Brazil look good on the ending of the game.
If defense win championship……..
@mlizzle604
Actually I have no idea , I don’t wanna bet against morocco but i think it’s gonna end here,
Fun bet: Portugal to win by exactly 1 goal, which gives you decent odds
england/france, all the hype being around messi vs CR7 and Brazil blah blah blah……which means less pressure n expectation for lions, this england team very close to lift a trophy..on the other hand, don’t wanna talk much about france , they conceded a goal every single game this WC, well more or less just a one man soccer team ……..I hate picking team without good defense but one serious concern here, I usually loss when I make a pick on england…..
but I truly believe if england win against france, they’re gonna win the champ, since all remaining teams playing subpar defense(except Croatia)
lean: england to score 1st goal
@mlizzle604
Actually I have no idea , I don’t wanna bet against morocco but i think it’s gonna end here,
Fun bet: Portugal to win by exactly 1 goal, which gives you decent odds
england/france, all the hype being around messi vs CR7 and Brazil blah blah blah……which means less pressure n expectation for lions, this england team very close to lift a trophy..on the other hand, don’t wanna talk much about france , they conceded a goal every single game this WC, well more or less just a one man soccer team ……..I hate picking team without good defense but one serious concern here, I usually loss when I make a pick on england…..
but I truly believe if england win against france, they’re gonna win the champ, since all remaining teams playing subpar defense(except Croatia)
lean: england to score 1st goal
Congrats to those of you on morocco, their defense is superb and they just make history ……![]()
england/france
battle of two wonder kids and I just add “tchouameni”anytime goal scorer which pays 19-1
he has a powerful long shot
good luck guys
Congrats to those of you on morocco, their defense is superb and they just make history ……![]()
england/france
battle of two wonder kids and I just add “tchouameni”anytime goal scorer which pays 19-1
he has a powerful long shot
good luck guys
For so many years, england still cannot find a good coach, if they sub rash, mount, Sterling when they getting all the momentum after Kane tying goal, it could be a different story
anyway, well guys, decent picks so far, let’s move on to semis ![]()
For so many years, england still cannot find a good coach, if they sub rash, mount, Sterling when they getting all the momentum after Kane tying goal, it could be a different story
anyway, well guys, decent picks so far, let’s move on to semis ![]()
The issue is that France did not play well at all. Sure, most of that has a lot to do with the way England played but for the most part, they just never had any rhythm and their better players were fairly subdued.
To still find a way to win the game is what separates the best from the rest.
One suspects a couple of those French superstars are going to be unleashed against Morocco.
If it's a France v Argentina final . . . . France are world champs yet again.
The issue is that France did not play well at all. Sure, most of that has a lot to do with the way England played but for the most part, they just never had any rhythm and their better players were fairly subdued.
To still find a way to win the game is what separates the best from the rest.
One suspects a couple of those French superstars are going to be unleashed against Morocco.
If it's a France v Argentina final . . . . France are world champs yet again.
yoro
very well done
regarding your thread title. our "rule of thumb" when it gets ticky-tacky trying to figure whom is better is something like this. its not an exact science but how my melon works
- strikers get all the attention, can win you matches and get you there
- defense/GKs keep you from losing (aka extend to PKs) and get you there.
but if you want to lift the trophy? you better have an above average midfield. midfields win hardware. strikers are a dime a dozen at this level, give any of them space from 25 metres out and youre going to be in a heap of trouble.
behind every great striker, there was a midfielder feeding him. in front of every great backline there was a midfield whom understood positioning & cut off passing lanes. sadly, there are very few individuals around nowadays whom can do both at a high level. well if youre having problems separating teams? look at midfields first.
yoro
very well done
regarding your thread title. our "rule of thumb" when it gets ticky-tacky trying to figure whom is better is something like this. its not an exact science but how my melon works
- strikers get all the attention, can win you matches and get you there
- defense/GKs keep you from losing (aka extend to PKs) and get you there.
but if you want to lift the trophy? you better have an above average midfield. midfields win hardware. strikers are a dime a dozen at this level, give any of them space from 25 metres out and youre going to be in a heap of trouble.
behind every great striker, there was a midfielder feeding him. in front of every great backline there was a midfield whom understood positioning & cut off passing lanes. sadly, there are very few individuals around nowadays whom can do both at a high level. well if youre having problems separating teams? look at midfields first.
Hot Forum Topics
-
🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵
446,605
-
Friday 09/11/2026
691
-
🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets
254,491
-
PART DEUX
225
-
I'm embarrassed for Trump supporters
57,598
-
9/11 Fast Cash Five 🤑🤑??
7,045
-
Anyone Tracking Scoring Drought System?
27,851
-
Trump's legacy?
25,323
-
Happening just recently . . .
34,680
-
MLB [1967] TOTAL o4-105 (1H CLE GUARDIANS vrs 1H MIN TWINS)
1,790
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
