an idea of how much more you have on the under compared to the Paraguay bets? Saying you're "big" on the under doesn't help them much with that. I imagine that a lot of the people that tailed you on that game may have lost money. You say that's the most important thing to you, so I thought I might help you make them more money.
So your saying people are too dumb to get the fact I said that the under was my main play and that I was betting big on it and that "I was taking stabs" at Paraguay at long odds...
You can't be serious. I get bashed for naming figures and get bashed for not naming figures...Unreal the amount of hate I get on these forums, even though I am hitting something like 75% the past 18 months...
Dear god ![]()
Man, the very first thing I said when I brought this up was "please don't take this as hate".
If you read my first post you saw that I gave an example. If someone had bet $200 on your under, and $50 on each of the others they would have lost money. I don't think that is totally unreasonable based on the fact you said you were "big" on the under. Everyone has a different definition of "big". You don't even have to give the amounts. If you said "My bet on the under is 36 times larger than my other bets" it would tell your followers exactly how much they should be betting on each.
I really don't see why it would be a big deal for you to post your amounts before you bet, rather than after. Can you tell me why that's difficult? As I said, it would certainly help your followers out.....which you have said is your main goal on the site.
All I'm trying to do is to give you a suggestion about helping your followers.....and not a very difficult suggestion at that. And somehow you spin it around so that I'm "hating" on you.
Man, the very first thing I said when I brought this up was "please don't take this as hate".
If you read my first post you saw that I gave an example. If someone had bet $200 on your under, and $50 on each of the others they would have lost money. I don't think that is totally unreasonable based on the fact you said you were "big" on the under. Everyone has a different definition of "big". You don't even have to give the amounts. If you said "My bet on the under is 36 times larger than my other bets" it would tell your followers exactly how much they should be betting on each.
I really don't see why it would be a big deal for you to post your amounts before you bet, rather than after. Can you tell me why that's difficult? As I said, it would certainly help your followers out.....which you have said is your main goal on the site.
All I'm trying to do is to give you a suggestion about helping your followers.....and not a very difficult suggestion at that. And somehow you spin it around so that I'm "hating" on you.
Dude you hated on my on the tennis forum did you not? And now my Nadal pick hit, ao now what I am an ok capper? and you want to give me advice on how I post my plays??
Yet, you posted this crap in the Tennis forum without knowing the facts (just go there now, all plays posted and delivered the past 12 months. A big 2 fingered salute to all the haters that hated on me INCLUDING YOU.
Firstly I called Federer the bet of the year last year. Then I said he woud not win the US Open 2009, Then I post plays for 2010 where I had Nadal +250 and +400 in the tennis forum and called in a STEAL 3 weeks ago, And Finally I said I was betting half my roll on Nadal against Murray knowing it was a total steal @-160...
Yet you come hijack my thread where I warned then Murray would lose and you say, I quote..
"Also, the thing that you have so much trouble getting through your head is that you need to pick winners consistently to be a good capper. If you are right on Friday and TC is wrong, it will in no way make you a better capper than him. If you have profits during Wimbledon and he does not, it will not make you a better capper than him. 1 match is a small sample size, 10 matches is a small sample size, even 100 matches is a small sample size. You have the same mentality as the people who say "I'm going to pick a -300 fave even though they only have a 65% chance to win". Then they win and they declare themselves brilliant. They're not brilliant. In the long run they are going to lose doing that. Just like in the long run you will not beat TC in Tennis"
If someone that I respect states Mack I wish you were clearer I have no problem adjusting my picks for some like that. NOT FOR YOU..
Dude you hated on my on the tennis forum did you not? And now my Nadal pick hit, ao now what I am an ok capper? and you want to give me advice on how I post my plays??
Yet, you posted this crap in the Tennis forum without knowing the facts (just go there now, all plays posted and delivered the past 12 months. A big 2 fingered salute to all the haters that hated on me INCLUDING YOU.
Firstly I called Federer the bet of the year last year. Then I said he woud not win the US Open 2009, Then I post plays for 2010 where I had Nadal +250 and +400 in the tennis forum and called in a STEAL 3 weeks ago, And Finally I said I was betting half my roll on Nadal against Murray knowing it was a total steal @-160...
Yet you come hijack my thread where I warned then Murray would lose and you say, I quote..
"Also, the thing that you have so much trouble getting through your head is that you need to pick winners consistently to be a good capper. If you are right on Friday and TC is wrong, it will in no way make you a better capper than him. If you have profits during Wimbledon and he does not, it will not make you a better capper than him. 1 match is a small sample size, 10 matches is a small sample size, even 100 matches is a small sample size. You have the same mentality as the people who say "I'm going to pick a -300 fave even though they only have a 65% chance to win". Then they win and they declare themselves brilliant. They're not brilliant. In the long run they are going to lose doing that. Just like in the long run you will not beat TC in Tennis"
If someone that I respect states Mack I wish you were clearer I have no problem adjusting my picks for some like that. NOT FOR YOU..
Yes, I did "hate" on you. You were the one who said "let bygones be bygones" afterwords, which is what I am trying to do.
You have said time after time after time that helping people make money is what you are all about. All I tried to friggin do today is to help you out in that quest.
Apparently it's not me that needs some help letting bygones be bygones. Jeez, how you have turned this into another shitfest is beyond me.
Yes, I did "hate" on you. You were the one who said "let bygones be bygones" afterwords, which is what I am trying to do.
You have said time after time after time that helping people make money is what you are all about. All I tried to friggin do today is to help you out in that quest.
Apparently it's not me that needs some help letting bygones be bygones. Jeez, how you have turned this into another shitfest is beyond me.
Yes, I did "hate" on you. You were the one who said "let bygones be bygones" afterwords, which is what I am trying to do.
You have said time after time after time that helping people make money is what you are all about. All I tried to friggin do today is to help you out in that quest.
Apparently it's not me that needs some help letting bygones be bygones. Jeez, how you have turned this into another shitfest is beyond me.
Don't want this thread to be bumped up constantly. I want to focus on winning money in the future..
You dont like me, feeling VERY mutual let that be bygones. Good luck to you
Yes, I did "hate" on you. You were the one who said "let bygones be bygones" afterwords, which is what I am trying to do.
You have said time after time after time that helping people make money is what you are all about. All I tried to friggin do today is to help you out in that quest.
Apparently it's not me that needs some help letting bygones be bygones. Jeez, how you have turned this into another shitfest is beyond me.
Don't want this thread to be bumped up constantly. I want to focus on winning money in the future..
You dont like me, feeling VERY mutual let that be bygones. Good luck to you

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.