Super 15 Week 11
Yea can say that but they have to travel against time which is super hard.
Yea can say that but they have to travel against time which is super hard.
- Despite their troubles, the Stormers' defence is still one of the best competition, with only the Sharks and Blues conceding less points and conceding a league low of just 9 tries.
- The 'Canes defence is pretty leaky with only 3 sides conceding more tries.
- Despite their troubles, the Stormers' defence is still one of the best competition, with only the Sharks and Blues conceding less points and conceding a league low of just 9 tries.
- The 'Canes defence is pretty leaky with only 3 sides conceding more tries.
- Despite their troubles, the Stormers' defence is still one of the best competition, with only the Sharks and Blues conceding less points and conceding a league low of just 9 tries.
- The 'Canes defence is pretty leaky with only 3 sides conceding more tries.
- Despite their troubles, the Stormers' defence is still one of the best competition, with only the Sharks and Blues conceding less points and conceding a league low of just 9 tries.
- The 'Canes defence is pretty leaky with only 3 sides conceding more tries.
Can you read? "The 'Canes defence is pretty leaky with only 3 sides conceding more tries" how is that suggesting I like the under?
I don't post my plays because I generally don't get round to doing so, but to be saying I have no clue when you're sitting here -33.25 units is pretty rich.
Way to make something personal out of nothing. What is the point of these forums where if you share relevant stats you tickle someones box?
Can you read? "The 'Canes defence is pretty leaky with only 3 sides conceding more tries" how is that suggesting I like the under?
I don't post my plays because I generally don't get round to doing so, but to be saying I have no clue when you're sitting here -33.25 units is pretty rich.
Way to make something personal out of nothing. What is the point of these forums where if you share relevant stats you tickle someones box?
Can you read? "The 'Canes defence is pretty leaky with only 3 sides conceding more tries" how is that suggesting I like the under?
I don't post my plays because I generally don't get round to doing so, but to be saying I have no clue when you're sitting here -33.25 units is pretty rich.
Way to make something personal out of nothing. What is the point of these forums where if you share relevant stats you tickle someones box?
Can you read? "The 'Canes defence is pretty leaky with only 3 sides conceding more tries" how is that suggesting I like the under?
I don't post my plays because I generally don't get round to doing so, but to be saying I have no clue when you're sitting here -33.25 units is pretty rich.
Way to make something personal out of nothing. What is the point of these forums where if you share relevant stats you tickle someones box?
My .02
Hurricanes suck with Barret at fullback. Now they don't have Savea either. IMO they're a fraud team: every win they they have had (bar 1, the miracle win over the Saders which required a late intercept try as well as Dan Carter missing the winning FG attempt from in front of the posts with time up) has been vs a side with a negative points differential, every loss they have had has been vs a side with a positive points differential. The Stormers have a positive pts diff. None of that says the Canes can't win, but they're not worth my time or money. I'd rather deal with live betting, getting to see what each team is offering after 20 mins
As for the total, when did a full round of S15 rugby ever go all Under like it did last weekend? Watch the Overs return this weekend, esp. in matches expected to go Under (ie. Blues/Reds).
My .02
Hurricanes suck with Barret at fullback. Now they don't have Savea either. IMO they're a fraud team: every win they they have had (bar 1, the miracle win over the Saders which required a late intercept try as well as Dan Carter missing the winning FG attempt from in front of the posts with time up) has been vs a side with a negative points differential, every loss they have had has been vs a side with a positive points differential. The Stormers have a positive pts diff. None of that says the Canes can't win, but they're not worth my time or money. I'd rather deal with live betting, getting to see what each team is offering after 20 mins
As for the total, when did a full round of S15 rugby ever go all Under like it did last weekend? Watch the Overs return this weekend, esp. in matches expected to go Under (ie. Blues/Reds).
The Stormers are also 6-2 in Australasia the last 2 seasons.
Would also lean to the under.
The Stormers are also 6-2 in Australasia the last 2 seasons.
Would also lean to the under.
Hot Forum Topics
- 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 463,068
- 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 286,907
- PART DEUX 107
- Thursday 10/29/2026 502
- Happy National 😺🐈 Day: Panthers vs Packers ingame live TNF 1,325
- NFL LOCKED IN! 111,010
- Friday 10/30/2026 437
- Week 6 Money 16,820
- I’m on the Brewers to defeat the Rays in the World Series 6,513
- NCAA WEEK 9 *** Wet Dream on Covers Street *** 3,596
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
