Its raining,its pouring,the under is snoring

Over in the horrible wet conditions

Chris Sandow = wet track specialist

but, but, but, rostos said...

IF the rain doesnt impact on overs and unders, then WHY

do the bookmakers wait until a few hours before the game to post there overs unders as opposed to when it is a dry clear forecast they post it the night before?

Just an answer will do.

rostos, are lines set on what bookmakers think the total should be?

Rain and Unders for NRL totals are a myth. Huge myth. I've been saying that for the last few years.

With rain, there is more chance of handling errors etc.

Whereas a sport like AFL, unders are a good play because it's fast paced and handling errors occur on nearly every second possession.

In Rugby taking unders because it rains is not the thing to do.

Whereas a sport like AFL, unders are a good play because it's fast paced and handling errors occur on nearly every second possession.


rain or no rain

Bolar what u are saying is at odds with what i see from bookmakers.

As i said, the bookmakers when there is rain around, wait till the last possible moments before setting the line.

It is generally the bookmakers best interest to have lines available as long as possible before the event to attract as much business on the event.

IF, weather has NO impact on overs and unders, then why arent the lines out on Tuesday when all the other markets are out.

You still havent answered the question why this is the case...

Yes, i ASSUME the bookmakers make when setting overs unders just look at avg points scored and avg points conceeded during the season of the teams playing.

I am sure this figure doesnt change from tuesday to friday, so why do they delay it till the last possible few hrs?

 

Ace, are you the Duchess of LUCK?

Vazquez capped the scoring by grounding a single up the middle for his first RBI since 2009, when he was with Atlanta. He spent last season with the New York Yankees and had five plate appearances.

"I was just trying to put the ball in play. It was just luck," Vazquez said.

LUCK.......

I said 100 times i don't care what bookmakers do when it rains,i simply said bad conditions doesn't mean a game will automatically go under the total as you seem to think(you always leans unders in bad weather)

read up on bookmaking theory 101, and the difference between percieved line and true line

Of course weather doesnt mean an automatic under, otherwise why the f### would have a market....?

Then why the fuck do you lean under every single time you hear about bad weather

Started to rain during the 1st half  of the Waratahs/Rebels game last night,i believe they adjusted the total to 36.5 at halftime and it went over the total



Overs in da wet

All what my point is that weather impacts overs and unders.

Thats all.

If it is raining in a game and they set the total to 10.5, then of course it is going to f### go over........

if you understood bookmaking then you'll have your answer

however, you are not willing to learn, you just want to go off on your conspiracy theories, blame others, talk crap, make excuses, anything except learn the game and improve your skills

Your point never made any sense because it never had anything to do with what i was talking about


Every time i mention a game going over in the wet you start rambling on about bookmakers and other stuff

They set the Roosters Dragons game at 32.5 last week.

If it was a bright sunny day, it would be 38.5-40.5

But then again, i have seen over 60 points scored in a game which you could hardly see the players it is raining that hard.

so, whats your point?